Re: Intent to implement: CSS subgrid
On 11/04/18 21:09, Mats Palmgren wrote: > Hello Grid lovers, > > I've started implementing a prototype for CSS subgrid layout. > I say "prototype" since the spec [1] is far from settled and will need > to be updated based on feedback from implementors. I've summarized > the features of this prototype and my views on the spec at [2]. > (I'll use bug 1240834 as the meta bug. None of the code has landed yet.) This is really nice and the feedback on the issue is amazing. Thanks! It'd be awesome if you could use WPT for subgrid tests, that would make things much easier for other implementors to catch up. Cheers, Rego > > /Mats > > > [1] > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-2/#subgrids > > [2] > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2280#issuecomment-380546425 > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Intent to implement and ship: CSS caret-color property
Hi, On 23/12/16 18:32, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > The spec does mention this, but I can’t figure out what it’s saying that > the browser should do with the navigation caret. Should this property > not be respected for the navigation caret? Note that right now nsCaret > doesn’t know which kind of caret it is drawing; currently both kinds of > carets are activated in the exact same way through > nsCaret::SetVisible(). How are you planning to handle this? This was discussed here: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725 And in a CSS WG telecon [1] as a result a note was added on the spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#caret-color So it seems caret-color could be applied to navigation caret too. Bye, Rego [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Intent to implement and ship: CSS caret-color property
Hi, just a small clarification regarding tests: On 21/12/16 01:17, Xidorn Quan wrote: > Tests - URLs / paths to tests (preferably web-platform-tests) > CSSWG's test repo contains some semi-manual tests, which are not usable > in our infra. I'm adding an internal reftest (not wpt or csswg test) > which uses some of our internal features to check its rendering. Indeed a bunch of tests are not automatic, but there are a few (6 right now) that are testharness tests (completely automatic), so they might be useful for you too. In Blink we're using the semi-manual tests as pixel tests and, of course, we also use the testharness ones. Cheers, Rego ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
