Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster


Am 25.08.2009 um 00:20 schrieb Hans Hagen:


\def\dosetupmodule[#1][#2]%
{\scratchtoks\expandafter{\currentmoduleparameters}%
 \ifsecondargument
   \getparameters[\??md:#1:][#2]%
   \expanded{\getparameters[\??md:#1:][\the\scratchtoks]}%


no need for toks

\expanded{\getparameters[\??md:#1:]\expandafter} 
\expandafter[\currentmoduleparameters]%


hey, you wrote \setupmodule and not me


but maybe a \hetparameterscommand makes more sense -)


\hetparameterscommand?


   \processassignmentlist[#2]{\doabortmodule{#1}}%
 \else
   \getparameters[\??md:\currentmodule:][#1]%
   \expanded{\getparameters[\??md:\currentmodule:][\the 
\scratchtoks]}%

   \processassignmentlist[#1]{\doabortmodule\currentmodule}%
 \fi
 \let\currentmoduleparameters\empty}


but anyway, i wonder if we should go that route; normally context is  
downward compatible and eventually mkiv will become more stable


it was just a example how things can be done

Wolfgang

___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-24 Thread Oliver Buerschaper

*You* want to write a test suite for ConTeXt?


The test suite is there. There is even a script in the test suit  
that compares the outputs of two versions at pixel level. All we  
need is people to submit tests and then someone to monitor the test  
suite. See

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Test


Yep, I almost forgot about that ... so we have a foundation to build  
on! Someone then also needs to decide on which test code conforms to  
(current) valid syntax (which is probably *not* just everything that  
compiles ... think of deprecated code, hacks, workarounds etc. that  
aren't considered best practices).



The problem with such systems is they lead always to  
incompatibilities with ConTeXt installations (think about TeXLive)  
and we had one at the end of last year when Hans changed the  
multilingual interface to allow a persian interface.


Loading of lua files has this feature. For modules, asking for a  
minimum kernel version is no guarantee that the module will work  
with future versions of ConTeXT :-)


Yes, but it's a start ...

Oliver
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-24 Thread Oliver Buerschaper
MkIV is ConTeXt’s feature without an doubt but it's not so easy as  
you think.


I have myself two modules which work only with MkIV (simplefonts and  
games) but
bigger ones like simpleslides or letter are just complexer styles  
and you can't
expect from a user to upgrade to MkIV just to make a presentation or  
to write

a short letter.

I thought about integrating the version check into \setupmodule  
because the command
is only used in modules and available in MkII and MkIV but Thomas  
and Aditya use it
in the simpleslides module to pass parameters to the module and this  
a few times

at different places and not only at the start of the file.


Perhaps this is too simple ... what about some passive check on behalf  
of the module? That is, would the MkII kernel evaluate another field  
in the module's header upon loading or ignore it because it doesn't  
recognize the additional info? In the latter case the MkIV kernel  
could evaluate the additional header and refuse to load the module if  
necessary.


Of course, this wouldn't prevent an MkIV only module from being loaded  
in MkII but it would implement the compatibility check at least for  
MkIV. But that's probably fine given that some modules are MkIV  
exclusive already :-) And even for existing modules one will probably  
have to split into (frozen?) MkII and current MkIV versions at some  
point anyway ...


Well, just a thought.

Oliver
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-24 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:



Am 24.08.2009 um 00:17 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:

In your module you can either use \getparameters or – what I think you 
want in your module – \setvariables because it's not very different to 
\setupmodule.


I thought that \setupmodule was meant for passing parameters to modules, 
mainly because of the following comment in core-fil


Is this passing parameters to the module, I don't think so!

\def\dosetupTitle[#1]%
{\setupmodule[simpleslides:title][#1]}


Oh those. I had forgotten about them :) I will change these to 
\getvariables.


As, \setupmodule is just \getparameters with a few defaults in place, I can 
also use \getparamters with \currentmoduleparamters.


You use \currentmoduleparameter only in t-simpleslides to load a style file
but \moduleparameter is used many other files to setvariables etc. and the 
last

one is more like \getvariables (which use rawparameters)


I agree.


To stop the TeX run we can have

\setupmodule[contextversion=2009.08.22]

at the begin of a module and ConTeXt will abort the run if the key 
'contextversion' has a value and context is older than the user has 
requested.


Do you want this to check to be part of the definition of \setupmodule? One 
difficultly that I see is that typically this will mean that we need to set 
this separately for each engine.


I don't need such a check, it was Olivers idea and I thought about a idea how 
this
can be integrated without introducing a new command which breaks backward 
compatibility.



I meant that when you said
\setupmodule[contextversion=...], what is the implementation you had in 
mind. \setupmodule macro doing the checking, or the module writer doing 
the checking.


Aditya___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-24 Thread Wolfgang Schuster


Am 24.08.2009 um 16:27 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:


To stop the TeX run we can have
\setupmodule[contextversion=2009.08.22]
at the begin of a module and ConTeXt will abort the run if the  
key 'contextversion' has a value and context is older than the  
user has requested.
Do you want this to check to be part of the definition of  
\setupmodule? One difficultly that I see is that typically this  
will mean that we need to set this separately for each engine.


I don't need such a check, it was Olivers idea and I thought about  
a idea how this
can be integrated without introducing a new command which breaks  
backward compatibility.


I meant that when you said
\setupmodule[contextversion=...], what is the implementation you  
had in mind. \setupmodule macro doing the checking, or the module  
writer doing the checking.


I think it's up to the developer to write something in the module,
e.g. 
http://bitbucket.org/wolfs/simplefonts/src/46a1f454bccc/files/t-simplefonts.tex
but it's not so hard to integrate it into the \setupmodule command.

% untested, it should only show how \setupmodule can be extended to  
stop a tex run

% when a module is used with a too old context version

\def\c!contextversion{contextversion}

\def\doabortmodule#1#2#3%
  {\doif{#2}\c!contextversion{\doifolderversionelse\contextversion{#3} 
{\forcequitjob{#1}}\donothing}}


\def\dosetupmodule[#1][#2]%
  {\scratchtoks\expandafter{\currentmoduleparameters}%
   \ifsecondargument
 \getparameters[\??md:#1:][#2]%
 \expanded{\getparameters[\??md:#1:][\the\scratchtoks]}%
 \processassignmentlist[#2]{\doabortmodule{#1}}%
   \else
 \getparameters[\??md:\currentmodule:][#1]%
 \expanded{\getparameters[\??md:\currentmodule:][\the 
\scratchtoks]}%

 \processassignmentlist[#1]{\doabortmodule\currentmodule}%
   \fi
   \let\currentmoduleparameters\empty}

Wolfgang

___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-24 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:



Am 24.08.2009 um 16:27 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:


To stop the TeX run we can have
\setupmodule[contextversion=2009.08.22]
at the begin of a module and ConTeXt will abort the run if the key 
'contextversion' has a value and context is older than the user has 
requested.
Do you want this to check to be part of the definition of \setupmodule? 
One difficultly that I see is that typically this will mean that we need 
to set this separately for each engine.


I don't need such a check, it was Olivers idea and I thought about a idea 
how this
can be integrated without introducing a new command which breaks backward 
compatibility.


I meant that when you said
\setupmodule[contextversion=...], what is the implementation you had in 
mind. \setupmodule macro doing the checking, or the module writer doing the 
checking.


I think it's up to the developer to write something in the module,
e.g. 
http://bitbucket.org/wolfs/simplefonts/src/46a1f454bccc/files/t-simplefonts.tex

but it's not so hard to integrate it into the \setupmodule command.


Thanks for clarifying. I also think that it is better to do this 
selectively for each module rather than in the core.


Aditya
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-23 Thread Wolfgang Schuster


Am 22.08.2009 um 13:47 schrieb Oliver Buerschaper:

What's more important, the exit status of the context command is 0  
(via echo $?) indicating that there was no problem at all! This  
might turn out problematic as soon as documents are processed in a  
batch run ... (like e.g. a regression test suite ;-)


*You* want to write a test suite for ConTeXt?

Perhaps one could even integrate this requirement check into the  
module loading code of the kernel. For example, one might enforce  
that each valid module has to declare a field like  
minkernelversion in its header ... just thinking out loud.


The problem with such systems is they lead always to incompatibilities  
with older
ConTeXt installations (think about TeXLive) and we had one at the end  
of last year
when Hans changed the multilingual interface to allow a persian  
interface.


Wolfgang

___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-23 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:



Am 22.08.2009 um 13:47 schrieb Oliver Buerschaper:

What's more important, the exit status of the context command is 0 (via 
echo $?) indicating that there was no problem at all! This might turn out 
problematic as soon as documents are processed in a batch run ... (like 
e.g. a regression test suite ;-)


*You* want to write a test suite for ConTeXt?


The test suite is there. There is even a script in the test suit that 
compares the outputs of two versions at pixel level. All we need is people 
to submit tests and then someone to monitor the test suite. See

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Test

Perhaps one could even integrate this requirement check into the module 
loading code of the kernel. For example, one might enforce that each valid 
module has to declare a field like minkernelversion in its header ... 
just thinking out loud.


The problem with such systems is they lead always to incompatibilities 
with ConTeXt installations (think about TeXLive) and we had one at the 
end of last year when Hans changed the multilingual interface to allow a 
persian interface.


Loading of lua files has this feature. For modules, asking for a 
minimum kernel version is no guarantee that the module will work with 
future versions of ConTeXT :-)


Aditya
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-23 Thread Oliver Buerschaper
What's more important, the exit status of the context command is 0  
(via echo $?) indicating that there was no problem at all! This  
might turn out problematic as soon as documents are processed in a  
batch run ... (like e.g. a regression test suite ;-)


*You* want to write a test suite for ConTeXt?


Well, not exactly ... this might be too ambitious an endeavour for one  
person alone ;-)


I'm trying though to store a bunch of test cases locally which I  
sporadically collect from the main mailing test whenever a bug report  
shows up. If only to have something I can test my installation package  
against ...


For the moment I'm mainly interested in whether these test cases  
compile at all hence my remark about the exit status ... (After all,  
if that can't be automated any further verification steps will be  
pretty much useless I guess.)



Perhaps one could even integrate this requirement check into the  
module loading code of the kernel. For example, one might enforce  
that each valid module has to declare a field like  
minkernelversion in its header ... just thinking out loud.


The problem with such systems is they lead always to  
incompatibilities with older
ConTeXt installations (think about TeXLive) and we had one at the  
end of last year
when Hans changed the multilingual interface to allow a persian  
interface.


I agree that my suggestion would sacrifice backwards compatibility. At  
the same time I'm not sure how much change to the MkIV kernel is  
desirable given that MkII is considered frozen. I'm really in no  
position to have an educated opinion on whether there should be as few  
changes as possible or rather the occasional clear cut. It's just that  
if you guys think that some clear cuts are due for MkIV anyway then  
there will probably be never a better time than now to make module  
loading more bullet-proof. As I was saying, I'm just thinking out  
loud ;-)


Oliver
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-23 Thread Wolfgang Schuster


Am 23.08.2009 um 17:22 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:


*You* want to write a test suite for ConTeXt?


The test suite is there. There is even a script in the test suit  
that compares the outputs of two versions at pixel level. All we  
need is people to submit tests and then someone to monitor the test  
suite. See

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Test


Is this still alive and used?

Wolfgang

___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-23 Thread Wolfgang Schuster


Am 23.08.2009 um 17:52 schrieb Oliver Buerschaper:

I agree that my suggestion would sacrifice backwards compatibility.  
At the same time I'm not sure how much change to the MkIV kernel is  
desirable given that MkII is considered frozen. I'm really in no  
position to have an educated opinion on whether there should be as  
few changes as possible or rather the occasional clear cut. It's  
just that if you guys think that some clear cuts are due for MkIV  
anyway then there will probably be never a better time than now to  
make module loading more bullet-proof. As I was saying, I'm just  
thinking out loud ;-)


MkIV is ConTeXt’s feature without an doubt but it's not so easy as you  
think.


I have myself two modules which work only with MkIV (simplefonts and  
games) but
bigger ones like simpleslides or letter are just complexer styles and  
you can't
expect from a user to upgrade to MkIV just to make a presentation or  
to write

a short letter.

I thought about integrating the version check into \setupmodule  
because the command
is only used in modules and available in MkII and MkIV but Thomas and  
Aditya use it
in the simpleslides module to pass parameters to the module and this a  
few times

at different places and not only at the start of the file.

Wolfgang

___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-23 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:



Am 23.08.2009 um 17:52 schrieb Oliver Buerschaper:

I agree that my suggestion would sacrifice backwards compatibility. At the 
same time I'm not sure how much change to the MkIV kernel is desirable 
given that MkII is considered frozen. I'm really in no position to have an 
educated opinion on whether there should be as few changes as possible or 
rather the occasional clear cut. It's just that if you guys think that some 
clear cuts are due for MkIV anyway then there will probably be never a 
better time than now to make module loading more bullet-proof. As I was 
saying, I'm just thinking out loud ;-)


MkIV is ConTeXt’s feature without an doubt but it's not so easy as you think.

I have myself two modules which work only with MkIV (simplefonts and 
games) but bigger ones like simpleslides or letter are just complexer 
styles and you can't expect from a user to upgrade to MkIV just to make 
a presentation or to write a short letter.


I thought about integrating the version check into \setupmodule because 
the command is only used in modules and available in MkII and MkIV but 
Thomas and Aditya use it in the simpleslides module to pass parameters 
to the module and this a few times at different places and not only at 
the start of the file.


If you have a suggestion that will make things cleaner, we (Thomas and I) 
can easily change the internals of simple slides to accomodate that.


Aditya___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-22 Thread Wolfgang Schuster


Am 21.08.2009 um 22:45 schrieb Jörg Hecke:

Ahh many thanks for the links. I have not looked at the modules  
site. I'll download it right away and will try to get it work in the  
standard TeXlive Context (MKII) distribution.


The typescripts in the package work only with LuaTeX or XeTeX, to use  
them

with TeXLive 2008 process your files with 'texexec --xetex filename'.

There will be *no* support for pdfTeX from me.

Wolfgang

___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-22 Thread Oliver Buerschaper
Would it then be possible to have ConTeXt grind to a complete halt  
once it encounters a module whose minimum requirements aren't met?


\doifolderversionelse\contextversion{2100.01.01}\normalend\donothing
%\doifolderversionelse\contextversion{2009.07.01}\normalend\donothing

\starttext
Hello
\stoptext


That's great! It's almost what I was looking for ... yet I think  
\normalend might not be drastic enough ;-) Namely, running this  
example with


context test.tex

gives me the following terminal output:

---
MTXrun | run 1: luatex --fmt=/Users/oliver/.context/2009-06-13-beta/ 
luatex-cache/context/18b584d8d585db5fc4cbfa8499d343d8/formats/cont-en  
--lua=/Users/oliver/.context/2009-06-13-beta/luatex-cache/context/ 
18b584d8d585db5fc4cbfa8499d343d8/formats/cont-en.lui --backend=pdf ./ 
general-0002.tex

This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.40.5-2009061123 (Web2C 2009)
 \write18 enabled.
(general-0002.tex
color   : system all is global activated
color   : system gray is global activated
color   : mpcmyk color space is supported
color   : mpspot color space is supported
color   : system rgb is global activated
color   : system all is global activated

ConTeXt  ver: 2009.06.13 13:37 MKIV  fmt: 2009.8.15  int: english/ 
english


system  : cont-new loaded
(/usr/local/context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf-context/tex/context/base/ 
cont-new.tex

systems : beware: some patches loaded from cont-new.tex
(/usr/local/context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf-context/tex/context/base/ 
cont-new.mkiv) (/usr/local/context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf-context/tex/ 
context/base/cont-mtx.tex))

system  : cont-fil loaded
(/usr/local/context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf-context/tex/context/base/ 
cont-fil.tex

loading : ConTeXt File Synonyms
)
system  : cont-sys.rme loaded
(/usr/local/context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf-context/tex/context/user/ 
cont-sys.rme (/usr/local/context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf-context/tex/ 
context/base/type-tmf.tex) (/usr/local/context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf- 
context/tex/context/base/type-siz.tex (/usr/local/context/2009-06-13- 
beta/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-siz.mkiv)) (/usr/local/ 
context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.tex (/ 
usr/local/context/2009-06-13-beta/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type- 
otf.mkiv)))

system  : general-0002.top loaded
(general-0002.top)
fonts   : preloading latin modern fonts
bodyfont: 12pt rm is loaded
language: language en is active
 )
mkiv lua stats : used config path  - /usr/local/context/ 
2009-06-13-beta/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
mkiv lua stats : used cache path   - /Users/oliver/.context/ 
2009-06-13-beta

mkiv lua stats : input load time   - 0.022 seconds
mkiv lua stats : stored bytecode data  - 170 modules, 45 tables,  
215 chunks

mkiv lua stats : cleaned up reserved nodes - 18 nodes, 8 lists of 1411
mkiv lua stats : node memory usage - 18 glue_spec, 2 dir
mkiv lua stats : loaded patterns   - en:us:pat:exc:2
mkiv lua stats : startup time  - 0.706 seconds (including  
runtime option file processing)
mkiv lua stats : callbacks - direct: 56, indirect:  
4741, total: 4797
mkiv lua stats : loaded fonts  - 31 files: lmmono12- 
regular.otf lmmono8-regular.otf lmmono9-regular.otf lmroman12-bold.otf  
lmroman12-regular.otf lmroman7-bold.otf lmroman7-regular.otf lmroman9- 
bold.otf lmroman9-regular.otf lmsans12-regular.otf lmsans8-regular.otf  
lmsans9-regular.otf eufb10.tfm eufb7.tfm eufb9.tfm eufm10.tfm  
eufm7.tfm eufm9.tfm msam10.tfm msam7.tfm msbm10.tfm msbm7.tfm  
lmex10.tfm lmmi12.tfm lmmi7.tfm lmmi9.tfm lmmib10.tfm lmmib7.tfm  
lmsy10.tfm lmsy7.tfm lmsy9.tfm

mkiv lua stats : fonts load time   - 0.369 seconds
mkiv lua stats : result saved in file  - general-0002.pdf
mkiv lua stats : luatex banner - this is luatex, version  
beta-0.40.5

mkiv lua stats : control sequences - 29596 of 165536
mkiv lua stats : current memory usage  - 29 MB (ctx: 29 MB)
mkiv lua stats : runtime   - 1.242 seconds
MTXrun | total runtime: 1.270
---

This states erronously that the result was saved in a PDF file (sixth  
line from the bottom) although it wasn't (which is correct, of course).


What's more important, the exit status of the context command is 0  
(via echo $?) indicating that there was no problem at all! This might  
turn out problematic as soon as documents are processed in a batch  
run ... (like e.g. a regression test suite ;-)



Since TeX would have to give up on the document anyway perhaps an  
early bail out could be the more graceful option ... what do you  
think?



I can add this test to my module together with a message at the  
terminal.


This would be wonderful!

Perhaps one could even integrate this requirement check into the  
module loading code of the kernel. For example, one might enforce that  
each valid module 

Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-22 Thread Hans Hagen

Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Would it then be possible to have ConTeXt grind to a complete halt 
once it encounters a module whose minimum requirements aren't met?


\doifolderversionelse\contextversion{2100.01.01}\normalend\donothing
%\doifolderversionelse\contextversion{2009.07.01}\normalend\donothing

\starttext
Hello
\stoptext


That's great! It's almost what I was looking for ... yet I think 
\normalend might not be drastic enough ;-) Namely, running this example 
with


I'll add:

\unprotect

\def\forcequitjob#1%
  {\writestatus\m!systems{forcing quit: #1}%
   \batchmode
   \dorecurse\textlevel\stoptext
   \normalend}

\protect

\starttext
test \forcequitjob{whatever}
\stoptext


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-21 Thread Wolfgang Schuster


Am 20.08.2009 um 22:26 schrieb Jörg Hecke:

There is a package with typescripts (including Myriad Pro) on the  
garden you can use.


Thanks for that tip. You mean here: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TypeScripts 
 ?
Can't find that package there. Seems to be a little bit tricky to  
find. I'll keep on searching.


The zip is here http://modules.contextgarden.net/typescripts and the  
dev version
can be found at http://bitbucket.org/wolfs/typescripts/ but as i don't  
need them

myself other users are needed to add more typescripts.

Wolfgang

___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-20 Thread Jörg Hecke

t-simplefonts-2009.07.14.zip


Wow. I have used the attached version and it worked right out of the  
box with the Context Minimals version installed by the installer of  
Oliver and his instructions.


You can try the following version http://bitbucket.org/wolfs/simplefonts/src/0a2adbda3117/files/t-simplefonts.tex 
 (or use the attached version, was on the garden afair) but i won't  
provide support in the case there is a problem with them.


Yes, I understand that. Many thanks for your help! The simple test  
file runs just fine right now.


There is a package with typescripts (including Myriad Pro) on the  
garden you can use.


Thanks for that tip. You mean here: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TypeScripts 
 ?
Can't find that package there. Seems to be a little bit tricky to  
find. I'll keep on searching.


Many thanks for your help so far!

Regards
Jörg
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


[dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-12 Thread Oliver Buerschaper

Dear all,

I've finally got around to actually make the Mac installation package  
happen :-) So please find a test version of the package (for Intel  
Macs running Tiger or higher) at


http://svn.contextgarden.net/minimals/installer/osx/

This package is identical to the Minimals distribution as of  
2009.06.11 13:24 except for the following:


1. It only contains MkIV
2. Configuration files are adapted to Mac OS X
3. It doesn't contain scripts etc. needed for other platforms

The installation experience should be rather pleasant, since you'll  
just have to double-click the installation package. After the  
installation is complete head over to System Preferences  TeX  
Distribution and you should find a new item called ConTeXt  
2009-06-11-beta alongside MacTeX 2008 etc. This means that by now  
you should be able to typeset your documents with a simple


context myfile.tex

in the Terminal. (TeXShop support is easy and will be included in the  
next revision.)


For the more curious: the package installs its TDS to /usr/local/ 
context/2009-06-11-beta and sets up a per user cache at ~/.context/ 
2009-06-11-beta. The directory for user additions is ~/Library/texmf  
and is shared with TeXLive. Fonts installed at the usual locations in  
Mac OS X should be recognized by ConTeXt as well. For the even more  
curious, there's also a readme file in the disk image ;-)


I'd be glad if as many people as possible on this list would give it a  
try and report back their experience. Once the package turns out to  
work as intended I'll make it available to the wider public.


Many thanks in advance to all testers!

Happy TeXing,
Oliver


PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context


Re: [dev-context] Mac installation package

2009-08-12 Thread Hans Hagen

Oliver Buerschaper wrote:

in the Terminal. (TeXShop support is easy and will be included in the 
next revision.)


then also consider texworks

thanks

Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context