Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
On Saturday, July 24, 2010 08:54:53 Jesse Keating wrote: Hey all! It's that time again, we're gearing up to branch for Fedora 14 this coming Tuesday! There is a major twist this time around, we're going to attempt a roll out of dist-git! What we will find in git? Only rawhide? F-14? All not EOLed Fedora versions? Or everything? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 617967] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
git branch -a will show you all branches (remote included) Until fedpkg is updated, to track any remote branch other than master (ie: F-13): git checkout -b f13 remotes/origin/F-13 Then, you juste have to do for switching: git checkout my_branch Best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Partial mass rebuild for Python 2.7 coming soon (I hope)
On 25/07/2010 13:47, Thomas Spura wrote: Am Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:54:40 +0200 schrieb Florent Le Cozlo...@louiz.org: On 22/07/2010 17:28, David Malcolm wrote: louizatakk (1): python-pgu http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2338286 I fixed the .spec file, it should work properly now, but I can't build on Koji to check. I first built it on devel, and I then tried on the target dist-f14-py27-rebuild http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=dist-f14-py27-rebuild but it failed with GenericError: Build already exists http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=185984 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2346535 Anyway, this should be fixed. Not yet. This is now only build in rawhide, but not in dist-f14-py27-rebuild. Because you already build 0.12.3-5 in rawhide, you cannot build the same version in another tag. Please bump the release and build it again in the target dist-f14-py27-rebuild. Thomas I've done the make srpm koji build --scratch dist-f14-py27-rebuild SRPM-FILE You gave in another thread, and this worked (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2350803) Is this OK or should I really bump the release and rebuild? Florent -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd is now the default init system in rawhide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/24/2010 09:39 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 16:36 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:14:33AM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote: Why is the systemd executable in /bin instead of /sbin? Without looking too closely I believe systemd eventually seeks to replace things like gnome-session daemon. It has session management in mind as well as system. Still belongs in /sbin, unless it's meant to actually be executed directly by end-users. No. If that were the criterion, update-mime-database would belong in /sbin . The FHS puts it like this: (a) /bin contains commands that may be used by both the system administrator and by users, but which are required when no other filesystems are mounted (e.g. in single user mode). It may also contain commands which are used indirectly by scripts. (b) /sbin contains binaries essential for booting, restoring, recovering, and/or repairing the system in addition to the binaries in /bin. So if the intent is that systemd will eventually be invoked (indirectly by some script/daemon) by users this seems justified by (a). On the other hand the page has this to say on init: The following files, or symbolic links to files, must be in /sbin if the corresponding subsystem is installed: ... init It's arguable though whether this refers to SysV's init or is intended to be more general. http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#BINESSENTIALUSERCOMMANDBINARIES http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SBINSYSTEMBINARIES Regards, Bryn. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxNVfQACgkQ6YSQoMYUY95UngCgxoS3//7yzpXZriKSCZMFnun+ 1qoAn107myHo05jderCykLfKsSmqYAmS =iYOx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Partial mass rebuild for Python 2.7 coming soon (I hope)
Am Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:45:33 +0200 schrieb Florent Le Coz lo...@louiz.org: On 25/07/2010 13:47, Thomas Spura wrote: Am Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:54:40 +0200 schrieb Florent Le Cozlo...@louiz.org: On 22/07/2010 17:28, David Malcolm wrote: louizatakk (1): python-pgu http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2338286 I fixed the .spec file, it should work properly now, but I can't build on Koji to check. I first built it on devel, and I then tried on the target dist-f14-py27-rebuild http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=dist-f14-py27-rebuild but it failed with GenericError: Build already exists http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=185984 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2346535 Anyway, this should be fixed. Not yet. This is now only build in rawhide, but not in dist-f14-py27-rebuild. Because you already build 0.12.3-5 in rawhide, you cannot build the same version in another tag. Please bump the release and build it again in the target dist-f14-py27-rebuild. Thomas I've done the make srpm koji build --scratch dist-f14-py27-rebuild SRPM-FILE You gave in another thread, and this worked (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2350803) Is this OK or should I really bump the release and rebuild? '--scratch' means, that it will be build, you can see the logs and after a while, everything is deleted again... You need to build *without* '--scratch', so this will be a proper build in koji. I don't think that will work without bumping the release and you get the same error like above. So you need to bumb the release and rebuild. Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide report: 20100726 changes
Compose started at Mon Jul 26 08:15:19 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.4.so()(64bit) PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.4.so()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgladeui-1.so.9()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit) cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit) claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit) dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.30.0-1.1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.30.0-1.1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) ekiga-3.2.7-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.i386 requires libgcj.so.10 frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-gnome-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) giggle-0.5-2.fc14.i686 requires libebook-1.2.so.9 giggle-0.5-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) glabels-2.2.8-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) glib-java-0.2.6-16.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 glib-java-0.2.6-16.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) gnome-python2-brasero-2.31.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libbrasero-burn.so.1()(64bit) gnome-python2-brasero-2.31.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libbrasero-media.so.1()(64bit) gnome-python2-evolution-2.31.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) gnome-python2-evolution-2.31.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) gnome-python2-totem-2.31.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgnome-media-profiles.so.0()(64bit) gnomeradio-1.8-6.fc14.x86_64 requires libgnome-media-profiles.so.0()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit) intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-11.fc14.x86_64 requires jna-examples lekhonee-gnome-0.11-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit) libgconf-java-2.12.4-14.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libgconf-java-2.12.4-14.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libgtk-java-2.8.7-13.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libgtk-java-2.8.7-13.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) mine_detector-6.0-3.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.4.so()(64bit) mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-4.fc14.noarch requires mingw32(libpng-3.dll) moblin-panel-myzone-0.0.13-4.fc14.i686 requires libecal-1.2.so.7 moblin-panel-myzone-0.0.13-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit)
[Bug 618310] New: perl-MIME-Types - EL6 branch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-MIME-Types - EL6 branch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618310 Summary: perl-MIME-Types - EL6 branch Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-MIME-Types AssignedTo: tcall...@redhat.com ReportedBy: trem...@tremble.org.uk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-MIME-Types New Branches: EL-6 Owners: spot tremble This would originally have gone through as part of the normal branching but it appeared for beta1 2 and has gone for the bea2 refresh... Spoke to spot on IRC and he has no objections to the branching -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 618310] perl-MIME-Types - EL6 branch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618310 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trem...@tremble.org.uk Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks
Start End Name Mon 26-Jul Fri 30-Jul Daily Review Notification of Open Alpha Blocker Bugs Tue 27-Jul Tue 27-Jul Spins Freeze--All Fedora 14 Spins Identified Tue 27-Jul Tue 27-Jul Branch Fedora 14 from Rawhide Tue 27-Jul Tue 27-Jul Feature Freeze (Testable|Complete) Tue 27-Jul Tue 27-Jul Orphan Rawhide Packages Thu 29-Jul Thu 29-Jul Create Alpha Test Compose (TC) Fri 30-Jul Fri 30-Jul Alpha Blocker Meeting (f14alpha) #3 Tue 03-Aug Tue 03-Aug Software String Freeze Tue 03-Aug Tue 03-Aug Alpha Change Deadline Thu 05-Aug Thu 05-Aug Compose Alpha Candidate Fri 06-Aug Fri 06-Aug Alpha Blocker Meeting (f14alpha) #4 Have you found something that is working really well in your schedule? Or maybe you've found something you believe would work better in the future? Update the schedule retrospective page now to capture all of the important details as they happen: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Schedule_Retrospective -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/26/2010 10:25 AM, Chen Lei wrote: Can we filter out all .cvsignore and Makefile files it git repo? It seems those files are irrelevant to dist-git. Yes, in the latest conversion scripts branch, import.log, and Makefile files are removed. The .cvsignore file is moved to .gitignore - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxNxjYACgkQ4v2HLvE71NVM4wCfUb2EuE1FSbI9bOdJDSVJw08/ avsAn3r1Piq20+NyojPQyxpmlMLina5D =7LXo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Question on SELinux AVC messages with systemd.
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: of those that it does open(),.. Is there seriously a use-case for someone wanting lvm partitioned /dev/ram disks ? or /dev/loop ? I would assume that's for testing. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
On 07/19/2010 05:42 PM, M A Young wrote: On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote: [xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what the best way to comply with these changes since xen is rather a mess of licenses - I count 25 files or symbolic links called COPYING or LICENSE in the unpacked source and the base level COPYING file talks about license conditions at the head of some files. They all seem to be basically GPL, LGPL or BSD with one case of The Artistic License. Should I include all the COPYING or LICENSE files, one of each type of license (though some of the license files have different md5sums even when they claim to be the same license) or just the bottom level COPYING file? You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry. ~spot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Python 2.7 rebuild status
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:13 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: Status: - we're down to 170 failing builds against python 2.7 - various BuildRequires are now available in the 2.7 Koji tag: - boost and openmpi (thanks oget!) - subversion (I took the liberty of applying a workaround for this) - kdebindings - gstreamer-python Thanks to David for tracking down some 2to3 bugs python-lxml is now available in the 2.7 koji branch. I'm not sure how many rebuilds were waiting for that but I'm sure that there are more than a few. -- Jeff Ollie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
2010/7/27 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com: On 07/19/2010 05:42 PM, M A Young wrote: On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote: [xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what the best way to comply with these changes since xen is rather a mess of licenses - I count 25 files or symbolic links called COPYING or LICENSE in the unpacked source and the base level COPYING file talks about license conditions at the head of some files. They all seem to be basically GPL, LGPL or BSD with one case of The Artistic License. Should I include all the COPYING or LICENSE files, one of each type of license (though some of the license files have different md5sums even when they claim to be the same license) or just the bottom level COPYING file? You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry. ~spot -- If a GPL binary is compiled with mixed BSD and GPL source files, should we also add the BSD license text along with GPL text? Regards, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) said: Nobody has said anything that upstart was being deprecated nobody! Actually, I'll say that, sort of. Fedora 14 should only ship with one automatic init system. Given the current feature, that would be systemd. If it fails, that would be upstart. But I'm firmly of the opinion that allowing people to pick their own set of breakage in init systems is a really bad idea. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
On 07/26/2010 02:53 PM, Chen Lei wrote: 2010/7/27 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com: On 07/19/2010 05:42 PM, M A Young wrote: On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote: [xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what the best way to comply with these changes since xen is rather a mess of licenses - I count 25 files or symbolic links called COPYING or LICENSE in the unpacked source and the base level COPYING file talks about license conditions at the head of some files. They all seem to be basically GPL, LGPL or BSD with one case of The Artistic License. Should I include all the COPYING or LICENSE files, one of each type of license (though some of the license files have different md5sums even when they claim to be the same license) or just the bottom level COPYING file? You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry. ~spot -- If a GPL binary is compiled with mixed BSD and GPL source files, should we also add the BSD license text along with GPL text? If the upstream provides a copy of an applicable license text with their source, you should package it as %doc. If they don't, you should ask them to add it. ~spot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-07-27)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. = Followups = #topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351 #topic #382 Implementing Stable Release Vision https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/382 #topic #423 F14Feature: GoldLinkerDefault - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/423 #topic #434 F14Feature - DNSSEC_on_workstations - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNSSEC_on_workstations https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/434 #topic #438 F14Feature: Ruby_1.87 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.8.7 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/438 = New business = #topic #440 Improve updates process to avoid windows of doom https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/440 = Fedora Engineering Services tickets = https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/report/6 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: * if we continue to require sysVinit scripts in the guidlines, this is true. * If we don't, then sysadmins that have to install packages without sysvinit scripts will have to deal with writing their own init scripts. My take on this is that sysvinit scripts should be a requirement, and systemd unit files an optional addition. Given that the guidelines have not been updated in any way this is basically what the guideliness currently say. I would say until we get a coherent story and guidelines on the packaging, activation, etc. of systemd unit files in a way that's unlikely to change long-term, that systemd unit files should not be encouraged. I don't want to have to train packagers each release. That being said, from reading the rest of this thread, it looks like we're making progress on that front. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: Example: /lib/systemd/system/syslog.target has this line: # See systemd.special(7) for details I am not sure I want to duplicate all documentation in the man pages and in the spec fails a second time. If you think a referal like that in the unit files won't work then I don't think that anything will ever work. Honestly, I think that if all systemd.special(7) is is one by one descriptions of each special target, then it's better to document them in the targets themselves and drop the man page entirely. Again, matter of taste. OK, I was missing a detail here - I was conflating alias with name. What I was noticing was the local.service - rc.local.service link in /lib/systemd. This is actually just bookkeeping to make sure it overrides the /etc/init.d/ service, if I'm now reading this right. I wonder if there's a better way to handle this case other than just creating more Name entries/symlinks (have the daemon do this without the symlink?), but... *shrug*. Well, it's just there because the old fedora sysv system is a bit weird and used both names at different places. And so we inherited that in a way. Can't this be solved by just having rc.local executed by a native systemd file and dropping the explicit Sxx SysV link? (Similar for some other items.) Given that knowledge, it makes me then wonder what exactly 'systemd-install disable' is supposed to do. I'll check out git. Currently it undos the suggested installation, but leaves everything you manually added enabled. Might be worth extending to remove all symlinks, i.e. for package uninstall. This is now on my todo list. Yeah, I think we'll need that just to avoid dangling symlinks getting left around in some cases - even if the user doesn't create random new targets, they might enable the service in one of the default targets. Well, I like what we have with upstart in that it just requires changing a variable in a config file, rather than filesystem-level changes. Perhaps there's a way to hack that in. But that again is a matter of taste, isn't it? Sort of. I wonder if it's equally similar to represent in config management systems like puppet. Something to look at later... Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora 14 Feature Freeze is tomorrow (2010-07-27)
A friendly reminder that tomorrow, Tuesday, July 27, 2010, is Feature Freeze for Fedora 14. Feature Freeze means that all accepted features for Fedora 14 must be *significantly* feature complete, ready for testing, and have a current status. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Feature_Freeze_Policy. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Milestones#Feature_Freeze If you have a feature that will not be feature complete by tomorrow that is okay. Simply change the wiki page category to Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler (edit text at the very bottom of the page) and include the reason and your plans in the commit comment. I'll see that your feature is targeted for Fedora 15 instead. Thank you, John ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Tom spot Callaway wrote: You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry. I have commited a spec file that puts all the COPYING and LICENSE files into a new xen-licenses package (I don't what to include that many files twice). I haven't built it yet as I was going to wait a bit to see what is happening with the python 2.7 merge. Michael Young -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora 14 Alpha Unresolved Blocker Bug Count = 3
It's reminder guy again with a public service announcement about the upcoming Fedora 12 Alpha Release. Some may recall that I declared my own feature for the Fedora 14 release (shipping Alpha, Beta, and Final on time) [1], even though I am not a package maintainer. In order for that feature to be implemented I need your help. :-) Starting today and up until the Fedora 14 Alpha blocker bug (http://bit.ly/d0weX3) has no bugs, I'll be sending out period reminders with a list of the bugs that aren't getting any love or attention. If you're interested in helping me in this effort (and it would be much appreciated), please contact me off list. Here's what we've got for today: 597858 :: NEW :: firefox :: Gecko Maintainer :: SELinux is preventing firefox from making its memory writable and executable. crashes rawhide firefox start :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597858 --Need some feedback from the package maintainer. No ETA when an estimated fix will be ready. 615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: boot from liveusb fails (can't mount root filesystem) :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615443 --Need some feedback from the package maintainer. No ETA when an estimated fix will be ready. 617115 :: ASSIGNED :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: rawhide live spins showing black screen instead of syslinux boot menu :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617115 --Really need some feedback from the package maintainer. No ETA when an estimated fix will be ready. If the Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker list is not clear by 2010-08-05, Release Engineering will not create a release candidate for the alpha, thus potentially delaying the release. John [1] http://poelcat.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/shipping-on-time-is-a-feature-for-fedora-14/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
f14 boost-1.44.0 upgrade: notice of intent
Hey. The boost maintainers are planning to update the boost versions to the current release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. This is in keeping with the general plan to sync with boost every six months or so. See more detail here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F14Boost144 Suggested plan is to push this to devel in the next 24 hrs, which will be announced on fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com. It is anticipated that this update will be less work than the 1.39-1.41 transition. This update changes the SONAME of boost libraries, and adds some new libraries. All boost dependencies will have to be rebuilt. As always, timely assistance from package maintainers is welcome. best, -benjamin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
Jesse Another dumb question. I uploaded a package, frama-c. Will it be included in 14. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 24, 2010, at 2:54 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: Hey all! It's that time again, we're gearing up to branch for Fedora 14 this coming Tuesday! There is a major twist this time around, we're going to attempt a roll out of dist-git! Dist-git is our replacement for the CVS system we are currently using. This is a pretty big deal, but we're going to try to make it as smooth as possible. In the next few days I'll be finalizing our git server setup and polishing up the user interface tool you all will be using to interact with the source control and build system. The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish there was another way, but converting over 9K cvs repos into git repos does take some time. I really feel that this move is worth the extended outage. The tool you all will use to interact with git and the buildsystem is called fedpkg. It comes from the fedora-packager package. There is a version of it available now in all active Fedora and EPEL releases, although it is built to work against our staging environment where we have been testing the setup for a while. This setup is slightly different than the final version, but you can install it and poke around the help system to get a feel for what's going on. Most of the make targets have made it over and are named the same; build, sources, srpm, etc... Many of the targets can take arguments and options. Where the make system used shell variables, fedpkg uses options and arguments. Each target takes a --help argument that will show any available options. Fedpkg does not yet have a man page, that may be coming soon. We're also going to be working on wiki pages to document the new stuff and archive the old stuff. We're going to need help on this too, so if you want to pitch in, by all means! As I mentioned above, this is an attempt. We are trying this pretty early, which I wouldn't normally do. However we have a good roll back plan. We are going to keep the CVS server as is, although turned read-only during and after the dist-git rollout. If something fails beyond reasonable repair with the dist-git attempt we will re-enable write access to the CVS server (after we branch it for Fedora 14). Otherwise we will keep it around, in some capacity, as a read-only reference point. I'm certain we will run into some bumps along the way, and some wrinkles to iron out. I ask that you are patient with us as we work through these, and as we either get updates pushed out of fedpkg or make adjustments to the git repos on the git server. This transition has been a long time coming, and I'm really happy to be the one to make it happen. Keep in mind that this will be the first iteration of our transition, and it will operate mostly the same as dist-cvs did with a few improvements. Later on we will start to explore more interesting advancements such as automatic patch management with exploded sources, linking to upstream source repositories, automatic %changelog generation from git changelogs, or things I haven't even thought about. Most of all, we won't be using CVS any more and that feels really good to me. If you're curious about how the new system will work or have concerns, or want to help, you can reply to this email thread or find me on IRC as Oxf13 (that's an o, not a zero). If you run across bugs in fedpkg, you can file them in the fedora-packager hosted trac space https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ or just find me on IRC as well. Thanks again for your patience, both in waiting so long for us to make this move, and for bearing with us during the transition. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd is now the default init system in rawhide
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 03:26 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Heya, I have just uploaded a new systemd and a new upstart package which make systemd the default init system for Rawhide. The scheme I followed makes sure that in case systemd actually breaks systems there is an easy path back to upstart. And here's how it works: Aside from the noted conflict, I see this in the build logs for the 20100726 nightly live (http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/logs/20100726.15-x86_64.log ): Installing: systemd-units### [ 113/1075]/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3xbHei: line 11: /bin/ln: No such file or directory ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/ge...@.service' '/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/ge...@tty1.service' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/ge...@.service' '/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/ge...@tty2.service' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/ge...@.service' '/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/ge...@tty3.service' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/ge...@.service' '/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/ge...@tty4.service' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/ge...@.service' '/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/ge...@tty5.service' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/ge...@.service' '/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/ge...@tty6.service' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/prefdm.service' '/etc/systemd/system/graphical.target.wants/prefdm.service' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/getty.target' '/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/getty.target' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service' '/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/rc-local.service' ln -s '/lib/systemd/system/remote-fs.target' '/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/remote-fs.target' Looks like it's missing a Requires(post), I guess. It also doesn't seem that systemd is yet kicking in as the default for the live builds. Even though the installed systemd-units package is systemd-units-4-3.fc14.x86_64 , indicating a version new enough to be intended to be the default was available, systemd-units is the *only* systemd package installed, and upstart-sysvinit-0.6.5-7.fc14 is installed, so it seems upstart still gets to be the default. Not sure if that's another packaging issue, or just that the live spin kickstart file needs to be changed. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd is now the default init system in rawhide
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 17:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
It also doesn't seem that systemd is yet kicking in as the default for
the live builds. Even though the installed systemd-units package is
systemd-units-4-3.fc14.x86_64 , indicating a version new enough to be
intended to be the default was available, systemd-units is the *only*
systemd package installed, and upstart-sysvinit-0.6.5-7.fc14 is
installed, so it seems upstart still gets to be the default. Not sure if
that's another packaging issue, or just that the live spin kickstart
file needs to be changed.
Addendum - I just checked spin-kickstarts and AFAICT it doesn't
explicitly specify an init system, I guess it relies on dependencies.
I note that initscripts has an explicit dependency on upstart:
%define with_upstart 1%{nil}
...
if with_upstart
Requires: upstart = 0.6.0
%else
Requires: SysVinit = 2.85-38
%endif
seems like something that should be changed. readahead,
system-setup-keyboard and vpnc also have direct dependencies on upstart,
presumably because they (I think incorrectly) include upstart-style
scripts in their main packages rather than separating them into a
-upstart subpackage.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Seeking to merge python 2.7 into rawhide
Current status: 114 failing builds http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html See also the notes on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7#Current_status Many of these appear to be pre-existing FTBFS; as far as I can make out, the #includes for parts of the GTK stack are substantially broken in rawhide. Can we get all of the hundreds of successful builds into rawhide before it drifts further? Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/26/10 5:39 PM, Mark Rader wrote: Another dumb question. I uploaded a package, frama-c. Will it be included in 14. If it has been built for rawhide prior to the branch event, then it will be in 14. - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxOQSQACgkQ4v2HLvE71NXUxQCglvoUN/gAJoEuft9udGInOTrO jkQAoIplWkRH0HxTPkm4lIhmuyZR4006 =96u/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:31 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 09:10:24AM -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey all! It's that time again, we're gearing up to branch for Fedora 14
this coming Tuesday! There is a major twist this time around, we're
going to attempt a roll out of dist-git!
--snipped---
I'm just curious but would this allow someone to more easily fork the
distro? (think of stuff like Mint)
The ability to fork {packages|kernels|distros} is a good thing. It
keeps the software lively and keeps the purveyors of software honest.
I enjoyed reading Rick Moen's essay on the subject:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/forking.html
Also, of course, one of the truisms about git is that it doesn't only
make it easier to *fork*: it makes it easier to *merge*. So even if the
change does let people fork Fedora more easily, it also lets us
incorporate their changes and bring them back into mainline more easily
too.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
And vice versa :)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seeking to merge python 2.7 into rawhide
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 21:27 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: Current status: 114 failing builds http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html See also the notes on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7#Current_status Many of these appear to be pre-existing FTBFS; as far as I can make out, the #includes for parts of the GTK stack are substantially broken in rawhide. Can we get all of the hundreds of successful builds into rawhide before it drifts further? Some of the ones that are broken look like fairly important things which we really wouldn't want to be broken in Rawhide when we're trying to build the Alpha test compose (Thursday): farsight2 telepathy-farsight openoffice.org libgpod abrt revelation (okay, okay, i'm sneaking this one in because *i* depend on it :) bodhi(!) alacarte gnome-applets gnome-games python-fedora That's not an exhaustive list, just things that leap out at me as being no-brainers, they really need to be fixed before this goes into main Rawhide IMHO. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seeking to merge python 2.7 into rawhide
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:27 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: Current status: 114 failing builds http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html See also the notes on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7#Current_status Many of these appear to be pre-existing FTBFS; as far as I can make out, the #includes for parts of the GTK stack are substantially broken in rawhide. Hmm two of the three of mine left are failing because of another missing a gnome-python2-something package. Hmmm I'll need to poke you for the scipy failure. I think its the same thing you had to patch in matplotlib or numpy..some preprocessor macro that's gone poof. -jef -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 22:33 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote: Also, of course, one of the truisms about git is that it doesn't only make it easier to *fork*: it makes it easier to *merge*. So even if the change does let people fork Fedora more easily, it also lets us incorporate their changes and bring them back into mainline more easily too. And vice versa :) Er, if you read my post carefully, it already includes the vice *and* the versa ;) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Seeking to merge python 2.7 into rawhide
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: revelation (okay, okay, i'm sneaking this one in because *i* depend on it :) I depend on it to and it needs a complete overhaul and an upstream reboot. Want to help me start an effort to reboot the upstream? It really needs to be retooled..especially porting it to gvfs from gnomevfs. -jef -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rpms/perl-XML-TokeParser/EL-6 perl-XML-TokeParser.spec,1.2,1.3
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-XML-TokeParser/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8664
Modified Files:
perl-XML-TokeParser.spec
Log Message:
import from elv6 beta 2
Index: perl-XML-TokeParser.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-XML-TokeParser/EL-6/perl-XML-TokeParser.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- perl-XML-TokeParser.spec26 Jul 2009 17:39:20 - 1.2
+++ perl-XML-TokeParser.spec27 Jul 2010 03:04:07 - 1.3
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-XML-TokeParser
Version:0.05
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:2.1%{?dist}
Summary:Simplified interface to XML::Parser
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -50,8 +50,12 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
-* Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.05-2
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
+* Fri Jan 22 2010 Dennis Gregorovic dgre...@redhat.com - 0.05-2.1
+- Rebuilt for RHEL 6
+Related: rhbz#543948
+
+* Thu Jul 02 2009 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com - 0.05-2
+- bump for RHEL
* Mon May 04 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.05-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.77.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-XML-TokeParser/EL-5 perl-XML-TokeParser.spec,1.4,1.5
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-XML-TokeParser/EL-5
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8901
Modified Files:
perl-XML-TokeParser.spec
Log Message:
import from elv6 beta 2
Index: perl-XML-TokeParser.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-XML-TokeParser/EL-5/perl-XML-TokeParser.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5
--- perl-XML-TokeParser.spec7 May 2010 13:51:41 - 1.4
+++ perl-XML-TokeParser.spec27 Jul 2010 03:05:14 - 1.5
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-XML-TokeParser
Version:0.05
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:2.1%{?dist}
Summary:Simplified interface to XML::Parser
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -50,14 +50,12 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
-* Fri May 07 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.05-4
-- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
+* Fri Jan 22 2010 Dennis Gregorovic dgre...@redhat.com - 0.05-2.1
+- Rebuilt for RHEL 6
+Related: rhbz#543948
-* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 0.05-3
-- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
-
-* Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.05-2
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
+* Thu Jul 02 2009 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com - 0.05-2
+- bump for RHEL
* Mon May 04 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.05-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.77.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File MojoMojo-1.01.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mojomojo: af1fbb558b0375eb6fb18c798cc5518d MojoMojo-1.01.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/mojomojo/devel formatter-docbook.patch, NONE, 1.1 mojomojo-httpd.conf, NONE, 1.1 mojomojo-paths.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/mojomojo/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9532
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
formatter-docbook.patch mojomojo-httpd.conf
mojomojo-paths.patch
Log Message:
initial import
formatter-docbook.patch:
DocBook.pm |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- NEW FILE formatter-docbook.patch ---
diff -up MojoMojo-1.01/lib/MojoMojo/Formatter/DocBook.pm.orig
MojoMojo-1.01/lib/MojoMojo/Formatter/DocBook.pm
--- MojoMojo-1.01/lib/MojoMojo/Formatter/DocBook.pm.orig2010-05-23
22:25:39.0 +0200
+++ MojoMojo-1.01/lib/MojoMojo/Formatter/DocBook.pm 2010-07-08
06:36:16.0 +0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ my $eval_res = $@;
use MojoMojo::Formatter::DocBook::Colorize;
my $xsltfile =
- /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/nwalsh/xhtml/docbook.xsl;
+ /usr/share/sgml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets/xhtml/docbook.xsl;
=head2 module_loaded
--- NEW FILE mojomojo-httpd.conf ---
Alias /mojomojo/static/ /usr/share/mojomojo/root/static/
Location /mojomojo/static/
SetHandler default-handler
/Location
Alias /mojomojo/ /usr/bin/mojomojo_fastcgi.pl/
Location /mojomojo/
Options ExecCGI
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
AddHandler fcgid-script .pl
/Location
mojomojo-paths.patch:
mojomojo.conf | 10 +-
script/mojomojo_cgi.pl |5 -
script/mojomojo_fastcgi.pl |5 -
script/mojomojo_server.pl |1 +
script/mojomojo_spawn_db.pl |7 +--
5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- NEW FILE mojomojo-paths.patch ---
diff -up MojoMojo-1.00/mojomojo.conf.orig MojoMojo-1.00/mojomojo.conf
--- MojoMojo-1.00/mojomojo.conf.orig2010-05-12 00:57:27.0 +0200
+++ MojoMojo-1.00/mojomojo.conf 2010-05-21 06:01:32.0 +0200
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ system_mail Default Installation norepl
password db_password
# SQLite dsn (default data store)
-dsn dbi:SQLite:mojomojo.db
+dsn dbi:SQLite:/var/lib/mojomojo/mojomojo.db
# Enable unicode for supported databases
sqlite_unicode1
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ system_mail Default Installation norepl
/connect_info
/Model::DBIC
-root __path_to(root)__
-static_path /.static/
-attachment_dir __path_to(uploads)__
-index_dir __path_to(index)__
+root /usr/share/mojomojo/root
+static_path /mojomojo/static/
+attachment_dir /var/lib/mojomojo/uploads
+index_dir /var/lib/mojomojo/index
session
expires 604800
diff -up MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_cgi.pl.orig
MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_cgi.pl
--- MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_cgi.pl.orig 2010-05-08 19:13:32.0
+0200
+++ MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_cgi.pl2010-05-21 06:01:32.0
+0200
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
#!/usr/bin/env perl
-BEGIN { $ENV{CATALYST_ENGINE} ||= 'CGI' }
+BEGIN {
+$ENV{MOJOMOJO_HOME} ||= '/var/lib/mojomojo';
+$ENV{CATALYST_ENGINE} ||= 'CGI';
+}
use strict;
use warnings;
diff -up MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_fastcgi.pl.orig
MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_fastcgi.pl
--- MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_fastcgi.pl.orig 2010-05-08
19:13:32.0 +0200
+++ MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_fastcgi.pl2010-05-21 06:01:32.0
+0200
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
#!/usr/bin/env perl
-BEGIN { $ENV{CATALYST_ENGINE} ||= 'FastCGI' }
+BEGIN {
+$ENV{MOJOMOJO_HOME} ||= '/var/lib/mojomojo';
+$ENV{CATALYST_ENGINE} ||= 'FastCGI';
+}
use strict;
use warnings;
diff -up MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_server.pl.orig
MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_server.pl
--- MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_server.pl.orig2010-05-08
19:13:32.0 +0200
+++ MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_server.pl 2010-05-21 06:01:32.0
+0200
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#!/usr/bin/env perl
BEGIN {
+$ENV{MOJOMOJO_HOME} ||= '/var/lib/mojomojo';
$ENV{CATALYST_ENGINE} ||= 'HTTP';
$ENV{CATALYST_SCRIPT_GEN} = 39;
require Catalyst::Engine::HTTP;
diff -up MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_spawn_db.pl.orig
MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_spawn_db.pl
--- MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_spawn_db.pl.orig 2010-05-09
21:16:51.0 +0200
+++ MojoMojo-1.00/script/mojomojo_spawn_db.pl 2010-05-21 06:02:27.0
+0200
@@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ Jonathan Rockway jrock...@cpan.org
=cut
-BEGIN { $ENV{CATALYST_DEBUG} = 0 }
+BEGIN {
+$ENV{MOJOMOJO_HOME} ||= '/var/lib/mojomojo';
+$ENV{CATALYST_DEBUG} = 0;
+}
use strict;
use warnings;
use FindBin '$Bin';
@@ -103,7 +106,7 @@ eval {
};
if ($@) {
die Your DSN line in mojomojo.conf doesn't look like a valid DSN.
- . Add one, or pass it on the command line.;
+ . Add one, or pass it on the command line. . $@;
}
die No valid Data Source Name (DSN).\n if !$dsn;
$dsn =~ s/__HOME__/$FindBin::Bin\/\.\./g;
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file:
Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Unresolved Blocker Bug Count = 3
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 04:40:11PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote: It's reminder guy again with a public service announcement about the upcoming Fedora 12 Alpha Release. ^^ I sure hope not. ;) Regardless, thanks for your continued work in attempting to keep Fedora's release schedule on time. :) -- Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com pgpkt9JGy6J8m.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 617966] perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.030 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617966 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib: 35111348ee481deef95aaf804b8fbd4b Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.030.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2: 573bc6a513f054dbc7ac652f93d77344 Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.030.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.6, 1.7
Author: psabata
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5623
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0:2.030-1
- 2.030 version bump
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 6 May 2010 08:03:13 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 26 Jul 2010 09:24:55 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.027.tar.gz
+Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030.tar.gz
Index: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec 6 May 2010 08:03:15 - 1.10
+++ perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec 26 Jul 2010 09:24:55 - 1.11
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
Epoch: 0
-Version:2.027
+Version:2.030
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Low-Level Interface to zlib compression library
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0:2.030-1
+- 2.030 version bump
+
* Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 0:2.027-1
- update
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sources 6 May 2010 08:03:15 - 1.6
+++ sources 26 Jul 2010 09:24:55 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6af5c62e55f3118e142326798a28d278 Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.027.tar.gz
+35111348ee481deef95aaf804b8fbd4b Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.6, 1.7
Author: psabata
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5887
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.030-1
- 2.030 version bump
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- .cvsignore 6 May 2010 07:51:28 - 1.6
+++ .cvsignore 26 Jul 2010 09:26:01 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.027.tar.gz
+Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.030.tar.gz
Index: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/devel/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec6 May 2010 07:51:28 - 1.13
+++ perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec26 Jul 2010 09:26:01 - 1.14
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
Summary:Low-Level Interface to bzip2 compression library
-Version:2.027
+Version:2.030
Release:1%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.030-1
+- 2.030 version bump
+
* Thu May 6 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.027-1
- update
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sources 6 May 2010 07:51:28 - 1.6
+++ sources 26 Jul 2010 09:26:01 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3338fe762ec77009316adb405197bf40 Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.027.tar.gz
+573bc6a513f054dbc7ac652f93d77344 Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.030.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-13 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.6, 1.7
Author: psabata
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7118
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.030-1
- 2.030 version bump
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-13/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 11 May 2010 07:33:06 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 26 Jul 2010 09:35:14 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.027.tar.gz
+Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030.tar.gz
Index: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-13/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10
--- perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec 11 May 2010 07:33:06 - 1.9
+++ perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec 26 Jul 2010 09:35:14 - 1.10
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
Epoch: 0
-Version:2.027
+Version:2.030
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Low-Level Interface to zlib compression library
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.030-1
+- 2.030 version bump
+
* Tue May 11 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2.027-1
- update version
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-13/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sources 11 May 2010 07:33:06 - 1.6
+++ sources 26 Jul 2010 09:35:14 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6af5c62e55f3118e142326798a28d278 Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.027.tar.gz
+35111348ee481deef95aaf804b8fbd4b Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-13 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec, 1.12, 1.13 sources, 1.6, 1.7
Author: psabata
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7386
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.030-1
- 2.030 version bump
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-13/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 11 May 2010 07:54:32 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 26 Jul 2010 09:36:44 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.027.tar.gz
+Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.030.tar.gz
Index: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-13/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13
--- perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec11 May 2010 07:54:32 - 1.12
+++ perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec26 Jul 2010 09:36:44 - 1.13
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
Summary:Low-Level Interface to bzip2 compression library
-Version:2.027
+Version:2.030
Release:1%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.030-1
+- 2.030 version bump
+
* Tue May 11 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.027-1
- update
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-13/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sources 11 May 2010 07:54:32 - 1.6
+++ sources 26 Jul 2010 09:36:44 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3338fe762ec77009316adb405197bf40 Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.027.tar.gz
+573bc6a513f054dbc7ac652f93d77344 Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.030.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 617967] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-07-26 05:58:50 EDT --- Petr, are you going to update IO::Compress to 2.030 too? I'll need that before I can update Compress::Raw::Lzma and IO::Compress::Lzma to 2.030. And since you're preparing an update for F-13 too, those packages should probably be grouped together in a big update of the IO::Compress stack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 611015] perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule fails to build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-07-26 06:38:05 EDT --- Checking test results on CPAN, results on different perl versions, checking source code show the problem is more mysterious. More ever adding some debugging prints into the test one can see Data::Dumper treat local hashes and AST hashes in different manner. In addition if we patch the tests, it will start failing on lower perls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File IO-Compress-2.030.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Compress: 1e6200ce12b4a87f24f110930260ebe8 IO-Compress-2.030.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 617967] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967 --- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2010-07-26 07:04:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Petr, are you going to update IO::Compress to 2.030 too? I'll need that before I can update Compress::Raw::Lzma and IO::Compress::Lzma to 2.030. I'm on it. And since you're preparing an update for F-13 too, those packages should probably be grouped together in a big update of the IO::Compress stack. I don't think it's needed since IO::Compress depends on the same or newer versions of Compress::Raw::Bzip2 and Zlib. I'm not sure how to group that with Lzma, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 617967] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-07-26 07:14:53 EDT --- IO::Compress doesn't need IO::Compress::Lzma but IO::Compress::Lzma does need IO::Compress, so it would be nice to group the stack together as a single update. The dependency hierarchy is: IO::Compress::Lzma | +-- Compress::Raw::Lzma | +-- IO::Compress | +-- Compress::Raw::Bzip2 | +-- Compress::Raw::Zlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 611015] perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule fails to build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2010-07-26 07:43:36 EDT --- Openly said, I don't see much sense in trying to fix this package. It's not used by Fedora, its upstream build-matrix (http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Pugs-Compiler-Rule+0.37) also speaks a very clear language. My vote goes to let this package die. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-IO-Compress/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-IO-Compress.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3
Author: psabata
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26137
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Compress.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2.030-1
- 2.030 version bump
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- .cvsignore 11 May 2010 06:23:13 - 1.2
+++ .cvsignore 26 Jul 2010 12:26:43 - 1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-IO-Compress-2.027.tar.gz
+IO-Compress-2.030.tar.gz
Index: perl-IO-Compress.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/devel/perl-IO-Compress.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- perl-IO-Compress.spec 11 May 2010 06:23:13 - 1.1
+++ perl-IO-Compress.spec 26 Jul 2010 12:26:43 - 1.2
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
%{?perl_default_filter}
Name: perl-IO-Compress
-Version:2.027
+Version:2.030
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:IO::Compress Perl module
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2.030-1
+- 2.030 version bump
+
* Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2.027-1
- update
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sources 11 May 2010 06:23:14 - 1.2
+++ sources 26 Jul 2010 12:26:43 - 1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-44d83f95593fe7549a588c9b2c1992a5 IO-Compress-2.027.tar.gz
+1e6200ce12b4a87f24f110930260ebe8 IO-Compress-2.030.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-IO-Compress/F-13 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-IO-Compress.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3
Author: psabata
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26542
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Compress.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2.030-1
- 2.030 version bump
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/F-13/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- .cvsignore 11 May 2010 06:27:29 - 1.2
+++ .cvsignore 26 Jul 2010 12:29:44 - 1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-IO-Compress-2.027.tar.gz
+IO-Compress-2.030.tar.gz
Index: perl-IO-Compress.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/F-13/perl-IO-Compress.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- perl-IO-Compress.spec 11 May 2010 09:45:48 - 1.2
+++ perl-IO-Compress.spec 26 Jul 2010 12:29:44 - 1.3
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
%{?perl_default_filter}
Name: perl-IO-Compress
-Version:2.027
+Version:2.030
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:IO::Compress Perl module
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 26 2010 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2.030-1
+- 2.030 version bump
+
* Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2.027-1
- update
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/F-13/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sources 11 May 2010 06:27:30 - 1.2
+++ sources 26 Jul 2010 12:29:44 - 1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-44d83f95593fe7549a588c9b2c1992a5 IO-Compress-2.027.tar.gz
+1e6200ce12b4a87f24f110930260ebe8 IO-Compress-2.030.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 617967] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967 --- Comment #4 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2010-07-26 08:54:40 EDT --- Yes, that sounds reasonable. I have removed the Bzip2 Zlib updates from Bodhi for the moment. I'm currently waiting for the dist-f13 koji buildroot regeneration to build IO::Compres 2.030. Rawhide build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351193 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.030.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma: 9d9820c602f4e7a87e8145ebf6aed0ac Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.030.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-07-26 18:27:38 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File MooseX-Method-Signatures-0.35.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Method-Signatures: ec054aca6281d253dcffdbc02a0f2ec8 MooseX-Method-Signatures-0.35.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Makefile-DOM/EL-5 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 perl-Makefile-DOM.spec, 1.3, 1.4
Author: rlandmann
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-DOM/EL-5
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10821/EL-5
Modified Files:
import.log perl-Makefile-DOM.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Jan 22 2010 Dennis Gregorovic dgre...@redhat.com - 0.004-1.1
- Rebuilt for RHEL 6
Related: rhbz#543948
* Sun Jun 21 2009 Jeff fearn jfe...@redhat.com 0.004-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-DOM/EL-5/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log 29 Oct 2009 03:21:35 - 1.1
+++ import.log 27 Jul 2010 04:33:45 - 1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
perl-Makefile-DOM-0_004-2_fc11:HEAD:perl-Makefile-DOM-0.004-2.fc11.src.rpm:1256786632
+perl-Makefile-DOM-0_004-1_1_fc13:EL-5:perl-Makefile-DOM-0.004-1.1.fc13.src.rpm:1280205169
Index: perl-Makefile-DOM.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Makefile-DOM/EL-5/perl-Makefile-DOM.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- perl-Makefile-DOM.spec 3 May 2010 03:04:32 - 1.3
+++ perl-Makefile-DOM.spec 27 Jul 2010 04:33:45 - 1.4
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Makefile-DOM
Version:0.004
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:1.1%{?dist}
Summary:Simple DOM parser for Makefiles
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -13,16 +13,10 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Clone) = 0.18
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.21
BuildRequires: perl(Params::Util) = 0.22
-BuildRequires: perl(CPAN)
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Embed)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Harness)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple)
Requires: perl(Clone) = 0.18
Requires: perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.21
Requires: perl(Params::Util) = 0.22
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
-Provides: perl(Makefile::DOM) = %{version}
%description
This libary can serve as an advanced lexer for (GNU) makefiles. It parses
@@ -65,14 +59,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
-* Mon May 03 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.004-4
-- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
+* Fri Jan 22 2010 Dennis Gregorovic dgre...@redhat.com - 0.004-1.1
+- Rebuilt for RHEL 6
+Related: rhbz#543948
-* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 0.004-3
-- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
-
-* Tue Sep 08 2009 Ryan Lerch rle...@redhat.com 0.004-2
-- Added BuildRequires and Provides lines to the specfile, as per the Fedora
Perl Packaging Guidelines.
-* Mon Sep 07 2009 Ryan Lerch rle...@redhat.com 0.004-1
+* Sun Jun 21 2009 Jeff fearn jfe...@redhat.com 0.004-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
-
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
