Re: WebApplication.addIgnoreMountPath(String)
Ok, then I'll deprecate it in 1.4 and remove it completely in 1.5 2010/7/22 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com i dont see why -igor On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: I forgot about this ... Actually this is org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.unmount(String) from Wicket 1.4. Don't know why this method is renamed ... Do we still need it ? 2010/7/19 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com you can by subclassing it... -igor On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote: Presumably because you can not configure the wicket filter through code? I agree. The use case is thin. Regards, Erik. Op 19-07-10 18:24, Igor Vaynberg wrote: why do we need this? afaik in 1.4 wicket filter can be configured to ignore paths -igor -- Sent from my SMTP compliant software Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
Re: WebApplication.addIgnoreMountPath(String)
I forgot about this ... Actually this is org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.unmount(String) from Wicket 1.4. Don't know why this method is renamed ... Do we still need it ? 2010/7/19 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com you can by subclassing it... -igor On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote: Presumably because you can not configure the wicket filter through code? I agree. The use case is thin. Regards, Erik. Op 19-07-10 18:24, Igor Vaynberg wrote: why do we need this? afaik in 1.4 wicket filter can be configured to ignore paths -igor -- Sent from my SMTP compliant software Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
Re: WebApplication.addIgnoreMountPath(String)
i dont see why -igor On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: I forgot about this ... Actually this is org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.unmount(String) from Wicket 1.4. Don't know why this method is renamed ... Do we still need it ? 2010/7/19 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com you can by subclassing it... -igor On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote: Presumably because you can not configure the wicket filter through code? I agree. The use case is thin. Regards, Erik. Op 19-07-10 18:24, Igor Vaynberg wrote: why do we need this? afaik in 1.4 wicket filter can be configured to ignore paths -igor -- Sent from my SMTP compliant software Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
Re: WebApplication.addIgnoreMountPath(String)
why do we need this? afaik in 1.4 wicket filter can be configured to
ignore paths
-igor
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
A have a Wicket 1.5 question:
There is a comment
in org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.addIgnoreMountPath(String)
:
public final void addIgnoreMountPath(String path)
{
// TODO how is this supposed to work :/
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
Idea:
currently the root mapper is SystemMapper which extends
CompoundRequestMapper. We can instanceof and cast here
to CompoundRequestMapper and add the list of ignored paths and later on in
org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.CompoundRequestMapper.mapRequest(Request)
we can check the ignored ones first and then iterate over the added mappers.
The only problem I see is that the user can register
another root IRequestMapper with
org.apache.wicket.Application.setRootRequestMapper(IRequestMapper) and then
this feature will stop working. But in this case many other things wont work
too - see org.apache.wicket.SystemMapper.SystemMapper(Application).
What do you think ?
Re: WebApplication.addIgnoreMountPath(String)
Presumably because you can not configure the wicket filter through code? I agree. The use case is thin. Regards, Erik. Op 19-07-10 18:24, Igor Vaynberg wrote: why do we need this? afaik in 1.4 wicket filter can be configured to ignore paths -igor -- Sent from my SMTP compliant software Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
Re: WebApplication.addIgnoreMountPath(String)
you can by subclassing it... -igor On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote: Presumably because you can not configure the wicket filter through code? I agree. The use case is thin. Regards, Erik. Op 19-07-10 18:24, Igor Vaynberg wrote: why do we need this? afaik in 1.4 wicket filter can be configured to ignore paths -igor -- Sent from my SMTP compliant software Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
