ManagerBase error on Tomcat 6.0.16
Hi to all, Under heavly load (about 500k/requests by day), I see this error about 30 times last week on a Tomcat 6.0.16 (with libtcnative 1.1.14 on a Suse SLES 10) WARNING: Exception processing manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] background process Throwable occurred: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.util.AbstractCollection.toArray(Unknown Source) at org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.findSessions(ManagerBase.java:873) at org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.processExpires(ManagerBase.java:676) at org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.backgroundProcess(ManagerBase.java:667) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.backgroundProcess(ContainerBase.java:1316) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1601) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1610) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1610) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.run(ContainerBase.java:1590) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:735) 7 nov. 2008 16:18:21 org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase backgroundProcess WARNING: Exception processing manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] background process Throwable occurred: java.lang.IllegalMonitorStateException at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.tryRelease(ReentrantLock.java:140) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.release(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1188) at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.unlock(ReentrantLock.java:444) at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$Segment.remove(ConcurrentHashMap.java:555) at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.remove(ConcurrentHashMap.java:936) at org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.remove(ManagerBase.java:885) at org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession.expire(StandardSession.java:743) at org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession.isValid(StandardSession.java:592) at org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.processExpires(ManagerBase.java:682) at org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.backgroundProcess(ManagerBase.java:667) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.backgroundProcess(ContainerBase.java:1316) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1601) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1610) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1610) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.run(ContainerBase.java:1590) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:735) Did some of you see the same behaviour ? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46177] New: Cookie Values are cut off
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177 Summary: Cookie Values are cut off Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.27 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Vista Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: dev@tomcat.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have the following Problem: I set a Cookie with a value such as (without the quotes): [EMAIL PROTECTED]|SESSIONID=0B626AB7E5DA538D12BE296F90126BED|EXPIRES=1226326772293|KEY=key1|HASH=vXGIbxWxumu+9caKlGxdaA== This is the cookies value only. Setting and reading of this cookie works fine on Tomcat 5.5.25 and 6.0.18. If i use Tomcat 5.5.26 or 5.5.27 the Cookies value is cut off after the first = character, so all my application receives is (without the quotes) USERID What confuses me is: if it only worked due to a Bug in 5.5.25 then why would it work in 6.0.18 again which afaik has the same Bugs fixed which were fixed in the version Jump from 5.5.25 to 5.5.26 . Is this a Bug or am i trying to do something which isn't allowed due to security constraints. Best Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46169] mod_jk extension use_server_errors not working
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46169 --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Hilbig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 01:44:22 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) You can test the patch, it is small and I committed it right now as revision r712207 ( https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=revrev=712207 ). Will be part of 1.2.28. I just integrated and tested the patch and it works as expected. Nevertheless consider upgrading to httpd 2.2 ;) We're not only considering but already planning the upgrade :) But that will take some time and we needed to integrate Tomcat sooner, so thanks a lot for the quick response and patch! -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r712701 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool: .classpath java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/DefaultTestCase.java test/org/apache/tomcat/j
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Nov 10 09:09:40 2008
New Revision: 712701
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=712701view=rev
Log:
Added test case to test two concurrent datasources, fixed the flag to turn on
the sweeper
Added:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/TwoDataSources.java
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/.classpath
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/DefaultTestCase.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/.classpath
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/.classpath?rev=712701r1=712700r2=712701view=diff
==
--- tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/.classpath (original)
+++ tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/.classpath Mon Nov 10 09:09:40 2008
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
classpathentry kind=src path=java/
classpathentry kind=src path=test/
classpathentry kind=con
path=org.eclipse.jdt.launching.JRE_CONTAINER/
- classpathentry kind=var
path=TOMCAT_LIBS_BASE/tomcat6-deps/dbcp/tomcat-dbcp.jar/
- classpathentry kind=var path=TOMCAT_LIBS_BASE/
classpathentry combineaccessrules=false kind=src
path=/tomcat-trunk/
classpathentry kind=con
path=org.eclipse.jdt.junit.JUNIT_CONTAINER/3/
+ classpathentry kind=var
path=TOMCAT_LIBS_BASE/tomcat6-deps/dbcp/tomcat-dbcp.jar/
+ classpathentry kind=lib path=mysql-connector-java-5.1.6-bin.jar/
classpathentry kind=output path=bin/
/classpath
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java?rev=712701r1=712700r2=712701view=diff
==
---
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java
(original)
+++
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java
Mon Nov 10 09:09:40 2008
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@
public boolean isPoolSweeperEnabled() {
boolean result = getTimeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis()0;
result = result (isRemoveAbandoned()
getRemoveAbandonedTimeout()0);
-result = result (isTestWhileIdle() getValidationQuery()!=null);
+result = result || (isTestWhileIdle() getValidationQuery()!=null);
return result;
}
}
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/DefaultTestCase.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/DefaultTestCase.java?rev=712701r1=712700r2=712701view=diff
==
---
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/DefaultTestCase.java
(original)
+++
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/DefaultTestCase.java
Mon Nov 10 09:09:40 2008
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@
super(name);
}
-protected void init() throws Exception {
+public DataSourceProxy createDefaultDataSource() {
+DataSourceProxy datasource = null;
PoolProperties p = new DefaultProperties();
p.setJmxEnabled(false);
p.setTestWhileIdle(false);
@@ -57,6 +58,11 @@
p.setRemoveAbandoned(false);
datasource = new org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceProxy();
datasource.setPoolProperties(p);
+return datasource;
+}
+
+protected void init() throws Exception {
+this.datasource = createDefaultDataSource();
}
protected void transferProperties() {
@@ -92,6 +98,7 @@
protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
+try {datasource.close();}catch(Exception ignore){}
datasource = null;
tDatasource = null;
System.gc();
Added:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/TwoDataSources.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/TwoDataSources.java?rev=712701view=auto
==
---
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/TwoDataSources.java
(added)
+++
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/TwoDataSources.java
Mon Nov 10 09:09:40 2008
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+package org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.test;
+
+import java.sql.Connection;
+
+import org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceProxy;
+
+public class TwoDataSources extends DefaultTestCase {
+
+public TwoDataSources(String name) {
+super(name);
+}
+
+public void testTwoDataSources() throws Exception {
+DataSourceProxy d1 = this.createDefaultDataSource();
+DataSourceProxy d2 = this.createDefaultDataSource();
+
svn commit: r712702 - /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java
Author: fhanik Date: Mon Nov 10 09:14:41 2008 New Revision: 712702 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=712702view=rev Log: Last bit of my ego goes away Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java?rev=712702r1=712701r2=712702view=diff == --- tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java (original) +++ tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/PoolProperties.java Mon Nov 10 09:14:41 2008 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ protected int removeAbandonedTimeout = 60; protected boolean logAbandoned = false; protected int loginTimeout = 1; -protected String name = Filip Connection Pool[+(poolCounter++)+]; +protected String name = Tomcat Connection Pool[+(poolCounter++)+]; protected String password; protected String username; protected long validationInterval = 3; - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46177] Cookie Values are cut off
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177 Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 07:34:25 PST --- This is a question for the users list - or just search the archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: Re: TC patches as discussed]
Mark Thomas wrote: http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-10-31-tc4-wininstaller.patch Can you explain a bit the motivation for all the path changes (including the sub directory in the target path and adding *.* to the source)? I might then well be able to vote for the second one too. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: Re: TC patches as discussed]
Rainer Jung wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-10-31-tc4-wininstaller.patch Can you explain a bit the motivation for all the path changes (including the sub directory in the target path and adding *.* to the source)? File -r common matches common/*.* and */common/*.* File -r common/*.* matches only common/*.* Because we use common/*.* as a pattern you have to set the directory first to make sure stuff gets expanded to the right place. The problem with the current pattern is we include stuff we shouldn't form other random directories that happen to include the root directory name in their path. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTLMAuthenticator for Apache Tomcat 6.0.18 (Intranet within a Microsoft domain)
Hi!
I wanted to:
* centralize the parameterization of user authentication at the container level;
* have a simple NTLM authentication for intranet users;
* be able to run Tomcat in a Microsoft Active Directory network where the
server is secured (absolutely no login allowed to regular users)
There is a Microsoft specification (bug?) by which all LDAP binds are
evaluated on the Domain Server (like if the user was attempting to login on the
Domain Server).
It would be better to have binds evaluated as if they were originating from the
LDAP client machine (the Tomcat Server).
To circumvent this, I have been obliged to remove the binding (the password
checking) but to ensure that it is NTLM (and nothing else) which provides the
username.
The users are therefore automatically logged with the username used to log on
their PC.
The attached patch is for current Apache Tomcat sources (6.0.18).
It adds:
An NTLM Authenticator: nothing to configure except in the web.xml of each
application:
login-config
auth-methodNTLM/auth-method
realm-nameThisIsApassword/realm-name
/login-config
The realm-name is the password which ensures that authentication is done by
NTLM and no other method.
A very long password is strongly recommended.
A modified JNDI Realm with new parameters:
preAuthenticatedPassword=ThisIsApassword
This to suppress password checking if preAuthenticatedPassword is provided.
userIdentification=userPrincipalName provides a standardized username,
whatever the retrieved user name (case of complex userSearch patterns)
userNamePrefix and userNameSuffix
This to suppress a prefix and/or a suffix from username before returning it to
the application: good to suppress domain identification, etc.
When you user complex userSearch pattern, this can be very useful. Example:
userSearch=(|(sAMAccountName={0})([EMAIL PROTECTED])(userPrincipalName={0}))
userIdentification=userPrincipalName userNamePrefix=domain\
userNameSuffix=@domain.com
Hopes this can be useful to the community!
Please do not hesitate to ask me if something can be done to make this
contribution perennial.
Wishing you a very nice day,
Christophe Dupriez
Centre Antipoisons - Antigifcentrum
C/o Hôpital Central de la Base Reine Astrid
Rue Bruyn - 1120 Bruxelles - Belgique
tel 32-(0)2.264.96.36 fax 32-(0)2.264.96.46-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42446] Condition is likely to fail in org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42446 Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 14:56:18 PST --- This was fixed in r711500 ( https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=revrev=711500 ) and will be included in 6.0.19 onwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svn commit: r712864 - /tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-PLAN-6.0.txt
Author: markt Date: Mon Nov 10 15:03:48 2008 New Revision: 712864 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=712864view=rev Log: Remove out of date file from trunk Removed: tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-PLAN-6.0.txt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46179] New: apr ssl client authentication
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 Summary: apr ssl client authentication Product: Tomcat Native Version: 1.1.14 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Library AssignedTo: dev@tomcat.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created an attachment (id=22852) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22852) config file and keys/certificates i am trying to use ssl client authentication together with apr. I have followed the instructions contained in apr manual but no success. When I try access server with the browser (get the prompt for user cert and submit it), i get the error: An error occurred during a connection to rzuem5008u.jap2.ch:8443. SSL peer was unable to negotiate an acceptable set of security parameters. (Error code: ssl_error_handshake_failure_alert) When I try to access the server with: openssl s_client -msg -CAfile /home/rejap/certs/REtest-RootCA.pem -cert /home/rejap/certs/0D.pem -state -connect rzuem5008u.jap2.ch:8443 it produces the following error: --- snip, snip --- SSL_connect:SSLv3 write client certificate A TLS 1.0 Handshake [length 0086], ClientKeyExchange 10 00 00 82 00 80 7b a6 c2 cf 5e a1 44 60 1c 5d ... 71 06 75 4b 06 c4 SSL_connect:SSLv3 write client key exchange A TLS 1.0 Handshake [length 0106], CertificateVerify 0f 00 01 02 01 00 4a f4 64 74 56 b4 d0 51 b1 27 ... 2b 90 55 46 fd c4 SSL_connect:SSLv3 write certificate verify A TLS 1.0 ChangeCipherSpec [length 0001] 01 SSL_connect:SSLv3 write change cipher spec A TLS 1.0 Handshake [length 0010], Finished 14 00 00 0c 70 b5 b4 08 35 3a ae 15 d3 28 2c e4 SSL_connect:SSLv3 write finished A SSL_connect:SSLv3 flush data TLS 1.0 Alert [length 0002], fatal decrypt_error 02 33 SSL3 alert read:fatal:decrypt error SSL_connect:failed in SSLv3 read finished A 18383:error:1409441B:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert decrypt error:s3_pkt.c:1053:SSL alert number 51 18383:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s23_lib.c:188: The server.xml is all default except: Connector port=8443 protocol=HTTP/1.1 SSLEnabled=true maxThreads=150 scheme=https secure=true sslProtocol=TLSv1 SSLCertificateFile=/home/rejap/app/certs/rzuem5008u.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile=/home/rejap/app/certs/rzuem5008u.key SSLCertificateChainFile=/home/rejap/app/certs/cacert.pem SSLVerifyClient=require SSLVerifyDepth=10 SSLCACertificateFile=/home/rejap/app/certs/all-cacerts.pem / Content of the certificate files: rzuem5008u.crt - server certificate, signed by CA1 rzuem5008u.key - server private key cacert.pem - CA1 certificate signed by ROOT all-cacerts.pem - CA1 certificated (signed by ROOT) followed by ROOT (self signed) client sends the user certificate (0D.pem) singned by CA1 client has the ROOT certificate added to the trust If I turn off the verify client (take out last 3 directives from config) the server auth works ok. I have verified the certs (chains) with apache server. I did parallel setup with the same certs/keys and it appears to work. I have verified the certs with the tomcat without native. Everything is tip top. I tried to switch to sslv3. I got similar but not exactly the same error. verions: tomcat 6.0.18 apr 1.2.11-1 (ubuntu) openssl 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.3 java version 1.6.0_07 Pawel -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NTLMAuthenticator for Apache Tomcat 6.0.18 (Intranet within a Microsoft domain)
I'm a little confused about your goals
On Nov 10, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Christophe Dupriez wrote:
Hi Tomcat Developpers!
I wanted to:
* centralize the parameterization of user authentication at the
container level;
What do you mean by this and how is this expressed?
* have a simple NTLM authentication for intranet users;
* be able to run Tomcat in a Microsoft Active Directory network
where the server is secured (absolutely no login allowed to regular
users)
Do you mean that you want intranet users to have their local MAD login
propagated automatically to the tomcat server with no explicit tomcat
login required? If so the official way to support this is via
the JASPI spec (jsr 196) and (IIUC) a SPNEGO server authentication
module such as that at http://spnego.ocean.net.au/ (jboss might have
another one???)
At this point tomcat does not have a jaspi implementation although I
expect it to be a part of javaee 6, and I'm mostly interested in
trying to understand what you are trying to do rather than suggesting
an implementation strategy.
thanks
david jencks
There is a Microsoft “specification” (bug?) by which all LDAP binds
are evaluated on the Domain Server (like if the user was attempting
to login on the Domain Server).
It would be better to have binds evaluated as if they were
originating from the LDAP client machine (the Tomcat Server).
To circumvent this, I have been obliged to remove the binding (the
password checking) but to ensure that it is NTLM (and nothing else)
which provides the username.
The users are therefore automatically logged with the username used
to log on their PC.
The attached patch is for current Apache Tomcat sources (6.0.18).
It adds:
An NTLM Authenticator: nothing to configure except in the web.xml of
each application:
login-config
auth-methodNTLM/auth-method
realm-nameThisIsApassword/realm-name
/login-config
The realm-name is the “password” which ensures that authentication
is done by NTLM and no other method.
A very long password is strongly recommended.
A modified JNDI Realm with new parameters:
preAuthenticatedPassword=”ThisIsApassword”
This to suppress password checking if preAuthenticatedPassword is
provided.
userIdentification=”userPrincipalName” provides a standardized
username, whatever the retrieved user name (case of complex
userSearch patterns)
userNamePrefix and userNameSuffix
This to suppress a prefix and/or a suffix from username before
returning it to the application: good to suppress domain
identification, etc.
When you user complex userSearch pattern, this can be very useful.
Example:
userSearch=(|(sAMAccountName={0})([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(userPrincipalName={0}))
userIdentification=userPrincipalName userNamePrefix=”domain\” [EMAIL PROTECTED]
”
Hopes this can be useful to the community!
Please do not hesitate to ask me if something can be done to make
this contribution perennial.
Wishing you a very nice day,
Christophe Dupriez
Centre Antipoisons - Antigifcentrum
C/o Hôpital Central de la Base Reine Astrid
Rue Bruyn - 1120 Bruxelles - Belgique
tel 32-(0)2.264.96.36 fax 32-(0)2.264.96.46
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46183] New: about jvm dump file EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183 Summary: about jvm dump file EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc005) Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.23 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Server 2003 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: dev@tomcat.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi folks, Well, Unfortunately We are facing some issue which cause a Tomcat service is down in the following environment. OS : Windows Server 2003 R2 ( https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=revrev=2 ) SP2 TOMCAT version=5.5.23 Java version=1.5.0_12 We try to find the cause using attached dump file which generated the one. but not sure why this issue happen in sometime(about once a month) Could anyone know what could be wrong? i am baz, did you get to solve this same problem? Thanks in advance... ---following a jvm dump file # # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine: # # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc005) at pc=0x7c97be3e, pid=3608, tid=5976 # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_12-b04 mixed mode, sharing) # Problematic frame: # C [ntdll.dll+0x2be3e] # T H R E A D Current thread (0x02d88850): JavaThread http-8080-Processor18 daemon [_thread_in_native, id=5976] siginfo: ExceptionCode=0xc005, reading address 0xfff8 Registers: EAX=0x0380, EBX=0x, ECX=0x037f, EDX=0x ESP=0x0383f068, EBP=0x0383f074, ESI=0x00570178, EDI=0x0080 EIP=0x7c97be3e, EFLAGS=0x00010206 Top of Stack: (sp=0x0383f068) 0x0383f068: 0057 0581 02fb9000 0383f098 0x0383f078: 7c97b561 00570178 0581 02fb9000 0x0383f088: 0057 02f8 02f8 0380 0x0383f098: 0383f0e0 7c97ba81 0581 00fb9000 0x0383f0a8: 0581 0057 02fb9000 0x0383f0b8: 0c08 02fbb000 0383f0dc 02f8 0x0383f0c8: 02fb8e70 0x0383f0d8: 0181 0383f1c4 7c97b646 Instructions: (pc=0x7c97be3e) 0x7c97be2e: 57 64 8b 14 8a 83 c2 08 3b f2 0f 84 d5 fe ff ff 0x7c97be3e: 0f b7 5a f8 3b 5d 0c 73 0b 8b 12 3b f2 75 f1 e9 Stack: [0x0380,0x0384), sp=0x0383f068, free space=252k Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code) C [ntdll.dll+0x2be3e] C [ntdll.dll+0x2b561] C [ntdll.dll+0x2ba81] C [ntdll.dll+0x2b646] C [MSVCRT.dll+0x1cef6] C [net.dll+0x6a86] J java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Ljava/io/FileDescriptor;[BIII)I J java.net.SocketInputStream.read([BII)I J org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalInputBuffer.fill()Z J org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalInputBuffer.parseRequestLine()V J org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Ljava/io/InputStream;Ljava/io/OutputStream;)V j org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Lorg/apache/tomcat/util/net/TcpConnection;[Ljava/lang/Object;)V+113 j org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(Ljava/net/Socket;Lorg/apache/tomcat/util/net/TcpConnection;[Ljava/lang/Object;)V+45 j org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt([Ljava/lang/Object;)V+102 j org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run()V+167 j java.lang.Thread.run()V+11 v ~StubRoutines::call_stub V [jvm.dll+0x87599] V [jvm.dll+0xdfbb2] V [jvm.dll+0x8746a] V [jvm.dll+0x871c7] V [jvm.dll+0xa2048] V [jvm.dll+0x1110d8] V [jvm.dll+0x1110a6] C [MSVCRT.dll+0x2b530] C [kernel32.dll+0x24829] Java frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code) J java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Ljava/io/FileDescriptor;[BIII)I J java.net.SocketInputStream.read([BII)I J org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalInputBuffer.fill()Z J org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalInputBuffer.parseRequestLine()V J org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Ljava/io/InputStream;Ljava/io/OutputStream;)V j org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Lorg/apache/tomcat/util/net/TcpConnection;[Ljava/lang/Object;)V+113 j org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(Ljava/net/Socket;Lorg/apache/tomcat/util/net/TcpConnection;[Ljava/lang/Object;)V+45 j org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt([Ljava/lang/Object;)V+102 j org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run()V+167 j java.lang.Thread.run()V+11 v ~StubRoutines::call_stub P R O C E S S Java Threads: ( = current thread ) 0x02ee7820 JavaThread File Reaper daemon [_thread_blocked, id=4744] 0x02e23958 JavaThread TP-Monitor daemon [_thread_blocked, id=6000] 0x033159e8 JavaThread TP-Processor4 daemon [_thread_in_native, id=7532]
