RE: discuss namespace in java code

2016-08-24 Thread Sean Broeder
My opinion is that the names themselves are not all that significant, unless
apache has a naming requirement.  What seems more significant, to me anyway,
is that the names are different from other components so that tracing has
some granularity when deciding what components should have tracing turned
on.

Dave's point about being able to use the DTM on other platforms might have
been very relevant a few years ago, prior to adopting the coprocessor model.
But now that the coprocessor model has been adopted it would be more
difficult to move to other platforms.  Still, the idea that we might revert
away from the coprocessor model is not that far-fetched for other reasons,
so perhaps we should at least consider it moving forward.

Regards,
Sean

-Original Message-
From: Narendra Goyal [mailto:narendra.go...@esgyn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:39 AM
To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: discuss namespace in java code

I think the package prefix 'org.trafodion' was picked before we moved to
being in Apache incubation.

I don’t know whether being an Apache project requires the package name be
altered - one might 'want' to do it but perhaps not required.

My vote would be to keep the package name org.trafodion for now. Perhaps
think about changing it as per Aven's suggestion once we are a TLP :)

Thanks,
-Narendra

-Original Message-
From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:24 AM
To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: discuss namespace in java code

Hi,

The DTM developers might want to speak up.

My understanding was that there was a desire to design the DTM in such a way
that it could be a stand-alone project. That is, it should be possible to
use the DTM with other SQL engines or frameworks. If we still want to keep
that possibility open, then separate name spaces are appropriate.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Ma, Sheng-Chen (Aven) [mailto:shengchen...@esgyn.cn]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 2:46 AM
To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
Subject: discuss namespace in java code

Hi all:
I noticed that our trafodion namespace is org.trafodion.sql or
org.trafodion.dtm.
Since trafodion been one of apache project ,in my view is we should use
org.apache.trafodion.xxx, but there is a huge change, so I send this email
to discuss this. If it's ok to change, I will do this job.

Thanks
Aven


RE: discuss namespace in java code

2016-08-24 Thread Dave Birdsall
Hi,

The DTM developers might want to speak up.

My understanding was that there was a desire to design the DTM in such a
way that it could be a stand-alone project. That is, it should be possible
to use the DTM with other SQL engines or frameworks. If we still want to
keep that possibility open, then separate name spaces are appropriate.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Ma, Sheng-Chen (Aven) [mailto:shengchen...@esgyn.cn]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 2:46 AM
To: dev@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
Subject: discuss namespace in java code

Hi all:
I noticed that our trafodion namespace is org.trafodion.sql or
org.trafodion.dtm.
Since trafodion been one of apache project ,in my view is we should use
org.apache.trafodion.xxx, but there is a huge change, so I send this email
to discuss this. If it's ok to change, I will do this job.

Thanks
Aven