Re: Intent to ship: a change to the initial value of image-orientation

2020-04-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, at 8:19 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> This doesn't really fit the format of an Intent email, but just as a 
> heads up, I am landing a change to the initial value of the 
> image-orientation property, from "none" to "from-image".  The effect of 
> this change is that EXIF orientation data in JPEG images used in HTML 
>  elements and in the CSS content property will be honored by 
> default.

This work was delayed a little, but has just landed and is now in the current 
Nightly.  Now, all uses of JPEG images with EXIF orientation metadata will be 
automatically oriented correctly, except for content images with 
`image-orientation: none`.  Some of the upstream HTML spec issues still need 
discussion but I didn't feel they needed to block this landing.

The equivalent change shipped in Chrome 81 on April 7.

If you see any odd image orientation or sizing behavior, please let me know.

Thanks,

Cameron
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Intent to ship: a change to the initial value of image-orientation

2020-02-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, at 9:12 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Where is this standardized?

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-3/#the-image-orientation

> See https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4495 for some tricky questions
> that come up that haven't been conclusively answered yet, as far as I
> can tell.

Thanks, I wasn't subscribed to that issue.  I don't think all questions 
mentioned there necessarily need to block this change.  I will respond there.

Cameron
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Intent to ship: a change to the initial value of image-orientation

2020-02-17 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:19 PM Cameron McCormack  wrote:
> This doesn't really fit the format of an Intent email, but just as a heads 
> up, I am landing a change to the initial value of the image-orientation 
> property, from "none" to "from-image".  The effect of this change is that 
> EXIF orientation data in JPEG images used in HTML  elements and in the 
> CSS content property will be honored by default.

Where is this standardized? See
https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4495 for some tricky questions
that come up that haven't been conclusively answered yet, as far as I
can tell.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Intent to ship: a change to the initial value of image-orientation

2020-02-16 Thread Cameron McCormack
This doesn't really fit the format of an Intent email, but just as a heads up, 
I am landing a change to the initial value of the image-orientation property, 
from "none" to "from-image".  The effect of this change is that EXIF 
orientation data in JPEG images used in HTML  elements and in the CSS 
content property will be honored by default.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1607667

This change has been timed to land so that it reaches the first Firefox release 
after the Chrome release that also makes this change.  This has also already 
landed in WebKit.

If you notice any problems due to images being unexpectedly rotated, please 
file a bug and let me know.

Thanks,

Cameron
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform