Re: [dev-context] [NTG-context] ConTeXt release 2007.02.20 (fwd)

2007-02-23 Thread Taco Hoekwater


Hans Hagen wrote:

 Does one of you have any other suggestions/ideas how to work around
 this? I am not sure that we can get lm 1.01 into Debian soon, not before
 Debian etch is released, and this 
   
 one option is to add the 1.01 lm map files to the context package; they 
 are more complete

I doubt this would help, since it seems the actual rm-*.tfm files were
a new addition in 1.01

Best, Taco
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Math subformula numbering

2007-02-23 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Hans Hagen wrote:

 Aditya Mahajan wrote:
 Any comments? I think that Mojca and I are the only people who use 
 \startsubformulas right now (my fault, have not documented them), so 
 breaking the backward compatibility of \startsubformulas should not be too 
 big a problem.
 
 As long as it's consistent ... I'm really sensitive for consistency -) 
 Just send me the patches needed.

I will do that once I get home.

 (which reminds me of other pending patches but i assume that i get to know 
 things once they're ready)

The theorem part needs more work. I have something that works, but it 
needs more testing. I did not get any feedback on theorems, so I think 
that I really need to write a myway to show what can and cannot be 
done :-)

Aditya
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context