DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35959] mod_jk not independant of UseCanonicalName

[bugzilla]

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35959

Sven  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |

--- Comment #10 from Sven  2011-10-25 19:03:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> No response in nearly 4 years.
> User didn't provide a concrete use case for the feature.

UseCanonicalName influences things like redirects on the apache side. As far as
I can recall, a redirect will use the canonical name if UseCanonicalName=on.
That behaviour of apache can be totally undesired, since obviously the http
client would be redirected to another domain and therefor cookies will be
invalid 
and whatnot.

On the other hand, UseCanonicalName=on was the only way to make sure that a
http-request that matched a certain vhost on the apache site goes to a specific
tomcat vhost. With UseCanonicalName=off you would basically have to adjust the
tomcat config so that resembles the apache config with its servernames and
serveraliases as close as possible. I'm not sure, if the latter is even
possible in any case. The apache configuration language might be more powerful
than the tomcat's.

So with respect to mod_jk, UseCanonicalName=on can be desired  while at the
same time UseCanonicalName=off can be desired for redirect on the apache side.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35959] mod_jk not independant of UseCanonicalName

[bugzilla]

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35959

Rainer Jung  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID

--- Comment #9 from Rainer Jung  2011-10-25 18:08:21 
UTC ---
No response in nearly 4 years.
User didn't provide a concrete use case for the feature.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35959] - mod_jk not independant of UseCanonicalName

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35959





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-05 09:31 ---
I don't really understand your answer, maybe there are to many aspects in it.

Could we start simple: please give a basic setup where your initial statement
applies:

"It would be nice to leave UseCanonicalName off and instead set a mod_jk 
specific
option for it."

Please give a concrete example.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35959] - mod_jk not independant of UseCanonicalName

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35959





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-03 15:12 ---
UseCanonialName was simply unwanted by me. I didn't want users to be redirected
between domains just because they hit one of Apache's redirection.
That also causes losing of the session, doesn't it?

At the same time, i wouldn't want to clone a rather complicated VirtualHost
config in Tomcat. Whatever VirtualHost Apache chooses, i want to be sure, which
Host will be used on the Tomcat side. I'd like a clear association, instead of
two configs which i have to keep in sync.
Actually i ask myself, if any Apache-config can be represented by a 
Tomcat-config.


The easiest (and only) way for a clean association between Apache and Tomcat
Hosts was (and still is?), to "UseCanonialName on" on Apache side and
useIPVHosts="true" on Tomcat side.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35959] - mod_jk not independant of UseCanonicalName

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35959


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-03 05:36 ---
Could you please explain your use case? I think it's good, that you can switch
the behaviour with UseCanonicalName, because it makes the behaviour of the
reverse proxy consistent with a single directive. Why do you need to have
UseCanonicalName set to off and still want mod_jk to send the data extracted
from ServerName to Tomcat?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]