DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40208] Request-Dump when ErrorDocument in httpd.conf is a jsp

2011-10-25 Thread bugzilla 
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40208

Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de 2011-10-25 18:21:05 
UTC ---
No response for about 5 years.
Closing as invalid.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40208] - Request-Dump when ErrorDocument in httpd.conf is a jsp

2006-12-26 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40208.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40208


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-12-26 16:31 ---
I wouldn't post this as an httpd bug, unless you're also seeing strange behavior
with httpd standalone (no Tomcat, no mod_jk, static HTML error page).

I don't suppose you can test this with Tomcat 5.5.20 and a more recent mod_jk or
Apache httpd (or both)?  That would help us prioritize fixing this issue.

What happens if you turn off the ErrorDocument directive in httpd (temporarily),
and just use the Tomcat error page for Tomcat errors?  Does that at least work
properly?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]