Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[sebb]

On 02/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists  wrote:
> Martin Dubuc wrote:
>
> > What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially
> released?
> >
> >
>  that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be
> released.

I've not seen the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail ?

>
> > If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/?
> >
> >
>  releases are source based, so only the sources would have to be identical,
> but my guess is that everything will be.
>
>  Filip
>
>
> > Martin
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > The candidates binaries are available here:
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
> > >
> > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
> > > [ ] Broken
> > > [ ] Alpha
> > > [ ] Beta
> > > [ ] Stable
> > >
> > > Rémy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

Martin Dubuc wrote:

What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released?
  
that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be 
released.



If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/?
  
releases are source based, so only the sources would have to be 
identical, but my guess is that everything will be.


Filip

Martin

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat  wrote:

  

The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org





  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Remy Maucherat]

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 13:22 -0400, Martin Dubuc wrote:
> What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released?
> If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/?

I've been in "lazy" mode ...

It has been mirrored, so only the last step remains (updating the
website).

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Martin Dubuc]

What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released?
If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/?

Martin

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat  wrote:

> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
>
> Rémy
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Yoav Shapira]

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Remy Maucherat  wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:33 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
>> [ ] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ X ] Stable

Belated, but I did play with it some.  Runs our apps fine, in-house
app-level tests pass.  Didn't run the TCK.

Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Remy Maucherat]

On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:33 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
> 
> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable

Ok, so with one exception, all voted stable, so it looks like it is good
enough. Last call.

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Konstantin Kolinko]

2009/5/24 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat :
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
>> [ ] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [x] Stable
>>
>
> I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
> of the tgz sources archive.
>
> Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following:
> The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip
> archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes.
>
> Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. I prepared such
> an archive and placed it in
> http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/
>
> md5 sum is
> 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz
>

Release notes, as displayed by Windows installer, are unreadable.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267

The option to display the file is on by default, so it affects a lot
of people. Though may be most of them do not care.

Based on this, and on our issues with src.tar.gz archive, I change my vote to

[x] Beta

Please review and vote on current and upcoming proposed patches in STATUS.

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Remy Maucherat]

On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 17:02 +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
> of the tgz sources archive.
> 
> Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following:
> The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip
> archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes.
> 
> Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. I prepared such
> an archive and placed it in
> http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/
> 
> md5 sum is
> 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz

Hacks were used in the past, but at the moment I prefer if the released
files correspond to the svn tag.

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[sebb]

On 25/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko  wrote:
> 2009/5/24 sebb :
>
> > On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko  wrote:
>  >> 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat :
>  >>
>  >> > The candidates binaries are available here:
>  >>  > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>  >>  >
>  >>  > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
>  >>  > [ ] Broken
>  >>  > [ ] Alpha
>  >>  > [ ] Beta
>  >>
>  >> > [x] Stable
>  >>  >
>  >>
>  >>  I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
>  >>  of the tgz sources archive.
>  >>
>  >>  Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following:
>  >>  The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip
>  >>  archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes.
>  >>
>  >>  Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz.
>  >
>  > Strictly speaking, it's not sufficient, because the binary archives
>  > are supposed to be derivable from the source archives.
>  >
>
>
> It is source archive (-src.tar.gz) I am talking about.  All binaries
>  are derivable from it.

Oops, sorry.

>  I do not see a contradiction here.

Agreed.

>  It contains the same files as -src.zip. I used Apache Ant 1.7.0 to repack 
> these
>  sources (using the package-src-tgz target from dist.xml, but with fxcrlf 
> filter
>  removed).
>
>
>
>  > See
>  > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
>  >
>  > at the end of the section it says:
>  >
>  > "In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same
>  > version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode
>  > files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code
>  > release."
>  >
>  > This is not the case for the tgz archive.
>  >
>  >>  I prepared such
>  >>  an archive and placed it in
>  >>  http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/
>  >>
>  >>  md5 sum is
>  >>  6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz
>  >>
>
>
> There are also the following options:
>
>  1. Rerun the build, but now with
>  LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1; export LANG;
>  before it.
>
>  It will fix the UTF-8 issue with -src.tar.gz

OK.

>  2. Release as is. As Mark noted, 6.0.18 suffers from the same issue.
>
>  I am OK with it.
>

I think it would be a bad idea to release 6.0.20 with the same fault.

>
>
>  Best regards,
>  Konstantin Kolinko
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Konstantin Kolinko]

2009/5/24 sebb :
> On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko  wrote:
>> 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat :
>>
>> > The candidates binaries are available here:
>>  > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>>  >
>>  > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
>>  > [ ] Broken
>>  > [ ] Alpha
>>  > [ ] Beta
>>
>> > [x] Stable
>>  >
>>
>>  I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
>>  of the tgz sources archive.
>>
>>  Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following:
>>  The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip
>>  archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes.
>>
>>  Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz.
>
> Strictly speaking, it's not sufficient, because the binary archives
> are supposed to be derivable from the source archives.
>

It is source archive (-src.tar.gz) I am talking about.  All binaries
are derivable from it.

I do not see a contradiction here.

It contains the same files as -src.zip. I used Apache Ant 1.7.0 to repack these
sources (using the package-src-tgz target from dist.xml, but with fxcrlf filter
removed).


> See
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
>
> at the end of the section it says:
>
> "In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same
> version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode
> files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code
> release."
>
> This is not the case for the tgz archive.
>
>>  I prepared such
>>  an archive and placed it in
>>  http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/
>>
>>  md5 sum is
>>  6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz
>>

There are also the following options:

1. Rerun the build, but now with
LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1; export LANG;
before it.

It will fix the UTF-8 issue with -src.tar.gz

2. Release as is. As Mark noted, 6.0.18 suffers from the same issue.

I am OK with it.



Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[sebb]

On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko  wrote:
> 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat :
>
> > The candidates binaries are available here:
>  > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>  >
>  > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
>  > [ ] Broken
>  > [ ] Alpha
>  > [ ] Beta
>
> > [x] Stable
>  >
>
>  I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
>  of the tgz sources archive.
>
>  Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following:
>  The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip
>  archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes.
>
>  Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz.

Strictly speaking, it's not sufficient, because the binary archives
are supposed to be derivable from the source archives.

See
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what

at the end of the section it says:

"In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same
version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode
files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code
release."

This is not the case for the tgz archive.

>  I prepared such
>  an archive and placed it in
>  http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/
>
>  md5 sum is
>  6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz
>
>
>  Best regards,
>
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Konstantin Kolinko]

2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat :
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [x] Stable
>

I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
of the tgz sources archive.

Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following:
The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip
archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes.

Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. I prepared such
an archive and placed it in
http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/

md5 sum is
6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz


Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Rainer Jung]

On 22.05.2009 15:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
> 2. i18n resources are still corrupted. There is a patch already in the
> STATUS file to fix this. Was an issue in 6.0.18 so this is a bug that
> has not been fixed rather than a regression.

But only for the tarball source distribution, right? I checked some in
the intl jars of the bin distributions, which looked OK.

Regards,

Rainer

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Mark Thomas]

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
> 
> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] Stable
> 
> Rémy

Observations
-src.tar.gz - hashes match, key in WOT (more sigs would be nice though)

Minor issues
1. The fixcrlf task is adding newlines to the end of files that don't
end in a bank line making comparing -src.tar.gz against an svn export
harder. I've patched trunk and proposed the fix for 6.0.x

2. i18n resources are still corrupted. There is a patch already in the
STATUS file to fix this. Was an issue in 6.0.18 so this is a bug that
has not been fixed rather than a regression.

3. A couple of other files are also corrupted. Again, there is a patch
already in the STATUS file to fix this. I'm happy living with these
minor niggles for 6.0.20

4. Servlet TCK passes under normal operation and with a SecurityManager
a handful fail (as expected) due to restricted network access.

5. JSP TCK passes under normal operation and fails under the security
manager. This is a known bug, again - patches are in the STATUS file.

So in summary, a few minor niggles but nothing we haven't had in
previous releases. Hence my stable vote.

Mark



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Jim Jagielski]

Just clarification: The tgz is broken. Assuming that is fixed,
I see no problems and the actual *codebase* is

[X] Stable

On May 20, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:


[X] Broken

On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote:


extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.

All jars should ideally have N&L files, but they must be present if
the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here.

The EXE fails to install the following file:

RELEASE-NOTES

It also fails to install RUNNING.txt and most of the contents of the
bin directory (compared with the zip archive) but those are perhaps
not as essential.

As noted already, the properties files are corrupt in the tgz version
of the source.

-1 because of the above problems.

On 14/05/2009, Remy Maucherat  wrote:

The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Tim Funk]

Remy Maucherat wrote:

The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Rainer Jung]

On 14.05.2009 01:33, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
> 
> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] Stable


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

[X] Stable



Remy Maucherat wrote:

The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org


  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Jim Jagielski]

[X] Broken

On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote:


extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.

All jars should ideally have N&L files, but they must be present if
the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here.

The EXE fails to install the following file:

RELEASE-NOTES

It also fails to install RUNNING.txt and most of the contents of the
bin directory (compared with the zip archive) but those are perhaps
not as essential.

As noted already, the properties files are corrupt in the tgz version
of the source.

-1 because of the above problems.

On 14/05/2009, Remy Maucherat  wrote:

The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[sebb]

extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.

All jars should ideally have N&L files, but they must be present if
the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here.

The EXE fails to install the following file:

RELEASE-NOTES

It also fails to install RUNNING.txt and most of the contents of the
bin directory (compared with the zip archive) but those are perhaps
not as essential.

As noted already, the properties files are corrupt in the tgz version
of the source.

-1 because of the above problems.

On 14/05/2009, Remy Maucherat  wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>  http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>
>  According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
>  [ ] Broken
>  [ ] Alpha
>  [ ] Beta
>  [ ] Stable
>
>  Rémy
>
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Rainer Jung]

On 14.05.2009 01:33, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
> 
> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable

Please stay tuned, I can test and vote tomorrow.
Thanks for RMing.

Rainer

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[jean-frederic clere]

Remy Maucherat wrote:

The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable


Looks OK :-)

Cheers

Jean-Frederic



Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Konstantin Kolinko]

2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat :
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
>
> Rémy
>

The tgz archive of the sources is broken.

Some of the files there have undergone conversion to UTF-8,
while the relevant ones in the zip archive remain in ISO-8859-1.

Here is an example of those lines that differ:

* \src\_tgz\java\javax\servlet\LocalStrings_fr.properties

err.not_iso8859_1={0} n''est pas un caractя┐�`re ISO 8859-1
value.true=true
* \src\_zip\java\javax\servlet\LocalStrings_fr.properties

err.not_iso8859_1={0} n''est pas un caractшre ISO 8859-1
value.true=true
*

Disregard the Cyrillic encoding issues - you may see that the count of
characters differ.

Here is the list of files that are broken:


/KEYS

/java/javax/servlet/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/javax/servlet/http/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/core/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/LocalStrings_de.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/catalina/security/LocalStrings_es.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/security/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/session/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/startup/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/users/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/util/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/valves/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/jasper/resources/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/naming/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/naming/resources/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/res/LocalStrings_es.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/res/LocalStrings_es.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/res/LocalStrings_es.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties

/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/LocalStrings_es.properties
/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/LocalStrings_fr.properties



The binary distributions seem to be OK.

At least:
1) tgz and zip archives match each other
2) by quick look into tomcat-i18n-fr.jar the properties files are OK there
3) the properties files in /webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes are also OK


Some other small discrepancies that can be fixed later:
1. the apache-tomcat-6.0.20-fulldocs.tar.gz file contains two exact copies of
/tomcat-6.0-doc/RUNNING.txt

2. the exe installer and zip distributive have the following
difference in server.xml :

* C:\PROGRAM FILES\APACHE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION\TOMCAT 6.0\CONF\server.xml

* C:\(...)\_ZIP\CONF\SERVER.XML

*

I have not run the binaries yet.

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

[VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[Remy Maucherat]

The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org