Re: svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
Mark Thomas wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: markt Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008 New Revision: 680102 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102view=rev Log: Fix RDF as per report on users list This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide information that is two years out of date. Hmm... see http://projects.apache.org/indexes/quick.html I don't suppose we want tomcat falling off that list? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: markt Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008 New Revision: 680102 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102view=rev Log: Fix RDF as per report on users list This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide information that is two years out of date. Hmm... see http://projects.apache.org/indexes/quick.html I don't suppose we want tomcat falling off that list? Speaking of which, none of my projects seemed to understand the fields required for presentation of http://projects.apache.org/indexes/releases.html (or that page is just broken :). Will research, if I learn anything I'm happy to update tomcat's doap as well. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: markt Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008 New Revision: 680102 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102view=rev Log: Fix RDF as per report on users list This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide information that is two years out of date. For starters, try the attached. I've committed something similar. Note 6.0.18 isn't released yet. Is part of the flaw that it's not in the xdocs origin tree? Maybe leaving this in plain site for authoring would make it easier to keep it in sync. Possibly but I suspect it is more than to with the fact the none of the committers use/care about the information. We'll see if it gets kept up to date now. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
