Re: [vote] release wicket-1.5-M2.1
[ X ] Yes, release :) 2010/9/13 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com: This vote is to release wicket 1.5-M2.1. This fixes a critical problem in *unreleased* 1.5-M2, namely WICKET-3040 Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.5-M2.1/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5-M2.1/dist Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5-M2.1/m2-repo Changelog 1.5-M2.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315331sorter/field=prioritysorter/order=DESC Changelog 1.5-M2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315237sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC This vote ends Thursday 9:00am GMT-8 Please test the release and offer your vote: [ ] Yes, release [ ] No, don't release it (and please tell us why)
Re: wicket-security Subject getPrincipals
Hi Les,
I thought about this, and I don't think it the way to go for Wicket Security.
Wicket Security provides very good integration with Wicket on all levels of
the API, much better than Shiro can ever provide. With the upcomming changes
for 1.5, which will include annotations on components to define permissions,
this integration will improve even further.
For Wicket Security, there is no need to reinvent the wheel, because Wicket
Security is already working. Very little changes are needed to the security
layer itself. For people who want to use Shiro with Wicket, there is a project
wicket-shiro, which does that.
Also, rewriting Wicket Security to use Apache Shiro will force all users of
Wicket Security to rewrite major parts of their application; something I
really don't want.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 18:10:13 Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi Edmond,
Have you thought of using Apache Shiro as the basis for Wicket
Security? Much like SLF4J, Shiro has a general purpose application
security API and then it has its default implementation. It could
even be implemented with JAAS or Spring Security or other mechanisms.
Shiro already supports robust caching strategies, events, a highly
pluggable architecture and more - and it of course allows dynamic
changes at runtime.
It seems like quite an awful lot of work to 'reinvent the wheel' for a
security API - for example, we don't create our own logging APIs for
each project we work on. And after working on Shiro for ~ 6 years
now, trust me, it is no small effort to 'get it right' when building a
security API :). Just a thought...
Cheers,
Les
P.S. I know Shiro's incubation status might deter some people from
using it, but not to worry - it will become a Top Level Project at
this month's Apache Board meeting (barring any objections by the
board, of course). We'll release 1.1 shortly thereafter.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Emond Papegaaij
emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote:
Hi Thibault,
I do agree with you that the Subject interface is not very clean. However
it is not the interface that is incompatible with your needs, but the
way Wicket Security works. If you look at that interface, it also has a
method 'setReadOnly()', which, as documented, will always be called on
subjects being handed to the security layer (on logon). A subject is not
allowed to change its principals after that, making it impossible to
implement dynamically changing authorizations.
The reason for this can be found in SimpleCachingHive, which caches
permissions for subjects. Without this cache, Wicket Security would be
way too slow to use in a large application.
Supporting dynamic authorization would be a nice feature to support, but
will require major changes to Wicket Security. Especially caching of
permission lookups will be difficult to implement.
I still plan on doing some work on Wicket Security for Wicket 1.5, which
should see some API improvements. However, my time is very limited at the
moment. A release for 1.4, which fixes some minor bugs, is also on my
todo list.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
On Monday 23 August 2010 13:30:41 Thibault Kruse wrote:
Hi, combining Shiro with WASP, I found that the interface
org.apache.wicket.security.hive.authentication.Subject
requires a method
/**
* A readonly view of the principals.
*
* @return the principals
*/
public SetPrincipal getPrincipals();
the only usage for that I found is in BasicHive
subjectPrincipals = subject.getPrincipals();
for (Principal curPrincipal : principalSet)
{
if
(subjectPrincipals.contains(curPrincipal) ||
curPrincipal.implies(subject))
return true;
}
My minor problem with that is that it exposes the Principals of the
Subject needlessly to the rest of the world. Which is bad if the rest of
the world decides to cache the principals, and they change in the
meantime, as Shiro would allow.
To improve, the above could be changed to require
public boolean Subject.principalsImply(Principal);
leaving it to the Subject implementation to verify, not exposing actual
Principals. As this would be sufficient for all cureent needs I can
think of and see, having a getter function for Principal exposes more
than we need to expose. Should caching be required that can surely be
the responsibility of the Subject (or the underlying framework used by
the subject).
As an example the LoginContainer$MultiSubject
already caches the principals reading them only in the constructor,
making that incompatible with the Shiro Strategy of dynamically changing
authorizations.
regards,
Thibault
Re: [vote] release wicket 1.4.12
+1 fixing critical bugs leave no choice other than releasing Am 13.09.2010 um 05:45 schrieb Igor Vaynberg: This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040. Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.12/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.12/dist Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.12/m2-repo Changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315312sorter/field=prioritysorter/order=DESC This vote ends Thursday 9:00am GMT-8 Please test the release and offer your vote: [ ] Yes, release [ ] No, don't release it (and please tell us why) ChangeLog Release Notes - Wicket - Version 1.4.12 ** Sub-task * [WICKET-3037] - InnerFeedbackTest test fails due locale issue ** Bug * [WICKET-1743] - WicketTester fires onSubmit for first form button prior to firing requested ajax event * [WICKET-3032] - WebApplication#mountBookmarkablePage with unicode path not works. * [WICKET-3033] - Stack Overflow in getBeanDefinition()'s of SpringBeanLocator and AnnotProxyFieldValueFactory * [WICKET-3040] - Ajax form submit fails in Wicket 1.4.11/Firefox3.6 * [WICKET-3043] - Ajax support broken under Firefox 3.6.x and Wicket 1.4.11 ** Improvement * [WICKET-2922] - AutoCompleteTextField should allow the generics specification for the getChoices iterator and the type of the model ** Task * [WICKET-3041] - Relative link in JavaScript
Re: [vote] release wicket-1.5-M2.1
+1 Am 13.09.2010 um 10:31 schrieb nino martinez wael: [ X ] Yes, release :) 2010/9/13 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com: This vote is to release wicket 1.5-M2.1. This fixes a critical problem in *unreleased* 1.5-M2, namely WICKET-3040 Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.5-M2.1/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5-M2.1/dist Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5-M2.1/m2-repo Changelog 1.5-M2.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315331sorter/field=prioritysorter/order=DESC Changelog 1.5-M2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315237sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC This vote ends Thursday 9:00am GMT-8 Please test the release and offer your vote: [ ] Yes, release [ ] No, don't release it (and please tell us why)
Re: [vote] release wicket 1.4.12
+1 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:45, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040. Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.12/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.12/dist Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.12/m2-repo Changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315312sorter/field=prioritysorter/order=DESC This vote ends Thursday 9:00am GMT-8 Please test the release and offer your vote: [ ] Yes, release [ ] No, don't release it (and please tell us why) ChangeLog Release Notes - Wicket - Version 1.4.12 ** Sub-task * [WICKET-3037] - InnerFeedbackTest test fails due locale issue ** Bug * [WICKET-1743] - WicketTester fires onSubmit for first form button prior to firing requested ajax event * [WICKET-3032] - WebApplication#mountBookmarkablePage with unicode path not works. * [WICKET-3033] - Stack Overflow in getBeanDefinition()'s of SpringBeanLocator and AnnotProxyFieldValueFactory * [WICKET-3040] - Ajax form submit fails in Wicket 1.4.11/Firefox3.6 * [WICKET-3043] - Ajax support broken under Firefox 3.6.x and Wicket 1.4.11 ** Improvement * [WICKET-2922] - AutoCompleteTextField should allow the generics specification for the getChoices iterator and the type of the model ** Task * [WICKET-3041] - Relative link in JavaScript
Re: [vote] release wicket-1.5-M2.1
+1 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Peter Ertl pe...@gmx.org wrote: +1 Am 13.09.2010 um 10:31 schrieb nino martinez wael: [ X ] Yes, release :) 2010/9/13 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com: This vote is to release wicket 1.5-M2.1. This fixes a critical problem in *unreleased* 1.5-M2, namely WICKET-3040 Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.5-M2.1/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5-M2.1/dist Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5-M2.1/m2-repo Changelog 1.5-M2.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315331sorter/field=prioritysorter/order=DESC Changelog 1.5-M2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315237sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC This vote ends Thursday 9:00am GMT-8 Please test the release and offer your vote: [ ] Yes, release [ ] No, don't release it (and please tell us why) -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
wicketstuff maven repository
I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next wicketstuff release. When I build: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4/jdk-1.5-parent everything runs OK, but I don't see anything in: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro/ Do we need to do anything to get projects to show up in the 'release' builds? Thanks Ryan
Re: wicketstuff maven repository
https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~wicket-shiro On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next wicketstuff release. When I build: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4/jdk-1.5-parent everything runs OK, but I don't see anything in: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro/ Do we need to do anything to get projects to show up in the 'release' builds? Thanks Ryan
Re: wicketstuff maven repository
Hi Ryan, wicket-shiro is has been included in the wicketstuff-core releases since version 1.4.9.1 in June 2010. See in central here: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent So long as it builds it will be included in the next release aswell (probably thursday or friday to align with the wicket 1.4.12 version). We switched over to oss.sonatype.org for wicketstuff-core a few months ago and the wicketstuff.org/hudson (you can self create an account for yourself) build the snapshots here: http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent Your recent commits triggered a build that is presently in progress: http://wicketstuff.org/hudson/job/Wicket%20Stuff%20Core%20Java5%20%28wicket%201.5-SNAPSHOT%29/11/ Regards, Mike https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~wicket-shiro On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Ryan McKinleyryan...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next wicketstuff release. When I build: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4/jdk-1.5-parent everything runs OK, but I don't see anything in: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro/ Do we need to do anything to get projects to show up in the 'release' builds? Thanks Ryan
Re: wicketstuff maven repository
nice! It may be worth a note on: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote: Hi Ryan, wicket-shiro is has been included in the wicketstuff-core releases since version 1.4.9.1 in June 2010. See in central here: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent So long as it builds it will be included in the next release aswell (probably thursday or friday to align with the wicket 1.4.12 version). We switched over to oss.sonatype.org for wicketstuff-core a few months ago and the wicketstuff.org/hudson (you can self create an account for yourself) build the snapshots here: http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent Your recent commits triggered a build that is presently in progress: http://wicketstuff.org/hudson/job/Wicket%20Stuff%20Core%20Java5%20%28wicket%201.5-SNAPSHOT%29/11/ Regards, Mike https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~wicket-shiro On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Ryan McKinleyryan...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next wicketstuff release. When I build: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4/jdk-1.5-parent everything runs OK, but I don't see anything in: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro/ Do we need to do anything to get projects to show up in the 'release' builds? Thanks Ryan
RE: wicketstuff maven repository
Can you pls take me of the list, I do not wish to receive these emails Many Thanks Emma -Original Message- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 September 2010 16:36 To: dev@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicketstuff maven repository nice! It may be worth a note on: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote: Hi Ryan, wicket-shiro is has been included in the wicketstuff-core releases since version 1.4.9.1 in June 2010. See in central here: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent So long as it builds it will be included in the next release aswell (probably thursday or friday to align with the wicket 1.4.12 version). We switched over to oss.sonatype.org for wicketstuff-core a few months ago and the wicketstuff.org/hudson (you can self create an account for yourself) build the snapshots here: http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent Your recent commits triggered a build that is presently in progress: http://wicketstuff.org/hudson/job/Wicket%20Stuff%20Core%20Java5%20%28wicket%201.5-SNAPSHOT%29/11/ Regards, Mike https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~wicket-shiro On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Ryan McKinleyryan...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next wicketstuff release. When I build: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4/jdk-1.5-parent everything runs OK, but I don't see anything in: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro/ Do we need to do anything to get projects to show up in the 'release' builds? Thanks Ryan __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For any problems regarding this mail please contact us at supp...@hurstuk.com __
Re: wicketstuff maven repository
Emma, just send an email to dev-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Emma Moss e.m...@hurstuk.com wrote: Can you pls take me of the list, I do not wish to receive these emails Many Thanks Emma -Original Message- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 September 2010 16:36 To: dev@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicketstuff maven repository nice! It may be worth a note on: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote: Hi Ryan, wicket-shiro is has been included in the wicketstuff-core releases since version 1.4.9.1 in June 2010. See in central here: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent So long as it builds it will be included in the next release aswell (probably thursday or friday to align with the wicket 1.4.12 version). We switched over to oss.sonatype.org for wicketstuff-core a few months ago and the wicketstuff.org/hudson (you can self create an account for yourself) build the snapshots here: http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent Your recent commits triggered a build that is presently in progress: http://wicketstuff.org/hudson/job/Wicket%20Stuff%20Core%20Java5%20%28wicket%201.5-SNAPSHOT%29/11/ Regards, Mike https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~wicket-shirohttps://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick%7Ewicket-shiro On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Ryan McKinleyryan...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next wicketstuff release. When I build: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4/jdk-1.5-parent everything runs OK, but I don't see anything in: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro/ Do we need to do anything to get projects to show up in the 'release' builds? Thanks Ryan __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For any problems regarding this mail please contact us at supp...@hurstuk.com __
RE: wicketstuff maven repository
Thank you -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: 13 September 2010 16:45 To: dev@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicketstuff maven repository Emma, just send an email to dev-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Emma Moss e.m...@hurstuk.com wrote: Can you pls take me of the list, I do not wish to receive these emails Many Thanks Emma -Original Message- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 September 2010 16:36 To: dev@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicketstuff maven repository nice! It may be worth a note on: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote: Hi Ryan, wicket-shiro is has been included in the wicketstuff-core releases since version 1.4.9.1 in June 2010. See in central here: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent So long as it builds it will be included in the next release aswell (probably thursday or friday to align with the wicket 1.4.12 version). We switched over to oss.sonatype.org for wicketstuff-core a few months ago and the wicketstuff.org/hudson (you can self create an account for yourself) build the snapshots here: http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent Your recent commits triggered a build that is presently in progress: http://wicketstuff.org/hudson/job/Wicket%20Stuff%20Core%20Java5%20%28wicket%201.5-SNAPSHOT%29/11/ Regards, Mike https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~wicket-shirohttps://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick%7Ewicket-shiro On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Ryan McKinleyryan...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next wicketstuff release. When I build: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4/jdk-1.5-parent everything runs OK, but I don't see anything in: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro/ Do we need to do anything to get projects to show up in the 'release' builds? Thanks Ryan __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For any problems regarding this mail please contact us at supp...@hurstuk.com __ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For any problems regarding this mail please contact us at supp...@hurstuk.com __
Re: [vote] release wicket 1.4.12
On 09/13/2010 05:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040. Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.12/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.12/dist Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.12/m2-repo Changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12315312sorter/field=prioritysorter/order=DESC This vote ends Thursday 9:00am GMT-8 Please test the release and offer your vote: [ ] Yes, release [ ] No, don't release it (and please tell us why) +1 for release
Simple page navigation - newbie
I have been working with Wicket for only a few days so please bare with me. I am trying to configure a simple page navigation GUI at the moment using iFrames. I looked at frames - Example demonstrating HTML frames but examples were not with external links. I also looked at navomatic - Page navigation which only used internal Wicket links as well. I am also unsure if I should be using something else. I went down several other paths without success. The app I was designing was a simple Page Navigation app with 5 or so external links and 1 stand alone Wicket application. There is no need to pass parameters or monitor events between iframes; this is a very simple application. I would like to get some page navigation in place with external links before diving into the stand alone Wicket form. I could bring up an ExternalLink but I simply want to bring up the url without the click. 'Unsure if I should be using setResponsePage or other. Any help or link is appreciated. I am sure this has been answered though I found nothing. I have been speed reading Wicket in Action so feal free to reference anything in there as well. Thanks in advance, --Norm -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Simple-page-navigation-newbie-tp2538035p2538035.html Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Simple page navigation - newbie
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:32 PM, norm.pence norm.pe...@gmail.com wrote: I have been working with Wicket for only a few days so please bare with me. First of all, this is a user question, it should be sent to the user list, not the developer list.
Test
This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via nabble. Did this get through? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Test
Nope. I never saw it. Sorry. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via nabble. Did this get through? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop
Re: Test
Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this turned off. I wanted to see if I could successfully post. Looks like we've got to figure out how to turn this off. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Philip Chapman pchap...@pcsw.us wrote: Nope. I never saw it. Sorry. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via nabble. Did this get through? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop
Re: Test
i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn... -igor On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this turned off. I wanted to see if I could successfully post. Looks like we've got to figure out how to turn this off. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Philip Chapman pchap...@pcsw.us wrote: Nope. I never saw it. Sorry. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via nabble. Did this get through? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop
Re: Test
Yeah. Messing with martijn is such fun. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn... -igor On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this turned off. I wanted to see if I could successfully post. Looks like we've got to figure out how to turn this off. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Philip Chapman pchap...@pcsw.us wrote: Nope. I never saw it. Sorry. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via nabble. Did this get through? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop
Re: Test
Well, the intent was not to mess with him per se. It's just a nice side effect. Sorry, Martijn. :) We were talking via IM earlier and he said he thought he had it turned off. He asked me if I had the new topic link and I did, so I thought I'd test it out. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn... -igor On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this turned off. I wanted to see if I could successfully post. Looks like we've got to figure out how to turn this off. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Philip Chapman pchap...@pcsw.us wrote: Nope. I never saw it. Sorry. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via nabble. Did this get through? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop
Re: Test
its a sport -igor On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Philip Chapman pchap...@pcsw.us wrote: Yeah. Messing with martijn is such fun. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn... -igor On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this turned off. I wanted to see if I could successfully post. Looks like we've got to figure out how to turn this off. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Philip Chapman pchap...@pcsw.us wrote: Nope. I never saw it. Sorry. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via nabble. Did this get through? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop
Re: Test
We should set up a league. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: its a sport -igor On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Philip Chapman pchap...@pcsw.us wrote: Yeah. Messing with martijn is such fun. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn... -igor On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this turned off. I wanted to see if I could successfully post. Looks like we've got to figure out how to turn this off. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Philip Chapman pchap...@pcsw.us wrote: Nope. I never saw it. Sorry. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via nabble. Did this get through? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop -- Philip A. Chapman Java Software Development Enterprise, Web, and Desktop
