Re: Build Wicket 1.4.10 soon?

[Johan Compagner]

a very old java 5 version??

Java version: 1.5.0_06

thats old..


On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 18:56, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
 I still don't understand why only Igor had these problems.

 On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
 wrote:

 Nevermind - just saw commits 983268 and 983292.

 On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy Thomerson 
 jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:

  So, what changed that it was able to build for you?
 
  On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  weird. compiles here with 6 but not with 5 :| i guess one of you guys
  will have to do the build.
 
  -igor
 
  On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
  wrote:
   No errors here too with both jdk 1.5 and 1.6.
  
   On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
   jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
  
   Well, on my laptop I have to regularly switch between 5 and 6, so
  there's
   really no telling. :)
  
   On Aug 7, 2010 12:24 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   but did you do it with jdk5?
  
   -igor
  
  
   On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
   jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
That's weird...
  
  
 
 
 
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 


 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com

Re: Remove support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5

[James Carman]

I'd say at least move it to wicketstuff, so that if there's some other
person out there with the will and means to take the project on, they
can do so.

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi,

 I just created a ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2976)
 to remove the support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5.
 It is currently broken because of the re-work of WicketFilter and request
 processing.
 Since none of the active core developers use this technology in his daily
 job it is hard for us to support it.
 Now is the time to vote against this decision and give us a hand to improve
 it or just silently agree.

 martin-g

 P.S. I sent this email earlier today but for some reason it was rejected.
 Excuse me if you receive it for second time.