Can jjava 5 update 22 be installed on the wicketstuff.org server?
Hello, With the version of java 5 currently installed on wicketstuff.org hudson gives build errors with one of the jwicket projects (related to instanceof outerclass?.innerClass, a generics issue). But compiling in Linux and Windows using the latest jdk5 update 22 results in no compile error. I tried to use the hudson auto jdk installer but it doesn't seem to work for FreeBSD: JDK installation skipped: Unknown CPU name: freebsd JDK installation skipped: Unknown CPU name: freebsd Would someone with the correct access be able to install the jdk update 22 onto the wicketstuff.org server? This won't effect my ability to cut a wicketstuff-core 1.4.10 release but it would be nice if all the jwicket artifacts can have a latest snapshot version. Thanks, Mike
Update examples at wicketstuff.org
Hi, I would like to ask wicketstuff.org maintainers to update the examples deployed at this machine to latest 1.4.10 and 1.5-M1 versions. Recently we had a ticket about broken 1.4 examples but everything was fine in the latest snapshot (running the examples locally). Do you think it is a good idea to run the examples in DEVELOPMENT mode so we and the users can see the problem in the browser instead of asking for logs ? martin-g
Re: Update examples at wicketstuff.org
i see that teamcity is gone now, and we use hudson, but that doesnt build wicket-examples So the easy copy file that i have doesnt work anymore.. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:09, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to ask wicketstuff.org maintainers to update the examples deployed at this machine to latest 1.4.10 and 1.5-M1 versions. Recently we had a ticket about broken 1.4 examples but everything was fine in the latest snapshot (running the examples locally). Do you think it is a good idea to run the examples in DEVELOPMENT mode so we and the users can see the problem in the browser instead of asking for logs ? martin-g
Re: Can jjava 5 update 22 be installed on the wicketstuff.org server?
at the moment 1.5.0_13-p7 does run there. And i dont know how to update that under freebsd. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 14:53, Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote: Hello, With the version of java 5 currently installed on wicketstuff.org hudson gives build errors with one of the jwicket projects (related to instanceof outerclass?.innerClass, a generics issue). But compiling in Linux and Windows using the latest jdk5 update 22 results in no compile error. I tried to use the hudson auto jdk installer but it doesn't seem to work for FreeBSD: JDK installation skipped: Unknown CPU name: freebsd JDK installation skipped: Unknown CPU name: freebsd Would someone with the correct access be able to install the jdk update 22 onto the wicketstuff.org server? This won't effect my ability to cut a wicketstuff-core 1.4.10 release but it would be nice if all the jwicket artifacts can have a latest snapshot version. Thanks, Mike
Re: Can jjava 5 update 22 be installed on the wicketstuff.org server?
i think i can get _16 on it if i get it right.. But not sure if that would fix your compile problem On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:55, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: at the moment 1.5.0_13-p7 does run there. And i dont know how to update that under freebsd. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 14:53, Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote: Hello, With the version of java 5 currently installed on wicketstuff.org hudson gives build errors with one of the jwicket projects (related to instanceof outerclass?.innerClass, a generics issue). But compiling in Linux and Windows using the latest jdk5 update 22 results in no compile error. I tried to use the hudson auto jdk installer but it doesn't seem to work for FreeBSD: JDK installation skipped: Unknown CPU name: freebsd JDK installation skipped: Unknown CPU name: freebsd Would someone with the correct access be able to install the jdk update 22 onto the wicketstuff.org server? This won't effect my ability to cut a wicketstuff-core 1.4.10 release but it would be nice if all the jwicket artifacts can have a latest snapshot version. Thanks, Mike
Re: svn commit: r984800 - /wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
Is this related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2977 or this
is something different ?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, jcompag...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcompagner
Date: Thu Aug 12 14:23:34 2010
New Revision: 984800
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=984800view=rev
Log:
fix for double characters autocomplete and Upper Case
Modified:
wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
Modified:
wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js?rev=984800r1=984799r2=984800view=diff
==
---
wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
(original)
+++
wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
Thu Aug 12 14:23:34 2010
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
objonchangeoriginal=obj.onchange;
obj.onchange=function(event){
if(mouseactive==1)return false;
- if(typeof
objonchangeoriginal==function)objonchangeoriginal.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonchangeoriginal==function) return
objonchangeoriginal.apply(this,[event]);
}
objonchange=obj.onchange;
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
return killEvent(event);
}
hideAutoComplete();
- if(typeof
objonblur==function)objonblur.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonblur==function) return
objonblur.apply(this,[event]);
}
obj.onfocus=function(event){
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
}
}
ignoreOneFocusGain = false;
- if(typeof
objonfocus==function)objonfocus.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonfocus==function) return
objonfocus.apply(this,[event]);
}
obj.onkeydown=function(event){
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
hidingAutocomplete = 1;
}
mouseactive = 0;
-if (typeof objonkeydown==function)
objonkeydown.apply(this,[event]);
+if (typeof objonkeydown==function) return
objonkeydown.apply(this,[event]);
return true;
break;
default:
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
default:
updateChoices();
}
- if(typeof
objonkeyup==function)objonkeyup.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonkeyup==function) return
objonkeyup.apply(this,[event]);
}
obj.onkeypress=function(event){
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
return killEvent(event);
}
}
- if(typeof
objonkeypress==function)objonkeypress.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonkeypress==function) return
objonkeypress.apply(this,[event]);
}
}
Re: Update examples at wicketstuff.org
ok if that is stable then thats fine i updated the copywicket14.sh file: wget -Owicket14.war 'http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war' and did run it so you should have the latest now. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:55, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Here is a URL to latest build at Hudson: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war I think this is a stable URL so we can use it. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: i see that teamcity is gone now, and we use hudson, but that doesnt build wicket-examples So the easy copy file that i have doesnt work anymore.. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:09, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to ask wicketstuff.org maintainers to update the examples deployed at this machine to latest 1.4.10 and 1.5-M1 versions. Recently we had a ticket about broken 1.4 examples but everything was fine in the latest snapshot (running the examples locally). Do you think it is a good idea to run the examples in DEVELOPMENT mode so we and the users can see the problem in the browser instead of asking for logs ? martin-g
Re: Can jjava 5 update 22 be installed on the wicketstuff.org server?
Hi Johan, It turns out to be really easy to use jnlp to connect a slave node into hudson. I can contribute a slow Linux node with the latest jdk 5 on it for running the jdk5 builds. But I will need the firewall opened up for a specific tcp port for the master/node communication. I've entered in a port of 32323 but any port could be configured and then setup in hudson. Thanks, Mike i think i can get _16 on it if i get it right.. But not sure if that would fix your compile problem On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:55, Johan Compagnerjcompag...@gmail.com wrote: at the moment 1.5.0_13-p7 does run there. And i dont know how to update that under freebsd. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 14:53, Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote: Hello, With the version of java 5 currently installed on wicketstuff.org hudson gives build errors with one of the jwicket projects (related to instanceof outerclass?.innerClass, a generics issue). But compiling in Linux and Windows using the latest jdk5 update 22 results in no compile error. I tried to use the hudson auto jdk installer but it doesn't seem to work for FreeBSD: JDK installation skipped: Unknown CPU name: freebsd JDK installation skipped: Unknown CPU name: freebsd Would someone with the correct access be able to install the jdk update 22 onto the wicketstuff.org server? This won't effect my ability to cut a wicketstuff-core 1.4.10 release but it would be nice if all the jwicket artifacts can have a latest snapshot version. Thanks, Mike
Re: Update examples at wicketstuff.org
And the same for http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.5.x/ws/trunk/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.warplease :-) Maybe we can rename http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/ to http://wicketstuff.org/wicket15/ http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/ ? On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: ok if that is stable then thats fine i updated the copywicket14.sh file: wget -Owicket14.war ' http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war ' and did run it so you should have the latest now. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:55, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Here is a URL to latest build at Hudson: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war I think this is a stable URL so we can use it. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: i see that teamcity is gone now, and we use hudson, but that doesnt build wicket-examples So the easy copy file that i have doesnt work anymore.. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:09, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to ask wicketstuff.org maintainers to update the examples deployed at this machine to latest 1.4.10 and 1.5-M1 versions. Recently we had a ticket about broken 1.4 examples but everything was fine in the latest snapshot (running the examples locally). Do you think it is a good idea to run the examples in DEVELOPMENT mode so we and the users can see the problem in the browser instead of asking for logs ? martin-g
Re: svn commit: r984800 - /wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
thats something else but i also fixed that one quickly
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:57, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Is this related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2977 or this
is something different ?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, jcompag...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcompagner
Date: Thu Aug 12 14:23:34 2010
New Revision: 984800
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=984800view=rev
Log:
fix for double characters autocomplete and Upper Case
Modified:
wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
Modified:
wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js?rev=984800r1=984799r2=984800view=diff
==
---
wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
(original)
+++
wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/ajax/markup/html/autocomplete/wicket-autocomplete.js
Thu Aug 12 14:23:34 2010
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
objonchangeoriginal=obj.onchange;
obj.onchange=function(event){
if(mouseactive==1)return false;
- if(typeof
objonchangeoriginal==function)objonchangeoriginal.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonchangeoriginal==function) return
objonchangeoriginal.apply(this,[event]);
}
objonchange=obj.onchange;
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
return killEvent(event);
}
hideAutoComplete();
- if(typeof
objonblur==function)objonblur.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonblur==function) return
objonblur.apply(this,[event]);
}
obj.onfocus=function(event){
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
}
}
ignoreOneFocusGain = false;
- if(typeof
objonfocus==function)objonfocus.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonfocus==function) return
objonfocus.apply(this,[event]);
}
obj.onkeydown=function(event){
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
hidingAutocomplete = 1;
}
mouseactive = 0;
- if (typeof objonkeydown==function)
objonkeydown.apply(this,[event]);
+ if (typeof objonkeydown==function) return
objonkeydown.apply(this,[event]);
return true;
break;
default:
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
default:
updateChoices();
}
- if(typeof
objonkeyup==function)objonkeyup.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonkeyup==function) return
objonkeyup.apply(this,[event]);
}
obj.onkeypress=function(event){
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ Wicket.AutoComplete=function(elementId,
return killEvent(event);
}
}
- if(typeof
objonkeypress==function)objonkeypress.apply(this,[event]);
+ if(typeof objonkeypress==function) return
objonkeypress.apply(this,[event]);
}
}
Re: Update examples at wicketstuff.org
there is no such file with the extention .warplease ;) On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 17:12, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: And the same for http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.5.x/ws/trunk/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.warplease :-) Maybe we can rename http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/ to http://wicketstuff.org/wicket15/ http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/ ? On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: ok if that is stable then thats fine i updated the copywicket14.sh file: wget -Owicket14.war ' http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war ' and did run it so you should have the latest now. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:55, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Here is a URL to latest build at Hudson: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war I think this is a stable URL so we can use it. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: i see that teamcity is gone now, and we use hudson, but that doesnt build wicket-examples So the easy copy file that i have doesnt work anymore.. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:09, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to ask wicketstuff.org maintainers to update the examples deployed at this machine to latest 1.4.10 and 1.5-M1 versions. Recently we had a ticket about broken 1.4 examples but everything was fine in the latest snapshot (running the examples locally). Do you think it is a good idea to run the examples in DEVELOPMENT mode so we and the users can see the problem in the browser instead of asking for logs ? martin-g
Re: Update examples at wicketstuff.org
done, trunk - wicket On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 17:14, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: there is no such file with the extention .warplease ;) On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 17:12, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: And the same for http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.5.x/ws/trunk/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.warplease :-) Maybe we can rename http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/ to http://wicketstuff.org/wicket15/ http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/ ? On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: ok if that is stable then thats fine i updated the copywicket14.sh file: wget -Owicket14.war ' http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war ' and did run it so you should have the latest now. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:55, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Here is a URL to latest build at Hudson: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Apache%20Wicket%201.4.x/ws/wicket-1.4.x/wicket-examples/target/wicket-examples.war I think this is a stable URL so we can use it. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote: i see that teamcity is gone now, and we use hudson, but that doesnt build wicket-examples So the easy copy file that i have doesnt work anymore.. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 15:09, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to ask wicketstuff.org maintainers to update the examples deployed at this machine to latest 1.4.10 and 1.5-M1 versions. Recently we had a ticket about broken 1.4 examples but everything was fine in the latest snapshot (running the examples locally). Do you think it is a good idea to run the examples in DEVELOPMENT mode so we and the users can see the problem in the browser instead of asking for logs ? martin-g
Re: Form.delegateSubmit: invoke onSubmit() of nested Forms before onSubmit() of enclosing Form
i think this change was triggered by the commit for: WICKET-1124: enhancement of nested form handling its like that in the patch we got, i guess the patch is just applied this way. On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:38, Florian Wunderlich fwunderl...@factor3.de wrote: It can be assumed that an enclosing Form in some way or another may depend on the state of an enclosed Form, but that an enclosed Form should never depend on the state of its enclosing Form. Therefore, Form.delegateSubmit should invoke onSubmit() of the nested Forms (lines 1540-1553 in Form.java) before invoking onSubmit() of the enclosing Form (lines 1537-1538). Is there any reason why this is the other way around at the moment?
