Re: icla-completed.pdf and icla-completed.pdf.asc renamed in svn

2016-09-29 Thread Sam Ruby 
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Craig Russell  wrote:
> I know we discussed this but I’d like to rename the files to
> icla.pdf and icla.pdf.asc when secmail copies the files to documents/iclas/.
>
> I see where the files are added but can’t figure out how to rename them when 
> committing them to svn.
>
> # create/add file(s)
> dest = message.write_svn("#{dir}/iclas", @filename, @selected, @signature)

OK, I modified write_svn to take a hash of attachment names => file names.

https://github.com/apache/whimsy/commit/957314eb25de9b290ebddb26da92f6b600c32abb

Let me know if I broke anything.  :-)

- Sam Ruby

icla-completed.pdf and icla-completed.pdf.asc renamed in svn

2016-09-29 Thread Craig Russell 
I know we discussed this but I’d like to rename the files to
icla.pdf and icla.pdf.asc when secmail copies the files to documents/iclas/.

I see where the files are added but can’t figure out how to rename them when 
committing them to svn.

# create/add file(s)
dest = message.write_svn("#{dir}/iclas", @filename, @selected, @signature)

# Show files to be added
svn 'status', "#{dir}/iclas"

# commit changes
svn 'commit', "#{dir}/iclas/#{@filename}#{fileext}",
  '-m', "ICLA from #{@pubname}"

Craig L Russell
Architect
craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Re: Unprocessed grant in documents/received/sga_ptgoetz_storm_jms.pdf

2016-09-29 Thread Sam Ruby 
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Craig Russell
 wrote:
>
>> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Craig Russell  wrote:
>>
>> I think it’s time to switch over to secmail.
>>
>> The only thing we have not tested is new members. As long as you’re willing 
>> to add the membership application functionality before the next members come 
>> in, we can disable secretary workbench.
>
> What I can do is to rough in the form for the member app. But the processing 
> to update the members.txt file may be too much for my current skilz. Since 
> the form, processing, and email bits are now more separated it might be 
> easier.
> WDYT?

Sure.  Take your time, rough in what you like/feel comfortable doing.

I'm not overly concerned about membership applications processing of
things like members.txt as I have working code I can steal from.
While you may not yet feel comfortable writing the action script from
scratch, hopefully you will be able to do minor tweaks on the logic
once it is in place.  The fact that the new logic shows what it is
going to do before it does it should make that process easier.  And
that fact that doing it consists primarily of executing svn commands
and actually delivering the mail should also.

With the new design, all work is done in temporary directories, so
there is no need to worry about locks, no need to clean up, and no
possibility of 'wedging'.

> Craig

- Sam Ruby

>> Thanks,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Sam Ruby  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Craig Russell  
>>> wrote:
 Any idea why this document does not show up in secretary workbench?
>>>
>>> Um, perhaps because it was deleted?
>>>
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/60704b7e60e99f150d7f1ea33bdfb03e805e4d46296b242a61bf37ec@%3Cfoundation-commits.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> Perhaps the real question should be: what functionality is missing
>>> from the new secmail tool that would enable you to switch over
>>> completely?
>>>
>>> One thing I have noticed is that when you have a document that you
>>> have received out of band you want to process you commit it to
>>> document/received and process it with the old workbench tool.  The new
>>> process would be to email it to secretary@ and process it with the
>>> secmail tool.
>>>
>>> Is there anything else that needs to be addressed?
>>>
>>> - Sam Ruby
>>>
 Thanks,

 Craig

 Craig L Russell
 Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
 c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo

>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect
>> craig.russ...@oracle.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect
> craig.russ...@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Unprocessed grant in documents/received/sga_ptgoetz_storm_jms.pdf

2016-09-29 Thread Craig Russell 

> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Craig Russell  wrote:
> 
> I think it’s time to switch over to secmail.
> 
> The only thing we have not tested is new members. As long as you’re willing 
> to add the membership application functionality before the next members come 
> in, we can disable secretary workbench.

What I can do is to rough in the form for the member app. But the processing to 
update the members.txt file may be too much for my current skilz. Since the 
form, processing, and email bits are now more separated it might be easier.

WDYT?

Craig

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Craig
> 
>> On Sep 28, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Sam Ruby  wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Craig Russell  
>> wrote:
>>> Any idea why this document does not show up in secretary workbench?
>> 
>> Um, perhaps because it was deleted?
>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/60704b7e60e99f150d7f1ea33bdfb03e805e4d46296b242a61bf37ec@%3Cfoundation-commits.apache.org%3E
>> 
>> Perhaps the real question should be: what functionality is missing
>> from the new secmail tool that would enable you to switch over
>> completely?
>> 
>> One thing I have noticed is that when you have a document that you
>> have received out of band you want to process you commit it to
>> document/received and process it with the old workbench tool.  The new
>> process would be to email it to secretary@ and process it with the
>> secmail tool.
>> 
>> Is there anything else that needs to be addressed?
>> 
>> - Sam Ruby
>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Craig
>>> 
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>>> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>> 
> 
> Craig L Russell
> Architect
> craig.russ...@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Craig L Russell
Architect
craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

RECOVERY: whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) is back up!

2016-09-29 Thread Ping My Box 

Hello,
The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) seems to be 
back in working order again.

With regards,
Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/

ALERT: whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) is DOWN!

2016-09-29 Thread Ping My Box 

Hello,
The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) has been 
reported as down by our monitoring system:

Component:  response
Error code: Internal Server Error or equivalent bad message received: HTTP/1.1 
400 svn officers_historic ["svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 400 'Bad 
Request' on '/repos/private/!svn/rvr/71839/foundation/officers/historic'", "", 
"svn: E175009: Additional errors:", "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad 
Request)"]
Debug output:
--
[Thu Sep 29 12:57:30 2016]: Initialising socket
[Thu Sep 29 12:57:30 2016]: Looking up hostname whimsy.apache.org...
[Thu Sep 29 12:57:30 2016]: Connecting to 207.244.88.137:443
[Thu Sep 29 12:57:31 2016]: Connected, sending HTTPS payload.
[Thu Sep 29 12:57:31 2016]: Reading response header from server
[Thu Sep 29 12:57:32 2016]: Caught exception: Internal Server Error or 
equivalent bad message received: HTTP/1.1 400 svn officers_historic ["svn: 
E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 400 'Bad Request' on 
'/repos/private/!svn/rvr/71839/foundation/officers/historic'", "", "svn: 
E175009: Additional errors:", "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad 
Request)"]


--

With regards,
Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/

RECOVERY: whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) is back up!

2016-09-29 Thread Ping My Box 

Hello,
The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) seems to be 
back in working order again.

With regards,
Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/

ALERT: whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) is DOWN!

2016-09-29 Thread Ping My Box 

Hello,
The https service at whimsy.apache.org (whimsy.apache.org (https)) has been 
reported as down by our monitoring system:

Component:  response
Error code: Internal Server Error or equivalent bad message received: HTTP/1.1 
400 svn Meetings ["svn: E175002: Unexpected HTTP status 400 'Bad Request' on 
'/repos/private/!svn/rvr/71839/foundation/Meetings'", "", "svn: E175009: 
Additional errors:", "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)"]
Debug output:
--
[Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Initialising socket
[Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Looking up hostname whimsy.apache.org...
[Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Connecting to 207.244.88.137:443
[Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Connected, sending HTTPS payload.
[Thu Sep 29 11:35:39 2016]: Reading response header from server
[Thu Sep 29 11:35:48 2016]: Caught exception: Internal Server Error or 
equivalent bad message received: HTTP/1.1 400 svn Meetings ["svn: E175002: 
Unexpected HTTP status 400 'Bad Request' on 
'/repos/private/!svn/rvr/71839/foundation/Meetings'", "", "svn: E175009: 
Additional errors:", "svn: E175009: XML parsing failed: (400 Bad Request)"]


--

With regards,
Ping My Box - https://www.pingmybox.com/