Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2015-04-07 Thread Tobias B. Besemer
OK, to reopen this discussion ...

I suggested in Bug 1151371 to activate the status IN_PROGRESS in bmo and use 
this status for bugs that are in progress (patch in work) and that 
everybody use the status applied in future only as taken or as in the 
to-dos-list like the others do.
My arguments for this and reasons can be found in the bug.
Feedback welcome.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1151371
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2015-04-07 Thread Daniel Holbert
On 04/07/2015 01:15 PM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:
 OK, to reopen this discussion ...
 
 I suggested in Bug 1151371 to activate the status IN_PROGRESS in bmo and 
 use this status for bugs that are in progress (patch in work) and that 
 everybody use the status applied in future only as taken or as in the 
 to-dos-list like the others do.
 My arguments for this and reasons can be found in the bug.

People already have inconsistent interpretations of what the bug
status field ASSIGNED vs NEW means (and inconsistent
levels-of-bothering-to-actually-tweak-the-flag). Adding an additional
IN_PROGRESS status will likely just make things more confusing --
particularly given that many people won't bother to set it, either
explicitly or accidentally.  (Why should they? It's extra process for
process's sake, and it'd arguably be a waste of their time.)

What is the problem you're trying to solve?  I think you're worried
about new contributors mistakenly thinking NEW means unassigned?  If
that's your concern, then (to the extent that's an actual problem) I
think it'd be better to focus on surfacing the assignee field, and
highlighting tools like Bugs Ahoy which these contributors should be
using in the first place.

I don't think adding an additional status (which will break existing
conventions  will be applied inconsistently) is going to help here.

~Daniel
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2015-04-07 Thread Karl Dubost
Daniel,

Le 8 avr. 2015 à 06:19, Daniel Holbert dholb...@mozilla.com a écrit :
 People already have inconsistent interpretations of what the bug
 status field ASSIGNED vs NEW means (and inconsistent
 levels-of-bothering-to-actually-tweak-the-flag).

(Sorry if it had already been discussed in the past, slap me with a URI with 
the past archived discussion about it.)

Agreed for the ASSIGNED vs NEW is bothering to set manually.
That said I never understood, why it was not tied to someone being assigned to 
the bug. Take this bug should flip automatically this field. Going back to 
nobody should put it back to NEW.

-- 
Karl Dubost, Mozilla
http://www.la-grange.net/karl/moz

___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2014-07-10 Thread Ed Morley

On 09/07/2014 16:48:05, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:

As glob noted upthread, the NEW/ASSIGNED distinction is sometimes used
by people when they are the assignee. There is only a lack of
difference when the assignee is nob...@mozilla.org. That doesn't
warrant abolishing the status (although we could arguably ask bmo
folks to make the reset the assignee to default also set the status
to new if the status was previously assigned)


I've filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1036834 for 
resetting the status from ASSIGNED to NEW when the assignee is reset.


Ed
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2014-07-10 Thread Philip Chee
On 09/07/2014 23:48, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
 As glob noted upthread, the NEW/ASSIGNED distinction is sometimes used 
 by people when they are the assignee. There is only a lack of difference 
 when the assignee is nob...@mozilla.org. That doesn't warrant 
 abolishing the status (although we could arguably ask bmo folks to make 
 the reset the assignee to default also set the status to new if the 
 status was previously assigned)

Then there are bugs which are ASSIGNED but with multiple assignees. For
example Bug 1027241 was a team effort [1].

[1] https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/a900b3a64007

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2014-07-09 Thread Chris Peterson
hi Tobias, Bugzilla has many fields and teams use them in many different 
ways. :) It's usually best to let the people reporting or investigating 
the bugs update the bug fields.


From my experience, many (most?) teams never change a bug's Status 
from NEW to ASSIGNED, but they still use Assigned To. A few teams set 
both, but change Status from NEW to ASSIGNED when the assigned 
developer actually begins to work on the bug.


Despite its name, the Target Milestone field is usually left unset 
until *after* the bug is fixed. Then Target Milestone is set to the 
version of Firefox Nightly that was fixed (e.g. Nightly 33 is 
mozilla33). Even if a bug fix is uplifted from Nightly 33 to, say, 
Beta 31, the Target Milestone would stay mozilla33, not mozilla 
31. There must have been a good reason for this at some time, but it's 
hard to say for certain.. :)



chris


On 7/8/14 6:51 PM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:

Hi!

Sorry, I have since some weeks the can-edit at Bugzilla and misunderstood the 
Assigned!
I tried to help and clean up a bit Bugzilla with updating the Target Milestone to a Milestone that get 
still developed ... and was thinking that when a bug is Assigned To, that then the Status have 
to be Assigned ...
I now realized, that this don't have to be !!!
Sorry, if I have hurt somebody with this !!!


Greets, Tobias.



___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2014-07-09 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen

On 7/9/2014 2:47 AM, Chris Peterson wrote:

Despite its name, the Target Milestone field is usually left unset
until *after* the bug is fixed. Then Target Milestone is set to the
version of Firefox Nightly that was fixed (e.g. Nightly 33 is
mozilla33). Even if a bug fix is uplifted from Nightly 33 to, say,
Beta 31, the Target Milestone would stay mozilla33, not mozilla
31. There must have been a good reason for this at some time, but it's
hard to say for certain.. :)


It's been that way since before status flags even existed. I think it's 
still useful for archeology purposes to keep this is when it landed on 
trunk separate from this is what branches it was uplifted to.


-Ryan
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2014-07-09 Thread Tobias B. Besemer
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 03:51:32 UTC+2 schrieb Tobias B. Besemer:
 I tried to help and clean up a bit Bugzilla with updating the Target 
 Milestone to a Milestone that get still developed ...

I did this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?f1=OPf0=OPclassification=Componentsemailtype1=exactf4=CPquery_format=advancedf3=CPbug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDproduct=Coretarget_milestone=M1target_milestone=M2target_milestone=M3target_milestone=M4target_milestone=M5target_milestone=M6target_milestone=M7target_milestone=M8target_milestone=M9target_milestone=M10target_milestone=M11target_milestone=M12target_milestone=M13target_milestone=M14target_milestone=M15target_milestone=M16target_milestone=M17target_milestone=M18target_milestone=mozilla0.6target_milestone=mozilla0.8target_milestone=mozilla0.8.1target_milestone=mozilla0.9target_milestone=mozilla0.9.1target_milestone=mozilla0.9.2target_milestone=mozilla0.9.3target_milestone=mozilla0.9.4target_milestone=mozilla0.9.5target_milestone=mozilla0.9.6target_milestone=mozilla0.9.7target_milestone=mozilla0.9.8target_milestone=mozilla0.9.9target_milestone
 
=psm2.0target_milestone=psm2.1target_milestone=psm2.2target_milestone=psm2.3target_milestone=psm2.4target_milestone=mozilla1.0target_milestone=mozilla1.0.1target_milestone=mozilla1.0.2target_milestone=mozilla1.0.3target_milestone=mozilla1.1alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.1betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.1finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.2alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.2betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.2finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.3alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.3betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.3finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.4alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.4betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.4finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.5alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.5betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.5finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.6alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.6betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.6finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.7alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.7betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.7finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha1target_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha2target_milest
 
one=mozilla1.8alpha3target_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha4target_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha5target_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha6target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta1target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta2target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta3target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta4target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta5target_milestone=mozilla1.8rc1target_milestone=mozilla1.8rc2target_milestone=mozilla1.8finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.8.1alpha1target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1alpha2target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1alpha3target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1beta1target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1beta2target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha1target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha2target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha3target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha4target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha5target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha6target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha7target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha8target_milestone=mozilla1.9beta1target_milestone=mozilla1.9beta2target_milestone=mozilla1.9beta3target_milestone=mozilla1.9
 
beta4target_milestone=mozilla1.9beta5target_milestone=mozilla1.9target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1a1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1a2target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1b1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1b2target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1b3target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1b4target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.2a1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.2b1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.2target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a2target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a3target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a4target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a5target_milestone=mozilla2.0b1target_milestone=mozilla2.0b2target_milestone=mozilla2.0b3target_milestone=mozilla2.0b4target_milestone=mozilla2.0b5target_milestone=mozilla2.0b6target_milestone=mozilla2.0b7target_milestone=mozilla2.0b8target_milestone=mozilla2.0b9target_milestone=mozilla2.0b10target_milestone=mozilla2.0b11target_milestone=mozilla2.0b12target_milestone=mozilla2.0target_milestone=mozilla5target_milestone=mozilla6tar
 
get_milestone=mozilla7target_milestone=mozilla8target_milestone=mozilla9target_milestone=mozilla10target_milestone=mozilla11target_milestone=mozilla12target_milestone=mozilla13target_milestone=mozilla14target_milestone=mozilla15target_milestone=mozilla16target_milestone=mozilla17target_milestone=mozilla18target_milestone=mozilla19target_milestone=mozilla20target_milestone=mozilla21target_milestone=mozilla22target_milestone=mozilla23target_milestone=mozilla25target_milestone=mozilla26target_milestone=mozilla27
;-)
And the set the Target Milestone to --- ...
But a lot of work ...
My next run would be Status = Assigned  Assigned To = nob...@mozilla.org 
...
After that I will check my own old bugs and my votes and then look what else in 
Bugzilla can be cleaned up ... maybe the same then above on Bugzilla or a 
other component ...
There exist no functions/scripts for this, right?

Tobias.
___
dev-platform 

Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2014-07-09 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch

On 09/07/2014 16:00, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:

Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 03:51:32 UTC+2 schrieb Tobias B. Besemer:

I tried to help and clean up a bit Bugzilla with updating the Target 
Milestone to a Milestone that get still developed ...


I did this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?f1=OPf0=OPclassification=Componentsemailtype1=exactf4=CPquery_format=advancedf3=CPbug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDproduct=Coretarget_milestone=M1target_milestone=M2target_milestone=M3target_milestone=M4target_milestone=M5target_milestone=M6target_milestone=M7target_milestone=M8target_milestone=M9target_milestone=M10target_milestone=M11target_milestone=M12target_milestone=M13target_milestone=M14target_milestone=M15target_milestone=M16target_milestone=M17target_milestone=M18target_milestone=mozilla0.6target_milestone=mozilla0.8target_milestone=mozilla0.8.1target_milestone=mozilla0.9target_milestone=mozilla0.9.1target_milestone=mozilla0.9.2target_milestone=mozilla0.9.3target_milestone=mozilla0.9.4target_milestone=mozilla0.9.5target_milestone=mozilla0.9.6target_milestone=mozilla0.9.7target_milestone=mozilla0.9.8target_milestone=mozilla0.9.9target_milesto

ne=psm2.0
target_milestone=psm2.1target_milestone=psm2.2target_milestone=psm2.3target_milestone=psm2.4target_milestone=mozilla1.0target_milestone=mozilla1.0.1target_milestone=mozilla1.0.2target_milestone=mozilla1.0.3target_milestone=mozilla1.1alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.1betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.1finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.2alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.2betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.2finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.3alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.3betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.3finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.4alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.4betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.4finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.5alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.5betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.5finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.6alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.6betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.6finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.7alphatarget_milestone=mozilla1.7betatarget_milestone=mozilla1.7finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha1target_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha2target_milestone=mozi
lla1.8alp
ha3target_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha4target_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha5target_milestone=mozilla1.8alpha6target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta1target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta2target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta3target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta4target_milestone=mozilla1.8beta5target_milestone=mozilla1.8rc1target_milestone=mozilla1.8rc2target_milestone=mozilla1.8finaltarget_milestone=mozilla1.8.1alpha1target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1alpha2target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1alpha3target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1beta1target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1beta2target_milestone=mozilla1.8.1target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha1target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha2target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha3target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha4target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha5target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha6target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha7target_milestone=mozilla1.9alpha8target_milestone=mozilla1.9beta1target_milestone=mozilla1.9beta2target_milestone=mozilla1.9beta3target_milestone=mozilla1.9beta4target_miles
tone=mozi
lla1.9beta5target_milestone=mozilla1.9target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1a1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1a2target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1b1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1b2target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1b3target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1b4target_milestone=mozilla1.9.1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.2a1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.2b1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.2target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a1target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a2target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a3target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a4target_milestone=mozilla1.9.3a5target_milestone=mozilla2.0b1target_milestone=mozilla2.0b2target_milestone=mozilla2.0b3target_milestone=mozilla2.0b4target_milestone=mozilla2.0b5target_milestone=mozilla2.0b6target_milestone=mozilla2..0b7target_milestone=mozilla2.0b8target_milestone=mozilla2.0b9target_milestone=mozilla2.0b10target_milestone=mozilla2.0b11target_milestone=mozilla2.0b12target_milestone=mozilla2.0target_milestone=mozilla5target_milestone=mozilla6target_milestone=mozilla7targ
et_milest
one=mozilla8target_milestone=mozilla9target_milestone=mozilla10target_milestone=mozilla11target_milestone=mozilla12target_milestone=mozilla13target_milestone=mozilla14target_milestone=mozilla15target_milestone=mozilla16target_milestone=mozilla17target_milestone=mozilla18target_milestone=mozilla19target_milestone=mozilla20target_milestone=mozilla21target_milestone=mozilla22target_milestone=mozilla23target_milestone=mozilla25target_milestone=mozilla26target_milestone=mozilla27

;-)
And the set the Target Milestone to --- ...
But a lot of work ...
My next run would be Status = Assigned  Assigned To = nob...@mozilla.org 
...
After that I will check my own old bugs and my votes and then look what else in Bugzilla can be 
cleaned up ... maybe the same then above on Bugzilla or a other component 
...
There exist no functions/scripts for this, right?

Tobias.


Please don't 

Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2014-07-09 Thread Milan Sreckovic
What’s the purpose of the “ASSIGNED status?  If we’re saying that this status 
can be computed from Assigned To field (being set to nobody or something else), 
then why do we still have it?  If it isn’t equivalent, then we may be losing 
some information if we reset it back to New.

--
- Milan

On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:27 , Daniel Holbert dholb...@mozilla.com wrote:

 On 07/09/2014 08:16 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
 On 09/07/2014 16:00, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:
 My next run would be Status = Assigned  Assigned To =
 nob...@mozilla.org ...
 
 Tobias.
 
 Please don't mass change the target milestone flag on bugs (definitely
 not manually). Same goes for the assignee field.
 
 ~ Gijs
 
 To be clear, I don't think he's planning on mass-changing the *assignee*
 field -- rather, it sounds like his next plan was to reset Status to
 NEW, for bugs that are ASSIGNED but have no assignee.
 
 That seems like a reasonable sort of change to me.  Of course, any
 mass-change in Bugzilla could have unintended consequences or step on
 toes in some obscure component with its own rules; but AFAIK, this
 particular change seems likely to just be a change to better-reflect
 reality.
 
 (I'm not sure how much value it adds, but I don't see it doing much harm.)
 
 ~Daniel
 ___
 dev-platform mailing list
 dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
 https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: Misunderstood the Assigned at bugs! Sorry !!!

2014-07-09 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
As glob noted upthread, the NEW/ASSIGNED distinction is sometimes used 
by people when they are the assignee. There is only a lack of difference 
when the assignee is nob...@mozilla.org. That doesn't warrant 
abolishing the status (although we could arguably ask bmo folks to make 
the reset the assignee to default also set the status to new if the 
status was previously assigned)


~ Gijs

On 09/07/2014 16:45, Milan Sreckovic wrote:

What’s the purpose of the “ASSIGNED status?  If we’re saying that this status 
can be computed from Assigned To field (being set to nobody or something else), then 
why do we still have it?  If it isn’t equivalent, then we may be losing some 
information if we reset it back to New.

--
- Milan

On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:27 , Daniel Holbert dholb...@mozilla.com wrote:


On 07/09/2014 08:16 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:

On 09/07/2014 16:00, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:

My next run would be Status = Assigned  Assigned To =
nob...@mozilla.org ...

Tobias.


Please don't mass change the target milestone flag on bugs (definitely
not manually). Same goes for the assignee field.

~ Gijs


To be clear, I don't think he's planning on mass-changing the *assignee*
field -- rather, it sounds like his next plan was to reset Status to
NEW, for bugs that are ASSIGNED but have no assignee.

That seems like a reasonable sort of change to me.  Of course, any
mass-change in Bugzilla could have unintended consequences or step on
toes in some obscure component with its own rules; but AFAIK, this
particular change seems likely to just be a change to better-reflect
reality.

(I'm not sure how much value it adds, but I don't see it doing much harm.)

~Daniel
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform




___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform