Re: svn commit: r367115 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/Response.java

2006-01-09 Thread Remy Maucherat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: markt
Date: Sun Jan  8 14:48:43 2006
New Revision: 367115

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=367115view=rev
Log:
Fix bug 29214. containsHeader() not working for Content-Length and Content-Type


I don't like this fix (to a non issue), but since I have the opportunity 
of not using it, you can leave it in if you want to.


Rather than adding complexity in code which is critical, I would have 
hacked instead the org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.containsHeader 
method, which is not actually used at all (except by application code, 
IMO for weird reasons).


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: svn commit: r367115 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/Response.java

2006-01-09 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Fix bug 29214. containsHeader() not working for Content-Length and
 Content-Type
 
 Rather than adding complexity in code which is critical, I would have
 hacked instead the org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.containsHeader
 method, which is not actually used at all (except by application code,
 IMO for weird reasons).

I'll look into an alternative patch that has less impact on the
critical code.

Mark


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: svn commit: r367115 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/Response.java

2006-01-09 Thread Costin Manolache
If you're looking to reduce complexity - one idea would be to check if
the redundant fields are actually needed, because that's the actual
source of the problem.

I can only think of performance benefits - storing the contentLength
as an int may be a good way to avoid conversion to and from String -
but the headers are stored as MessageBytes, and that supports storing
the int value. If the redundant values are used to avoid looking up
the header - storing the MessageBytes value could solve this.

If you decide to fix it at the higher layer - maybe you can also
deprecate the method containsHeader in Response or put a big javadoc
saying that it's not very accurate.


Costin

On 1/9/06, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Remy Maucherat wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Fix bug 29214. containsHeader() not working for Content-Length and
  Content-Type
 
  Rather than adding complexity in code which is critical, I would have
  hacked instead the org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.containsHeader
  method, which is not actually used at all (except by application code,
  IMO for weird reasons).

 I'll look into an alternative patch that has less impact on the
 critical code.

 Mark


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]