Re: DXR problem?
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:11:40AM -0400, Erik Rose wrote: > I get a underline on hover, plus my cursor changes to the "context-menu" one. > What happens for you? absolutely nothing. The console displays only some nunjucks warning - is this relevant? "[nunjucks] Warning: the "default" filter was used without specifying the type of comparison. 2.0 changed the default behavior from boolean (val ? val : def) to strictly undefined, so you should make sure that doesn't break anything. Be explicit about this to make this warning go away, or wait until 2.1. See http://mozilla.github.io/nunjucks/templating.html#defaultvalue-default-boolean; nunjucks-slim.43040a7a.min.js:2:11839 > > > On Jul 6, 2016, at 8:40 , Richard Z <r...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > works ... slightly unintuitive behaviour as howering over the symbols > > doesn't show > > any indication it is clickable. Richard -- Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: DXR problem?
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:43:02PM -0400, Erik Rose wrote: > We are about to squash a JS bug that affects older FFs and Safari: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1283645. Perhaps that's > affecting you? quite likely, works now:) > > Displaying source like > > https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/mobile/android/modules/Prompt.jsm > > works but does not provide any xref links?? > > Hmm, though we don't underline the links (since that would underline > practically the whole file), most of the symbols in that file can be clicked > to find property definitions and references. More JS analysis is to come. works ... slightly unintuitive behaviour as howering over the symbols doesn't show any indication it is clickable. Richard -- Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
DXR problem?
Hi, tried dxr as replacement for lxr yesterday and today and it does not seem to work for me. Whatever I type into the searchbox the results is just an empty "This page was generated by DXR ."? https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=voice=true Displaying source like https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/mobile/android/modules/Prompt.jsm works but does not provide any xref links?? Richard -- Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Searchfox (new code search tool)
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:35:34PM -0700, Bill McCloskey wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to announce a new tool I've been working on for source > code searching called Searchfox (http://searchfox.org). If you use MXR > or DXR, I recommend you try Searchfox. Here are some of the benefits: cool. Btw - is there any tool to do code search in addons that are published on AMO and allow source viewing? Richard -- Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Intent to deprecate: MacOS 10.6-10.8 support
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:28:50PM -0800, Terrence Cole wrote: > We've had this conversation several times in the last few years and I think > I've finally figured out why it has always felt subtly wrong. > > Our share of users on older platforms is disproportionally high compared to > the market in general because of our decline in market share. People who > don't want to upgrade their OS generally don't want to "upgrade" their > browser to the shiny new "chrome" thing the kids are talking about either. here is the problem. Firefox has a different userbase than chrome. In my perceprion it is people who are cautious, prefer stable interfaces, not attracted to blingbling and more focused on stability, privacy and security. Much of the blingbling features which some developers die for are a plain nuisance for a significant share of users. It took 4 years to fix the autoplay bug at least partially? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659285 This is what is driving away users. Firefox won't win the blingbling race with Google and Co, maybe if it focuses on its traditional userbase and their demands it would do better. Richard -- Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
