Re: Updating SSL keys on fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10

2011-03-10 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-03-10, Stephen Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:

 We have already updated fedorahosted.org and will now be updating the
 cert for the main site: fedoraproject.org.

 The old certificate came from Equifax, was a 1024 bit key and had the
 fingerprint:
[...]
 The new certificate is issued by GeoTrust, Inc and is a 4096 bit key
 with the fingerprint:

Key length is not everything. Didn't you forget to upgrade hash
algorithm? Sticking on SHA-1 that's been abandoned by ETSI and other
authorities does not look most safely.

-- Petr

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 42 Orphaned packages

2011-03-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote:
 basket

I'll take this.

Regards,

Hans
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 42 Orphaned packages

2011-03-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi,

On 03/10/2011 09:16 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
 Sven Lankess...@lank.es  wrote:
 basket

 I'll take this.

Ugh, I mistakenly confused this with bastet, untaking it, sorry
for the pkgdb acl change spam to those involved.

Regards,

Hans


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Java Webapp installation

2011-03-10 Thread Nicolas Mailhot


Le Mer 9 mars 2011 15:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky a écrit :
 I've been asked to package apache-solr [1] in Fedora. This is a java
 library and webapp posing as a frontend to lucene for searching.

 Packaging java jars is not a problem, but there are more problems with
 webapp part. I made it into subpackage apache-solr-webapp. Ant build
 creates war file (basically a zip with metadata and dependencies
 bundled). I expand this war file and replace dependencies with
 symlinks to %{_javadir}. I then place content of this directory inside
 /usr/share/java/webapps/apache-solr/. This makes it possible to use
 webapp in container (tomcat/jetty) while enabling us to update
 dependencies independently.

This is nothing new and actually why jpackage-utils contains a
build-jar-directory command that populates a directory with symlinks (and a
rebuild-jar-directory that refreshes them if necessary)

/usr/share/java/webapps/ is likely to conflict with this command logic BTW.
/usr/share/java/ was supposed to contain only jars on jpackaged systems
originally.

 I was thinking about adding default configuration for tomcat inside
 yet another subpackage. But this would be just one simple xml file
 inside /etc/tomcat6/Catalina/localhost/. Plus solr needs additional
 configuration:
  * creating of SOLR_HOME directory and placing it somewhere, presumably
  /var/lib/solr). I have example solr home dir in %doc, but it is generic
  and configuration is not really usable in that state for anything
  other than serve as a commented example.

 All in all seems like too much of a hassle for little gain.

It's not little gain. If you find it too complex to do manually, the usual
solution is to write rpm macros or shell helpers to help deploy this kind of
webapp.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Java Webapp installation

2011-03-10 Thread Nicolas Mailhot


Le Jeu 10 mars 2011 10:17, Stanislav Ochotnicky a écrit :
 Excerpts from Nicolas Mailhot's message of Thu Mar 10 09:55:47 +0100 2011:

 Le Mer 9 mars 2011 15:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky a écrit :
  I've been asked to package apache-solr [1] in Fedora. This is a java
  library and webapp posing as a frontend to lucene for searching.
 
  Packaging java jars is not a problem, but there are more problems with
  webapp part. I made it into subpackage apache-solr-webapp. Ant build
  creates war file (basically a zip with metadata and dependencies
  bundled). I expand this war file and replace dependencies with
  symlinks to %{_javadir}. I then place content of this directory inside
  /usr/share/java/webapps/apache-solr/. This makes it possible to use
  webapp in container (tomcat/jetty) while enabling us to update
  dependencies independently.

 This is nothing new and actually why jpackage-utils contains a
 build-jar-directory command that populates a directory with symlinks (and a
 rebuild-jar-directory that refreshes them if necessary)

 Yes. I of course know about build-jar-repository (typo on your
 part?).

Yes, sorry about that, long time I've not used it :(

 Question wasn't so much about that, but general approach since
 AFAIK there was no previous Java Webapp in Fedora (therefore noone
 dealt directly with war files).


 /usr/share/java/webapps/ is likely to conflict with this command logic BTW.
 /usr/share/java/ was supposed to contain only jars on jpackaged systems
 originally.

 This is I guess more problematic aspect I haven't really though of. I
 don't really think it would cause practical issues, but I agree it's
 better to get it right(tm).

The only practical issue is if someone ever tries to packages a webapp.jar as
the build-jar-repository will do lookups on directories too (to allow
replacing transparently foo.jar with a foo subdir containing a set of jar
files)

 So how about /usr/share/java-webapps ? Or
 to have nice ordering with php(?) webapps /usr/share/webapps-java.

Anyone will do, being consistent with php would of course be nice to users.

 It's really not a technical issue, more of a what's the most normal
 way issue :-)

normal way with Java deployment? That's an oxymoron. The only Java
deployment conventions so have have been written by distro people. I'd suggest
to look at the php webapps included in the distro, derive something similar
for Java, and write a formal Fedora packaging guideline so others have an
answer to your question. Everything but the location of the tomcat/jetty/jboss
config files is likely to be identical no matter what the webapp language is

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

IA__gtk_tree_model_get_valist crashes

2011-03-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
Various apps crashing in gtktreemodel.c's

  IA__gtk_tree_model_get_valist  

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedshort_desc=IA__gtk_tree_model_get_valistbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDshort_desc_type=allwordssubstrclassification=Fedora

Sometimes after a button press callback, other times related to comboboxes.
Do these issues have anything in common? e.g. incorrect gtk2 API usage?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: xerces-c soname bump in Rawhide

2011-03-10 Thread Kalev Lember
On 03/10/2011 12:35 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Jonathan Robie and I are planning to update xerces-c from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1
 in Rawhide, which includes a soname bump; F-15 will stay on 3.0.1.

The rebuilds are done except for two packages which failed with errors
unrelated to the xerces-c update. I'm CCing the package owners who can
hopefully take a look.

 gdal-1.7.3-2.fc15
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2900031name=build.log
Failed with
g++: error: unrecognized option '-Xcompiler'

 ovaldi-5.6.4-1.fc14
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2900084name=build.log
Failed with
../../src/probes/linux/RPMInfoProbe.cpp:391:20: error: cannot convert
'rpmTagType*' to 'rpm_tagtype_t*' for argument '3' to 'int
headerGetEntry(Header, rpm_tag_t, rpm_tagtype_t*, void**, rpm_count_t*)'


The following are all rebuilt (a few of them needed minor patches):
 blahtexml-0.8-2.fc15
 cegui-0.7.5-5.fc15
 enigma-1.01-12
 frepple-0.8.1-3.fc15
 glest-3.2.2-7.fc15
 libdigidocpp-0.3.0-3.fc15
 opensaml-2.3-3.fc15
 qpid-cpp-0.8-6.fc16
 xalan-c-1.10.0-8.fc15
 xmlcopyeditor-1.2.0.2-4.fc15
 xml-security-c-1.5.1-4.fc15
 xmltooling-1.3.3-2.fc15
 xqilla-2.2.3-8.fc14
 xsd-3.3.0-4.fc15

-- 
kalev
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Using LD_PRELOAD wrappers to identify problem use of shared library functions

2011-03-10 Thread William Cohen
Shared library are heavily used through Linux distributions. Unfortunately, 
there are cases of functions in the libraries having undefined behavior. Rather 
than immediately reporting the dependence on that undefined behavior, the 
applications may later fail in odd and seemingly random ways. On particular 
example of this problem is the memcpy function which has undefined behavior 
when the source and destination regions overlap. This resulted in the following 
bug being filled about Strange sound on mp3 flash website:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2898613

The diagnosis of this problem was not straightford because the memcpy silently 
corrupted the data in the copy. There are many other examples of this type of 
memcpy problems in bugzilla.

What would be desirable is catching the dependency on undefined behavior when 
it occurs. The LD_PRELOAD environment variable allows wrappers for shared 
library functions to be inserted. These wrappers can do additional checks and 
flag those issues when they occur. The mutrace package in Fedora is one example 
of this approach. It makes use of this mechanism to instrument the mutex 
operations and can trigger a gdb breakpoint when a problem mutex operation 
occurs.

I have taken the code in the mutrace package and made memstomp which looks for 
the memcpy of overlapping regions.

git repo at:

http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=wcohen/public_git/memstomp;a=summary

A fedora scratch package RPM at:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2898613


Valgrind does check the arguments for memcpy (and many other memory related 
checks). The main advantage to using the specialized wrappers like memstomp is 
lower overhead. Most people are not willing to pay for the overhead that 
valgrind introduces (4x-100x slow downs). The overhead for the memstomp 
wrappers should be low enough that it would be feasible to set the LD_PRELOAD 
for Fedora alpha releases. This would make the problems depending on undefined 
behavior obvious rather than spending a large amount of time trying to 
replicate the problem and then diagnosing it.


-Will

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Using LD_PRELOAD wrappers to identify problem use of shared library functions

2011-03-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:25:38AM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
 
 git repo at:
 
 http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=wcohen/public_git/memstomp;a=summary
 
 A fedora scratch package RPM at:
 
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2898613
 
 
 Valgrind does check the arguments for memcpy (and many other memory
 related checks). The main advantage to using the specialized wrappers
 like memstomp is lower overhead. Most people are not willing to pay
 for the overhead that valgrind introduces (4x-100x slow downs). The
 overhead for the memstomp wrappers should be low enough that it would
 be feasible to set the LD_PRELOAD for Fedora alpha releases. This
 would make the problems depending on undefined behavior obvious rather
 than spending a large amount of time trying to replicate the problem
 and then diagnosing it.

There could be problems with the memstomp PRELOAD wrapper function
for any application code which is using memcpy() from within a signal
handler. Functions like fprintf()  malloc() are not async signal
safe, so could deadlock the process or worse. The odds of hitting this
problem are fairly low, but wanted to point out that speed isn't the
only concern wrt enabling a global distro LD_PRELOAD like this.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Using LD_PRELOAD wrappers to identify problem use of shared library functions

2011-03-10 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:25:38AM -0500, William Cohen wrote:

 Shared library are heavily used through Linux distributions.
 Unfortunately, there are cases of functions in the libraries having
 undefined behavior.  Rather than immediately reporting the dependence on
 that undefined behavior, the applications may later fail in odd and
 seemingly random ways.  On particular example of this problem is the
 memcpy function which has undefined behavior when the source and
 destination regions overlap.  This resulted in the following bug being
 filled about Strange sound on mp3 flash website:
 
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2898613
 
 The diagnosis of this problem was not straightford because the memcpy
 silently corrupted the data in the copy.  There are many other examples of
 this type of memcpy problems in bugzilla.
 
 What would be desirable is catching the dependency on undefined behavior
 when it occurs.  The LD_PRELOAD environment variable allows wrappers for
 shared library functions to be inserted.  These wrappers can do additional
 checks and flag those issues when they occur.  The mutrace package in
 Fedora is one example of this approach.  It makes use of this mechanism to
 instrument the mutex operations and can trigger a gdb breakpoint when a
 problem mutex operation occurs.
 
 I have taken the code in the mutrace package and made memstomp which looks
 for the memcpy of overlapping regions.
 
 git repo at:
 
 http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=wcohen/public_git/memstomp;a=summary
 
 A fedora scratch package RPM at:
 
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2898613
 
 
 Valgrind does check the arguments for memcpy (and many other memory
 related checks).  The main advantage to using the specialized wrappers
 like memstomp is lower overhead.  Most people are not willing to pay for
 the overhead that valgrind introduces (4x-100x slow downs).  The overhead
 for the memstomp wrappers should be low enough that it would be feasible
 to set the LD_PRELOAD for Fedora alpha releases.  This would make the
 problems depending on undefined behavior obvious rather than spending a
 large amount of time trying to replicate the problem and then diagnosing
 it.

Nice, but I think the dlsym (NULL, main) lookup should not be done, at
least not by default, we really don't want to encourage people linking
programs with -rdynamic, that adds a runtime penalty.

And, it would be nice when you have such a library not to check just
memcpy, there are plenty of other commonly used calls which could
be warned about.

memcpy, strcpy, strncpy, strcat, strncat, strtok, strtok_r, mempcpy, strsep,
stpcpy, stpncpy, memccpy

just to name a few from string.h, then for -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE also
__memcpy_chk, __mempcpy_chk, __strcpy_chk, __stpcpy_chk, __strncpy_chk,
__stpncpy_chk, __strcat_chk, __strncat_chk.

In wchar.h e.g.
wcscpy, wcsncpy, wcscat, wcsncat, wcstok, wmemcpy, wmempcpy
and maybe
mbrtowc, wcrtomb, mbrlen, mbsrtowcs, wcsrtombs, mbsnrtowcs,
wcsnrtombs, wcstol, wcstoul, wcstoll, wcstoull, ...

Maybe also sprintf/snprintf if format string contains some %s/%ls/%S
specifiers and those arguments overlap the target.

Basically, most of the __restrict/restrict qualified prototypes
in glibc headers would be good candidates for overlap tests (if possible
to determine length).

In the implementation of the checking library you probably want
to #include sys/cdefs.h, then #undef __restrict #define __restrict
and similarly for restrict and __restrict_arr and compile the
file with -fno-builtin, to make sure gcc doesn't optimize your checks
away based on the arguments being restricted pointers.

Jakub
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Updating SSL keys on fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10

2011-03-10 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:07, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
 On 2011-03-10, Stephen Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:

 We have already updated fedorahosted.org and will now be updating the
 cert for the main site: fedoraproject.org.

 The old certificate came from Equifax, was a 1024 bit key and had the
 fingerprint:
 [...]
 The new certificate is issued by GeoTrust, Inc and is a 4096 bit key
 with the fingerprint:

 Key length is not everything. Didn't you forget to upgrade hash
 algorithm? Sticking on SHA-1 that's been abandoned by ETSI and other
 authorities does not look most safely.

From my research to use the SHA-2 in TLS requires the user and server
to be both able to talk TLS-1.2. From what I found at wikipedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security) Firefox does
not support 1.2 (only Opera and IE8 do).

 -- Petr

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle. -- Ian MacLaren
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Updating SSL keys on fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10

2011-03-10 Thread Andre Robatino
Stephen John Smoogen smooge at gmail.com writes:

From my research to use the SHA-2 in TLS requires the user and server
 to be both able to talk TLS-1.2. From what I found at wikipedia
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security) Firefox does
 not support 1.2 (only Opera and IE8 do).

It's being worked on, at least:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480514




-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Test-Announce] Reminder: today is GNOME 3 Test Day #2

2011-03-10 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, everyone! Just a quick reminder that today is the second Test Day
for GNOME 3:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-10_GNOME3_Beta . Please
do come along and help with testing if you can. We're having trouble
with the 32-bit live image, but a 64-bit image is available now and all
the test instructions are in place. We'll be in #fedora-test-day on IRC
all day long to help out with testing, so come along and join us there.
Thanks a lot!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Updating SSL keys on fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10

2011-03-10 Thread Robert Relyea
On 03/10/2011 09:17 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:07, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
 On 2011-03-10, Stephen Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
 We have already updated fedorahosted.org and will now be updating the
 cert for the main site: fedoraproject.org.

 The old certificate came from Equifax, was a 1024 bit key and had the
 fingerprint:
 [...]
 The new certificate is issued by GeoTrust, Inc and is a 4096 bit key
 with the fingerprint:

 Key length is not everything. Didn't you forget to upgrade hash
 algorithm? Sticking on SHA-1 that's been abandoned by ETSI and other
 authorities does not look most safely.
 From my research to use the SHA-2 in TLS requires the user and server
 to be both able to talk TLS-1.2. From what I found at wikipedia
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security) Firefox does
 not support 1.2 (only Opera and IE8 do).
There are more than one usage for SHA-1/SHA-2. TLS uses SHA-1 as an
HMAC. SHA-1 is still strong for such use (though prudence would
encourage one to move off of SHA-1 even for this operation).

SHA-1 is also used in the certificate. That, in theory, doesn't require
TLS 1.2, though only TLS 1.2 includes protocol to tell servers what
hashing algorithms the clients support, so in a strict sense only TLS
tells you whether or not it's safe to use a cert with something other
than SHA-1 or MD5. Most modern browers will support SHA-2 algorithms in
the certificate (even when using SSL3, to TLS 1.x). The notable
exceptions is verisons of Windows older than Windows XP service patch 3,
and several older phones.

Many CA's are apparently starting to move SHA-256 roots this year,
mostly driven by NIST standards.

bob




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 42 Orphaned packages

2011-03-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:40:09AM +, Mat Booth wrote:
 On 9 March 2011 06:37, Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote:
  After a dispute on the #fedora-kde IRC channel thomasj has orphaned a
  huge number of packages.
 
 
 Must have been some dispute. It's a shame it couldn't be resolved.
 
  I extracted the list from scm-commits emails so I hope that I haven't
  missed any.
 
  The following packages are in need of new owners:
 
  recordmydesktop
  qt-recordmydesktop
  gtk-recordmydesktop
 
 
 I really like this tool for making screencasts, if nobody takes this
 by the time I get home from work, I will pick these up.

I second that this is a great (albeit simple) tool; I don't have the
time to maintain it though ...

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Using LD_PRELOAD wrappers to identify problem use of shared library functions

2011-03-10 Thread John Reiser
On 03/10/2011 08:25 AM, William Cohen wrote:
 I have taken the code in the mutrace package and made memstomp which looks 
 for the memcpy of overlapping regions.
 
 git repo at:
 
 http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=wcohen/public_git/memstomp;a=summary

Did anybody else run into trouble trying to clone the git repository (as per 
the README)?

$ git clone http://wcohen.fedorapeople.org/git/memstomp/
Cloning into memstomp...
fatal: http://wcohen.fedorapeople.org/git/memstomp/info/refs not found: did you 
run git update-server-info on the server?
$

-- 
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Using LD_PRELOAD wrappers to identify problem use of shared library functions

2011-03-10 Thread John Reiser
On 03/10/2011 08:25 AM, William Cohen wrote:
 git repo at:
 
 http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=wcohen/public_git/memstomp;a=summary

Actually: git clone 
git://fedorapeople.org/home/fedora/wcohen/public_git/memstomp

The implementation has some properties:
1.  Not async signal safe [malloc, fprintf], as noted previously by Daniel 
Berrange.
2.  Not thread safe: unguarded top-level static variables in 
backtrace-symbols.c.
3.  Essentially bundles a private copy of libbfd.
4.  Needs work for a process tree that uses a mixture of 32-bit and 64-bit 
programs.
5.  Does not catch violations in compile-time inlined expansions.
6.  SIGSEGVs for violations from just-in-time compiled code: uninit local
variables in backtrace_symbols() not set by calls to dl_iterate_phdr.

-- 
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Bug 683782] New: perl-App-cpanminus-1.4003 is available

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.4003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683782

   Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.4003 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: perl-App-cpanminus
AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com
Classification: Fedora


Latest upstream release: 1.4003
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.3001
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-cpanminus/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Bug 683787] New: perlbrew-0.17 is available

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: perlbrew-0.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683787

   Summary: perlbrew-0.17 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: perlbrew
AssignedTo: iarn...@gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com
Classification: Fedora


Latest upstream release: 0.17
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.16
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-perlbrew/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Bug 683785] New: perl-Test-Pod-1.45 is available

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: perl-Test-Pod-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683785

   Summary: perl-Test-Pod-1.45 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: perl-Test-Pod
AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: st...@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com,
pertu...@free.fr, mmasl...@redhat.com,
psab...@redhat.com
Classification: Fedora


Latest upstream release: 1.45
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.44
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Pod/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Bug 683782] perl-App-cpanminus-1.4003 is available

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683782

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File App-cpanminus-1.4003.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2011-03-10 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus:

c6bd448370b01087fef1303f4109d835  App-cpanminus-1.4003.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-App-cpanminus] 1.4003 bump

2011-03-10 Thread Petr Pisar
commit f9ef1f308bd6acb6398af41827092fba1f75a3ef
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Mar 10 13:05:52 2011 +0100

1.4003 bump

 .gitignore  |1 +
 perl-App-cpanminus.spec |5 -
 sources |2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index eacb751..7b8e9dd 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ App-cpanminus-0.9935.tar.gz
 /App-cpanminus-1.3000.tar.gz
 /App-cpanminus-1.3001.tar.gz
 /App-cpanminus-1.4000.tar.gz
+/App-cpanminus-1.4003.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-App-cpanminus.spec b/perl-App-cpanminus.spec
index fad2a1b..1e42c58 100644
--- a/perl-App-cpanminus.spec
+++ b/perl-App-cpanminus.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-App-cpanminus
-Version:1.4000
+Version:1.4003
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Library for get, unpack, build and install CPAN modules
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ make test
 %{_bindir}/cpanm
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Mar 10 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.4003-1
+- 1.4003 bump
+
 * Tue Mar 08 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.4000-1
 - 1.4000 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ca93ce8..fd7f158 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-040cac204d1ca9bc4672f81ac6f6a195  App-cpanminus-1.4000.tar.gz
+c6bd448370b01087fef1303f4109d835  App-cpanminus-1.4003.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 683782] perl-App-cpanminus-1.4003 is available

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683782

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpanminus-1.4003-1
   ||.fc16
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-03-10 07:12:16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Bug 683785] perl-Test-Pod-1.45 is available

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683785

Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File Test-Pod-1.45.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2011-03-10 Thread Petr Sabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Pod:

089c8f272931df82f6c4d11a74f04628  Test-Pod-1.45.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-Test-Pod] 1.45 bump, buildroot cleanup

2011-03-10 Thread Petr Sabata
commit 97a54905543e03dadf545fad7c90ed9beca0af11
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Mar 10 13:21:37 2011 +0100

1.45 bump, buildroot cleanup

 .gitignore |1 +
 perl-Test-Pod.spec |   17 +++--
 sources|2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 99074df..90acba9 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 Test-Pod-1.44.tar.gz
+/Test-Pod-1.45.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod.spec b/perl-Test-Pod.spec
index 0c34187..e4a228d 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Pod.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Pod.spec
@@ -1,17 +1,15 @@
 Name:   perl-Test-Pod
-Version:1.44
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:1.45
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Test POD files for correctness
-
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Pod/
 Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DW/DWHEELER/Test-Pod-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 
 BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build) = 0.30
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build) = 0.3000
 BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Simple) = 3.05
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Builder::Tester) = 1.02
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.62
@@ -35,7 +33,6 @@ the heavy lifting.
 
 
 %install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 ./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 2/dev/null
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
@@ -45,10 +42,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 
2/dev/null
 LC_ALL=C ./Build test
 
 
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-
 %files
 %defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc Changes README
@@ -57,6 +50,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Mar 10 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 1.45-1
+- 1.45 bump
+- Buildroot garbage cleanup
+
 * Wed Feb 09 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.44-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 472cd25..689806d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-02380af5539521524d5df17273a57ae7  Test-Pod-1.44.tar.gz
+089c8f272931df82f6c4d11a74f04628  Test-Pod-1.45.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-Test-Pod/f15/master] 1.45 bump, buildroot cleanup

2011-03-10 Thread Petr Sabata
Summary of changes:

  97a5490... 1.45 bump, buildroot cleanup (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Bug 683785] perl-Test-Pod-1.45 is available

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683785

--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 
07:35:20 EST ---
perl-Test-Pod-1.45-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Pod-1.45-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File GnuPG-Interface-0.43.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2011-03-10 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-GnuPG-Interface:

513982e7c60d04d0fa0085a6708bdb6c  GnuPG-Interface-0.43.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-GnuPG-Interface] Update to 0.43

2011-03-10 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 430510dcac61d5d02c0f0bd287f74c7579688b5c
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date:   Thu Mar 10 14:44:38 2011 +0100

Update to 0.43

 perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec |7 +--
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec b/perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec
index c788772..0193577 100644
--- a/perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec
+++ b/perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-GnuPG-Interface
-Version:0.42
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Version:0.43
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl interface to GnuPG
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPLv2+ or Artistic
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Mar 10 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 0.43-1
+- Update to 0.43
+
 * Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.42-6
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-GnuPG-Interface] Bump to build the release

2011-03-10 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit c7bde21ae733a134b1aa4f46a93233d79c79440c
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date:   Thu Mar 10 14:55:11 2011 +0100

Bump to build the release

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec |3 +++
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index fa9a329..5dad1b5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 GnuPG-Interface-0.42.tar.gz
+/GnuPG-Interface-0.43.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec b/perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec
index 0193577..ff6330d 100644
--- a/perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec
+++ b/perl-GnuPG-Interface.spec
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Mar 10 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 0.43-2
+- Bump to build the release
+
 * Thu Mar 10 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 0.43-1
 - Update to 0.43
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index cddbba0..8753d3b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c5cc5426c02b93900cb96f4879c9be28  GnuPG-Interface-0.42.tar.gz
+513982e7c60d04d0fa0085a6708bdb6c  GnuPG-Interface-0.43.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File App-perlbrew-0.17.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2011-03-10 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perlbrew:

0df804f2148bbcaf15f9a27bff26927d  App-perlbrew-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perlbrew] update to 0.17

2011-03-10 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 3bd25019a6ef48a0b78e91ccda11a003080f0984
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date:   Thu Mar 10 16:34:57 2011 +0100

update to 0.17

 .gitignore|1 +
 perlbrew.spec |5 -
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e552877..c8aee42 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 /App-perlbrew-0.14.tar.gz
 /App-perlbrew-0.15.tar.gz
 /App-perlbrew-0.16.tar.gz
+/App-perlbrew-0.17.tar.gz
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index 7c58037..c0d2ca1 100644
--- a/perlbrew.spec
+++ b/perlbrew.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perlbrew
-Version:0.16
+Version:0.17
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Manage perl installations in your $HOME
 License:MIT
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Mar 10 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.17-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
 * Sun Feb 20 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.16-1
 - update to latest upstream version
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 45aa6e5..c475f3d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-463b44da3c5967c9de68117c7a515fac  App-perlbrew-0.16.tar.gz
+0df804f2148bbcaf15f9a27bff26927d  App-perlbrew-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perlbrew/f15/master] update to 0.17

2011-03-10 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes:

  3bd2501... update to 0.17 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Bug 683787] perlbrew-0.17 is available

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683787

--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 
10:49:51 EST ---
perlbrew-0.17-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perlbrew-0.17-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Bug 647783] perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647783

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Mail-Box-2.097-1.fc15  |perl-Mail-Box-2.097-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Bug 647783] perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed

2011-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647783

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-10 15:47:33 EST ---
perl-Mail-Box-2.097-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-Crypt-Random-Source/f14/master] Initial import.

2011-03-10 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit d9917efb44099bbdd6fb26f88d800cfe60f71360
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date:   Fri Mar 11 00:57:34 2011 +0100

Initial import.

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-Crypt-Random-Source.spec |   56 +
 sources   |1 +
 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..ebff30b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Crypt-Random-Source-0.07.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Crypt-Random-Source.spec b/perl-Crypt-Random-Source.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..678efd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Crypt-Random-Source.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+Name:   perl-Crypt-Random-Source
+Version:0.07
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Get weak or strong random data from pluggable sources
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Group:  Development/Libraries
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-Random-Source/
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NU/NUFFIN/Crypt-Random-Source-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl(Any::Moose)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Capture::Tiny)
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Find)
+BuildRequires:  perl(namespace::clean)
+BuildRequires:  perl(ok)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Sub::Exporter)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Exception)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+
+%{?perl_default_filter}
+
+%description
+This module provides implementations for a number of byte oriented sources
+of random data.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Crypt-Random-Source-%{version}
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%files
+%defattr(-,root,root,-)
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%changelog
+* Mon Feb 14 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 0.07-1
+- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..ba36133 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+56251a6c909e21f5ae535b0e2af3897e  Crypt-Random-Source-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


Broken dependencies: perl-Kwiki-Users-Remote

2011-03-10 Thread buildsys


perl-Kwiki-Users-Remote has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Kwiki-Users-Remote-0.04-12.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
On i386:
perl-Kwiki-Users-Remote-0.04-12.fc15.noarch requires perl(mixin)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


Broken dependencies: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools

2011-03-10 Thread buildsys


perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-4.fc15.noarch requires 
main_module)
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-4.fc15.noarch requires 
perl(tmpl_var)
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-4.fc15.noarch requires 
perl(tmpl_var
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-4.fc15.noarch requires 
main_module)
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-4.fc15.noarch requires 
perl(tmpl_var)
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-4.fc15.noarch requires 
perl(tmpl_var
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[389-devel] Please review: (616707) Allow editing of attributes matching rules from console

2011-03-10 Thread Nathan Kinder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616707

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483545action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel