Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

Thanks for the feedback though and for the time spent on testing.
It's definitely useful feedback for next release
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:06 PM Alex The Rocker  wrote:

> Okay I understand that 8.0.7 is not usable because of the issue with
> JAX RS, and that this is a "ghost" release to make 9.0.0 available in
> time for Jakarta Certification.
>
> Here's my +1 (non-binding)
>
> Alex
>
> Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 19:58, Jean-Louis Monteiro
>  a écrit :
> >
> > agreed!
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 7:56 PM Cesar Hernandez 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > > We can add a Note in the download section for TomEE 8.0.7 and in
> parallel
> > > working on the fixes to then release  8.0.8. We have been doing this
> for 9
> > > milestones.
> > > Up to this point we have been seen and living the benefits of the
> patch and
> > > transformer plugging, this time I think we can add the note for 8.0.7
> so
> > > when 8.0.8 is release we are back on track.
> > >
> > > El lun, 3 may 2021 a las 11:31, Zowalla, Richard (<
> > > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > I guess, that the links got mixed up.
> > > >
> > > > The 8.0.7 binaries are in the 1182 repo:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/
> > > >
> > > > Gruss
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > > Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 19:24 +0200 schrieb Alex The Rocker:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't found 8.0.7 binaries (only binaries at 9.0.0M7 link), is
> > > > > that intentional ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 17:01, David Blevins 
> a
> > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > Ok, folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the
> > > > > > Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll
> a
> > > > > > Apache TomEE 8.0.8 and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we
> > > > > > should plan on doing that anyway, so feel free to say call it
> > > > > > straight out when reporting "I found x issue we should fix in
> > > > > > 8.0.8"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.
> When
> > > > > > voting -1, please state the reason.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > David Blevins
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
> > > > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics
> > > >
> > > > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
> > > > Max-Planck-Str. 39
> > > > D-74081 Heilbronn
> > > > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
> > > > mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de
> > > > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Atentamente:
> > > César Hernández.
> > >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Alex The Rocker]

Sure, no reason to publicly release 8.0.7 binaries if they are too
much in regression vs. 8.0.6.

Regarding skipping TomEE versions like Tomcat site does, here's my two
cents: whatever works well for Tomcat for so many years should be
imitated!

Alex

Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 22:31, David Blevins  a écrit :
>
> Launching off a discuss thread so we can track issues and discuss without 
> filling up the vote thread.
>
> Sounds like there are regressions on the 8.0.7.  What I'd recommend is we 
> just don't put 8.0.7 on the mirror system or website.  We leave the mirrors 
> and website with 8.0.6 until there are better 8.0.x binaries available and 
> just put up the 9.x binaries.
>
> Tomcat does this fairly often if there's a bad build of one of the branches.  
> If you look here there are 36 releases of 9.x, but the highest version number 
> is 9.0.45, so a decent percentage were never published:
>
>  - http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-9/
>
> I think that's probably one of the reasons they can crank out so many 
> releases so consistently despite maintaining 3 branches.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> -David
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[David Blevins]

> On May 3, 2021, at 1:34 PM, David Jencks  wrote:
> 
> This seems like a good idea, but the current vote is for 3 sets of artifacts 
> and if it passes would we be obligated to release all to the mirror system?  
> Is it too late to have independent votes for the 3 sets?

Then we can simply leave it off the website and make sure to keep 8.0.6 on the 
mirror system.

We wouldn't be able separate them 9.0.0-M7 uses all the 8.0.7 binaries and is 
created via bytecode transformation.  If we were in a situation where 8 was 
good and 9 was bad, we could separate them and just abandon the 9 binaries.  
Just not the reverse as the 8.x binaries are 95% of what goes into 9.


-David



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[David Jencks]

This seems like a good idea, but the current vote is for 3 sets of artifacts 
and if it passes would we be obligated to release all to the mirror system?  Is 
it too late to have independent votes for the 3 sets?

David Jencks

> On May 3, 2021, at 1:30 PM, David Blevins  wrote:
> 
> Launching off a discuss thread so we can track issues and discuss without 
> filling up the vote thread.
> 
> Sounds like there are regressions on the 8.0.7.  What I'd recommend is we 
> just don't put 8.0.7 on the mirror system or website.  We leave the mirrors 
> and website with 8.0.6 until there are better 8.0.x binaries available and 
> just put up the 9.x binaries.
> 
> Tomcat does this fairly often if there's a bad build of one of the branches.  
> If you look here there are 36 releases of 9.x, but the highest version number 
> is 9.0.45, so a decent percentage were never published:
> 
> - http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-9/
> 
> I think that's probably one of the reasons they can crank out so many 
> releases so consistently despite maintaining 3 branches.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> -David
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Alex The Rocker]

Okay I understand that 8.0.7 is not usable because of the issue with
JAX RS, and that this is a "ghost" release to make 9.0.0 available in
time for Jakarta Certification.

Here's my +1 (non-binding)

Alex

Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 19:58, Jean-Louis Monteiro
 a écrit :
>
> agreed!
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 7:56 PM Cesar Hernandez  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> > We can add a Note in the download section for TomEE 8.0.7 and in parallel
> > working on the fixes to then release  8.0.8. We have been doing this for 9
> > milestones.
> > Up to this point we have been seen and living the benefits of the patch and
> > transformer plugging, this time I think we can add the note for 8.0.7 so
> > when 8.0.8 is release we are back on track.
> >
> > El lun, 3 may 2021 a las 11:31, Zowalla, Richard (<
> > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > I guess, that the links got mixed up.
> > >
> > > The 8.0.7 binaries are in the 1182 repo:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/
> > >
> > > Gruss
> > > Richard
> > >
> > > Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 19:24 +0200 schrieb Alex The Rocker:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I haven't found 8.0.7 binaries (only binaries at 9.0.0M7 link), is
> > > > that intentional ?
> > > >
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 17:01, David Blevins  a
> > > > écrit :
> > > > > Ok, folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the
> > > > > Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a
> > > > > Apache TomEE 8.0.8 and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we
> > > > > should plan on doing that anyway, so feel free to say call it
> > > > > straight out when reporting "I found x issue we should fix in
> > > > > 8.0.8"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When
> > > > > voting -1, please state the reason.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > David Blevins
> > > > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > >
> > > --
> > > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
> > > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics
> > >
> > > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
> > > Max-Planck-Str. 39
> > > D-74081 Heilbronn
> > > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
> > > mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de
> > > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Atentamente:
> > César Hernández.
> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

agreed!
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 7:56 PM Cesar Hernandez  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
> We can add a Note in the download section for TomEE 8.0.7 and in parallel
> working on the fixes to then release  8.0.8. We have been doing this for 9
> milestones.
> Up to this point we have been seen and living the benefits of the patch and
> transformer plugging, this time I think we can add the note for 8.0.7 so
> when 8.0.8 is release we are back on track.
>
> El lun, 3 may 2021 a las 11:31, Zowalla, Richard (<
> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I guess, that the links got mixed up.
> >
> > The 8.0.7 binaries are in the 1182 repo:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/
> >
> > Gruss
> > Richard
> >
> > Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 19:24 +0200 schrieb Alex The Rocker:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I haven't found 8.0.7 binaries (only binaries at 9.0.0M7 link), is
> > > that intentional ?
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 17:01, David Blevins  a
> > > écrit :
> > > > Ok, folks,
> > > >
> > > > Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the
> > > > Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a
> > > > Apache TomEE 8.0.8 and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we
> > > > should plan on doing that anyway, so feel free to say call it
> > > > straight out when reporting "I found x issue we should fix in
> > > > 8.0.8"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
> > > >
> > > > Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
> > > >
> > > > Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
> > > >
> > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When
> > > > voting -1, please state the reason.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > David Blevins
> > > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >
> > --
> > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
> > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics
> >
> > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
> > Max-Planck-Str. 39
> > D-74081 Heilbronn
> > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
> > mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de
> > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
> >
>
>
> --
> Atentamente:
> César Hernández.
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Cesar Hernandez]

+1 (binding)
We can add a Note in the download section for TomEE 8.0.7 and in parallel
working on the fixes to then release  8.0.8. We have been doing this for 9
milestones.
Up to this point we have been seen and living the benefits of the patch and
transformer plugging, this time I think we can add the note for 8.0.7 so
when 8.0.8 is release we are back on track.

El lun, 3 may 2021 a las 11:31, Zowalla, Richard (<
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió:

> Hi Alex,
>
> I guess, that the links got mixed up.
>
> The 8.0.7 binaries are in the 1182 repo:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/
>
> Gruss
> Richard
>
> Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 19:24 +0200 schrieb Alex The Rocker:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I haven't found 8.0.7 binaries (only binaries at 9.0.0M7 link), is
> > that intentional ?
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 17:01, David Blevins  a
> > écrit :
> > > Ok, folks,
> > >
> > > Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the
> > > Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a
> > > Apache TomEE 8.0.8 and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we
> > > should plan on doing that anyway, so feel free to say call it
> > > straight out when reporting "I found x issue we should fix in
> > > 8.0.8"
> > >
> > >
> > > TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
> > >
> > > Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
> > >
> > > Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When
> > > voting -1, please state the reason.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > David Blevins
> > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> --
> Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
> Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics
>
> Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
> Max-Planck-Str. 39
> D-74081 Heilbronn
> phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
> mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de
> web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
>


-- 
Atentamente:
César Hernández.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Zowalla, Richard]

Hi Alex,

I guess, that the links got mixed up.

The 8.0.7 binaries are in the 1182 repo:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/

Gruss
Richard

Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 19:24 +0200 schrieb Alex The Rocker:
> Hello,
> 
> I haven't found 8.0.7 binaries (only binaries at 9.0.0M7 link), is
> that intentional ?
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 17:01, David Blevins  a
> écrit :
> > Ok, folks,
> > 
> > Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the
> > Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a
> > Apache TomEE 8.0.8 and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we
> > should plan on doing that anyway, so feel free to say call it
> > straight out when reporting "I found x issue we should fix in
> > 8.0.8"
> > 
> > 
> > TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
> > 
> > Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
> > 
> > Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
> > 
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When
> > voting -1, please state the reason.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > David Blevins
> > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > 
-- 
Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics

Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
Max-Planck-Str. 39 
D-74081 Heilbronn 
phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de
web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

We have some backward compatibility issues in the JAXRS landscape because
of the TCK work we have done.
We know we also have some additional work to do in terms of packaging. And
other things.

The goal for this release is mainly a milestone for being referenced as a
compatible implementation for Jakarta EE 9.1 Web Profile.
This is still a milestone for TomEE 9.x

For TomEE 8.0.7 this is a maintenance and a feature release. Unfortunately
and fortunately, we share the same code base, so to reach our main goal, we
introduced some backward compatibility issues.

That being said, there is nothing that prevents us from starting to fix it
from today on and do another release next week.
In terms of balance, I see clearly a big win for the community to be a
compatible implementation. We are clearly standing by big players which I'm
proud of.

So with respect to the tremendous amount of time, work and energy
the community spent to implement missing pieces, and pass the TCK.

Here is my +1.

Thanks everyone for the work, tests, moral support.
Thanks David for the hours and fights you put on this release.

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 6:21 PM Wiesner, Martin <
martin.wies...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> after quick review and discussion with Richard Z, we found JAX-RS is _not_
> working out of the box for 8.0.7.
> Reasons: see Richard’s comment below.
>
> For the aforementioned reason, but with strategic goals in mind, my
> (non-binding) vote is:
> -0
>
> Best
> Martin
> —
> https://twitter.com/mawiesne
>
>
> Am 03.05.2021 um 18:13 schrieb Zowalla, Richard <
> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
>
> Seems, that "application/json" support via JAX-RS is broken for 8.0.7
> [1]. We should fix this in 8.0.8 asap otherwise 8.0.7 is unusable for
> us.
>
> Basically, it is the same issue our unit tests experience in "openejb-
> cxf-rs" [2].
>
> For the sake of getting certified _and_ meeting the deadline, I am
> going to vote +0
>
> Gruss
> Richard
>
>
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/rzo1/a9ca1f5e7765fe4986ad86c44bc93813
> [2]
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-quick/118/org.apache.tomee$openejb-cxf-rs/
>
> Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 12:30 -0300 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos:
> Hello +1
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021, 12:01 David Blevins 
> wrote:
>
> Ok, folks,
>
> Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the
> Jakarta EE
> 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a Apache
> TomEE 8.0.8
> and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we should plan on doing
> that
> anyway, so feel free to say call it straight out when reporting "I
> found x
> issue we should fix in 8.0.8"
>
>
> TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
>
> Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
>
> Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When
> voting
> -1, please state the reason.
>
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Alex The Rocker]

Hello,

I haven't found 8.0.7 binaries (only binaries at 9.0.0M7 link), is
that intentional ?

Alex

Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 17:01, David Blevins  a écrit :
>
> Ok, folks,
>
> Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the Jakarta EE 
> 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a Apache TomEE 8.0.8 
> and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we should plan on doing that anyway, 
> so feel free to say call it straight out when reporting "I found x issue we 
> should fix in 8.0.8"
>
>
> TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
>
> Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
>
> Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When voting -1, 
> please state the reason.
>
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Wiesner, Martin]

Hi all,

after quick review and discussion with Richard Z, we found JAX-RS is _not_ 
working out of the box for 8.0.7.
Reasons: see Richard’s comment below.

For the aforementioned reason, but with strategic goals in mind, my 
(non-binding) vote is:
-0

Best
Martin
—
https://twitter.com/mawiesne


Am 03.05.2021 um 18:13 schrieb Zowalla, Richard 
mailto:richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>>:

Seems, that "application/json" support via JAX-RS is broken for 8.0.7
[1]. We should fix this in 8.0.8 asap otherwise 8.0.7 is unusable for
us.

Basically, it is the same issue our unit tests experience in "openejb-
cxf-rs" [2].

For the sake of getting certified _and_ meeting the deadline, I am
going to vote +0

Gruss
Richard



[1] https://gist.github.com/rzo1/a9ca1f5e7765fe4986ad86c44bc93813
[2]
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-quick/118/org.apache.tomee$openejb-cxf-rs/

Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 12:30 -0300 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos:
Hello +1

Thanks

On Mon, May 3, 2021, 12:01 David Blevins 
wrote:

Ok, folks,

Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the
Jakarta EE
9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a Apache
TomEE 8.0.8
and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we should plan on doing
that
anyway, so feel free to say call it straight out when reporting "I
found x
issue we should fix in 8.0.8"


TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/

Apache TomEE 8.0.7
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/

Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/

This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When
voting
-1, please state the reason.



--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[David Jencks]

Congratulations!

It looks like 1182 is TomEE 8.0.7 and 1183 is the patch plugin.

There are some confusingly labeled artifacts such as 
apache-tomee-8.0.7-sources.jar 

 which doesn’t have any sources in it.

The sources seem to be in tomee-project-9.0.0-M7-source-release.zip 
,
 tomee-project-8.0.7-source-release.zip 
,
 and tomee-patch-core-0.5-sources.jar 
.

+1

David Jencks



> On May 3, 2021, at 8:01 AM, David Blevins  wrote:
> 
> Ok, folks,
> 
> Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the Jakarta EE 
> 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a Apache TomEE 8.0.8 
> and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we should plan on doing that anyway, 
> so feel free to say call it straight out when reporting "I found x issue we 
> should fix in 8.0.8"
> 
> 
> TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
> 
> Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
> 
> Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
> 
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When voting -1, 
> please state the reason.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Zowalla, Richard]

Seems, that "application/json" support via JAX-RS is broken for 8.0.7
[1]. We should fix this in 8.0.8 asap otherwise 8.0.7 is unusable for
us. 

Basically, it is the same issue our unit tests experience in "openejb-
cxf-rs" [2].

For the sake of getting certified _and_ meeting the deadline, I am
going to vote +0 

Gruss
Richard



[1] https://gist.github.com/rzo1/a9ca1f5e7765fe4986ad86c44bc93813
[2] 
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-quick/118/org.apache.tomee$openejb-cxf-rs/

Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 12:30 -0300 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos:
> Hello +1
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Mon, May 3, 2021, 12:01 David Blevins 
> wrote:
> 
> > Ok, folks,
> > 
> > Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the
> > Jakarta EE
> > 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a Apache
> > TomEE 8.0.8
> > and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we should plan on doing
> > that
> > anyway, so feel free to say call it straight out when reporting "I
> > found x
> > issue we should fix in 8.0.8"
> > 
> > 
> > TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
> > 
> > Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
> > 
> > Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
> > 
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When
> > voting
> > -1, please state the reason.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > David Blevins
> > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > 
> > 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Daniel Dias Dos Santos]

Hello +1

Thanks

On Mon, May 3, 2021, 12:01 David Blevins  wrote:

> Ok, folks,
>
> Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the Jakarta EE
> 9.1 release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a Apache TomEE 8.0.8
> and Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we should plan on doing that
> anyway, so feel free to say call it straight out when reporting "I found x
> issue we should fix in 8.0.8"
>
>
> TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/
>
> Apache TomEE 8.0.7
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/
>
> Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When voting
> -1, please state the reason.
>
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>

[VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[David Blevins]

Ok, folks,

Here we go.  Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the Jakarta EE 9.1 
release ballot today.  Any issues and we can roll a Apache TomEE 8.0.8 and 
Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8 asap.  I think we should plan on doing that anyway, so 
feel free to say call it straight out when reporting "I found x issue we should 
fix in 8.0.8"


TomEE Patch Plugin v0.5
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1182/

Apache TomEE 8.0.7
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1183/

Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/

This vote will be open for 72 hours.  Please vote +1, 0, -1.  When voting -1, 
please state the reason.



-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Mark Struberg]

 +1
LieGrue,strub

On Monday, 3 May 2021, 11:30:50 CEST, Alex The Rocker 
 wrote:  
 
 +1 (non-binding) for this 8.0.7 release, I'll test it as soon as link
to binaries is available !

Alex

Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 10:24, David Blevins  a écrit :
>
> Dear Community.
>
> The time has come :)
  

Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Alex The Rocker]

+1 (non-binding) for this 8.0.7 release, I'll test it as soon as link
to binaries is available !

Alex

Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 10:24, David Blevins  a écrit :
>
> Dear Community.
>
> The time has come :)

Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[David Blevins]

Dear Community.

The time has come :)

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Wiesner, Martin]

Hello all, hello (tired) David

I'm in favor of rolling a release (vote). Here's my „+1“.

Thx in advance to all contributors who made this great progress possible!

Best
Martin
—
https://twitter.com/mawiesne


Am 01.05.2021 um 17:01 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos 
mailto:daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com>>:

Hello David,

I am in favor of releasing the vote, here's my +1


Em sex., 30 de abr. de 2021 às 22:32, David Blevins 
mailto:david.blev...@gmail.com>>
escreveu:

Heads up that we are narrowing in in the last few TCK issues and there is
still some chance we can be Jakarta EE 9.1 Web Profile certified in time
for the Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote Monday.

It would be super super and I mean *super* tight

However, if we can get it done we'll need to do a release vote by no later
than Sunday afternoon and file our certification request.  We don't need to
have concluded our vote to make the Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot, we just
need final binaries of our own to be at least in staging and in the process
of our own vote.

We do need that vote pass, however, so that would require some pragmatism
on all our parts.

For that reason I recommend we do not try to push out a 9.0.0 final, but
go ahead with 9.0.0-M7. If there are some issues with the binaries we put
up for vote, unless they are legal issues, we can still release them and
immediately fix the issues next week in a subsequent 8.0.8 and 9.0.0-M8.
There's no reason to "wait", we can simply release twice.  Version numbers
are free.

The Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote lasts for two weeks and an announcement
would happen some days after that.  Ff we did want to push out a 9.0.0 for
the announcement, we'd have at least till May 17th to do that, perhaps even
the 20th.

The reason we want to get certified in time for the ballot is recently
there was a change that implementations listed on the ballot get a special
place at the top of the specification page.  Any implementations that come
even one day later cannot be included and will not be accepted or given
special designation.  This lasts forever and is a permanent advantage to
those in the list.  It's also a permanent *disadvantage* to those not on
the list.  It's eat or be eaten.

So that's what we're going for:  A staged binary up for a vote here,
passing the TCK, in time to be listed on the Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot
Monday.


-David

[GitHub] [tomee-site-generator] cesarhernandezgt merged pull request #24: added Debugging tck result for 9.0.0-M7

[GitBox]

cesarhernandezgt merged pull request #24:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/24


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [tomee-site-generator] cesarhernandezgt merged pull request #22: TOMEE-3733 Jakarta EE TCK summary page

[GitBox]

cesarhernandezgt merged pull request #22:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/22


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

[Zowalla, Richard]

Hi Alexandre,

in 8.0.7, Tomcat is @ version 9.0.45 atm (TOMEE-2998).
We also updated the related web.xml files for mime type mapping (TOMEE-
3718).

Gruss
Richard


Am Sonntag, den 02.05.2021, 19:22 +0200 schrieb Alex The Rocker:
> Hi David,
> 
> Thanks for your answer, this is perfectly clear.
> 
> Will this upcoming TomEE 8.0.7 release include latest Tomcat / CXF
> dependencies that fixes CVEs that showed up since 8.0.6 release ?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Alexandre
> 
> Le dim. 2 mai 2021 à 19:09, David Blevins  a
> écrit :
> > > On May 2, 2021, at 9:39 AM, Alex The Rocker  > > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > I am a bit confused : I thought that renaming of javax.* into
> > > jakarta.* packages for the EE API is only targeted for TomEE 9.x.
> > 
> > All the source code is in TomEE 8.0 and TomEE 9.0.x is just created
> > through bytecode transformation.  The long and short of that is
> > they pass/fail almost the exact same tests as it's the same code.
> > We can do library upgrades in the `tomee-jakarta` repo and add a
> > patch file for third-party dependencies here and there, but any
> > fixes on the TomEE side go into 8 and are automatically picked up
> > in via bytecode transformation of 9 as well.
> > 
> > In fact, I've been doing most my local work exclusively running the
> > Jakarta EE 8 TCK and just letting the automated systems do the
> > running of the EE 9 TCK.
> > 
> > > In such case, what would be the content of a TomEE 8.0.7 release?
> > 
> > Everything in this list is fixed, except about 10 tests which are
> > not part of the Web Profile and therefore not required for
> > certification and will be fixed later.  Though it says "EE 9" these
> > failed for both 8 and 9 TCKs:
> > 
> >  - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3140
> > 
> > We're still one TCK test shy of passing and have some work to do on
> > the API jars to pass the signature tests, but it's looking good.
> > 
> > Brief pause for me to take a nap, however, as I've been up for 24
> > hours and keep nodding off at the keyboard :)
> > 
> > 
> > -David
> > 
> > 
> > > In any cases, I'd be happy to see a TomEE 8.0.7 release soon, in
> > > order
> > > to get latest CVE fixes since 8.0.6.
> > > 
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Alexandre
> > > 
> > > Le sam. 1 mai 2021 à 03:32, David Blevins <
> > > david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > > Heads up that we are narrowing in in the last few TCK issues
> > > > and there is still some chance we can be Jakarta EE 9.1 Web
> > > > Profile certified in time for the Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote
> > > > Monday.
> > > > 
> > > > It would be super super and I mean *super* tight
> > > > 
> > > > However, if we can get it done we'll need to do a release vote
> > > > by no later than Sunday afternoon and file our certification
> > > > request.  We don't need to have concluded our vote to make the
> > > > Jakarta EE 9.1 release ballot, we just need final binaries of
> > > > our own to be at least in staging and in the process of our own
> > > > vote.
> > > > 
> > > > We do need that vote pass, however, so that would require some
> > > > pragmatism on all our parts.
> > > > 
> > > > For that reason I recommend we do not try to push out a 9.0.0
> > > > final, but go ahead with 9.0.0-M7. If there are some issues
> > > > with the binaries we put up for vote, unless they are legal
> > > > issues, we can still release them and immediately fix the
> > > > issues next week in a subsequent 8.0.8 and 9.0.0-M8.  There's
> > > > no reason to "wait", we can simply release twice.  Version
> > > > numbers are free.
> > > > 
> > > > The Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote lasts for two weeks and an
> > > > announcement would happen some days after that.  Ff we did want
> > > > to push out a 9.0.0 for the announcement, we'd have at least
> > > > till May 17th to do that, perhaps even the 20th.
> > > > 
> > > > The reason we want to get certified in time for the ballot is
> > > > recently there was a change that implementations listed on the
> > > > ballot get a special place at the top of the specification
> > > > page.  Any implementations that come even one day later cannot
> > > > be included and will not be accepted or given special
> > > > designation.  This lasts forever and is a permanent advantage
> > > > to those in the list.  It's also a permanent *disadvantage* to
> > > > those not on the list.  It's eat or be eaten.
> > > > 
> > > > So that's what we're going for:  A staged binary up for a vote
> > > > here, passing the TCK, in time to be listed on the Jakarta EE
> > > > 9.1 release ballot Monday.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -David
> > > > 
-- 
Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics

Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
Max-Planck-Str. 39 
D-74081 Heilbronn 
phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de
web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature