Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2

2016-12-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky 

On 12/10/16 8:35 AM, Valentin Gosu wrote:

I had some patches posted in bug 1263722, but then I started working on
other things, and I haven't been watching the spec in the mean time.
I'll try to get the patches ready to land later next week, and I'll try to
see if there are any relevant changes the spec has made that affect our
implementation.


Great, thank you.

The high priority here is really to check whether the spec makes sense, 
both in terms of whether the timings it exposes are the right/useful 
ones and in terms of whether it can actually be implemented sanely.  If 
you can do that, that would be very much appreciated.


-Boris

___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2

2016-12-10 Thread Valentin Gosu 
I had some patches posted in bug 1263722, but then I started working on
other things, and I haven't been watching the spec in the mean time.
I'll try to get the patches ready to land later next week, and I'll try to
see if there are any relevant changes the spec has made that affect our
implementation.

On 9 December 2016 at 23:06, Boris Zbarsky  wrote:

> On 12/9/16 6:22 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>
>>   Performance Timeline Level 2
>>   W3C TR draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline-2/
>>   W3C Editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/
>>   deadline: Tuesday, February 28, 2017
>>
>
> Has anyone on our end been tracking this work or implementing this?  In
> general, this is one of the specs we would be expected to implement, so we
> should make sure _someone_ looks at it
>
> -Boris
> ___
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Intent to ship: Presentation API on Fennec

2016-12-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky 

On 12/5/16 3:20 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:

Correct. Intent to ship has been sent on blink-dev. Chrome Android
should follow.


Do you have any idea what the timeframe is?


The answers to these two questions is very similar. The spec allows to
pass an array of URLs to the `PresentationRequest` constructor. That
will allow developers to pass Chrome Cast, DIAL and HTTP links (usually
called 1-UA mode). Potentially also a Firefox OS TV app URL if they are
still different from regular HTTP links.


OK, but a website doing this won't work in Chrome Android.  So what 
would websites actually do in practice?


-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2

2016-12-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky 

On 12/9/16 6:22 PM, L. David Baron wrote:

  Performance Timeline Level 2
  W3C TR draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline-2/
  W3C Editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/
  deadline: Tuesday, February 28, 2017


Has anyone on our end been tracking this work or implementing this?  In 
general, this is one of the specs we would be expected to implement, so 
we should make sure _someone_ looks at it


-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform