Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan TeXmacs Grabbed. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl. --- Jan Werich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: incompatible screen update
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: The problem is it would require making screen setuid root which I do not think it is too good idea. Well, I think the fear of making something SUID root is not reason enough not to make things technically correct. How about creating a helper similar to utempter? -- Miroslav Lichvar -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Package review swaps
Hi, I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in return: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671883 Bug 671883 - Review Request: v4l-utils - Utilities for video4linux and DVB devices Thanks Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Package review swaps
Hi Hans. I'll get this one done for you, can you do https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926 Peter On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in return: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671883 Bug 671883 - Review Request: v4l-utils - Utilities for video4linux and DVB devices Thanks Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide and LDAP
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 18:31:21, Braden McDaniel wrote: Is ldapsearch on your rawhide machine working? It is. What's not working is logging in as a user other than root. I can't even su to a user other than root. I am using Kerberos for user authentication; however, kinit user works fine from the rawhide machine. This doesn't seem like openldap issue to me. I suggest identifying the problem (package) by trying to downgrade openldap-clients, krb5, pam_krb5, etc. Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: new raid1 read balance working, please test it! kernel 2.6.37 based
On 02/08/2011 02:22 AM, Roberto Spadim wrote: hi guys, i made some changes to md raid1 software, could fedora test it? for me it work very nice =) the raid1 new code is based in kernel 2.6.37 here is the new and old code: www.spadim.com.br/raid1 just read_balance changed (4 modes: near_head(today) round_robin(counter per mirror) stripe (like raid0, with shift for make stripe less or more intensive), time based (depending on head positioning time and read size it calculate the fasted mirror, some new improvement must be done but it works, improvements= get io queue of each mirror and many a time estimation of queue time, with it get more close best disk) it´s open source please help me testing it, neil at raid kernel must some benchmarks to put it inside kernel source for mixed speed mirrors time based is good, for ssd only round_Robin is good (per mirror count, put 230 for 230mb/s, 150 for mb/s or multiples to make a good round robin) for disks and/or ssd mixed or not, stripe is good for disks only near head is good Hi Roberto, You might find it's better to discuss this on the linux-raid mailing list hosted at kernel.org: http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-raid The list is dedicated to discussion of RAID technologies and their use with Linux, including the kernel MD subsystem. You might also find it easier to get review and testing of your changes if you distribute them as unified diff files instead of .old.c/.new.c files. Diffs or patches are the standard format for distributing and reviewing changes to source code and by using that format you make it more likely that others will test, read and comment on your code. It's also a good habit to get into to break your changes up into a series of smaller logically related changes. This makes reviewing changes and spotting bugs or errors easier and also makes it easier to get changes accepted (since hard-to-review stuff is less likely to make it in). There are some basic guidelines and answers to common questions here: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s1 There's lots of documentation that goes into more detail on the process and recommended if you search around. I turned your changes into a patch that follows the usual conventions here: http://fpaste.org/Uqqy/ It's still a big patch but much easier to review in this format. Regards, Bryn. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide and LDAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/09/2011 12:31 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote: On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote: Something in a recent round of updates seems to have hosed use of LDAP-based user accounts for my rawhide installation. (My LDAP server is on a different machine; the rawhide one just doesn't seem to be able to use it.) Hi Braden, please, can you be more specific? Which versions of openldap-servers, openldap-clients, pam_ldap, nss_ldap, etc. do you have installed? openldap-servers, pam_ldap, and nss_ldap are not installed on the rawhide machine. openldap-clients is version 2.4.23-8.fc15. The server is running Fedora 14. It has: openldap-servers: 2.4.23-4.fc14 openldap-clients: 2.4.23-4.fc14 pam_ldap: 185-5.fc14 nss_ldap: 265-6.fc14 Are you using SSL/TLS? No. Is ldapsearch on your rawhide machine working? It is. What's not working is logging in as a user other than root. I can't even su to a user other than root. I am using Kerberos for user authentication; however, kinit user works fine from the rawhide machine. I suspect you are using SSSD to handle LDAP logins. This was broken in rawhide yesterday because I pushed a new version of libldb that apparently broke ABI without an SO bump. I have subsequently reverted this change. Please downgrade to libldb-0.9.10-25.fc15 and SSSD will work again. - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1T5aQACgkQeiVVYja6o6NPKgCfRcKjKCEvCe/W3W9isTer057T yk0AniyuYIwxCWHkc9KFcTHX8v9TJ6YV =JsAH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide and LDAP
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/09/2011 12:31 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote: On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote: Something in a recent round of updates seems to have hosed use of LDAP-based user accounts for my rawhide installation. (My LDAP server is on a different machine; the rawhide one just doesn't seem to be able to use it.) Hi Braden, please, can you be more specific? Which versions of openldap-servers, openldap-clients, pam_ldap, nss_ldap, etc. do you have installed? openldap-servers, pam_ldap, and nss_ldap are not installed on the rawhide machine. openldap-clients is version 2.4.23-8.fc15. The server is running Fedora 14. It has: openldap-servers: 2.4.23-4.fc14 openldap-clients: 2.4.23-4.fc14 pam_ldap: 185-5.fc14 nss_ldap: 265-6.fc14 Are you using SSL/TLS? No. Is ldapsearch on your rawhide machine working? It is. What's not working is logging in as a user other than root. I can't even su to a user other than root. I am using Kerberos for user authentication; however, kinit user works fine from the rawhide machine. I suspect you are using SSSD to handle LDAP logins. Correct. This was broken in rawhide yesterday because I pushed a new version of libldb that apparently broke ABI without an SO bump. I have subsequently reverted this change. Please downgrade to libldb-0.9.10-25.fc15 and SSSD will work again. That did it. Thanks! -- Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Backported gtk3 for F14 available
Hi, to allow porting applications to GTK+ 3 and testing them with a current GTK+ 3 on Fedora 14 (the stock 2.90.5 is quite old, from before the theming changes, among other things), I have prepared packages of the latest gtk3 (2.99.3) for Fedora 14: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/kkofler/gtk3-f14-backport/ Some notes: * WARNING: This repository will REPLACE YOUR SYSTEM VERSION OF glib2 (2.26.0) with a newer stable version (2.28.0). glib2 is also used by many other things, including gtk2 and even (for event loop integration) qt. It is supposed to be backwards compatible, but if there are any problems: You have been warned! * The gtk3 package has introspection disabled, because the gobject-introspection in F14 (0.9.3) is too old, the required version (0.10.1) is not backwards-compatible, and I haven't managed to make gtk3 build with 0.9.3 when I tried. (By the way, to the gtk3 maintainers, you should fix gobject_introspection_version in gtk3.spec, it still says 0.9.3, but the sources actually require 0.10.1.) * The packages in this repository are signed with my GPG key, as found on: https://www.calcforge.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-calcforge * Only glib2, gtk3 and their subpackages are provided at this time. Anything higher in the GNOME 3 stack is NOT available, and the versions in F14, if any, are likely not to work with this gtk3. Again, you have been warned. * This repository is NOT endorsed or supported by Red Hat, the Red Hat Desktop Team nor the Fedora GTK+/GNOME packagers. Use at your own risk! Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Test-Announce] 2011-02-11 @ 17:00 UTC - F15 Alpha Blocker bug review meeting
# F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2011-02-11 # Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) [1] # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of Fedora 15. We'll be discussing all of these to determine if they meet the Alpha release criteria [2], should stay on the list, and are getting the attention they need. == Suggested Meeting Preparation == If you are the OWNER of one of these bugs, PLEASE add a comment to the bug letting us know how things are going and what you are planning to do next. If your bug is in MODIFIED, please make sure a build has been submitted. If that's already happened, please change the bug to ON_QA so we can start test verification. Note, that once the release is branched [3], bodhi updates will also be required. If you REPORTED a bug, please be responsive to any requests for additional information. == Proposed F15Alpha Blocker bugs == https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F15Alphahide_resolved=1 674978 :: NEW :: gdm :: rstr...@redhat.com :: GDM in autologon error loop :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674978 675509 :: NEW :: libXcursor :: sandm...@redhat.com :: default cursor theme should not depend on used desktop environment :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675509 672265 :: NEW :: LiveCD :: mcla...@redhat.com :: Install to harddrive fails with not a live image :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672265 671922 :: ASSIGNED :: anaconda :: dleh...@redhat.com :: ValueError: isys.umount() can only umount by mount point :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671922 670379 :: ASSIGNED :: firstboot :: mgra...@redhat.com :: Unknown lvalue 'ValidNoProcess' in section 'Service'. :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670379 579838 :: ASSIGNED :: binutils :: ni...@redhat.com :: glibc not compatible with AMD Geode LX :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838 676032 :: MODIFIED :: anaconda :: anaconda-maint-l...@redhat.com :: Import Error: No module named iutil :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676032 673907 :: MODIFIED :: lorax :: mgra...@redhat.com :: Install from DVD fails: /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket is missing :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673907 == Proposed F15Alpha Nice-to-have bugs == https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F15Alpha-acceptedhide_resolved=1 669037 :: NEW :: gnome-settings-daemon :: bnoc...@redhat.com :: [abrt] gnome-settings-daemon-2.91.8-1.fc15: Process /usr/libexec/gnome-settings-daemon was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669037 Thanks, James [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Alpha_Release_Criteria [3] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-15/f-15-quality-tasks.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Test-CPAN-Meta] Created tag perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-0.17-1.el4
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-0.17-1.el4' was created pointing to: 8827c41... Initial EPEL 4/5 release, based on F-14 version -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-CPAN-Meta] Created tag perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-0.17-1.el5
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-0.17-1.el5' was created pointing to: 8827c41... Initial EPEL 4/5 release, based on F-14 version -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
interesting blog relevant to abrt/bugzilla discussions
Karl Vogel has an interesting discussion relevant to the bugzilla growth and management issues from the 'abrt' debate. The blog is titled Bug Growth is Proportional to User Growth, and Bugs are not Technical Debt: http://www.rants.org/2010/01/10/bugs-users-and-tech-debt/ He makes a point that for a growing project it doesn't even make sense to expect zero or constant bugs---instead, the challenge is how to manage the infinite growth. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Backported gtk3 for F14 available
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Hi, to allow porting applications to GTK+ 3 and testing them with a current GTK+ 3 on Fedora 14 (the stock 2.90.5 is quite old, from before the theming changes, among other things), I have prepared packages of the latest gtk3 (2.99.3) for Fedora 14: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/kkofler/gtk3-f14-backport/ Some notes: * WARNING: This repository will REPLACE YOUR SYSTEM VERSION OF glib2 (2.26.0) with a newer stable version (2.28.0). glib2 is also used by many other things, including gtk2 and even (for event loop integration) qt. It is supposed to be backwards compatible, but if there are any problems: You have been warned! * The gtk3 package has introspection disabled, because the gobject-introspection in F14 (0.9.3) is too old, the required version (0.10.1) is not backwards-compatible, and I haven't managed to make gtk3 build with 0.9.3 when I tried. (By the way, to the gtk3 maintainers, you should fix gobject_introspection_version in gtk3.spec, it still says 0.9.3, but the sources actually require 0.10.1.) * The packages in this repository are signed with my GPG key, as found on: https://www.calcforge.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-calcforge * Only glib2, gtk3 and their subpackages are provided at this time. Anything higher in the GNOME 3 stack is NOT available, and the versions in F14, if any, are likely not to work with this gtk3. Again, you have been warned. * This repository is NOT endorsed or supported by Red Hat, the Red Hat Desktop Team nor the Fedora GTK+/GNOME packagers. Use at your own risk! Interesting idea. Note that I've _just_ released the stable GTK+ 3.0.0. We could think about updating the gtk3 package in F14 to 3.0.0 if that is useful for people. We had essentially abandoned this and a few other packages in F14 after GNOME 3 was delayed to F15, and nothing in the repo should depend on it... Of course, there is the slight risk of updating glib to a newer major version, but an extended updates-testing stay could certainly reduce the concern. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Abandoned packages (mediawiki-openid and php-pear-Auth-OpenID-2.1.1)
Hey just pinging you, do I need to do anything to get added to the packages still? On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Kurt Seifried k...@seifried.org wrote: I'll approve it as a fesco member. ;) Just ping me in 3 days and we can add you to the package. Sorry got caught up with some other stuff, pinging you as requested. (trying to get these openid packages to work with yahoo, it's apparently broken =(. -Kurt -- Kurt Seifried k...@seifried.org skype: 1-703-879-3176 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Archive Fedora 12
I will be working on archiving fedora release 12 from /pub/fedora/linux to /pub/archive/fedora/linux. The data should be mostly across already, but I want to let people know that the changes are occuring and that we will be making changes to Mirror manager point from one to the other. -- Stephen J Smoogen. The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance. Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacLaren -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Mass Rebuild and Mass branching status update
The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and the list of all things not built yet at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html there is ~400 packages that rpm-4.9.0 failed to parse the spec files. the couple ive looked at so far are due to unsupported macro use. We have also mass branched everything. you will now need to use bodhi to push updates in. Thanks for your paitence, please bring up any issues that you see. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Backported gtk3 for F14 available
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:28 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: snip Interesting idea. Note that I've _just_ released the stable GTK+ 3.0.0. We could think about updating the gtk3 package in F14 to 3.0.0 if that is useful for people. We had essentially abandoned this and a few other packages in F14 after GNOME 3 was delayed to F15, and nothing in the repo should depend on it... Of course, there is the slight risk of updating glib to a newer major version, but an extended updates-testing stay could certainly reduce the concern. It's going to break gvfs, make the terminal setting in the preferred applications not take effect, and disregard the settings for web browser and mail clients. And that's just the stuff I broke in glib2. I don't think it's suitable to be added to F14 as anything but a user repo with a big warning. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Abandoned packages (mediawiki-openid and php-pear-Auth-OpenID-2.1.1)
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:34:02 -0700 Kurt Seifried k...@seifried.org wrote: Hey just pinging you, do I need to do anything to get added to the packages still? Hum. You are not currently a packager? (or if so, I can't find your account in that group). If you aren't, we will need to get you sponsored before you can work on these packages. If you are, can you mail me in private your account info? Thanks, kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass Rebuild and Mass branching status update
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us writes: We have also mass branched everything. ... so, given that I've used fedpkg co -B to create a working tree with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/ subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's a better answer than rm -rf and re-clone. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass Rebuild and Mass branching status update
... so, given that I've used fedpkg co -B to create a working tree with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/ subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's a better answer than rm -rf and re-clone. This is what I am doing: for i in *; do if [ -d $i -a -d $i/master -a ! -d $i/f15 ]; then cd $i fedpkg co -b f15 $i mv $i f15 cd .. fi done Jens -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass Rebuild and Mass branching status update
The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed Thanks and congrats! list of all things not built yet at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html there is ~400 packages that rpm-4.9.0 failed to parse the spec files. Are there any more details about the errors? Jens -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide
Hi, i took ice since it is business critical, co-maintainers are *very* welcome. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Event-Lib] Rebuild against newer libevent
commit 47db636264024ac42c394bba9f0ac22ec33edda6
Author: Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 10 07:10:08 2011 -0800
Rebuild against newer libevent
perl-Event-Lib.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Event-Lib.spec b/perl-Event-Lib.spec
index c0b7fe3..7a5833d 100644
--- a/perl-Event-Lib.spec
+++ b/perl-Event-Lib.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Event-Lib
Version:1.03
-Release:13%{?dist}
+Release:14%{?dist}
Summary:Perl wrapper around libevent
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Thu Feb 10 2011 Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com - 1.03-14
+- Rebuild against newer libevent
+
* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.03-13
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File NetPacket-1.1.1.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jpo
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetPacket: 545776de880ee92586afe8ffe9f67e2a NetPacket-1.1.1.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-NetPacket] * Update to 1.1.1.
commit f4795a84d6e5ab33fb9a40286e0a5d15f6c06691
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Thu Feb 10 21:20:47 2011 +
* Update to 1.1.1.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-NetPacket.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index cef5b98..d40646d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
/NetPacket-1.0.1.tar.gz
/NetPacket-1.1.0.tar.gz
+/NetPacket-1.1.1.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-NetPacket.spec b/perl-NetPacket.spec
index ff4167f..92c18b6 100644
--- a/perl-NetPacket.spec
+++ b/perl-NetPacket.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-NetPacket
-Version:1.1.0
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.1.1
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
License:Artistic 2.0
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Feb 10 2011 Jose Pedro Oliveira jpo at di.uminho.pt - 1.1.1-1
+- Update to 1.1.1.
+
* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.1.0-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index c87822c..38b52aa 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-359e76a54f3564714d0c16e7cca027f7 NetPacket-1.1.0.tar.gz
+545776de880ee92586afe8ffe9f67e2a NetPacket-1.1.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-NetPacket/f15/master] * Update to 1.1.1.
Summary of changes: f4795a8... * Update to 1.1.1. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-AnyEvent] - Rewritten to new filtering rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresF
commit 74d9ede693cfd714a73ffe69b3446dd829ec03d6
Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Feb 10 22:42:25 2011 +0100
- Rewritten to new filtering rules
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Perl
perl-AnyEvent.spec | 35 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent.spec b/perl-AnyEvent.spec
index 97e77f5..b73c821 100644
--- a/perl-AnyEvent.spec
+++ b/perl-AnyEvent.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: perl-AnyEvent
Version:5.27
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:Framework for multiple event loops
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -16,6 +16,12 @@ BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
# Needed for test
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple)
+%{?filter_setup:
+%filter_from_requires /perl(Tk)/d; /perl(EV)/d; /perl(Irssi)/d; /perl(Qt/d;
/perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Qt/d
+%filter_from_provides /perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Qt/d
+%filter_setup
+}
+
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
@@ -28,29 +34,6 @@ peacefully at any one time).
%prep
%setup -q -n AnyEvent-%{version}%{?subver}
-# Filter unwanted Requires:
-cat \EOF %{name}-req
-#!/bin/sh
-%{__perl_requires} $* |\
- sed -e '/perl(Tk)/d' | \
- sed -e '/perl(EV)/d' | \
- sed -e '/perl(Irssi)/d' | \
- sed -e '/^perl(Qt/d' | \
- sed -e '/^perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Qt/d'
-
-EOF
-%define __perl_requires %{_builddir}/AnyEvent-%{version}%{?subver}/%{name}-req
-chmod +x %{name}-req
-
-# Filter unwanted Provides:
-cat \EOF %{name}-prov
-#!/bin/sh
-%{__perl_provides} $* |\
- sed -e '/^perl(AnyEvent::Impl::Qt/d'
-
-EOF
-%define __perl_provides %{_builddir}/AnyEvent-%{version}%{?subver}/%{name}-prov
-chmod +x %{name}-prov
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -82,6 +65,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Thu Feb 10 2011 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com - 5.27-4
+- Rewritten to new filtering rules
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Perl
+
* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 5.27-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-AnyEvent/f15/master] - Rewritten to new filtering rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresF
Summary of changes: 74d9ede... - Rewritten to new filtering rules http://fedoraproject.or (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[389-devel] Please review: [Bug 676053] export task followed by import task causes cache assertion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676053 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=478160action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=478160action=edit Description: Task version of export had a bug in handling the busy instance error case. When returning due to the busy error, the function ldbm_back_ldbm2ldif reset the busy bit set by other threads. This patch checks the special return value set in the busy error case and resets the busy bit only when it is set by the function. Also, this patch fixes a bug in dse_add which replaces an adding entry with its copy in pblock and the original entry is consumed. But the caller frees the original entry. Applying this patch, instead of consuming the original entry, its copy is consumed and the original adding entry stays in the pblock. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
