Re: 32-bit developer edition?

2016-06-06 Thread Ben Kelly 
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Jared Wein  wrote:

> We shouldn't hold back on providing a link to 64-bit Dev Edition users en
> masse. I worry that running an A/B test will slow down the full release
> without telling us much of anything that we don't already know.
>
> The user agent string says if the system is 64-bit, so sniffing is already
> possible.
>
> Ben, can you file the bug in Mozilla.org::webdev to get the link added to
> the download page?
>

Sure:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1278315
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: 32-bit developer edition?

2016-06-06 Thread Jared Wein 
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Javaun Moradi  wrote:

> +Clarkbw, who runs Dev Edition.
>
> Expansion of 64 bit was on hold pending the release of 47, where we had
> some critical sandboxing issues fixed and (conveniently) the Widevine CDM
> also hit that timeframe for video support.
>
> It’s an interesting idea to hit developers, who are a bit savvier. We
> assume elimination of small OOM and JS performance gains, security overall
> will be a tradeoff.
>



> We need more users in-field before we start rolling win64 out by default
> to normal people. DevEdition is a potentially compelling hook. We were
> going to offer 64 selectively on the download page to some users in an A/B
> test to try to get numbers up. Ideally, we’d be able to sniff who could run
> it, since we don’t have a stub installer.
>

We shouldn't hold back on providing a link to 64-bit Dev Edition users en
masse. I worry that running an A/B test will slow down the full release
without telling us much of anything that we don't already know.

The user agent string says if the system is 64-bit, so sniffing is already
possible.

Ben, can you file the bug in Mozilla.org::webdev to get the link added to
the download page?

Thanks,
Jared
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: 32-bit developer edition?

2016-06-03 Thread Javaun Moradi 
+Clarkbw, who runs Dev Edition.

Expansion of 64 bit was on hold pending the release of 47, where we had some 
critical sandboxing issues fixed and (conveniently) the Widevine CDM also hit 
that timeframe for video support.

It’s an interesting idea to hit developers, who are a bit savvier. We assume 
elimination of small OOM and JS performance gains, security overall will be a 
tradeoff.

We need more users in-field before we start rolling win64 out by default to 
normal people. DevEdition is a potentially compelling hook. We were going to 
offer 64 selectively on the download page to some users in an A/B test to try 
to get numbers up. Ideally, we’d be able to sniff who could run it, since we 
don’t have a stub installer.



> On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Lawrence Mandel  wrote:
> 
> + Javaun who should be able to fill in details about timing and what we want 
> to do with Win64 and why
> 
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Ben Kelly  > wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2016 2:15 AM, "Jet Villegas"  > wrote:
> >
> > We should offer both.
> 
> If we get a net reduction in OOMs with 64-bit it seems to me we should make
> that the default download link.
> 
> In any case, we're not showing a 64-bit link anywhere now.  Who should I
> pester or where should I file a bug to get that fixed?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Ben
> ___
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org 
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform 
> 
> 

___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: 32-bit developer edition?

2016-06-03 Thread Mike Hoye 

On 2016-06-03 8:51 AM, Ben Kelly wrote:
In any case, we're not showing a 64-bit link anywhere now. Who should 
I pester or where should I file a bug to get that fixed? 

Mozilla.org :: webdev



- mhoye
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: 32-bit developer edition?

2016-06-03 Thread Lawrence Mandel 
+ Javaun who should be able to fill in details about timing and what we
want to do with Win64 and why

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Ben Kelly  wrote:

> On Jun 3, 2016 2:15 AM, "Jet Villegas"  wrote:
> >
> > We should offer both.
>
> If we get a net reduction in OOMs with 64-bit it seems to me we should make
> that the default download link.
>
> In any case, we're not showing a 64-bit link anywhere now.  Who should I
> pester or where should I file a bug to get that fixed?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ben
> ___
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: 32-bit developer edition?

2016-06-03 Thread Ben Kelly 
On Jun 3, 2016 2:15 AM, "Jet Villegas"  wrote:
>
> We should offer both.

If we get a net reduction in OOMs with 64-bit it seems to me we should make
that the default download link.

In any case, we're not showing a 64-bit link anywhere now.  Who should I
pester or where should I file a bug to get that fixed?

Thanks.

Ben
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: 32-bit developer edition?

2016-06-03 Thread Jet Villegas 
We should offer both.

--Jet

On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Ben Kelly  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I noticed recently that all of the available download links for dev edition
> point to the 32-bit installer.  Is there a reason for this?
>
> Given we are talking about how to upgrade existing users to 64-bit it would
> seem good to update the download links for new installs.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ben
> ___
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org 
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform