[Dev] Improving the Add/Edit RXT UI to load Preset Asset Models
Hi all, Like we have preset security scenarios, toolboxes and ready to use mediators, I think we should create preset asset models which will load everything from RXT to Handler to Custom Reports that are related into the UI. This will connect the dots to complete what we claim to support OOTB with it making the least impact on those who do not wish to use them. I couldn't think of a better way to do this, but if it does, please do provide your feedback. For a start, we can plug this against the 5 sample asset models that we ship with G-Reg? Thoughts? Thanks, Senaka. -- * http://wso2con.com/ * * Senaka Fernando* Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee; Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [Dev] Improving the Add/Edit RXT UI to load Preset Asset Models
Hi Senaka, +1. How would the final outcome of this look like? Are you guys going to change the RXT configuration UI to support adding the handlers and the report templates or is there going to be a archive type which will install them all(RXT configuration, handlers and report templates) when you upload it? Thanks, Janaka On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote: Hi all, Like we have preset security scenarios, toolboxes and ready to use mediators, I think we should create preset asset models which will load everything from RXT to Handler to Custom Reports that are related into the UI. This will connect the dots to complete what we claim to support OOTB with it making the least impact on those who do not wish to use them. I couldn't think of a better way to do this, but if it does, please do provide your feedback. For a start, we can plug this against the 5 sample asset models that we ship with G-Reg? Thoughts? Thanks, Senaka. -- * http://wso2con.com/ * * Senaka Fernando* Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee; Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev -- Janaka Ranabahu Senior Software Engineer WSO2 Inc. Mobile +94 718370861 Email : jan...@wso2.com Blog : janakaranabahu.blogspot.com ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [Dev] Improving the Add/Edit RXT UI to load Preset Asset Models
Hi Janaka, Not quite. This is an attempt to create presets to load multiple well-known things/samples. And, this is not an attempt to create self contained deployment packages, which will end being just the same or an extension to how it is done today. We need to be careful about how we make changes to the RXT language itself, and related constructs, and we should consider how they'll will be tied with tooling etc. IMHO, another archive type is not that worthwhile when compared to what we have right now unless it is a product of some tool that helps users design/generate these. Thanks, Senaka. On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Janaka Ranabahu jan...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Senaka, +1. How would the final outcome of this look like? Are you guys going to change the RXT configuration UI to support adding the handlers and the report templates or is there going to be a archive type which will install them all(RXT configuration, handlers and report templates) when you upload it? Thanks, Janaka On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote: Hi all, Like we have preset security scenarios, toolboxes and ready to use mediators, I think we should create preset asset models which will load everything from RXT to Handler to Custom Reports that are related into the UI. This will connect the dots to complete what we claim to support OOTB with it making the least impact on those who do not wish to use them. I couldn't think of a better way to do this, but if it does, please do provide your feedback. For a start, we can plug this against the 5 sample asset models that we ship with G-Reg? Thoughts? Thanks, Senaka. -- * http://wso2con.com/ * * Senaka Fernando* Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee; Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev -- Janaka Ranabahu Senior Software Engineer WSO2 Inc. Mobile +94 718370861 Email : jan...@wso2.com Blog : janakaranabahu.blogspot.com -- * http://wso2con.com/ * * Senaka Fernando* Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee; Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
