Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
- Original Message - On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao ming@gmail.com wrote: well, does that affect the ARM platform? ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and ARMv7 is 32-bit, but ARMv8 is 64-bit. If someone is running ATS on ARMv6 or ARMv7...they can always stay on an old release. -- justin Exactly. The RM for v4.2.x even offered extending LTS for this release if there’s real demand for it. +1 on abandoning 32-bit support (R.I.P.) +1 under the condition that 4.2.x stays supported for older platforms. -- i Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 8716 7A9F 989B ABD5 100F 4008 F266 55D6 2998 1641
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
This seems like a logical move for a 5.0 release, +1 from me. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle je...@lethargy.orgwrote: Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward. I'm unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit systems. I propose removing 32bit support in Apache Traffic Server in the 5 release and forward. -- Theo Schlossnagle http://lethargy.org/~jesus/
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
On 4/11/2014 9:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote: Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit systems. Rasberry Pi ?
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
well, does that affect the ARM platform? - Yongming Zhao 赵永明 在 2014年4月11日，下午11:51，Theo Schlossnagle je...@lethargy.org 写道： Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit systems. I propose removing 32bit support in Apache Traffic Server in the 5 release and forward. -- Theo Schlossnagle http://lethargy.org/~jesus/ signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle je...@lethargy.org wrote: Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit systems. I propose removing 32bit support in Apache Traffic Server in the 5 release and forward. Specifically, what would we remove? Should we also review the set of supported OS versions? J
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
- Original Message - On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle je...@lethargy.org wrote: Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit systems. I propose removing 32bit support in Apache Traffic Server in the 5 release and forward. Specifically, what would we remove? Should we also review the set of supported OS versions? This makes me wonder: If we remove 32bit support, will any distro out there go out of their way to patch it back in, badly? J -- i Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 8716 7A9F 989B ABD5 100F 4008 F266 55D6 2998 1641
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao ming@gmail.com wrote: well, does that affect the ARM platform? ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and ARMv7 is 32-bit, but ARMv8 is 64-bit. If someone is running ATS on ARMv6 or ARMv7...they can always stay on an old release. -- justin
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
+1 - I don't know of anyone running ATS on 32-bit and I would highly recommend not running it on 32-bit. -Bryan On Apr 11, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle je...@lethargy.org wrote: Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit systems. I propose removing 32bit support in Apache Traffic Server in the 5 release and forward. -- Theo Schlossnagle http://lethargy.org/~jesus/
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao ming@gmail.com wrote: well, does that affect the ARM platform? ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and ARMv7 is 32-bit, but ARMv8 is 64-bit. If someone is running ATS on ARMv6 or ARMv7...they can always stay on an old release. -- justin Exactly. The RM for v4.2.x even offered extending LTS for this release if there’s real demand for it. +1 on abandoning 32-bit support (R.I.P.) — Leif
Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.
+1 Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit systems. I propose removing 32bit support in Apache Traffic Server in the 5 release and forward. -- Theo Schlossnagle http://lethargy.org/~jesus/
