[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2316: [DOC] Update documentation: JDK 1.7 -> 1.8

[tae-jun]

Github user tae-jun closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2316


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2316: [DOC] Update documentation: JDK 1.7 -> 1.8

[tae-jun]

Github user tae-jun commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2316
  
OK. Thanks for the review @1ambda!

I'm closing myself 😄 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2316: [DOC] Update documentation: JDK 1.7 -> 1.8

[1ambda]

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2316
  
> I think it's better build artifact using jdk7 on 0.7.2

I think we can close this PR. 0.7.2 would like to be built w/ JDK 7 
according to the comment.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2316: [DOC] Update documentation: JDK 1.7 -> 1.8

[tae-jun]

Github user tae-jun commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2316
  
Oh sorry I didn't see the last comment 
[here](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2405?focusedCommentId=15973784=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15973784).

Then should I close this PR or just merge into only 0.7.1?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2316: [DOC] Update documentation: JDK 1.7 -> 1.8

[1ambda]

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2316
  
Hi, @tae-jun Thanks for the contribution. AFAIK,
 
- Zeppelin is built with JDK 1.7 still for release binary. 
- 0.7.1 is built with JDK 1.8 unintentionally.

will be appreciated if someone also verifies JDK version.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2317: [ZEPPELIN-2493] Visualization class should thro...

[tae-jun]

GitHub user tae-jun opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2317

[ZEPPELIN-2493] Visualization class should throw an error if an abstract 
method is not implemented

### What is this PR for?
`Visualization` class should throw an error if an abstract method is not 
implemented just like 
[`SpellBase`](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-web/src/app/spell/spell-base.js#L25)
 does.

And I added some comments. In my opinion, though `Visualization` has [a 
good 
example](http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/development/writingzeppelinvisualization.html),
 it needs an API documentation page (`Spell` as well). `Visualization` class 
has methods which can be overridden (e.g. `refresh`, `destroy`, etc.), but the 
example doesn't mention them. Therefore, users don't know what and how to 
implement easily!

### What type of PR is it?
Improvement

### What is the Jira issue?
[ZEPPELIN-2493](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2493)

### How should this be tested?
* Inherit `Visualization`
* Don't implement any abstract method
* Run `getTransformation()` and `render()`
* Check they print appropriate errors

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? NO
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? NO
* Does this needs documentation? NO


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/tae-jun/zeppelin viz-abstract-error

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2317.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2317


commit d994b8a8f24301168ab7ce4743b1746258a3e5c1
Author: Jun Kim 
Date:   2017-04-25T10:06:48Z

Throw error if an abstract method is not implemented

commit 3fec6d36ca8d015e4e26c4d554d2a08aa21c5f2f
Author: Jun Kim 
Date:   2017-05-04T05:34:21Z

Throw error if Visualization class is not implemented and make doc more 
concrete




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2314: [minor] Fix JDBC doc after #2229

[prabhjyotsingh]

Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2314
  
@AhyoungRyu  Thank you for the review, have made the recommended changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2316: [DOC] Update documentation: JDK 1.7 -> 1.8

[tae-jun]

GitHub user tae-jun opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2316

[DOC] Update documentation: JDK 1.7 -> 1.8

### What is this PR for?
Zeppelin is built with JDK 1.8 since 0.7.1 as far as I know. But it is 
still 1.7 on [installation 
documentation](https://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.7.1/install/install.html). 
Polina Marasanova pointed that out! Thanks!

This PR should be merged into master and 0.7.X in my opinion.



### What type of PR is it?
Documentation

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? NO
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? NO
* Does this needs documentation? NO


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/tae-jun/zeppelin patch-4

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2316.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2316


commit 7dc62970b7ac846cb90e5d71a0a0da65aaf62396
Author: Jun Kim 
Date:   2017-05-04T05:19:19Z

Update documentation: JDK 1.7 -> 1.8




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Windows Build Support

[moon soo Lee]

Okay, then let me file an INFRA issue to turn off appveyor on pullrequest
build, but keeping it for branch build.

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:39 PM Jeff Zhang  wrote:

> Make sense for option 2
>
>
> moon soo Lee 于2017年5月3日周三 上午9:21写道：
>
> > Moving thread to dev@
> >
> > Currently CI on pullrequest is
> >
> >  - Individual contributor runs Travis - CI
> >  - ASF's Jenkins connected to Apache Zeppelin github repo, and get
> > information from each contributor's Travis build.
> >  - ASF's Appveyor build each pullrequest.
> >
> > CI on branch (master, branch-0.7, ...) is
> >  - ASF's Jenkins build new commits on branch
> >  - ASF's Appveyor build new commits on branch
> >
> >
> > Since Appveyor is enabled, I can see Zeppelin PR build on appveyor waits
> > very long time in the queue. I think we can have several options on it.
> >
> > 1. Keep it as is,
> >
> > Pros - Each pullrequest will be verified on windows environment before
> > merge
> > Cons - Long wait to get a slot in Appveyor
> >
> > 2. Disable Appveyor on Pullreuqest build, keep enable Appveyor on branch
> > build.
> >
> > Pros - Each pullrequest will not wait long time for Appveyor finish the
> > job.
> > Cons - If somethings broken on windows, we'll know after PR is merged.
> >
> > 3. Let individual contributor setup Appveyor and make Jenkins check it,
> > like we do it with Travis
> >
> > Pros - Both Travis, Appveyor test can be finished quickly on each PR
> > Cons - Each individual contributor need to setup both Travis, Appveyor.
> >
> >
> > To me, 2) looks reasonable because most of PR are not related to the
> > windows environment, so recognizing some PR break windows support after
> > merge will be rare event. And of course we can just submit another patch
> to
> > fix that.
> >
> > 3) is little bit too much for me, asking all contributors setup both
> travis
> > and appveyor.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > moon
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:31 PM moon soo Lee  wrote:
> >
> > > Filed an infra issue to enable appveyor support.
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14019
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > moon
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:22 AM Park Hoon <1am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks for reply @moon.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Additionally, i create umbrella issue for windows support
> > >>
> > >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2440
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regard,
> > >>
> > >> Hoon Park
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:28 PM, moon soo Lee 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for staring the thread.
> > >>>
> > >>> I've seen almost every month people report build broken on windows.
> > >>> Windows CI env will definitely help solving the problem.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm +1 on setting up appveyor for the project.
> > >>>
> > >>> Due to very high usage on ASF's travis account, Zeppelin project
> guide
> > >>> each contributor setup travis account and check success/fail using
> > Jenkins.
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't know how busy ASF's appveyor account. But I think we can
> first
> > >>> try just turn on appveyor with ASF's account and see how busy it is.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> moon
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:15 AM Park Hoon <1am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Hi all,
> > 
> >  Some people are struggling with build Zeppelin in windows.
> > 
> >  -
> > 
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40498638/install-zeppelin-on-windows/42560442#42560442
> > 
> >  IMO, it's enough to verify that zeppelin works well on windows.
> > 
> >  But it's not that hard to setup CI for windows and it's possible to
> >  execute integration tests on windows, it's useful. As you know, we
> > have
> >  some issues related with windows env
> > 
> >  -
> > 
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ZEPPELIN%20and%20text%20~%20windows
> > 
> >  I found that some apache projects already use appveyor to run CI on
> >  windows. (sadly, travis doesn't support)
> > 
> >  - (thrift)
> https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/master/appveyor.yml
> >  - (arrow) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12967
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  Thanks.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >>
> >
>

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2492) [Docker] Use single dockerfile for tag-pushes

[Hoon Park (JIRA)]

Hoon Park created ZEPPELIN-2492:
---

 Summary: [Docker] Use single dockerfile for tag-pushes
 Key: ZEPPELIN-2492
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2492
 Project: Zeppelin
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Hoon Park


Use single dockerfile for tag-pushes

Apache requires this information for tag-pushes. 

{code}
Type: "Tag" 
Name: "/rel\/avatica-(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)/" 
Dockerfile location: "/docker/src/main/dockerhub" 
Docker tag name: "{\1}"
{code}

See also: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12781



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2315: [ZEPPELIN-2491] fix: Bump spell package version...

[1ambda]

GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2315

[ZEPPELIN-2491] fix: Bump spell package version too

### What is this PR for?

[ZEPPELIN-2491] fix: Bump spell package version too

### What type of PR is it?
[Bug Fix]

### Todos

NONE

### What is the Jira issue?

[ZEPPELIN-2491](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2491)

### How should this be tested?

1. ` ./dev/change_zeppelin_version.sh 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT 0.8.0`
2. Check `/zeppelin-web/src/app/spell/package.json`

### Screenshots (if appropriate)

NONE

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? - NO
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? - NO
* Does this needs documentation? - NO


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/1ambda/zeppelin 
ZEPPELIN-2491/bump-spell-package-version-too

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2315.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2315


commit 20a8fae85a10296c91a5c83cb0555fd750ee87e6
Author: 1ambda <1am...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-05-04T04:36:57Z

fix: Bump spell package version too




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2312: ZEPPELIN-2486. AngularElem's onChange is only i...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2312


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2490) Parity of ZeppelinContext in Spark & PySpark

[Jeff Zhang (JIRA)]

Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-2490:


 Summary: Parity of ZeppelinContext in Spark & PySpark
 Key: ZEPPELIN-2490
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2490
 Project: Zeppelin
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.7.1
Reporter: Jeff Zhang
Assignee: Jeff Zhang


Some methods are missing in ZeppelinContext of PySpark



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2489) Can not use pickle in PySparkInterpreter

[Jeff Zhang (JIRA)]

Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-2489:


 Summary: Can not use pickle in PySparkInterpreter
 Key: ZEPPELIN-2489
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2489
 Project: Zeppelin
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Jeff Zhang


{code}
def f():
"hello"

import pickle
pickle.dumps(f)
{code}

{code}
Fail to execute line 5: pickle.dumps(f)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/var/folders/dp/hmchg5dd3vbcvds26q91spdwgp/T/zeppelin_pyspark-5559547270503920588.py",
 line 338, in 
exec(code, _zcUserQueryNameSpace)
  File "", line 5, in 
_pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle : attribute 
lookup f on __main__ failed
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2312: ZEPPELIN-2486. AngularElem's onChange is only invoked ...

[zjffdu]

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2312
  
Thanks, will merge if no more comments. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2298: [ZEPPELIN-2466] Chart resize problem

[1ambda]

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2298
  
Tested and works as described. LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2312: ZEPPELIN-2486. AngularElem's onChange is only invoked ...

[Leemoonsoo]

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2312
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2306: [ZEPPELIN-2479] Fix incorrect tooltip view inside of v...

[Leemoonsoo]

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2306
  
Merge to master and branch-0.7 if no further discussions.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2306: [ZEPPELIN-2479] Fix incorrect tooltip view insi...

[khalidhuseynov]

GitHub user khalidhuseynov reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2306

[ZEPPELIN-2479] Fix incorrect tooltip view inside of version control menu

### What is this PR for?
This is to fix incorrect appearance of tooltip inside version control menu

### What type of PR is it?
Improvement

### Todos
* [x] - fix/remove tooltip

### What is the Jira issue?
[ZEPPELIN-2479](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2479)

### How should this be tested?
go to `version control` menu in notebook action bar of note

### Screenshots (if appropriate)
before: 
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1642088/25606467/62f0901c-2f4c-11e7-95ef-c22f1df410be.png;>


after:
![screen shot 2017-05-02 at 6 55 24 
pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1642088/25613839/aac216a4-2f6a-11e7-8cab-a77ddb48382b.png)



### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? no
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? no
* Does this needs documentation? no


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/khalidhuseynov/zeppelin fix/ZEPPELIN-2479

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2306.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2306


commit ac4e651c6a3fc37c01df860a7efe504fa72f7904
Author: Khalid Huseynov 
Date:   2017-05-02T09:45:11Z

add css class




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2306: [ZEPPELIN-2479] Fix incorrect tooltip view inside of v...

[1ambda]

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2306
  
CI is green. https://travis-ci.org/khalidhuseynov/zeppelin/builds/227894706

LGTM.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2313: ZEPPELIN-2268. Adding png and jpg support for helium m...

[1ambda]

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2313
  
LGTM

however, Could you setup travis-ci for your fork and see if it passes the 
test? Please take a look CI.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2125: [ZEPPELIN-2222] Add Network Visualization

[1ambda]

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
  
Hi, @conker84 

Here is failed JOB and looks irrelevant. But could you make CI green? 

- https://travis-ci.org/conker84/zeppelin/jobs/227364420

you can click `restart` button in travis. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2306: [ZEPPELIN-2479] Fix incorrect tooltip view insi...

[khalidhuseynov]

Github user khalidhuseynov closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2306


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2268: [ZEPPELIN-2403] interpreter property widgets

[1ambda]

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2268
  
Let me review and comment soon for this awesome improvement.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2306: [ZEPPELIN-2479] Fix incorrect tooltip view inside of v...

[1ambda]

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2306
  
@khalidhuseynov Could you restart the failed travis JOB?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #658: Switch to Java 8

[thepolina]

Github user thepolina commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/658
  
Any news regarding upgrade to java 8?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2311: ZEPPELIN-2485. AngularModel can not be serializ...

[zjffdu]

Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2311


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2311: ZEPPELIN-2485. AngularModel can not be serialized corr...

[zjffdu]

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2311
  
oops, it is my mistake. I set AngularModel as value of angular object. 
Thanks @Leemoonsoo , close it.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2488) Cant run zeppelin on windows 10

[Zacharias Kostopoulos (JIRA)]

Zacharias Kostopoulos created ZEPPELIN-2488:
---

 Summary: Cant run zeppelin on windows 10
 Key: ZEPPELIN-2488
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2488
 Project: Zeppelin
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Zacharias Kostopoulos


I am using zeppelin on windows and I have the following issue. After executing 
the comand bin\zeppelin.cmd on command window and I see the message: "Done, 
zeppelin server has started" I browse at localhost:8080 and I get the following 
page: 

HTTP ERROR: 503

Problem accessing /. Reason:

Service Unavailable
Powered by Jetty://

On the comand window there is this bug:

javax.servlet.ServletException: Resource class org.apache.zeppelin.server.Zeppel
inServer can not be instantiated due to InvocationTargetException

I have downloaded the binary package with all interpreters from zeppelin 
website (the latest) and I have the latest java installed. Any suggestions?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2487) Enabling downloading more rows with Download Data as CSV

[Paul Brenner (JIRA)]

Paul Brenner created ZEPPELIN-2487:
--

 Summary: Enabling downloading more rows with Download Data as CSV
 Key: ZEPPELIN-2487
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2487
 Project: Zeppelin
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.7.1
Reporter: Paul Brenner


There are limits to how much data the download to csv button will download 
which limit Zeppelin’s usefulness for our BI teams. In Chrome the limit is 
either 1.5MB or 3500 rows. In Firefox it is possible to download 100k rows, 
however the web interface slows to a crawl. 

Although most users fluent in whatever language they are working with would 
just export 100k rows directly to csv (e.g. via df.write.csv() in spark), if 
Zeppelin is going to be a BI tool useful to analysts it is important to include 
a way to export more data to csv via the web app. 

Would it be possible to include a way to download more data (perhaps up to 100k 
rows if we need a limit) without showing all the rows on screen? Hue is able to 
do this by only loading data as it is scrolled through. If that is too complex 
perhaps just add an option to download all of the data sent to z.show even 
though z.show is limited to showing 1000 rows. 

Discussion on the users list is here: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fb9d3f95bb525fcb05baea06b303c192f393e7570eecd643f3cb3057@%3Cusers.zeppelin.apache.org%3E



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Trevor Grant has shared a document on Google Docs with you

[trevor . d . grant]

Trevor Grant has invited you to view the following document:

Open in Docs

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2311: ZEPPELIN-2485. AngularModel can not be serialized corr...

[Leemoonsoo]

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2311
  
I thought AngularModel is just syntactic sugar for AngularObject in Scala. 
And AngularObject is the object that is being serialized. @zjffdu Could you 
help me understand what makes AngularObject reference AngularModel?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2313: ZEPPELIN-2268. Adding png and jpg support for helium m...

[Leemoonsoo]

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2313
  
\cc @1ambda 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2314: [minor] Fix JDBC doc after #2229

[prabhjyotsingh]

Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2314
  
@AhyoungRyu  can you help review this PR. With that (#2229), I assumed all 
syntax of MD will work for documentation, but it didn't generate the table.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2314: [minor] Fix JDBC doc after #2229

[prabhjyotsingh]

GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2314

[minor] Fix JDBC doc after #2229

### What is this PR for?
Fix JDBC doc after #2229.

### What type of PR is it?
[Bug Fix]


### Screenshots (if appropriate)

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update?
* Is there breaking changes for older versions?
* Does this needs documentation?


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/prabhjyotsingh/zeppelin 
minor/jdbc-doc-zeppelin-2367

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2314.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2314






---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2293: [ZEPPELIN-2461] Masking Jetty Server version wi...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2293


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2291: ZEPPELIN-2459 Zeppelin Usability Improvement fo...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2291


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2310: [ZEPPELIN-2484] Fix NullPointerException in during che...

[Leemoonsoo]

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2310
  
LGTM and merge to master if no further comments.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2308: Some grammar updates.

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2308


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2299: [ZEPPELIN-2468] Enable websocket without Origin...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2299


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2312: ZEPPELIN-2486. AngularElem's onChange is only invoked ...

[zjffdu]

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2312
  
@Leemoonsoo Please help review. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2312: ZEPPELIN-2486. AngularElem's onChange is only i...

[zjffdu]

GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2312

ZEPPELIN-2486. AngularElem's onChange is only invoked once

### What is this PR for?
`ng-change` can not capture event, so that means `$event.timeStamp` is 
undefined. https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/6370
This cause AngularElem's onChange is only invoked once.


### What type of PR is it?
[Bug Fix]

### Todos
* [ ] - Task

### What is the Jira issue?
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2486

### How should this be tested?
Tested manually

### Screenshots (if appropriate)

Before

![zeppelin_after](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/164491/25662177/2108e898-3046-11e7-816f-7685480df83e.gif)
After

![zeppelin_before](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/164491/25662178/227ec2ec-3046-11e7-9852-9e041d008698.gif)

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/zjffdu/zeppelin ZEPPELIN-2486

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2312.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2312


commit 4cbb1a1cbf870b7e838efa23943c7a8ef6c28b34
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2017-05-03T12:42:34Z

ZEPPELIN-2486. ng-change is only invoked once for AngularElem




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2282: [ZEPPELIN-2447] Fix python interpreter as to use max r...

[paularmand]

Github user paularmand commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2282
  
@zjffdu I'll have a look. Can expect something later on this week.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2486) ng-change is only invoked once for AngularElem

[Jeff Zhang (JIRA)]

Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-2486:


 Summary: ng-change is only invoked once for AngularElem
 Key: ZEPPELIN-2486
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2486
 Project: Zeppelin
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.7.1
Reporter: Jeff Zhang
Assignee: Jeff Zhang






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2291: ZEPPELIN-2459 Zeppelin Usability Improvement for new p...

[prabhjyotsingh]

Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2291
  
Merging this if no more discussion.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2300: [ZEPPELIN-2467] Restoring second travis job functional...

[AlexanderShoshin]

Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2300
  
According to @Leemoonsoo suggestion I have added a comment for the travis 
job configuration about excluded tests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2311: ZEPPELIN-2485. AngularModel can not be serialized corr...

[zjffdu]

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2311
  
@Leemoonsoo please help review . 
CI fails due to flaky selenium test
```
Tests in error: 
  InterpreterIT.testShowDescriptionOnInterpreterCreate:69 » 
ElementNotVisible El...
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2294: [ZEPPELIN-2438]: Add local winutils.exe in buil...

[cfries]

GitHub user cfries reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2294

[ZEPPELIN-2438]: Add local winutils.exe in build step and use if required 
…

### What is this PR for?

Add local winutils.exe in build and use as temporary HADOOP_HOME if 
required on run (windows only).

The build of the spark dependencies now downloads winutils.exe and installs 
it in interpreter/spark/winutils.
The zeppelin-env.cmd (only used if we run on windows) then checks if 
HADOOP_HOME exists, if not, it will set it to point to winutils. This is 
required to have the spark interpreter work in Windows.

In order to have this active, the zeppelin-env.cmd had to be removed from 
the .gitignore.

### What type of PR is it?
[Bug Fix | Improvement]

Without this fix, the binary distribution or a local build of Zeppelin will 
have the spark interpreter (default interpreter) fail on a Windows platform 
(unless the user follows additional / manual installation steps or already has 
a local HADOOP). This will frustrate users trying to checkout Zeppelin.

For users having HADOOP or macOS/Linux users, the chance will have no 
effect.

### Todos

### What is the Jira issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2438

### How should this be tested?
- Non-Regression Test
- Standard Unit Test
- Run Zeppelin without additional installations (except Java) on Windows

### Screenshots (if appropriate)
N/A

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/cfries/zeppelin windows-compatiblity

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2294.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2294


commit 3635ed8a717108ba82753413bd0500519ffd4add
Author: Christian Fries 
Date:   2017-04-08T20:00:33Z

[ZEPPELIN-2375]: Avoid modification of CLASSPATH variable.

The script previously modified the CLASSPATH variable. This may lead to
an undesired side effect, where the zeppelin server classpath is
exported to the zeppelin interpreter classpath, see JIRA issue
ZEPPELIN-2375 for details. Instead of modifying classpath we now work
the other way around and set ZEPPELIN_CLASSPATH or
ZEPPELIN_INT_CLASSPATH to include CLASSPATH and then use
ZEPPELIN_CLASSPATH or ZEPPELIN_INT_CLASSPATH in the corresponding exec
(runner), respectively.

See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2375

commit 096fed6cfde37051b95018cedd455db3084aa1c9
Author: Christian Fries 
Date:   2017-04-27T16:38:53Z

Merge branch 'master' into apache/master

commit 303511f15dc95b0b75b224607f79ef00229392ba
Author: Christian Fries 
Date:   2017-04-27T17:19:28Z

[ZEPPELIN-2438]: Add local winutils.exe in build and use if required on run.

The build of the spark dependencies now downloads winutils.exe and
installs it in interpreter/spark/winutils.
The zeppelin-env.cmd (only used if we run on windows) then checks if
HADOOP_HOME exists, if not, it will set it to point to winutils. This
is required to have the spark interpreter work in Windows.

In order to have this active, the zeppelin-env.cmd had to be removed
from the .gitignore.

commit 18e226be7dfc11493edd17bf039019bb0da93e15
Author: Christian Fries 
Date:   2017-04-30T00:11:21Z

Added zeppelin-env.cmd to distribution.

commit 4ba7f564841cb09072969f3538460a2ff285fbcf
Author: Christian Fries 
Date:   2017-05-01T10:43:17Z

Moved fallback setting HADOOP_HOME to common.cmd.

commit 97f97850d2fb1e2056d99530c78d754f02841a67
Author: Christian Fries 
Date:   2017-05-01T10:45:31Z

Cosmetic change. Added newline to end (effectively reverting previous 
commit).

commit 93017a036cba2b49e00763f8ac65d977c9ccab26
Author: Christian Fries 
Date:   2017-05-01T11:23:42Z

Moved fallback setting HADOOP_HOME to common.cmd.

Fixed syntax and path.

commit f59e39eedda069c29f0c1945f39e6e8feb259afc
Author: Christian Fries 
Date:   2017-05-01T14:13:57Z

Merge branch 'apache/master' into windows-compatiblity




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a 

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2294: [ZEPPELIN-2438]: Add local winutils.exe in buil...

[cfries]

Github user cfries closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2294


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2311: ZEPPELIN-2485. AngularModel can be serialized c...

[zjffdu]

GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2311

ZEPPELIN-2485. AngularModel can be serialized correctly.

### What is this PR for?
AngularModel would be serialized as part of AngularObject, but it would 
fail to serialized to json sometimes. 

```
ERROR [2017-05-03 14:25:31,563] ({pool-21-thread-1} 
AngularObject.java[run]:193) - Exception on watch
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: class 
org.apache.zeppelin.display.angular.notebookscope.AngularModel declares 
multiple JSON fields named name
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.getBoundFields(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:122)
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.create(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:72)
at com.google.gson.Gson.getAdapter(Gson.java:349)
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.TypeAdapterRuntimeTypeWrapper.write(TypeAdapterRuntimeTypeWrapper.java:55)
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$1.write(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:89)
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$Adapter.write(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:195)
at com.google.gson.Gson.toJson(Gson.java:582)
at com.google.gson.Gson.toJson(Gson.java:561)
at com.google.gson.Gson.toJson(Gson.java:516)
at com.google.gson.Gson.toJson(Gson.java:496)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreterEventClient.angularObjectUpdate(RemoteInterpreterEventClient.java:96)
```


### What type of PR is it?
[Bug Fix]

### Todos
* [ ] - Task

### What is the Jira issue?
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2485

### How should this be tested?
Unit test is added


### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/zjffdu/zeppelin ZEPPELIN-2485

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2311.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2311


commit b2bbe3147b2dd798b8f4694a24d1f462cfb9de3b
Author: Jeff Zhang 
Date:   2017-05-03T08:46:01Z

ZEPPELIN-2485. AngularModel can be serialized correctly.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2485) AngularModel can be serialized correctly.

[Jeff Zhang (JIRA)]

Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-2485:


 Summary: AngularModel can be serialized correctly. 
 Key: ZEPPELIN-2485
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2485
 Project: Zeppelin
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.7.1
Reporter: Jeff Zhang
Assignee: Jeff Zhang


{code}
ERROR [2017-05-03 14:25:31,563] ({pool-21-thread-1} 
AngularObject.java[run]:193) - Exception on watch
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: class 
org.apache.zeppelin.display.angular.notebookscope.AngularModel declares 
multiple JSON fields named name
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.getBoundFields(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:122)
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.create(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:72)
at com.google.gson.Gson.getAdapter(Gson.java:349)
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.TypeAdapterRuntimeTypeWrapper.write(TypeAdapterRuntimeTypeWrapper.java:55)
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$1.write(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:89)
at 
com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$Adapter.write(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:195)
at com.google.gson.Gson.toJson(Gson.java:582)
at com.google.gson.Gson.toJson(Gson.java:561)
at com.google.gson.Gson.toJson(Gson.java:516)
at com.google.gson.Gson.toJson(Gson.java:496)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreterEventClient.angularObjectUpdate(RemoteInterpreterEventClient.java:96)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreterServer.onUpdate(RemoteInterpreterServer.java:788)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.display.AngularObjectRegistry$1.updated(AngularObjectRegistry.java:56)
at org.apache.zeppelin.display.AngularObject.emit(AngularObject.java:152)
at org.apache.zeppelin.display.AngularObject.set(AngularObject.java:175)
at org.apache.zeppelin.display.AngularObject.set(AngularObject.java:161)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.display.angular.AbstractAngularModel.value(AbstractAngularModel.scala:89)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.display.angular.notebookscope.AngularModel.(AngularModel.scala:31)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.display.angular.notebookscope.AngularModel$.apply(AngularModel.scala:50)
at 
$line37220163026.$read$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$anonfun$1.apply$mcV$sp(:41)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.display.angular.AbstractAngularElem$$anon$1.watch(AbstractAngularElem.scala:143)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.display.AngularObjectWatcher.watch(AngularObjectWatcher.java:33)
at org.apache.zeppelin.display.AngularObject$1.run(AngularObject.java:191)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)