Re: Minutes from Oct 31 Mobile Tech Leads meeting

[Sebastian Kaspari]

As I understand it's for all the reasons we wanted to have a standalone
Necko. For apps that already include GeckoView it kind of comes for free -
we just need to expose it.

For app code I would love to use it to avoid all the issues we saw in
Fennec whenever we used a different network stack (e.g. downloading
favicons).

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:22 PM Stefan Arentz  wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:49 PM Nicholas Alexander 
> wrote:
>
>>
>
>>- A proposed networking API
>> to expose in
>>GeckoView is looking healthy.
>>
>>
> What is the reason for doing network requests through GeckoView? I'm
> curious what the use case is.
>
>  S.
>
> ___
> android-components mailing list
> android-compone...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/android-components
>
___
Dev-fxacct mailing list
Dev-fxacct@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct

Re: Minutes from Oct 31 Mobile Tech Leads meeting

[Stefan Arentz]

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:49 PM Nicholas Alexander 
wrote:

>

>- A proposed networking API
> to expose in
>GeckoView is looking healthy.
>
>
What is the reason for doing network requests through GeckoView? I'm
curious what the use case is.

 S.
___
Dev-fxacct mailing list
Dev-fxacct@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct