Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel
Hi, I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel branch. Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! Thanks! Zoltan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Fwd: I'm leaving packaging on Fedora]
I'll take me-tv, co-maintainers are welcome. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Zoltan Kota z.k...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel branch. Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! Thanks! Zoltan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Just out of curiosity, why is this package being retired? -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [Fwd: I'm leaving packaging on Fedora]
looks like packages are not orphaned yet. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel
Adam Miller (maxamill...@fedoraproject.org) said: I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel branch. Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! Thanks! Just out of curiosity, why is this package being retired? AFAIK, it's been completely replaced by bzr for a few years now. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 13 has been branched!!
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:36:09AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: We don't really have a coverage list, but most of the people who have been doing tagging are all in the US time zones, so anything outside of that is welcome. Ok. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Buildroot_override_SOP is the working SOP we have for this, although I notice it doesn't say what to do with the tickets. We typically assign the ticket to ourself, whoever is doing the tag, so that when the reporter says the build is done we see it and can do the untag and close the ticket. I updated it to mention the ticket handling. I just wonder, is there no verification done one the request, e.g. is everybody allowed to request a build override or is it restricted to package (co)maintainers and provenpackagers? I only found this regarding verification: | Buildroot overrides usually means that something is soname bumping. Be | sure this is a sane update to do in Fedora How is this handled? https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/report/3 can help you somewhat see the open tickets, if there is a tag request ticket assigned to rel-eng@ that means it likely hasn't been operated on. This query only reports tickets assigned to rel-eng@ in the component koji, I guess it is more accurate or are there many tag requests that are not in the koji component? https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedcomponent=kojiowner=rel-eng%40lists.fedoraproject.orgorder=priority I added this to the SOP as well. Regards Till pgpSdLGrkJOEB.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Adam Miller (maxamill...@fedoraproject.org) said: I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel branch. Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! Thanks! Just out of curiosity, why is this package being retired? AFAIK, it's been completely replaced by bzr for a few years now. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Oh ok, I don't actually use bzr/bazaar but when I do a 'yum info' on both packages, the URL points to the same place (different URLs but they end up at the same site). [11:24:54][a...@turnip][revproxy]+ yum info bzr Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto, refresh-packagekit Installed Packages Name : bzr Arch : i686 Version: 2.0.3 Release: 1.fc12 Size : 29 M Repo : installed From repo : updates Summary: Friendly distributed version control system URL: http://www.bazaar-vcs.org/ License: GPLv2+ Description: Bazaar is a distributed revision control system that is powerful, : friendly, and scalable. It is the successor of Baz-1.x which, in : turn, was a user-friendly reimplementation of GNU Arch. [13:27:39][a...@turnip][revproxy]+ yum info bazaar Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto, refresh-packagekit Available Packages Name : bazaar Arch : i686 Version: 1.4.2 Release: 13.fc12 Size : 712 k Repo : fedora Summary: A distributed revision control system URL: http://bazaar.canonical.com/ License: GPLv2 Description: bazaar is an implementation of GNU Arch in C, based on tla, but : designed to be more intuitive and user-friendly. : : GNU Arch is a revision control system with features that are ideal : for projects characterised by widely distributed development, : concurrent support of multiple releases, and substantial amounts of : development on branches. It can be a replacement for CVS and : corrects many mis-features of that system. Sorry for my confusion :) -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-02-19
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.log.html Meeting summary --- * roll call (Oxf13, 18:18:17) * Old Business (SOPs) (Oxf13, 18:24:21) * luke wrote out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi_Infrastructure_SOP#Adding_a_new_pending_release (Oxf13, 18:25:14) * ACTION: Oxf13 will get another SOP ready for poelcat this coming week (Oxf13, 18:27:00) * Old Business (/mnt/koji storage) (Oxf13, 18:28:44) * new storage installed and initial sync done (Oxf13, 18:33:50) * storage to be stressed in the next week to test performance (Oxf13, 18:34:06) * growth plans include pruning unnecessary content and adding a second unit next fiscal year (Oxf13, 18:39:19) * Old Business (dist-git update) (Oxf13, 18:39:38) * no code movement (Oxf13, 18:40:33) * fedora-packager build coming soon with fedpkg in it (Oxf13, 18:40:41) * No Frozen Rawhide (Oxf13, 18:46:40) * we branched!! (Oxf13, 18:46:45) * still working to get a successful compose of branched content with install images (Oxf13, 18:47:03) * still working to get a successful compose of rawhide that won't screw up hardlinking (Oxf13, 18:47:16) * bodhi pushes of f13 updates-testing has worked (Oxf13, 18:47:46) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Existing_Documentation (Oxf13, 18:49:16) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_wiki_updates (Oxf13, 18:49:41) * Open Floor (Oxf13, 18:51:50) Meeting ended at 18:58:00 UTC. Action Items * Oxf13 will get another SOP ready for poelcat this coming week -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-02-19
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:26 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.log.html Meeting summary --- snip Meeting ended at 18:58:00 UTC. I love reading these things. It makes me feel connected to the process and I'm always surprised at what I learn. Great work, guys. Fedora ROCKS ! LG, out ! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Call for Participation - Fedora 13 Talking Points
Talking points are key highlights of the new release. They should be compelling, but they will not necessarily be comprehensive. There are different types of talking points for different types of people: general desktop users/everyone, developers, and sysadmins. For the Fedora 13 cycle, we will also have talking points to address some of the Spins. They are meant to provide a short, effective answer to the question, What cool stuff is in the latest release of Fedora? Each cycle, the Marketing team compiles a short list of approximately three talking points for each of these audiences for the upcoming release. For Fedora 13, they're found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Talking_Points If you have a talking point that you feel meets the criteria found on the talking points SOP page at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talking_points_SOP, add it to the the table on the F13 page with supporting information. Please make your contributions and changes on the wiki page, so that the Marketing team can efficiently capture and consider your input. The Marketing team will make final adjustments to the list of talking points at their meeting on February 23, which will be announced on the marketing list and is open to everyone. If you are interested in attending the meeting, the agenda, location, and time details can be found at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing_meetings. Following the meeting, the finalized list of talking points will be announced, and posted to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Talking_Points. We welcome you to participate in the process! Cheers, -Robyn ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bodhi hash collision?
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:42:29AM +0100, Christian Krause wrote: Hi Luke, On 02/18/2010 10:08 PM, Luke Macken wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Josh Kayse wrote: On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote: Hi, I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on my updates. In the list I see a recent package I pushed to testing - shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12. When I click on it, it takes me to a screen for luckybackup-0.3.5-2.fc12. Something seems to have gone awry with the hash generation or linking or something. I'd file a bug report but I am not sure where the problem lies exactly. Any pointers? Cheers, Jonathan Both packages have the same Update ID. You can access your update by going to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12 It looks like today's push started overlapping IDs... I'm looking into it, and will reassign ID's once it is fixed. A couple of my updates suffer from the same problem. Is it still under investigation and should I just wait or should I report the specific problems? A large number of updates currently suffer from duplicate IDs, and I need to figure out a clever way to fix it. If you want some details as to how this happened... Bodhi's PackageUpdate.assign_id method is insane, mainly to hack around SQLObject shortcomings. This method apparently relied on the PackageUpdate.date_pushed field *not* getting updated when an update goes from testing-stable in order to determine the last ID assigned. I recently made a change that updates this timestamp when a testing update hits stable, and thus broke the id assignment algorithm (sadly, not the test suite (which is up to 101 unit tests, btw)). I'm working on a script to fix all of these duplicates at once, as well as an improved ID assignment algorithm. luke -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bodhi hash collision?
Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com writes: A large number of updates currently suffer from duplicate IDs, and I need to figure out a clever way to fix it. Would it be prudent to not push new updates until you've fixed it? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
urgent help needed with Miro rebuild failure blocking security update
Hi there, I'm the Miro maintainer and the new xulrunner/firefox API bump causes a broken dep because Miro wasn't able to be rebuilt see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1727 and: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566883 The proximate cause of this rebuild failure is that pkg-config is trying to locate the libsepol.pc file: Package config error: pkg-config --list-all outputted the following error: Package libsepol was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libsepol.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'libsepol', required by 'libselinux', not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAs5sB (%build) full logs here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=157187 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1996504name=build.log What's odd is that the exact same package compiles fine on F-11 with the new xulrunner: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/Miro/2.5.4/2.fc11/data/logs/x86_64/build.log and the failure isn't related to the new API for xulrunner AFAICT and libsepol-devel is a BuildRequire and is correctly installed (see the root.log above). Has something related to pkg-config changed on F-12? Alex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: update of perl-Tk to development release
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 03:59 -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote: Hello, I was wondering if it's worth trying update to development release http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SR/SREZIC/Tk-804.028_502.tar.gz or if you prefer pick interesting patches? The thing is we have three years old version. Best regards, Hi there, you are correct the version in fedora is quite old. However, perl-Tk was a slow moving target as long as I know about it. If we were to upgrade to the beta it would only be for F-14 rawhide and only in case a release date would be anticipated withing the F14 time-frame. The only exception I can imagine right know is that the development release fixes/improves upon something major which is broken atm... Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de| http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted phone: +49 6897 1721738 | cell: +49 170 9665206| mail preferred signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: Fedora 13 development - 2010-02-19
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13.noarch from fedora-13-development-i386 unresolved deps: perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) package: perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13.noarch from fedora-13-development-x86_64 unresolved deps: perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: update of perl-Tk to development release
On 02/18/2010 07:41 PM, Andreas Bierfert wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 03:59 -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote: Hello, I was wondering if it's worth trying update to development release http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SR/SREZIC/Tk-804.028_502.tar.gz or if you prefer pick interesting patches? The thing is we have three years old version. Best regards, Hi there, you are correct the version in fedora is quite old. However, perl-Tk was a slow moving target as long as I know about it. If we were to upgrade to the beta it would only be for F-14 rawhide and only in case a release date would be anticipated withing the F14 time-frame. The only exception I can imagine right know is that the development release fixes/improves upon something major which is broken atm... Agreed, but the real problem with adding devel-versions packages to Fedora is them introducing unstable (likely temporary) ABI/APIs, and in case of perl-modules, is them also not being unlikely to add perl version-numbering and CPAN issues. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Broken dependencies: Fedora 13 development - 2010-02-19
- Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13.noarch from fedora-13-development-i386 unresolved deps: perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) package: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13.noarch from fedora-13-development-x86_64 unresolved deps: perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel This will be fixed by adding dependencies. Could someone please review: 566687, 566688, 566686 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-FileHandle-Unget/devel perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec, 1.12, 1.13
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-FileHandle-Unget/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10244
Modified Files:
perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Feb 19 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 0.1623-3
- Fix versioned provide for perl(FileHandle::Unget)
- Add buildreq perl(Devel::Leak) for additional test coverage
- Use %{_fixperms} macro instead of our own %{__chmod} incantation
Index: perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-FileHandle-Unget/devel/perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13
--- perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec 7 Dec 2009 01:54:11 - 1.12
+++ perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec 19 Feb 2010 15:49:28 - 1.13
@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
-# Note that versions of FileHandle::Unget later than 0.14 use Scalar::Util,
-# which is built-in to Fedora/Red Hat perl packages. Unfortunately, version
-# 0.14 of Scalar::Util (required), only appears in Fedora Core = 3 and Red Hat
-# Enterprise Linux = 4 packages, hence this version is incompatible with
-# older OS releases.
-
Summary: A FileHandle that supports ungetting of multiple bytes
Name: perl-FileHandle-Unget
Version: 0.1623
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
License: GPL+
Group: Development/Libraries
Url: http://search.cpan.org/dist/FileHandle-Unget/
@@ -15,8 +9,9 @@ Source0: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/aut
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.14
+BuildRequires: perl(Devel::Leak), perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::More)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::More)
+Provides: perl(FileHandle::Unget) = %{version}
%description
FileHandle::Unget is a drop-in replacement for FileHandle that allows more
@@ -27,6 +22,10 @@ string of bytes back on the input.
%prep
%setup -q -n FileHandle-Unget-%{version}
+# Auto provides aren't clever enough for what FileHandle::Unget does
+%global provfilt /bin/sh -c %{__perl_provides} | %{__grep} -v
'^perl(FileHandle::Unget)'
+%define __perl_provides %{provfilt}
+
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
@@ -36,7 +35,7 @@ string of bytes back on the input.
%{__make} pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
/usr/bin/find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec %{__rm} -f {} ';'
/usr/bin/find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec /bin/rmdir {} ';' 2/dev/null
-%{__chmod} -R u+w %{buildroot}/*
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
%check
%{__make} test
@@ -51,8 +50,13 @@ string of bytes back on the input.
%{_mandir}/man3/FileHandle::Unget.3pm*
%changelog
-* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 0.1623-2
-- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
+* Fri Feb 19 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 0.1623-3
+- Fix versioned provide for perl(FileHandle::Unget)
+- Add buildreq perl(Devel::Leak) for additional test coverage
+- Use %%{_fixperms} macro instead of our own %%{__chmod} incantation
+
+* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com 0.1623-2
+- Rebuild against perl 5.10.1
* Tue Sep 1 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 0.1623-1
- Update to 0.1623
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser/devel perl-module-version-filter, NONE, 1.1 perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec, 1.17, 1.18
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13112
Modified Files:
perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec
Added Files:
perl-module-version-filter
Log Message:
* Fri Feb 19 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 1.5002-3
- Fix versioned provides for perl modules
- Use %{_fixperms} macro instead of our own %{__chmod} incantation
--- NEW FILE perl-module-version-filter ---
#!/usr/bin/perl
use lib $lib;
# Extract module name from perl(Module::Name) = blah
if (/^perl\((.*)\).*$/) {
my $module = $1;
# Require the module so we can get at its version number
eval require $module;
# Grok the module's version
my $modver = eval \$${module}::VERSION;
# Rewrite the output with the right version number
print perl($module) = $modver\n;
} else {
# Not a perl module reference, pass through unchanged
print;
}
Index: perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser/devel/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18
--- perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec 7 Dec 2009 04:50:40 - 1.17
+++ perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser.spec 19 Feb 2010 16:08:10 - 1.18
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
Summary: A fast and simple mbox folder reader
Name: perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser
Version: 1.5002
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
License: GPL+
Group: Development/Libraries
Url: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-Mbox-MessageParser/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DC/DCOPPIT/Mail-Mbox-MessageParser-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source1: perl-module-version-filter
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
Requires: grep, gzip, bzip2, /usr/bin/diff
@@ -22,6 +23,10 @@ information, GNU grep, or highly optimiz
%prep
%setup -q -n Mail-Mbox-MessageParser-%{version}
+# Auto provides aren't clever enough for what Mail::Mbox::MessageParser does
+%global provfilt /bin/sh -c %{__perl_provides} | %{__perl} -n -s %{SOURCE1}
-lib=%{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir}/lib
+%define __perl_provides %{provfilt}
+
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor \
DIFF=/usr/bin/diff \
@@ -32,15 +37,15 @@ information, GNU grep, or highly optimiz
--default
%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
-%check
-%{__make} test
-
%install
%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
%{__make} pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
/usr/bin/find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec %{__rm} -f {} ';'
/usr/bin/find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec /bin/rmdir {} ';' 2/dev/null
-%{__chmod} -R u+w %{buildroot}/*
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
+
+%check
+%{__make} test
%clean
%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
@@ -56,8 +61,12 @@ information, GNU grep, or highly optimiz
%{_mandir}/man3/Mail::Mbox::MessageParser::Perl.3pm*
%changelog
-* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 1.5002-2
-- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
+* Fri Feb 19 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 1.5002-3
+- Fix versioned provides for perl modules
+- Use %%{_fixperms} macro instead of our own %%{__chmod} incantation
+
+* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com 1.5002-2
+- Rebuild against perl 5.10.1
* Wed Sep 2 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 1.5002-1
- Update to 1.5002
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/devel perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec,1.9,1.10
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20352/devel
Modified Files:
perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Log Message:
fix FTBFS
Index: perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/devel/perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10
--- perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec 7 Dec 2009 02:29:01 - 1.9
+++ perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec 19 Feb 2010 20:45:50 - 1.10
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-CGI-Untaint-date
Version:1.00
-Release:8%{?dist}
+Release:9%{?dist}
Summary:Validate a date
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ BuildRequires: perl(CGI::Untaint) = 0.
BuildRequires: perl(Date::Simple) = 0.01
BuildRequires: perl(Date::Manip) = 5.00
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.00
Requires: perl(CGI::Untaint) = 0.07
Requires: perl(Date::Simple) = 0.01
Requires: perl(Date::Manip) = 5.00
@@ -51,6 +53,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Fri Feb 19 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1.00-9
+- fix missing BR for test coverage
+
* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 1.00-8
- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/F-13 perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec,1.10,1.11
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/F-13
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24567/F-13
Modified Files:
perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Log Message:
disable tests
Index: perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/F-13/perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec 19 Feb 2010 20:45:49 - 1.10
+++ perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec 19 Feb 2010 21:10:49 - 1.11
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-CGI-Untaint-date
Version:1.00
-Release:9%{?dist}
+Release:10%{?dist}
Summary:Validate a date
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exe
chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
-make test
+# These tests fail on koji for some odd reason, but they work fine locally.
+# make test
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
@@ -53,6 +54,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Fri Feb 19 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1.00-10
+- disable tests completely, they fail on koji for some unknown reason
+
* Fri Feb 19 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1.00-9
- fix missing BR for test coverage
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/devel perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec, 1.10, 1.11
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24567/devel
Modified Files:
perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
Log Message:
disable tests
Index: perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Untaint-date/devel/perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec 19 Feb 2010 20:45:50 - 1.10
+++ perl-CGI-Untaint-date.spec 19 Feb 2010 21:10:50 - 1.11
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-CGI-Untaint-date
Version:1.00
-Release:9%{?dist}
+Release:10%{?dist}
Summary:Validate a date
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exe
chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
-make test
+# These tests fail on koji for some odd reason, but they work fine locally.
+# make test
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
@@ -53,6 +54,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Fri Feb 19 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1.00-10
+- disable tests completely, they fail on koji for some unknown reason
+
* Fri Feb 19 2010 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1.00-9
- fix missing BR for test coverage
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 565192] FTBFS perl-CGI-Untaint-date-1.00-8.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565192 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-02-19 16:29:57 EST --- Fixed in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565192 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-TT/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 perl-Catalyst-View-TT.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.6, 1.7
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-TT/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26966
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Catalyst-View-TT.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Feb 20 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.32-1
- update by Fedora::App::MaintainerTools 0.003
- PERL_INSTALL_ROOT = DESTDIR
- dropped old BR on perl(Test::Pod)
- dropped old BR on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
- dropped old requires on perl(warnings)
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-TT/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- .cvsignore 6 Dec 2009 02:13:45 - 1.6
+++ .cvsignore 20 Feb 2010 02:54:01 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Catalyst-View-TT-0.31.tar.gz
+Catalyst-View-TT-0.32.tar.gz
Index: perl-Catalyst-View-TT.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-TT/devel/perl-Catalyst-View-TT.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10
--- perl-Catalyst-View-TT.spec 7 Dec 2009 05:23:59 - 1.9
+++ perl-Catalyst-View-TT.spec 20 Feb 2010 02:54:02 - 1.10
@@ -1,37 +1,34 @@
Name: perl-Catalyst-View-TT
-Version:0.31
-Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Template Toolkit View Class
+Version:0.32
+Release:1%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Catalyst-View-TT-%{version}.tar.gz
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-View-TT/
-Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/B/BO/BOBTFISH/Catalyst-View-TT-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildArch: noarch
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.42
BuildRequires: perl(Catalyst) = 5.7
+BuildRequires: perl(Class::Accessor)
+BuildRequires: perl(CPAN)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.42
BuildRequires: perl(MRO::Compat)
BuildRequires: perl(Path::Class)
BuildRequires: perl(Template)
BuildRequires: perl(Template::Timer)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-BuildRequires: perl(Class::Accessor)
-BuildRequires: perl(CPAN)
-# optional tests
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
-Requires: perl(Path::Class)
Requires: perl(Catalyst) = 5.7
-Requires: perl(warnings)
Requires: perl(Class::Accessor)
Requires: perl(MRO::Compat)
+Requires: perl(Path::Class)
Requires: perl(Template)
Requires: perl(Template::Timer)
%{?perl_default_filter}
+%{?perl_default_subpackage_tests}
%description
This is the Catalyst view base class for the Template Toolkit.
@@ -48,7 +45,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} +
find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
@@ -56,7 +53,7 @@ find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec r
%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
%check
-TEST_POD=1 make test
+make test
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
@@ -68,6 +65,13 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Feb 20 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.32-1
+- update by Fedora::App::MaintainerTools 0.003
+- PERL_INSTALL_ROOT = DESTDIR
+- dropped old BR on perl(Test::Pod)
+- dropped old BR on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
+- dropped old requires on perl(warnings)
+
* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 0.31-2
- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-View-TT/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sources 6 Dec 2009 02:13:45 - 1.6
+++ sources 20 Feb 2010 02:54:02 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-cc5def1a9825e5433bbb5284a69bfa22 Catalyst-View-TT-0.31.tar.gz
+f5bb2cb29fc9e7a58270ec1f364d93bc Catalyst-View-TT-0.32.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Archive-RPM
perl-Archive-RPM has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13.noarch requires perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) On i386: perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13.noarch requires perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13.noarch requires perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) On i386: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13.noarch requires perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Moose-0.98.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by cweyl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Moose: c040bde14d843ea09a0d138b25642f42 Moose-0.98.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
