Re: OS/2 still supported ?
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: On 25.07.2017 02:04, Kris Maglione wrote: The only remaining in-tree references to the XP_OS2 macros are in NSPR and NSS, which are technically separate projects, and have their own sets of supported platforms. In esr52 there's a bit more: gfx/2d/DrawTargetCairo.cpp gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-features.h.in gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-mutex-impl-private.h gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-os2-private.h gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-os2-surface.c gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-os2.h gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo.h js/src/ctypes/CTypes.cpp js/src/ctypes/libffi/src/closures.c js/src/ctypes/libffi/src/dlmalloc.c js/src/ctypes/libffi/src/x86/win32.S media/libvpx/vp8/common/threading.h mfbt/Poison.cpp Cairo and libffi are separate projects that still support OS/2 and are used by more then Mozilla. Dave ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Non-tier 1 builders: NSPR usage?
Ted Mielczarek wrote: Hello, I'm interested in feedback from anyone out there that's doing builds on non-Tier 1 platforms. Specifically, I want to know if you build --with-system-nspr or not. I've got patches[1] to stop using NSPR's autoconf build system in favor of moz.build files, but I've only made them support our Tier 1 platforms currently. glandium suggested as a fallback that on non-Tier 1 platforms we could have the build system invoke NSPR's configure+make as usual, treating it more like the --with-system-nspr case. I haven't implemented that, and I was curious as to what configuration people are actually building in on those platforms. The other option is to simply require --with-system-nspr on platforms where our moz.build files don't support building NSPR, but if folks aren't already doing that that's a bit more of a hassle. -Ted 1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1230117 OS/2 is still using the in-tree NSPR which works fine after running autoconf on it (or setting a few things in config.site). If we had to we could switch to system-nspr Dave ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Changed font size interpretation
On 12/22/12 09:58 pm, L. David Baron wrote: On Saturday 2012-12-22 19:49 -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: This is part of localization, set things like separators, date formats and such depending on your locale. For me the separator has to be a decimal. And yes there is a lot of people working on translating various parts of the browser for various locales. No, this is not intentional; it's a bug, as I described in my earlier message. Apologies, I didn't see your previous message Dave ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Changed font size interpretation
Allan wrote: For a long time, I never understood how that worked for you. I have same problem here, that just about all websites uses too small fonts. When I tried that setting 1.1-1.9 made no difference, but 2 did INDEED:-) Today it just stroke me to try something odd, so I tried 1,1-1,9 instead. Now, I see your results, and this setting is indeed very usefull for me too now. However, this must be a major bug in Moz, as I assume the difference here is because of our country settings. Here in Denmark, we do indeed use ',' as the separator, where US uses '.' I can't really imagine, that every numeric setting in Moz has to be translated for a Danish user (and a lot of other countries too I guess) - and now I do wonder how many other setting with a decimal part that this might affect. Any ideas, why this is so ? This is part of localization, set things like separators, date formats and such depending on your locale. For me the separator has to be a decimal. And yes there is a lot of people working on translating various parts of the browser for various locales. Dave ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
