Re: [Discuss] TomEE 9 Release Candidate?
+1 Thanks for the RC release ! On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 10:43, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > I'll see if I can prepare something for this afternoon. > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:36 AM Alex The Rocker > wrote: > > > +1 provided Jean-Louis's proposal for including javaee automatic > > converter from webapp-javaee/ directory is part of it :) > > > > Thanks, > > Alexandre > > > > Le ven. 28 oct. 2022 à 10:19, Zowalla, Richard > > a écrit : > > > > > > Hi JL, > > > > > > +1 - let's roll out an M9 / RC1. > > > > > > Feedback from the community is super valuable at this stage. > > > > > > Gruß > > > Richard > > > > > > Am Freitag, dem 28.10.2022 um 10:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > It's been a hard and long journey, but we are there. > > > > > > > > We implemented the last MicroProfile specification and we now pass > > > > the full > > > > suite for MicroProfile 5.0. > > > > > > > > We have successfully moved the TomEE server from javax to jakarta to > > > > support Jakarta EE 9.1. So far, we are 12 tests down from that goal. > > > > But > > > > the build is fully fixed and stable now. > > > > > > > > I'm wondering before we claim it final, can we do a release > > > > candidate. It > > > > gives us the ability to collect some user feedback. We can also start > > > > filling MicroProfile compatibility requirements so we can be listed > > > > as a > > > > compatible implementation. > > > > > > > > My view is that we could create the final before Christmas as a gift > > > > and > > > > move straight to TomEE 10 for Jakarta EE 10. The jump from an end > > > > user > > > > point of view will be small, and maybe even invisible. Most of the > > > > work > > > > will be on the TCK setup to rethink and redo. The rest is small in > > > > terms of > > > > implementation. We should also be able to not only be Web Profile > > > > certified, but maybe full platform compatible. > > > > > > > > We could also move to MicroProfile 6.0 as now the gap is small. But > > > > I'll > > > > probably write another email for this. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > >
Re: [Discuss] TomEE 9 Release Candidate?
I'll see if I can prepare something for this afternoon. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:36 AM Alex The Rocker wrote: > +1 provided Jean-Louis's proposal for including javaee automatic > converter from webapp-javaee/ directory is part of it :) > > Thanks, > Alexandre > > Le ven. 28 oct. 2022 à 10:19, Zowalla, Richard > a écrit : > > > > Hi JL, > > > > +1 - let's roll out an M9 / RC1. > > > > Feedback from the community is super valuable at this stage. > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > Am Freitag, dem 28.10.2022 um 10:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > It's been a hard and long journey, but we are there. > > > > > > We implemented the last MicroProfile specification and we now pass > > > the full > > > suite for MicroProfile 5.0. > > > > > > We have successfully moved the TomEE server from javax to jakarta to > > > support Jakarta EE 9.1. So far, we are 12 tests down from that goal. > > > But > > > the build is fully fixed and stable now. > > > > > > I'm wondering before we claim it final, can we do a release > > > candidate. It > > > gives us the ability to collect some user feedback. We can also start > > > filling MicroProfile compatibility requirements so we can be listed > > > as a > > > compatible implementation. > > > > > > My view is that we could create the final before Christmas as a gift > > > and > > > move straight to TomEE 10 for Jakarta EE 10. The jump from an end > > > user > > > point of view will be small, and maybe even invisible. Most of the > > > work > > > will be on the TCK setup to rethink and redo. The rest is small in > > > terms of > > > implementation. We should also be able to not only be Web Profile > > > certified, but maybe full platform compatible. > > > > > > We could also move to MicroProfile 6.0 as now the gap is small. But > > > I'll > > > probably write another email for this. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > http://www.tomitribe.com >
Re: [Discuss] TomEE 9 Release Candidate?
+1 provided Jean-Louis's proposal for including javaee automatic converter from webapp-javaee/ directory is part of it :) Thanks, Alexandre Le ven. 28 oct. 2022 à 10:19, Zowalla, Richard a écrit : > > Hi JL, > > +1 - let's roll out an M9 / RC1. > > Feedback from the community is super valuable at this stage. > > Gruß > Richard > > Am Freitag, dem 28.10.2022 um 10:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > > Hi all, > > > > It's been a hard and long journey, but we are there. > > > > We implemented the last MicroProfile specification and we now pass > > the full > > suite for MicroProfile 5.0. > > > > We have successfully moved the TomEE server from javax to jakarta to > > support Jakarta EE 9.1. So far, we are 12 tests down from that goal. > > But > > the build is fully fixed and stable now. > > > > I'm wondering before we claim it final, can we do a release > > candidate. It > > gives us the ability to collect some user feedback. We can also start > > filling MicroProfile compatibility requirements so we can be listed > > as a > > compatible implementation. > > > > My view is that we could create the final before Christmas as a gift > > and > > move straight to TomEE 10 for Jakarta EE 10. The jump from an end > > user > > point of view will be small, and maybe even invisible. Most of the > > work > > will be on the TCK setup to rethink and redo. The rest is small in > > terms of > > implementation. We should also be able to not only be Web Profile > > certified, but maybe full platform compatible. > > > > We could also move to MicroProfile 6.0 as now the gap is small. But > > I'll > > probably write another email for this. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com
Re: [Discuss] TomEE 9 Release Candidate?
Hi JL, +1 - let's roll out an M9 / RC1. Feedback from the community is super valuable at this stage. Gruß Richard Am Freitag, dem 28.10.2022 um 10:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > Hi all, > > It's been a hard and long journey, but we are there. > > We implemented the last MicroProfile specification and we now pass > the full > suite for MicroProfile 5.0. > > We have successfully moved the TomEE server from javax to jakarta to > support Jakarta EE 9.1. So far, we are 12 tests down from that goal. > But > the build is fully fixed and stable now. > > I'm wondering before we claim it final, can we do a release > candidate. It > gives us the ability to collect some user feedback. We can also start > filling MicroProfile compatibility requirements so we can be listed > as a > compatible implementation. > > My view is that we could create the final before Christmas as a gift > and > move straight to TomEE 10 for Jakarta EE 10. The jump from an end > user > point of view will be small, and maybe even invisible. Most of the > work > will be on the TCK setup to rethink and redo. The rest is small in > terms of > implementation. We should also be able to not only be Web Profile > certified, but maybe full platform compatible. > > We could also move to MicroProfile 6.0 as now the gap is small. But > I'll > probably write another email for this. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
