Re: [tools-dev] requirements for a Windows build bot and cws box
Pavel Janík wrote, On 01/08/10 15:00: Hi, 900 € per year sounds reasonable compared to the price for - buying an equivalent machine - rooming - power - bandwith - hardware repairs / upgrades now I understand. The price of 69EUR is not for a hosting only, but for hosting and rent of the hardware Well, at least that was my impression by reading the wiki page. Otherwise it would have stated the HW costs, and not only the licensing costs. Martin might correct me in case my interpretation was wrong. Malte. . Hmm, then big +1 for the proposal. In our country we strongly separate hosting of own server in the computing center and renting already hosted server owned by the hosting company (either physical or virtual). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tools.openoffice.org
Re: [tools-dev] Requirement for DEV300 build-Win32
I vote for 3 - make sure OOo can be build with VS2008 Express, which includes getting rid of atl, which should be possible with a little bit of effort. This would help a lot of people who want to do OOo / Open Source development on Windows, but don't need a costly version of the compiler for other reasons. Malte. Takashi Ono wrote, On 10.04.08 00:23: Hi, Is it decided to depreciate .NET 2003 for building DEV300-Win32? DEV300 includes Windows Vista features and cannot be built with old psdk while recent Windows PDSK has problems with .NET 2003. I am using .NET 2003 professional. I think I have four options. 1. Buy and switch to .NET 2008 professional. 2. Switch to .NET 2008 express and give up atl related modules. 3. Switch to .NET 2008 express and copy atl stuff from .NET 2003 professional. 4. Copy sal.h from .NET 2008 express to Windows SDK and apply a few patches to ooo source. I am doing 4. and raised a couple of issues for the patches but it does not make sense if .NET 2003 is decided to be depreciated. I am doing MSVC build to eliminate side-effect of MingW port only and I do not want to buy .NET 2008 for the time being. Takashi Ono ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tools-dev] reworked dependency generation - #i81650#
No answer on this? Malte. Stephan Bergmann wrote, On 01/18/08 16:38: Hans-Joachim Lankenau wrote: hi! with the integration of CWS ause085 into SRC680_m243 the reworked dependency generation for c/c++ files will hit the main codeline. if you build with nodep=true or don't do incremental builds at all, you may stop reading here... the most visible change will be that dependencies are only generated for files now that actually have been touched. Does this lead to any new gotchas, like changing a makefile.mk in a way that causes the compiler to be called with different (-D) switches and changing one more (header) file might cause some files to not be recompiled, in error? -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
