[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3882) Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x

2012-01-03 Thread Simon Laws (Updated) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3882:


Attachment: edited-list-2.txt

Here's a list based on the revisions made to 1.x after the 2.x branch was 
taken. I've taken a pass through this list (hence the -2 suffix) and removed 
what seem to have been applied to 2.x already. It may be that the majority of 
the changes in this list are not required for 2.x we just need to go through an 
check. 

 Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x
 ---

 Key: TUSCANY-3882
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882
 Project: Tuscany
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
Reporter: Simon Laws
 Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0

 Attachments: edited-list-2.txt


 I don't know this to be true but I'm wondering if there are still changes in 
 1.x that we need in 2.x. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




Happy new year to one an all!

2012-01-03 Thread Simon Laws
Hope you all had a restful holiday.

Simon

-- 
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com


Re: Happy new year to one an all!

2012-01-03 Thread Simon Nash

Simon Laws wrote:

Hope you all had a restful holiday.

Simon


+1, Happy New Year to all!

  Simon



Re: Happy new year to one an all!

2012-01-03 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
 Simon Laws wrote:

 Hope you all had a restful holiday.

 Simon

 +1, Happy New Year to all!

  Simon


Thanks, Happy new year and best wishes to all, and that 2012 be a
wonderful hacking year !!!


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/


Re: Happy new year to one an all!

2012-01-03 Thread Giorgio Zoppi
+1 happy new year!

-- 
Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta
para hacerte respirar y vivir en me.
Favola -Moda.


[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3882) Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x

2012-01-03 Thread Simon Nash (Updated) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-3882:


Attachment: (was: edited-list-2.txt)

 Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x
 ---

 Key: TUSCANY-3882
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882
 Project: Tuscany
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
Reporter: Simon Laws
 Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0

 Attachments: edited-list-3.txt


 I don't know this to be true but I'm wondering if there are still changes in 
 1.x that we need in 2.x. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3882) Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x

2012-01-03 Thread Simon Nash (Updated) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-3882:


Attachment: edited-list-3.txt

Added commit 1210165

 Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x
 ---

 Key: TUSCANY-3882
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882
 Project: Tuscany
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
Reporter: Simon Laws
 Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0

 Attachments: edited-list-3.txt


 I don't know this to be true but I'm wondering if there are still changes in 
 1.x that we need in 2.x. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3882) Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x

2012-01-03 Thread Simon Nash (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13178861#comment-13178861
 ] 

Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-3882:
-

I've updated the list to add the changes for revision 1210165.

 Are there any changes in 1.x that we still need to apply to 2.x
 ---

 Key: TUSCANY-3882
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3882
 Project: Tuscany
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
Reporter: Simon Laws
 Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0

 Attachments: edited-list-3.txt


 I don't know this to be true but I'm wondering if there are still changes in 
 1.x that we need in 2.x. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4001) Error handling in JMSBindingProcessor.read could be improved for UnexpectedElement

2012-01-03 Thread Jennifer A Thompson (Created) (JIRA)
Error handling in JMSBindingProcessor.read could be improved for 
UnexpectedElement
--

 Key: TUSCANY-4001
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4001
 Project: Tuscany
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Java SCA JMS Binding Extension
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.x
Reporter: Jennifer A Thompson
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Java-SCA-2.x


Error handling in JMSBindingProcessor.read could be improved for 
UnexpectedElement. For example, when processing a .composite file which 
contained wireFormat.jmsdefault in the Tuscany namespace the following 
exception was thrown:

Incomplete binding.jms definition found unexpected element: 
org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.impl.ExtensionImpl@21e7c65 


(FYI, the correct element should have been wireFormat.jmsDefault in the OASIS 
SCA namespace.)

I had to run with a debugger to determine what the offending element was. It 
would be more useful to know the QName rather than the classtype  hash code. 


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira