Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ I tested the .zip version, but when trying .tar.gz I'm getting the: $tar zxf apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors Using tar (GNU tar) 1.26 from Fedora17, so should be ok. Anyone else tried .tar.gz from Mark's link? Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 21/11/2012 09:22, Mladen Turk wrote: On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ I tested the .zip version, but when trying .tar.gz I'm getting the: $tar zxf apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors Using tar (GNU tar) 1.26 from Fedora17, so should be ok. Anyone else tried .tar.gz from Mark's link? Hmm. The MD5's don't match when I download it. The MD5 does match with the original I have locally (so I can re upload it if necessary). I recall seeing something about an issue with double compression when downloading things from dist. Let me dig through my infra archives. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 21.11.2012 10:22, Mladen Turk wrote: On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ I tested the .zip version, but when trying .tar.gz I'm getting the: $tar zxf apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors Using tar (GNU tar) 1.26 from Fedora17, so should be ok. Anyone else tried .tar.gz from Mark's link? Me :) Did you check md5 and signature? Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 21.11.2012 12:03, Mark Thomas wrote: On 21/11/2012 09:22, Mladen Turk wrote: On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ I tested the .zip version, but when trying .tar.gz I'm getting the: $tar zxf apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors Using tar (GNU tar) 1.26 from Fedora17, so should be ok. Anyone else tried .tar.gz from Mark's link? Hmm. The MD5's don't match when I download it. The MD5 does match with the original I have locally (so I can re upload it if necessary). I recall seeing something about an issue with double compression when downloading things from dist. Let me dig through my infra archives. The pieces were OK, when I downloaded them from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7 on Monday evening. On my test directory: % ls -l apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 jung kippdata 7696004 Nov 18 23:00 apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz % md5sum -c apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz.md5 apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz: OK % cat apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz.md5 09fcee978b5cff6becf5d22aef69bc6a *apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz % md5sum apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz 09fcee978b5cff6becf5d22aef69bc6a apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 21/11/2012 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote: On 21.11.2012 12:03, Mark Thomas wrote: On 21/11/2012 09:22, Mladen Turk wrote: On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ I tested the .zip version, but when trying .tar.gz I'm getting the: $tar zxf apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors Using tar (GNU tar) 1.26 from Fedora17, so should be ok. Anyone else tried .tar.gz from Mark's link? Hmm. The MD5's don't match when I download it. The MD5 does match with the original I have locally (so I can re upload it if necessary). I recall seeing something about an issue with double compression when downloading things from dist. Let me dig through my infra archives. The pieces were OK, when I downloaded them from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7 on Monday evening. It is varies by user agent. Some handle the double compression correctly. Some don't. I've just fixed the server configuration not to double decompress. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 11/21/2012 12:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 21/11/2012 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote: The pieces were OK, when I downloaded them from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7 on Monday evening. It is varies by user agent. Some handle the double compression correctly. Some don't. I'm using Chrome. I've just fixed the server configuration not to double decompress. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ is now empty. Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 21/11/2012 12:44, Mladen Turk wrote: On 11/21/2012 12:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 21/11/2012 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote: The pieces were OK, when I downloaded them from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7 on Monday evening. It is varies by user agent. Some handle the double compression correctly. Some don't. I'm using Chrome. I've just fixed the server configuration not to double decompress. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ is now empty. Yes. They got moved when I did the release. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
Mark, On 11/18/12 6:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ The Maven staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-043/ The svn tag is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_33/ The proposed 7.0.33 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable Not sure if my vote is binding (probably not), but I might recommend -1 Broken -- see the very end for unit test failures in AccessLogValve. Environment: Debian Linux Squeeze OpenSSL 0.9.8o (Debian Packaged) APR 1.4.2 (Debian Packaged) Sun/Oracle Java 1.6.0_26 64-bit (Debian Packaged) Apache ant 1.8.2 + md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33.zip): Matches + GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33.zip): Matches + md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz): Matches + GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz): Matches + md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33.exe): Matches + GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33.exe): Matches + Binary Zip and tarball:Same + md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33-src.zip): Matches + GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33-src.zip): Matches + md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33-src.tar.gz): Matches + GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33-src.tar.gz): Matches + Source Zip and tarball:Same + Deps download and compile cleanly (DBCP has some ant warnings) + tcnative builds cleanly (a few minor warnings using GCC 4.4.5 glibc 2.11.3) + Tomcat Source builds cleanly (some deprecation warnings) / Tribes unit tests fail (this is expected, right?) - Other unit test failures: TEST-org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.APR.txt:Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.078 sec Testcase: testBug54044 took 0.065 sec FAILED arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00] but was:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00] but was:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00] at org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.testBug54044(TestAccessLogValve.java:52) - TEST-org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.BIO.txt:Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.048 sec Testcase: testBug54044 took 0.034 sec FAILED arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00] but was:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00] but was:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00] at org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.testBug54044(TestAccessLogValve.java:52) - TEST-org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.NIO.txt:Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.082 sec Testcase: testBug54044 took 0.059 sec FAILED arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00] but was:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00] but was:...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00] at org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.testBug54044(TestAccessLogValve.java:52) Looks like the time zone is either not being calculated properly or not being printed to the output stream properly. -chris signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21/11/2012 13:38, Christopher Schultz wrote: Not sure if my vote is binding (probably not), Correct. Only PMC member votes are binding. but I might recommend -1 Broken -- see the very end for unit test failures in AccessLogValve. That is a broken unit test. The AccessLogValve is fine. Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQrNs2AAoJEBDAHFovYFnn0X8QAO7+j42yDn+ezV1/1S80x+HH 92AhOVZLhYHi9N27S5z9WaUsWK0SJiQeSmrCbWqZliCLmNsEr3gUpJew5dfL26tE 3ksINVaBarzI9l4tpuJiS5ysaxg4vFWrBHUQNgIyFBTj5ZcuWqtqyqqPB7RZINpN h9PNp3axjLra+Cq8YupzzXLd5042bqCmqfFjjKLZBmc+CItNf+MhWPhYRh4eIm+t aF0XupzaOcB6kdIqjTvNc1bO2ce4k1gNUYcY9fysyqHON/D1j5VjN2BKT3yt0PYY e3x/VRdu+3DXNOq6ZTf98R8g+EOrYqoTNVShJf4R8BlGnnIlqg1aWHv1b2MSYq+i hASCjKtUoTbX/gYRKkliKDwSj2Gp8HoNaMjqr4Jeqv/7918oz9wTOxNbHhf5Vw2J 5nVb4oM4Qq56v24VUZbn8Bcp0OYXzq5rAtF17HsBVOnr4tkUpXrR3LF/GGCG/NI+ Gu+paI5Zn+nsLXFlf+f8AvLoscHBsdCwKPtq8+hYQmis6oReF0uFlrNI1BeR5XXD aFWrT1NVx2c0G6V44CeYr4tFv/0ZNIghE6I3jmK1E8iP5Luvyyztjkg3rJXojLEt Y9ES3Go7IKvZo9owwbaWf8X4Ww0cZxIWdjv21yTUM7QdVmh79LJEIP7dEZp1UIn7 vTNSU/I/UNuvyrzimeiA =GPUj -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 18/11/2012 23:34, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ The Maven staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-043/ The svn tag is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_33/ The proposed 7.0.33 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable Unit tests pass on 64-bit Windows and 64-bit Linux EL TCK passes JSP TCK passes with HTTP (direct) BIO, NIO APR/native (1.1.24) Servlet TCK passes with - HTTP (direct) BIO, NIO APR/native (1.1.24) - HTTP (mod_proxy_http) BIO, NIO APR/native (1.1.24) - AJP (mod_jk) BIO, NIO APR/native (1.1.24) - AJP (mod_proxy_ajp) BIO, NIO APR/native (1.1.24) All TCK tests run on 64-bit Linux with a security manager Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
2012/11/19 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ The Maven staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-043/ The svn tag is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_33/ The proposed 7.0.33 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [x] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
2012/11/19 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ The Maven staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-043/ The svn tag is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_33/ The proposed 7.0.33 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org -- Olivier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ The Maven staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-043/ The svn tag is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_33/ The proposed 7.0.33 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable Only a quick test, but looks good. Yoav Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed 7.0.33 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
On 19.11.2012 00:34, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ The Maven staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-043/ The svn tag is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_33/ The proposed 7.0.33 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable +1 to release Most notable observation: Details: - MD5 OK - signatures OK - key in KEYS file - gz and zip for src and bin consistent - src completely consistent with svn tag - builds fine - build result looks consistent with binaries - no checkstyle complaints - some Javadoc warnings (only in jdbc-pool, see below) - Unit tests - broken test TestAccessLogValve fixed in head, only a test problem - one APR test failure TestWebdavServlet started to loop. Messages see below. Hopefully fixed in future version by Mladens recent tcnative fixes. - some warnings (see below) - JMX MBean-Comparison OK Build and tests were done using Java 1.6.0_37. OS was Solaris 10 Sparc, tcnative was 1.1.24 based on APR 1.4.6 and OpenSSL 1.0.1c (plus two patches). - Some Javadoc Warnings in jdbc-pool (not a regression) Unit test warnings (except for tribes all of those look like 7.0.32 and before): - org.apache.catalina.deploy.TestWebXmlOrdering - BIO, NIO and APR: [main] org.apache.catalina.deploy.WebXml.orderWebFragments Used a wrong fragment name z at web.xml absolute-ordering tag! - org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestCustomSsl - BIO twice Exception getting SSL attributes in org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor actionInternal exception is: javax.net.ssl.SSLProtocolException: handshake alert: no_certificate - NIO twice WARNING: Exception re-negotiating SSL connection in org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor actionInternal - tribes: several warnings Unit test SEVERE messages: 229 total, about 40 unique messages Most of those are of type Servlet.service() for servlet ... threw exception. Exception in output of unit tests: 216 times, of these 75 times javax.servlet.ServletException: Opps. I'm not claiming that any of the SEVERE or Exception messages are new ones or important. Regards, Rainer Log output of Unit test failure (loop in TestWebdavServlet): [junit] INFO: Pausing ProtocolHandler [http-apr-127.0.0.1-auto-2-56276] [junit] Nov 19, 2012 6:53:35 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService stopInternal [junit] INFO: Stopping service Tomcat [junit] Nov 19, 2012 6:53:35 PM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log [junit] INFO: SessionListener: contextDestroyed() [junit] Nov 19, 2012 6:53:35 PM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log [junit] INFO: ContextListener: contextDestroyed() [junit] Nov 19, 2012 6:53:35 PM org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol stop [junit] INFO: Stopping ProtocolHandler [http-apr-127.0.0.1-auto-2-56276] [junit] Nov 19, 2012 6:53:35 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint$Poller doPoll [junit] SEVERE: Critical poller failure (restarting poller): [9] Bad file number - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org