Re: general@velocity mailing list

2015-06-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Well, it's been 10 days, so I'll assume lazy consensus for the rest of
the velocity team.


Our first step is to remove the mailing list information from our web
site.  This is a good excuse to figure out how the web site is
generated and published, so I'll take a look at this one, as I
understand at least the second part.


Our second step is send out a message and shut down the general@ list.

How does this sound?


Subject: Discontinuing general@velocity mailing list. Switch to user@velocity.

Velocity community members:

We are shutting down the gene...@velocity.apache.org mailing list as
it duplicates the u...@velocity.apache.org mailing list and is not
publicly mirrored elsewhere, unlike our other mailing lists on
nabble.com or mail-archive.org.

If you no longer wish to receive velocity-related information, or you
are already subscribed to the u...@velocity.apache.org mailing list,
no further action is required.

If you are subscribed to gene...@velocity.apache.org but not
subscribed to u...@velocity.apache.org, and you wish to continue to
receive velocity-related messages, you will need to subscribe to
u...@velocity.apache.org by sending an email to
user-subscr...@velocity.apache.org to sign up (no subject or message
body required) as described here:

   http://velocity.apache.org/engine/devel/mail-lists.html

Best regards,
The Apache Velocity development team




Our third and final step will be to open an INFRA ticket and ask that
the general@ mailing list be removed.


On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
 +1

 On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Frederick N. Brier fnbr...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Sounds good to me :).


 On 05/30/2015 04:11 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:

 And while we're at it, why have a general@apache mailing list?
 Something inherited from Jakarta?   It's not archived or publicly
 visible on nabble or mail-archive.com.   Users have a difficult enough
 time determining whether a posting should go to user@ and dev@.   I
 see nothing that differentiates between general@ and user@.

 I propose we remove the mailing list from our mailing lists page, and
 post a last message to general@ that we're shutting down general@ and
 switching existing subscribers to user@, and include instructions on
 how to unsubscribe from user@.  That's if we want to go opt-out.   Or
 go with opt-in, and post a last message to general@ that we're
 shutting down general@ and include instructions on how to subscribe to
 user@.   Opt-in is probably the better approach.  Then we ask infra to
 shut down the mailing list and optionally set up a redirect from
 general@ to user@.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org



Re: general@velocity mailing list

2015-06-09 Thread Nathan Bubna
Sounds great, thanks!

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Well, it's been 10 days, so I'll assume lazy consensus for the rest of
 the velocity team.


 Our first step is to remove the mailing list information from our web
 site.  This is a good excuse to figure out how the web site is
 generated and published, so I'll take a look at this one, as I
 understand at least the second part.


 Our second step is send out a message and shut down the general@ list.

 How does this sound?

 
 Subject: Discontinuing general@velocity mailing list. Switch to
 user@velocity.

 Velocity community members:

 We are shutting down the gene...@velocity.apache.org mailing list as
 it duplicates the u...@velocity.apache.org mailing list and is not
 publicly mirrored elsewhere, unlike our other mailing lists on
 nabble.com or mail-archive.org.

 If you no longer wish to receive velocity-related information, or you
 are already subscribed to the u...@velocity.apache.org mailing list,
 no further action is required.

 If you are subscribed to gene...@velocity.apache.org but not
 subscribed to u...@velocity.apache.org, and you wish to continue to
 receive velocity-related messages, you will need to subscribe to
 u...@velocity.apache.org by sending an email to
 user-subscr...@velocity.apache.org to sign up (no subject or message
 body required) as described here:

http://velocity.apache.org/engine/devel/mail-lists.html

 Best regards,
 The Apache Velocity development team

 


 Our third and final step will be to open an INFRA ticket and ask that
 the general@ mailing list be removed.


 On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
  +1
 
  On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Frederick N. Brier fnbr...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Sounds good to me :).
 
 
  On 05/30/2015 04:11 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
 
  And while we're at it, why have a general@apache mailing list?
  Something inherited from Jakarta?   It's not archived or publicly
  visible on nabble or mail-archive.com.   Users have a difficult enough
  time determining whether a posting should go to user@ and dev@.   I
  see nothing that differentiates between general@ and user@.
 
  I propose we remove the mailing list from our mailing lists page, and
  post a last message to general@ that we're shutting down general@ and
  switching existing subscribers to user@, and include instructions on
  how to unsubscribe from user@.  That's if we want to go opt-out.   Or
  go with opt-in, and post a last message to general@ that we're
  shutting down general@ and include instructions on how to subscribe to
  user@.   Opt-in is probably the better approach.  Then we ask infra to
  shut down the mailing list and optionally set up a redirect from
  general@ to user@.
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org




Re: Changing velocity web site

2015-06-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Thanks for pointing that one out.  I missed it despite Will mentioning
committer section.

I was looking at this one:

http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/VelocitySite

So that helps.

In the old days, the site was build in pieces, checked in, and then
merged using zones.

So the trick will be to either move that merging process back to the
local system or to directly push the pieces into the right place in
site/production.

I'll see if I can find a copy of /export/home/velocity/bin/*.sh in svn


On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu
sergiu.dumit...@gmail.com wrote:
 Especially http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/RebuildSites

 On 06/09/2015 04:18 PM, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
 Hi Mike,

 Have you reviewed the nots on the wiki?  They are old but may be of use.
 Look at Committer info section on this page.

 http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/

 WILL

 On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I've done some poking around.

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/site/production is indeed
 the svnsubpub directory: any changes committed here are instantly
 deployed to the web site.

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/site/site appears to be the
 maven project to build the site.

 I've had limited success with this.   If I compare the target/site/*
 files with the production/* files, I find:

 - The front page files are rebuilt with an updated copyright and last
 published date, but they lose the Project Documentation section
 (project info and project report links)

 - Same for the reports/ directory contents.

 - Many files are missing.

 I'm guessing that subprojects need to build the missing pieces (each
 seems to have a src/site directory).   I attempted to build site using
 mvn on trunk (2.x) but generated pages that look very different from
 what's deployed.   I attempted to build site using mvn on 1.x (had to
 upgrade findbugs-maven-plugin to what 2.x was using to make the build
 work) and got a mostly blank page with a header that still looked
 different.   So I'm not sure how to build the web site so that it
 matches what's currently out there.

 If anyone has any hints, please let me know.


 On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Will Glass-Husain
 wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
 The build process for the site is very old -- is that still applicable
 after the svnpubsub change?

 svnpubsub makes it so that whenever you commit to the svnpubsub
 directory, those changes are immediately pushed out into the live web
 site.

 So it's more of a change in how pages are published than a change in
 how pages are created.I haven't looked that the build process for
 the site, but I would guess only the deployment stage needs to be
 updated.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org





 --
 Sergiu Dumitriu
 http://purl.org/net/sergiu

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org



Re: Changing velocity web site

2015-06-09 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Hi Mike,

Have you reviewed the nots on the wiki?  They are old but may be of use.
Look at Committer info section on this page.

http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/

WILL

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I've done some poking around.

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/site/production is indeed
 the svnsubpub directory: any changes committed here are instantly
 deployed to the web site.

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/site/site appears to be the
 maven project to build the site.

 I've had limited success with this.   If I compare the target/site/*
 files with the production/* files, I find:

 - The front page files are rebuilt with an updated copyright and last
 published date, but they lose the Project Documentation section
 (project info and project report links)

 - Same for the reports/ directory contents.

 - Many files are missing.

 I'm guessing that subprojects need to build the missing pieces (each
 seems to have a src/site directory).   I attempted to build site using
 mvn on trunk (2.x) but generated pages that look very different from
 what's deployed.   I attempted to build site using mvn on 1.x (had to
 upgrade findbugs-maven-plugin to what 2.x was using to make the build
 work) and got a mostly blank page with a header that still looked
 different.   So I'm not sure how to build the web site so that it
 matches what's currently out there.

 If anyone has any hints, please let me know.


 On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Will Glass-Husain
  wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
  The build process for the site is very old -- is that still applicable
  after the svnpubsub change?
 
  svnpubsub makes it so that whenever you commit to the svnpubsub
  directory, those changes are immediately pushed out into the live web
  site.
 
  So it's more of a change in how pages are published than a change in
  how pages are created.I haven't looked that the build process for
  the site, but I would guess only the deployment stage needs to be
  updated.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org




Re: Changing velocity web site

2015-06-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Thanks.  I wasn't aware of that page.

Unfortunately, it confirms what I've guessed so far by reading through
the existing maven site docs + experimentation, without actually
providing the missing pieces :)

Everything past the site module is marked TODO

The one new piece of information I see there is a reference to
building engine site docs with ant but publishing via maven -- I'll
see if I can track that one down.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Will Glass-Husain
wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Mike,

 Have you reviewed the nots on the wiki?  They are old but may be of use.
 Look at Committer info section on this page.

 http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/

 WILL

 On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I've done some poking around.

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/site/production is indeed
 the svnsubpub directory: any changes committed here are instantly
 deployed to the web site.

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/site/site appears to be the
 maven project to build the site.

 I've had limited success with this.   If I compare the target/site/*
 files with the production/* files, I find:

 - The front page files are rebuilt with an updated copyright and last
 published date, but they lose the Project Documentation section
 (project info and project report links)

 - Same for the reports/ directory contents.

 - Many files are missing.

 I'm guessing that subprojects need to build the missing pieces (each
 seems to have a src/site directory).   I attempted to build site using
 mvn on trunk (2.x) but generated pages that look very different from
 what's deployed.   I attempted to build site using mvn on 1.x (had to
 upgrade findbugs-maven-plugin to what 2.x was using to make the build
 work) and got a mostly blank page with a header that still looked
 different.   So I'm not sure how to build the web site so that it
 matches what's currently out there.

 If anyone has any hints, please let me know.


 On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Will Glass-Husain
  wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
  The build process for the site is very old -- is that still applicable
  after the svnpubsub change?
 
  svnpubsub makes it so that whenever you commit to the svnpubsub
  directory, those changes are immediately pushed out into the live web
  site.
 
  So it's more of a change in how pages are published than a change in
  how pages are created.I haven't looked that the build process for
  the site, but I would guess only the deployment stage needs to be
  updated.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org



Re: Changing velocity web site

2015-06-09 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
Especially http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/RebuildSites

On 06/09/2015 04:18 PM, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
 Hi Mike,
 
 Have you reviewed the nots on the wiki?  They are old but may be of use.
 Look at Committer info section on this page.
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/
 
 WILL
 
 On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 I've done some poking around.

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/site/production is indeed
 the svnsubpub directory: any changes committed here are instantly
 deployed to the web site.

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/site/site appears to be the
 maven project to build the site.

 I've had limited success with this.   If I compare the target/site/*
 files with the production/* files, I find:

 - The front page files are rebuilt with an updated copyright and last
 published date, but they lose the Project Documentation section
 (project info and project report links)

 - Same for the reports/ directory contents.

 - Many files are missing.

 I'm guessing that subprojects need to build the missing pieces (each
 seems to have a src/site directory).   I attempted to build site using
 mvn on trunk (2.x) but generated pages that look very different from
 what's deployed.   I attempted to build site using mvn on 1.x (had to
 upgrade findbugs-maven-plugin to what 2.x was using to make the build
 work) and got a mostly blank page with a header that still looked
 different.   So I'm not sure how to build the web site so that it
 matches what's currently out there.

 If anyone has any hints, please let me know.


 On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Will Glass-Husain
 wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
 The build process for the site is very old -- is that still applicable
 after the svnpubsub change?

 svnpubsub makes it so that whenever you commit to the svnpubsub
 directory, those changes are immediately pushed out into the live web
 site.

 So it's more of a change in how pages are published than a change in
 how pages are created.I haven't looked that the build process for
 the site, but I would guess only the deployment stage needs to be
 updated.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org


 


-- 
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org