DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-09 01:29 --- Created an attachment (id=21099) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21099action=view) new patch Sorry... Updated the patch to be pure AL2. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Tomcat release? Out of the box bundle with Harmony?
BTW, Harmony people, may I suggest you be to contact the JPackage team (www.jpackage.org). Thanks for pointing to this project, Henri. No problem and happy to help. I was involved in Jpackage some times ago (member and co-founder) Cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Tomcat release? Out of the box bundle with Harmony?
--- HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm Now Tomcat is also a cool pojo application server --- - Original Message - From: Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List dev@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:15 PM Subject: Re: New Tomcat release? Out of the box bundle with Harmony? Hey, On Nov 8, 2007 9:10 AM, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to suggest you to create Tomcat out of the box bundle on top of Harmony. I've created such a bundle with the previous Harmony milestone release [2]. It works but has areas for improvements... For example it's possible to remove debug info from Harmony which is not needed in such a bundle. What do you think? Is such bundle interesting for Tomcat? Personally, I want to move the Tomcat downloads in a simpler direction, removing options not adding them. So I'm not in favor of various bundles and combinations. I agree, bundle TC as you will, but TC always needs to be independent. I would like to see TC more modulerized, things like clustering been an optional add on. Again there are bundles, but there is also a tiny downlaod that will run a servlet. All optional technologies should be modulerized... I think. Then in contrast to this... needed embedded technologies should be brought out through a TC specific API. For example things like base64 parsing, JMX for the servlet, XMLParsing like that in the default servlet, should be an option in a users servlet. If its intrinsic technology, dont waste it, bring it out as well. ... I think Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r593493 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Nov 9 03:20:13 2007
New Revision: 593493
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593493view=rev
Log:
Not sure why we set to NULL or zero something that was already set to zero
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c?rev=593493r1=593492r2=593493view=diff
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Fri Nov 9 03:20:13
2007
@@ -2335,29 +2335,13 @@
jk_server_conf_t *c =
(jk_server_conf_t *) apr_pcalloc(p, sizeof(jk_server_conf_t));
-c-mount_file = NULL;
-c-log_file = NULL;
-c-log = NULL;
-c-alias_dir = NULL;
-c-stamp_format_string = NULL;
-c-format_string = NULL;
-c-format = NULL;
-c-exclude_options = 0;
c-was_initialized = JK_FALSE;
if (s-is_virtual) {
c-mountcopy = JK_UNSET;
c-mount_file_reload = JK_UNSET;
c-log_level = JK_UNSET;
-c-options = 0;
-c-worker_indicator = NULL;
c-ssl_enable = JK_UNSET;
-c-https_indicator = NULL;
-c-certs_indicator = NULL;
-c-cipher_indicator = NULL;
-c-certchain_prefix = NULL;
-c-session_indicator = NULL;
-c-key_size_indicator = NULL;
c-strip_session = JK_UNSET;
} else {
c-mountcopy = JK_FALSE;
@@ -2382,14 +2366,7 @@
c-key_size_indicator = JK_ENV_KEY_SIZE;
c-strip_session = JK_FALSE;
}
-
-c-uri_to_context = NULL;
-c-uw_map = NULL;
-
c-envvars_in_use = JK_FALSE;
-c-envvars = NULL;
-c-envvars_def = NULL;
-c-envvar_items = NULL;
c-s = s;
apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, s, jk_apr_pool_cleanup, jk_apr_pool_cleanup);
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r593497 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Nov 9 03:45:14 2007
New Revision: 593497
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593497view=rev
Log:
Log missing uri maps
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c?rev=593497r1=593496r2=593497view=diff
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Fri Nov 9 03:45:14
2007
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
* Description: Apache 2 plugin for Tomcat *
* Author: Gal Shachor [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
- * Version: $Revision$ *
+ * Version: $Revision$*
***/
/*
@@ -2930,9 +2930,9 @@
if (!conf-uw_map) {
if (JK_IS_DEBUG_LEVEL(conf-log))
jk_log(conf-log, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
- Into translate empty uri map for uri=%s,
+ missing uri map for %s:%s,
+ conf-s-server_hostname ? conf-s-server_hostname
: _default_,
r-uri);
-
return DECLINED;
}
else
@@ -3041,6 +3041,12 @@
}
}
}
+else {
+if (JK_IS_DEBUG_LEVEL(conf-log))
+jk_log(conf-log, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
+ no match for %s found,
+ r-uri);
+}
}
}
@@ -3081,9 +3087,9 @@
if (!conf-uw_map) {
if (JK_IS_DEBUG_LEVEL(conf-log))
jk_log(conf-log, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
- Into map_to_storage empty uri map for uri=%s,
+ missing uri map for %s:%s,
+ conf-s-server_hostname ? conf-s-server_hostname
: _default_,
r-uri);
-
return DECLINED;
}
else
@@ -3117,6 +3123,12 @@
*jsessionid = '\0';
}
return DECLINED;
+}
+else {
+if (JK_IS_DEBUG_LEVEL(conf-log))
+jk_log(conf-log, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
+ no match for %s found,
+ r-uri);
}
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/ According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues, although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world, so it would seem to be possible to release as stable. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15
Hey, On Nov 9, 2007 11:09 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/ According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues, although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world, so it would seem to be possible to release as stable. We can also release 6.0.15-beta and put a note in the Release Notes saying why it's not stable. There's nothing wrong with having beta releases ;) Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15
Remy Maucherat wrote: On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/ According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues, although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world, so it would seem to be possible to release as stable. I'd push for stable, I'm gonna spend today on the escaping/parsing mechanism, to make sure. Filip Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15
Didn't someone say earlier that there was a TCK issue? Best wishes, Paul On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/ According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues, although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world, so it would seem to be possible to release as stable. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15
Remy Maucherat wrote: On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/ According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is: [X] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues, although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world, so it would seem to be possible to release as stable. Just checking through the release, we still have a licensing issue so I don't believe we can proceed with the tag as is. See http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-devm=119170137616267w=2 for details. Remy - you commmitted the files originally so you are the only one who can answer the question about their provenance. If the source was such that the Sun license can be removed, great. If not, we can use the CDDL ones. I am happy to make the changes myself but I need to know which way to go. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r593648 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/svn.html xdocs/svn.xml
Author: markt Date: Fri Nov 9 12:56:09 2007 New Revision: 593648 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593648view=rev Log: Make changes to web pages ready for creation of tomcat/trunk. I'll 'svn up' the web site as soon as I have created trunk. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/svn.xml Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html?rev=593648r1=593647r2=593648view=diff == --- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html (original) +++ tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html Fri Nov 9 12:56:09 2007 @@ -303,7 +303,18 @@ code/tc6.0.x//code /a /td -tdAll modules for Tomcat 6.0.x in a single unified tree/td +tdThe stable 6.0.x release branch, with all modules in a single +unified tree/td + /tr + tr +td +a href=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk; +code/trunk//code +/a +/td +tdThe primary development branch. Patches are committed here +using Commit-then-Review and then voted on for porting to the +release branches using Review-then-Commit./td /tr tr td @@ -361,6 +372,10 @@ thURL/th /tr tr +tdCurrent development/td +tdhttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/td + /tr + tr td6.0.x/td tdhttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/td /tr @@ -538,22 +553,19 @@ codetomcat/code directory./li liModules no longer used (eg tools service) should be clearly marked as archived./li - liThe codetrunk/code for each module should be the the development - branch of the latest Apache Tomcat version. Since there are always + liThe codetrunk/code for each module should be the the branch of the + latest Apache Tomcat version that uses that module. Since there are always several active versions at any one time, rather than be called - codetrunk -/code this directory should be named using the Apache Tomcat + codetrunk/code this directory should be named using the Apache Tomcat version it represents, eg codetc5.5.x/code./li - liThe development branches for the other Apache Tomcat versions - will be placed in the codebranches/code directory for each - component./li + liThe branches for the other Apache Tomcat versions that use that module + will be placed in the codebranches/code directory for each component. + /li liOther (non-development) branches will be placed in the codebranches/other/code directory in sub-directories that group the - other branches by the - Apache Tomcat version from which they were + other branches by the Apache Tomcat version from which they were created./li liTags will be treated in exactly the same way as branches./li - /ul /blockquote Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/svn.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/svn.xml?rev=593648r1=593647r2=593648view=diff == --- tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/svn.xml (original) +++ tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/svn.xml Fri Nov 9 12:56:09 2007 @@ -74,7 +74,15 @@ tr tda href=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x; code/tc6.0.x//code/a/td -tdAll modules for Tomcat 6.0.x in a single unified tree/td +tdThe stable 6.0.x release branch, with all modules in a single +unified tree/td + /tr + tr +tda href=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk; +code/trunk//code/a/td +tdThe primary development branch. Patches are committed here +using Commit-then-Review and then voted on for porting to the +release branches using Review-then-Commit./td /tr tr tda href=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/watchdog; @@ -107,6 +115,10 @@ thApache Tomcat Version/ththURL/th /tr tr +tdCurrent development/td +tdhttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/td + /tr + tr td6.0.x/td tdhttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/td /tr @@ -200,22 +212,19 @@ codetomcat/code directory./li liModules no longer used (eg tools service) should be clearly marked as archived./li - liThe codetrunk/code for each module should be the the development - branch of the latest Apache Tomcat version. Since there are always + liThe codetrunk/code for each module should be the the branch of the + latest Apache Tomcat version that uses that module. Since there are always several active versions at any one time, rather than be called - codetrunk -/code this directory should be named using the Apache Tomcat + codetrunk/code this directory should be named using the Apache Tomcat version it represents, eg codetc5.5.x/code./li - liThe development branches for the other Apache Tomcat versions - will be placed in the codebranches/code directory for each - component./li +
svn commit: r593649 - /tomcat/trunk/
Author: markt Date: Fri Nov 9 13:00:38 2007 New Revision: 593649 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593649view=rev Log: Create C-T-R development branch Added: tomcat/trunk/ - copied from r593648, tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Time to organise svn - Take 4
Mark Thomas wrote: Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote: Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security issue) final stable release of 6.0.x. Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch. -1. Branches should continue to be open as long as committers want to propose patches and make releases. I see where you are coming from. I still don't think there will be much (or indeed any) work on 6.0.x once 6.2.x is stable but you are right, we don't need to freeze 6.0.x and we will see what happens. In the absence of any other comments, I intend to implement Stage 1 (with appropriate updates to the svn page on the web site) some time tomorrow evening GMT. Sorry - got delayed build Ikea furniture last night. Working on this now - should be done shortly. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15
Remy Maucherat wrote: On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +, Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/ According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is: [X] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues, although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world, so it would seem to be possible to release as stable. Just checking through the release, we still have a licensing issue so I don't believe we can proceed with the tag as is. See http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-devm=119170137616267w=2 for details. Remy - you commmitted the files originally so you are the only one who can answer the question about their provenance. If the source was such that the Sun license can be removed, great. If not, we can use the CDDL ones. I am happy to make the changes myself but I need to know which way to go. These sources can be found in the specification documents. That doesn't mean we can just copy them. Geronimo should also have the same files somewhere. I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check. I'll prepare a patch for 6.0.16 that uses whatever they use. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43002] - NIO connector performance issue in 6.0.13
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43002. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-09 15:21 --- Some new information on this issue, so I reopened it. The problem seems to relate to parsing the body content when the **Transfer- Encoding: chunked** header is present. It appears that the chunk length gets corrupted under load and the client is unable to parse the chunk out of the response body. When the NIO connector parameter **socket.appWriteBufSize** is set to a value larger than the total response body, the error condition does not occur. One might succesfully argue that this is proper performance tuning. The Tomcat documents point out that to scale a large number of long held connections, the buffer sizes may need to be less than the response body (the memory footprint would be quite large otherwise). Could there be a race condition involving the response buffering code? I have confirmed this behavior on both JDKs 1.5 and 1.6 on both Windows 2003 and Linux. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15
On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +, Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/ According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is: [X] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues, although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world, so it would seem to be possible to release as stable. Just checking through the release, we still have a licensing issue so I don't believe we can proceed with the tag as is. See http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-devm=119170137616267w=2 for details. Remy - you commmitted the files originally so you are the only one who can answer the question about their provenance. If the source was such that the Sun license can be removed, great. If not, we can use the CDDL ones. I am happy to make the changes myself but I need to know which way to go. These sources can be found in the specification documents. That doesn't mean we can just copy them. Geronimo should also have the same files somewhere. I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check. I'll prepare a patch for 6.0.16 that uses whatever they use. Geronimo has gone to a lot of trouble and subjected our users to noticeable inconvenience to NOT ship any of the sun licensed xsds. We have not found any authority or reasoning that would let us do so. I believe the apache policy now allows us to put small numbers of CDDL schemas in apache svn and ship them but AFAIK we have not yet done so. thanks david jencks Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
