[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-4810) DUCC Job Driver (JD) C-Groups size not dynamic?

2017-09-01 Thread Burn Lewis (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150902#comment-16150902
 ] 

Burn Lewis commented on UIMA-4810:
--

Alternatively we could add a new argument to complement process_memory_size, 
e.g.

--driver_memory_size [size]
This specifies the maximum amount of RAM in MB to be allocated to the Job 
Driver. This value is used by the Resource Manager to allocate resources.
The default value is specified by jd.share.quantum in ducc.properties

> DUCC Job Driver (JD) C-Groups size not dynamic?
> ---
>
> Key: UIMA-4810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4810
> Project: UIMA
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: DUCC
>Reporter: Lou DeGenaro
>Assignee: Lou DeGenaro
> Fix For: future-DUCC
>
>
> Updated JD quantum size in ducc.properties to be 800. The next job driver got 
> a cgroup size of 
> 29 Feb 2016 21:50:53,953  INFO Agent.NodeAgent - J[N/A] T[2213] launchCommand 
>  Launching Process - 
> Commandline:/apps/ducc/ducc_runtime/duccling/bin/ducc_ling -u ducc -- 
> /bin/cgset -r memory.limit_in_bytes=734003200 ducc/5752.5752.0 
> the same value as it was when DUCC started: 700 [MB].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-4810) DUCC Job Driver (JD) C-Groups size not dynamic?

2017-09-01 Thread Lou DeGenaro (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150540#comment-16150540
 ] 

Lou DeGenaro commented on UIMA-4810:


For JD's DUCC should:

1. inspect each job's --driver_jvm_args for -Xmx value.
2. if -Xmx is not specified, then use the value specified for jd.share.quantum 
in ducc.properties.
3. dynamically allocate a JD share of the correct size.
4. dynamically assign cgroup size in correspondence with the allocated JD share.



> DUCC Job Driver (JD) C-Groups size not dynamic?
> ---
>
> Key: UIMA-4810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4810
> Project: UIMA
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: DUCC
>Reporter: Lou DeGenaro
>Assignee: Lou DeGenaro
> Fix For: future-DUCC
>
>
> Updated JD quantum size in ducc.properties to be 800. The next job driver got 
> a cgroup size of 
> 29 Feb 2016 21:50:53,953  INFO Agent.NodeAgent - J[N/A] T[2213] launchCommand 
>  Launching Process - 
> Commandline:/apps/ducc/ducc_runtime/duccling/bin/ducc_ling -u ducc -- 
> /bin/cgset -r memory.limit_in_bytes=734003200 ducc/5752.5752.0 
> the same value as it was when DUCC started: 700 [MB].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-4810) DUCC Job Driver (JD) C-Groups size not dynamic?

2016-03-03 Thread Lou DeGenaro (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15177926#comment-15177926
 ] 

Lou DeGenaro commented on UIMA-4810:


Presently Reservations are assigned a slot size at allocation time by the JD 
Scheduler, as specified in ducc.properties.

An improved design would allowed existing reservations to be carved up 
dynamically as opposed to being stuck at a particular slot size for the 
lifetime of the Reservation.

> DUCC Job Driver (JD) C-Groups size not dynamic?
> ---
>
> Key: UIMA-4810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4810
> Project: UIMA
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: DUCC
>Reporter: Lou DeGenaro
>Assignee: Lou DeGenaro
> Fix For: future-DUCC
>
>
> Updated JD quantum size in ducc.properties to be 800. The next job driver got 
> a cgroup size of 
> 29 Feb 2016 21:50:53,953  INFO Agent.NodeAgent - J[N/A] T[2213] launchCommand 
>  Launching Process - 
> Commandline:/apps/ducc/ducc_runtime/duccling/bin/ducc_ling -u ducc -- 
> /bin/cgset -r memory.limit_in_bytes=734003200 ducc/5752.5752.0 
> the same value as it was when DUCC started: 700 [MB].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)