Re: 9base in Fedora?
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:55:16PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:23:42AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:16:02AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:24:08AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:19:43AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
As I understand it, the best way to do this in Fedora, with
respect to
same ideas in this thread, would be having %{_libexecdir}/plan9
or similar,
with bin, lib and share (or whatever upstream supplies)
subdirectories.
You understood it wrong, %{_libexecdir}/plan9 should contain only
binaries
and nothing else, the rest would go into %{_libdir}/plan9.
I don't understand why exactly %{_libexecdir}/plan9/* would be
preferable to
the more-straightforward /usr/bin/plan9/*. Generally, programs that
are in
libexec are meant to _not_ be executed directly, which is not the
case here.
That would indeed be better, I guess.
It's okay with both FHS 2.3 and our current Guidelines (or maybe I'm
just
missing something), rpmlint complains about %{_bindir} subdirectory,
though.
(...)
9base.x86_64: E: subdir-in-bin /usr/bin/plan9/dc
The package contains a subdirectory in /usr/bin. It's not permitted to
create
a subdir there. Create it in /usr/lib/ instead.
(...)
I'm going to update the package review since this more like an rpmlint
issue.
I just got back from FUDCon Panama so I may have read a few things too
quickly... What's the use case for these programs?
Just for scripts?
For users that are used to plan9 behaviour and want to use them from their
shell?
Pretty much those. Plus they are fun to play with.
So, to be clear, you're saying this is just for the latter (users that want
to have plan9 behaviour) and not the former (for scripts)?
No, they are both for users and for scripts.
I'm sorry I haven't taken a look at your spec file -- does the latest
incarnation place the binaries in some non-PATH directory and then have
prefixed symlinks to those binaries in /usr/bin?
The latest version puts binaries in /usr/bin/plan9/ and other stuff in
/usr/lib[64]/plan9/ (etc, lib and share subdirectories, currently).
Having the etc and share directories in %{_libdir} is not all that great...
Either %{_libdir}/plan9 or %{_libdir}/plan9 + %{_libexecdir}/plan9 split
seem that they may fit the bill here. One of those may be more right than
the other depending on what use case we're trying to support.
Subdirectories of %{_bindir} really should not be used in Fedora.
But why exactly?
subdirectories of /bin are prohibited by the FHS. The subdirectories that
may be located in /usr/bin by the FHS are there specifically for
compatibilities sake for two selected subsystems (mh and X11R6).
Subdirectories of bin directories don't make any more sense than any other
directory as they are not added to the PATH by default and thus are not
user invokable progams without further modification to the environment.
Placing binaries that are not to be in the default PATH are better placed in
a more standard location (either libexecdir or libdir depending on the
use-case). Subdirectories of /usr/bin are just plain non-standard
locations.
Yes, I'm aware of that restriction for /bin; that doesn't apply to /usr/bin,
though. Users have to adjust their PATH no matter which directory I choose.
I don't find libexec to be a standard directory. Also, as Matthew already
stated, this should be used for non-directly invoked binaries, if at all.
And for %{_libdir}, according to FHS:
/usr/lib includes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that are
not intended to be executed directly by users or shell scripts.
This says it all.
%{_bindir}/plan9 seems like a perfect location; it's just some people don't feel
it's right...
--
# Petr Sabata
pgp5Cn2ynhZEV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: UID_MIN GID_MIN changed
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 11:47 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:27:21AM +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote: We can also annouce the 200 limit for reserved IDs. ;) We can't just make changes to this range. Especially not in the lower end of it. (and if we change the dynamic system account range to extend higher, we also can't use the 500-1000 range for that. This change has already happened. If it was done without any harm, I consider that a good job. :) To be clear, this change has only happened in rawhide with your last commit so it's a bit early to tell what harm there is. With the clarification that the dynamic UID range has started allocating at the top instead of the bottom in 2007, it makes a lot more sense that we can make this change. Are you sure you only want to allocate 0-200, though? Remember that the static assignments are our limited resource, perhaps you want to go higher than that? I guess Peter was talking about this 0-200 static ID reservation threshold change - and it happened in Fedora 12 (setup-2.8.7-1.fc12) with no reported complaints or conflicts so far. Yes, static assignments are limited resource and it probably makes sense to increase it even a bit further , however - in ~2 years since the change of the threshold to 200, 15 static new uid's were assigned. So if the trend will continue, there is enough free id's for reservation for ~5-10 years - so the threshold at 200 seems to be enough atm (especially if the dynamically assigned system id's assignments are going from the highest limit down). Ondrej Vasik -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Lubomir Rintel
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:46 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote: I'm following the procedure at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668513 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663593 (duplicate of above) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676699 (duplicate of above) Thanks, David I've heard from him fairly recently, CCing another email address. I'm terribly sorry for not keeping up with personal mail. I do not use Sunbird anymore and am not able to maintain Sunbird anymore, so I've orphaned the package. I'll be glad if someone picked it up, it even has comaintainers. -- Flash is the Web2.0 version of blink and animated gifs. -- Stephen Smoogen -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Lubomir Rintel
On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 07:32:07 PM Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote: I'm following the procedure at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668513 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663593 (duplicate of above) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676699 (duplicate of above) I've contacted him off-the-list, sunbird is orphaned now, see his reply. Thanks for heads-up. Jaroslav Thanks, David -- Jaroslav Řezník jrez...@redhat.com Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery
Hi all, Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if you've the same plans or are already working on this, please let me know. So we can avoid doing double work. I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery extension collection, so that people can install only those which they want without automatically getting all of them. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery
Hans de Goede wrote: I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery extension collection, so that people can install only those which they want without automatically getting all of them. I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work together. I understand that management of extensions has been added to gnome- tweak-tool. That seems like a better approach to controlling extensions than using the package manager. Ron -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Unplanned OUTAGE: buildsystem (2011-06-01)
During reboots and updates yesterday, the filesystem for the buildsystem was written to from two seperate places at the same time. A snapshot was taken of the filesystem and a fsck started. Builds were completing normally and the filesystem was functioning, until about 08:11UTC when the filesystem switched to read-only. Builds since that time have failed. We have disabled the builder hosts for now (submitted jobs will queue up and wait for their return) until the file system check is completed. You can follow progress of this issue in: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2800 Sorry for the inconvenience. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Potentially Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Charles A. Anderson
As more and more bugzapper F13 EOL mails continue to come in, I've had a look at some grab samples and have run into multiple bug reports for package ocp not having been responded to since 2010: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cra owns only two packages: flac123 ocp Last build in koji: 2010-08-09 Any news here? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 709663] perl-Log-Log4perl-1.33 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709663 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 709664] perl-ORLite-1.49 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709664 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Lubomir Rintel
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:34:38 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 07:32:07 PM Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote: I'm following the procedure at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668513 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663593 (duplicate of above) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676699 (duplicate of above) I've contacted him off-the-list, sunbird is orphaned now, see his reply. Thanks for heads-up. It probably should be dropped as upstream support for a standalone client has been dropped upstream and as time goes on maintainance is going to get harder. Since the lightning extension to thunderbird is packaged, I doubt the effort of maintaining sunbird is justified. (Of course people are free to spend there time maintaining whichever packages they want to work on.) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
leaving packages python-gdata and googlecl
I don't have time to maintain python-gdata nor googlecl. python-gdata seems well covered, so I will just remove myself. googlecl has a single other maintainer for all but EPEL. I will remove myself there as well, but it would be good if others could take maintainership, especially for EPEL. Thanks, Adam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Bugzilla/Bugzapper and ignored reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619785 this bugreport is a long time ago for fedora 13/14 it was never refreshed, no answer and only builds for F15 perl-IO-Socket-INET6-2.66-2.fc15 perl-IO-Socket-INET6-2.66-1.fc15 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
orphaning cnetworkmanager
I've just orphaned cnetworkmanager. Upstream is pretty dead, and nmcli does everything cnetworkmanager did and more. Also, it may not work at all in f15+ due to NM changes. There's 2 open bugs on it: 709356 Fedora new cnetworkmanager D-Bus error, ServiceName property 583043 Fedora assignedUnicodeEncodeError in networkmanager/util.py line 125 If someone would like to take it and run with it, great. ;) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning my packages...
I need to orphan all of my packages. In most cases, it would be great if someone (or more) could pick them up. Let me know if you'd like any of them and I'll release them to you. kst -- A data viewing program for KDE A great program for plotting data (especially live data). Currently in Fedora is the 1.x branch of kst; 2.0 has been released; I have a spec file ready but haven't had the time to push it though. slimdata -- Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data This package also gets little use, but it is easy to maintain. These two packages are still in need of a new maintainer. I'll be orphaning them soon. If you have any questions about them, just drop me a line. -- Matthew Truch m...@truch.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning my packages...
Truch, Matthew wrote: I need to orphan all of my packages. In most cases, it would be great if someone (or more) could pick them up. Let me know if you'd like any of them and I'll release them to you. kst -- A data viewing program for KDE A great program for plotting data (especially live data). Currently in Fedora is the 1.x branch of kst; 2.0 has been released; I have a spec file ready but haven't had the time to push it though. slimdata -- Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data This package also gets little use, but it is easy to maintain. These two packages are still in need of a new maintainer. I'll be orphaning them soon. If you have any questions about them, just drop me a line. I'll bite. I'll take both. Email me the 2.0 spec if you want. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)
I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I still get regular kernel abrt crashes on resume. Is it even marked stable in the upstream kernel yet? Peter On Jun 1, 2011 5:40 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags .fesco 563 = New business = #topic #589 Porting from sysVinit init scripts to systemd unit files #topic #591 F16Feature: Aeolus Conductor - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Aeolus_Conductor #topic #592 F16Feature: Blender 2.5 - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Blender25 #topic #593 F16Feature: Cloudstack - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cloudstack #topic #594 F16Feature: F16 BTRFS default file system - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F16BtrfsDefaultFs #topic #595 F16Feature: GHC 7.0.3 and Haskell Platform 2011.2.0.1 - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GHC703 #topic #596 F16Feature: HAL Removal - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval #topic #597 F16Feature: Sheepdog - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sheepdog #topic #598 F16Feature: SysV to Systemd - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd #topic #599 F16Feature: ConsoleKit Removal/Automatic Multi-Seat Support - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ckremoval #topic #600 F16Feature: nss-myhostname by default - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/nssmyhostname #topic #601 F16 Feature: Perl5.14 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/perl5.14 = Fedora Engineering Services tickets = https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/report/6 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Revoking and deleting in Bodhi Web
Sergio Belkin wrote: What does it occur when an update is revoked and is deleted? I've done an updated version of package, made a build and when I write the name in Package field I've found a bit odd that new build doesn't appear in the combo box. I wonder if I did something wrong... My understanding, is in bodhi: 1. revoke an update 2. wait for next updates push to get processed if you don't wait for 2 before deleting, there's a chance nothing actually happened, and by all accounts, your update is still in the wild (and not revoked). Though, makes me curious, why would you revoke/delete an update, just to re- issue it again with the same build? -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
orphaning anyterm
I'm no longer working on anything that requires anyterm and thus have orphaned it. Anyone feel free to grab, it should still be at the latest upstream release though there are two BZs filed against it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635784 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707816 -Mo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Revoking and deleting in Bodhi Web
2011/6/1 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu Sergio Belkin wrote: What does it occur when an update is revoked and is deleted? I've done an updated version of package, made a build and when I write the name in Package field I've found a bit odd that new build doesn't appear in the combo box. I wonder if I did something wrong... My understanding, is in bodhi: 1. revoke an update 2. wait for next updates push to get processed if you don't wait for 2 before deleting, there's a chance nothing actually happened, and by all accounts, your update is still in the wild (and not revoked). How can I determine that nothing actually occured? koji info: Package Tag Extra Arches Owner --- --- --- UpTools dist-5E-epel sebelk Though, makes me curious, why would you revoke/delete an update, just to re- issue it again with the same build? I've revoked and deleted an update because repoclosure reported that the package had unresolved deps. I didn't reissue, I submit a newer version. Thanks in advance! -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Quick update PPC status
Hi everyone. It's been roughly a month since the last update, so i wanted to send out a quick update of where we are. Things have been progressing nicely and we now even have 2 mash trees with install images for testing available for, one for ppc, the other for ppc64: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/mnt/koji/mash/15/ Those are our current development trees, so things might be broken at times. Also the rpms aren't signed as we're changing stuff to fast and this isn't a release. We have tested them on a Power7 box as well as on an older Apple G5, but your mileage may vary. Especially on Power5 and Power6 the problem still exists that the unified initramfs of Anaconda is too large to fit into the initial RAM during bootup, so you'll need to revert to the method described in the next paragraph. If you want to go a bit of a safer route you can try out an upgrade from Fedora 12 to Fedora 15. Dan Horak has described how to do this in a blog entry he wrote: http://sharkcz.livejournal.com/8649.html It's quite a bit of manual work, but it's pretty straight forward what to do. So feel free to give that a shot if you want to try that way instead of a fresh install with the mash images and trees. As stated previously, we won't be doing an official Fedora 15 release, it's just not ready yet. But Fedora 16 is definitely planed and currently on track. Current state of the work can always be found here, as usual: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/PowerPC Thanks regards, Phil -- Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470 Supervisor Core Services | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web: http://www.redhat.com/ D-70178 Stuttgart, Germany -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Net-SSLGlue-0.7.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by remi
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSLGlue: c30d3f7ed486eff0d7c0bef9421cebbe Net-SSLGlue-0.7.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-SSLGlue] update to 0.7
commit 7b57fb9b856bcf5f6ff18858f1f724f13263150d
Author: remi fed...@famillecollet.com
Date: Wed Jun 1 18:31:48 2011 +0200
update to 0.7
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index d7e5bf5..2ef3a31 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
*~
/Net-SSLGlue-0.6.tar.gz
+/Net-SSLGlue-0.7.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec b/perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec
index c328c5b..1c58427 100644
--- a/perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Net-SSLGlue
-Version:0.6
+Version:0.7
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2011 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com - 0.7-1
+- update to 0.7
+
* Tue May 10 2011 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com - 0.6-1
- update to 0.6 (doc fix only)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 2b72e61..bbb7e46 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fe8bfbd47776d7a48258c1d62191f80b Net-SSLGlue-0.6.tar.gz
+c30d3f7ed486eff0d7c0bef9421cebbe Net-SSLGlue-0.7.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: tomboy orphaned
Hi, took it, as I use it everyday. Will update to 1.6.0 when koji is back. - Thomas 2011/4/27 Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com: Hey guys, A long, long time ago (before the extras/core merge in fact i think) i was given tomboy to help spread the influx of mono packages across desktop team. IIt's a neat program, but I don't really use it. I'm more of a send-myself-email/scribble-on-whiteboard kind of guy. I'm also not very good about maintaining it. I've orphaned it now. If anyone is interested in it, feel free to take it. --Ray -- Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Quick update PPC status
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:53 +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote: We have tested them on a Power7 box as well as on an older Apple G5, but your mileage may vary. Especially on Power5 and Power6 the problem still exists that the unified initramfs of Anaconda is too large to fit into the initial RAM during bootup, so you'll need to revert to the method described in the next paragraph. Have we actually switched all userspace to 64-bit on 64-bit machines? That would exacerbate the initrd size issue quite a lot, wouldn't it? As well as being significantly less well-tested than the 32-bit support was. Are the ExcludeArch trackers still up to date for ppc and ppc64? Is there an estimate of how many packages are not built for ppc64 that *are* built for ppc32? -- dwmw2 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery
Hi Ron, Am 01.06.2011 11:19, schrieb Ron Yorston: Hans de Goede wrote: I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery extension collection, so that people can install only those which they want without automatically getting all of them. I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work together. I understand that management of extensions has been added to gnome- tweak-tool. That seems like a better approach to controlling extensions than using the package manager. Ron As far as gnome-tweak-tool can activate/deactivate certain extensions, I would prefer to have a package. This would be convenient for systems with many users. A global package provides extensions, which are displayed in gnome-tweak-tool, and users can switch them on and off. No need to search for extensions and install them individually. Mario -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Chart/el5] Fix find option order. Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation. BR ExtUtils::Mak
commit 4acc21887e0feb9028b7272a540774cea291de08
Author: Steven Pritchard st...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Apr 12 22:57:50 2007 +
Fix find option order. Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod
incantation. BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker. Minor spec cleanup to more closely
resemble cpanspec output.
perl-Chart.spec | 37 -
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Chart.spec b/perl-Chart.spec
index ce4187e..2e1ef1a 100644
--- a/perl-Chart.spec
+++ b/perl-Chart.spec
@@ -1,47 +1,45 @@
Name: perl-Chart
Version:2.4.1
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:Perl module for producing many types of charts
-
-Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL or Artistic
+Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Chart/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/C/CH/CHARTGRP/Chart-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(GD) = 1.20
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+#BuildRequires: perl(GD) = 1.20
+BuildRequires: perl(GD)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%description
%{summary}.
-
%prep
%setup -q -n Chart-%{version}
chmod -c 644 Chart/*.pm TODO Documentation.pdf
-
+rm -f pm_to_blib
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
-
%install
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find %{buildroot} -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
-chmod -R u+w %{buildroot}/*
+rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
make test
-
%clean
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
-
+rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
@@ -49,8 +47,13 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{perl_vendorlib}/Chart*
%{_mandir}/man3/Chart.3*
-
%changelog
+* Mon Apr 09 2007 Steven Pritchard st...@kspei.com 2.4.1-5
+- Fix find option order.
+- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation.
+- BR ExtUtils::MakeMaker.
+- Minor spec cleanup to more closely resemble cpanspec output.
+
* Mon Aug 27 2006 Michael J. Knox michael[AT]knox.net.nz - 2.4.1-4
- Rebuild for FC6
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Chart/el5] Update to 2.4.2. Improve Summary and description. Use PERL_INSTALL_ROOT instead of DESTDIR while ins
commit bd6c00bd339e677b5c9208d469d03ddd4b9ded68
Author: Steven Pritchard steven.pritch...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Dec 12 14:51:47 2010 -0600
Update to 2.4.2.
Improve Summary and description.
Use PERL_INSTALL_ROOT instead of DESTDIR while installing.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Chart.spec | 22 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index d00acc3..bc598c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
Chart-2.4.1.tar.gz
+/Chart-2.4.2.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Chart.spec b/perl-Chart.spec
index 2e1ef1a..883ef1c 100644
--- a/perl-Chart.spec
+++ b/perl-Chart.spec
@@ -1,20 +1,21 @@
Name: perl-Chart
-Version:2.4.1
-Release:5%{?dist}
-Summary:Perl module for producing many types of charts
-License:GPL or Artistic
+Version:2.4.2
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Series of charting modules
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Chart/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/C/CH/CHARTGRP/Chart-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-#BuildRequires: perl(GD) = 1.20
-BuildRequires: perl(GD)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+BuildRequires: perl(GD) = 1.20
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%description
-%{summary}.
+This module is an attempt to build a general purpose graphing module that
+is easily modified and expanded. Chart uses Lincoln Stein's GD module for
+all of its graphics primitives calls.
%prep
%setup -q -n Chart-%{version}
@@ -48,6 +49,11 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/Chart.3*
%changelog
+* Sun Dec 12 2010 Steven Pritchard st...@kspei.com 2.4.2-1
+- Update to 2.4.2.
+- Improve Summary and description.
+- Use PERL_INSTALL_ROOT instead of DESTDIR while installing.
+
* Mon Apr 09 2007 Steven Pritchard st...@kspei.com 2.4.1-5
- Fix find option order.
- Use fixperms macro instead of our own chmod incantation.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e866e60..1b823dc 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5e7a80badfb8bf6e29b21879689bcc2f Chart-2.4.1.tar.gz
+a75183d33b58f77e2e717165b93dbf79 Chart-2.4.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery
Ron Yorston wrote: I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work together. Except the Shut Down menu extension directly conflicts with the alternative-status-menu extension. Sub-packages are the safest bet. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Orphaning compiz
Hi, I have stopped using compiz a while ago and didn't really have much time to maintain it (it has a lots of open bugs) I decided that it is probably better to hand it over to someone else who has more time and actually still uses it. It has lots abrt of bugs open some of them are bugs inside compiz, others are driver bugs (some might be actually fixed by updates). Affected packages: compiz compiz-bcop compiz-fusion compiz-fusion-extras I have CC'ed Scott as he has been doing most of the maintenance work recently, he probably might want to become the primary maintainer, otherwise fell free to pick them up. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What is the status of Features/YumLangpackPlugin?
Hi, I have the yum-langpacks plugin installed and it works. :-) My problem in a sense is that it is limited in scope. :-( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin was the feature page for when the feature was initially deployed. The purpose of this is post is to raise awareness for this feature and continue to have it implemented to have a better experience for our users (from where developers are a subset). 1) This feature will also allow firefox and thunderbird to earn langpacks as they deserve. In F15 asking yum list *langpack* shows that only koffice libreoffice tesseract support langpacks and tesseract has three letters acronyms for languages: tesseract-langpack-bul tesseract-langpack-cat tesseract-langpack-ces tesseract-langpack-chi_sim tesseract-langpack-chi_tra tesseract-langpack-dan tesseract-langpack-dan-frak tesseract-langpack-deu tesseract-langpack-deu-frak tesseract-langpack-ell ... Searching to virtual provides we get: repoquery --whatprovides \*langpack\* this adds moodle-lang to the bundle. 2) In the Optional/longer term ideas: 3. recommendation for Packaging Guideline for standard naming of langpacks (eg basename-langpack-lang) This seems an easy step, both to standardize the form of lang as well as to suggest a virtual provides to packages that already provide this, I am thinking in this case of packages like kde-i18n* or kde-i10n*. What do others think? Regards, -- José Abílio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I still get regular kernel abrt crashes on resume. Is it even marked stable in the upstream kernel yet? Have you filed bugs for these crashes? Josef -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-06-01) === Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-06-01/fesco.2011-06-01-17.30.log.html Meeting summary --- * init process (nirik, 17:30:01) * #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags (nirik, 17:31:58) * Features - Introduction/general comments (nirik, 17:36:12) * #589 Porting from sysVinit init scripts to systemd unit files (nirik, 17:42:55) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd (nirik, 17:43:16) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability ? (mclasen, 17:45:52) * AGREED: feature is approved. (nirik, 17:52:21) * #591 F16Feature: Aeolus Conductor - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Aeolus_Conductor (nirik, 17:52:31) * AGREED: feature is approved. (nirik, 17:55:19) * #592 F16Feature: Blender 2.5 - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Blender25 (nirik, 17:55:24) * AGREED: feature is approved. (nirik, 17:59:55) * #593 F16Feature: Cloudstack - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cloudstack (nirik, 18:00:09) * AGREED: feature is approved. (nirik, 18:06:49) * #594 F16Feature: F16 BTRFS default file system - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F16BtrfsDefaultFs (nirik, 18:07:03) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/16/Schedule (nirik, 18:20:20) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features (mclasen, 18:21:48) * AGREED: FESCo folks will add critera and questions to the feature page, revisit feature next week. (nirik, 18:40:39) * #595 F16Feature: GHC 7.0.3 and Haskell Platform 2011.2.0.1 - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GHC703 (nirik, 18:41:18) * AGREED: feature is approved. (nirik, 18:42:23) * #596 F16Feature: HAL Removal - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval (nirik, 18:42:31) * AGREED: feature is approved. (nirik, 18:44:14) * #597 F16Feature: Sheepdog - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sheepdog (nirik, 18:44:26) * AGREED: feature is approved. (nirik, 18:46:10) * #598 F16Feature: SysV to Systemd - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd (nirik, 18:46:24) * #599 F16Feature: ConsoleKit Removal/Automatic Multi-Seat Support - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ckremoval (nirik, 18:47:03) * AGREED: defer and gather more info. (nirik, 18:51:45) * #600 F16Feature: nss-myhostname by default - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/nssmyhostname (nirik, 18:51:54) * AGREED: feature is approved. (nirik, 18:55:31) * #601 F16 Feature: Perl5.14 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/perl5.14 (nirik, 18:55:40) * AGREED: feature is approved. (provided it passes wrangler) (nirik, 18:58:26) * Schedule for f16 (nirik, 18:58:49) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/16/Schedule (nirik, 18:59:23) * AGREED: FESCo is ok with the proposed schedule. (nirik, 19:07:22) * Open Floor (nirik, 19:07:27) Meeting ended at 19:14:52 UTC. Action Items Action Items, by person --- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * nirik (178) * mclasen (43) * rbergeron (36) * mjg59 (35) * notting (34) * mmaslano (33) * fenrus02 (26) * josef (25) * cwickert (24) * ajax (18) * zodbot (17) * pjones (13) * kylem (11) * gholms (9) * jsmith (8) * drago01 (4) * tibbs|h (3) * tatica (2) * abadger1999 (2) * nsoranzo (2) * Southern_Gentlem (1) * SMParrish (0) -- 17:30:01 nirik #startmeeting FESCO (2011-06-01) 17:30:01 zodbot Meeting started Wed Jun 1 17:30:01 2011 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:30:01 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:30:01 nirik #meetingname fesco 17:30:01 zodbot The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 17:30:01 nirik #chair mclasen notting nirik SMParrish kylem ajax cwickert mjg59 mmaslano 17:30:01 nirik #topic init process 17:30:01 zodbot Current chairs: SMParrish ajax cwickert kylem mclasen mjg59 mmaslano nirik notting 17:30:08 notting hello all 17:30:26 nirik morning everyone 17:30:36 kylem yo. 17:30:38 * mclasen is here for a change 17:30:52 mmaslano hello 17:31:22 * cwickert is here 17:31:52 nirik ok, I guess lets dive in. we have a pile of features today. ;) 17:31:58 nirik #topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags 17:31:58 nirik .fesco 563 17:32:00 zodbot nirik: #563 (suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/563 17:32:08 nirik I guess ajax was looking into this more... 17:32:35 tibbs|h This sounds like a packaging guideline. 17:33:18 nirik tibbs|h: well, we were going to just change default cflags... 17:33:34 nirik but apparently
Re: Potentially Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Charles A. Anderson
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 01:32:26PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: As more and more bugzapper F13 EOL mails continue to come in, I've had a look at some grab samples and have run into multiple bug reports for package ocp not having been responded to since 2010: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cra owns only two packages: flac123 ocp Last build in koji: 2010-08-09 Any news here? Working on it. Thanks, Charles R. Anderson -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File MIME-EncWords-1.012.2.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by xavierb
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MIME-EncWords: af4f75ddac63198bcaf92a117b06910c MIME-EncWords-1.012.2.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MIME-EncWords] update to 1.012.2
commit 2ba3ef26b09a92c0bcc49f8db6641d434f9e6b60
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Wed Jun 1 21:38:12 2011 +0200
update to 1.012.2
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MIME-EncWords.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index fc63bfb..8923351 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
MIME-EncWords-1.010.101.tar.gz
/MIME-EncWords-1.012.tar.gz
/MIME-EncWords-1.012.1.tar.gz
+/MIME-EncWords-1.012.2.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MIME-EncWords.spec b/perl-MIME-EncWords.spec
index 8caded1..424e5f2 100644
--- a/perl-MIME-EncWords.spec
+++ b/perl-MIME-EncWords.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-MIME-EncWords
-Version:1.012.1
+Version:1.012.2
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words (improved)
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2011 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 1.012.2-1
+- Update to 1.012.2.
+
* Mon May 30 2011 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 1.012.1-1
- Update to 1.012.1.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index d07ce66..a5fb278 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6946c79212148102b1ca9440883bf523 MIME-EncWords-1.012.1.tar.gz
+af4f75ddac63198bcaf92a117b06910c MIME-EncWords-1.012.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01) (corrected)
Sorry about that, the minutes were cut off. Here's the complete log: kevin -- 17:30:01 nirik #startmeeting FESCO (2011-06-01) 17:30:01 zodbot Meeting started Wed Jun 1 17:30:01 2011 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:30:01 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:30:01 nirik #meetingname fesco 17:30:01 zodbot The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 17:30:01 nirik #chair mclasen notting nirik SMParrish kylem ajax cwickert mjg59 mmaslano 17:30:01 nirik #topic init process 17:30:01 zodbot Current chairs: SMParrish ajax cwickert kylem mclasen mjg59 mmaslano nirik notting 17:30:08 notting hello all 17:30:26 nirik morning everyone 17:30:36 kylem yo. 17:30:38 * mclasen is here for a change 17:30:52 mmaslano hello 17:31:22 * cwickert is here 17:31:52 nirik ok, I guess lets dive in. we have a pile of features today. ;) 17:31:58 nirik #topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags 17:31:58 nirik .fesco 563 17:32:00 zodbot nirik: #563 (suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/563 17:32:08 nirik I guess ajax was looking into this more... 17:32:35 tibbs|h This sounds like a packaging guideline. 17:33:18 nirik tibbs|h: well, we were going to just change default cflags... 17:33:34 nirik but apparently there's a bug in the toolchain somewhere with one of them, so we didn't yet. 17:34:20 nirik ajax: any news on ticket 563? 17:34:24 nirik .fesco 563 17:34:28 zodbot nirik: #563 (suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/563 17:34:47 ajax not that i've heard. i'll follow up. 17:34:51 tibbs|h At one time ajax had submitted a guideline draft surrounding PIE. 17:35:00 ajax PIC, not PIE. 17:35:17 tibbs|h Ah, right, that was a static library thing. 17:36:03 nirik ok, will revisit... 17:36:12 nirik #topic Features - Introduction/general comments 17:36:20 nirik so, we have a bunch of features today. 17:36:37 nirik I'd like to note that mether pointed out that many of our features lack reasonable docs/release notes. 17:36:47 * mclasen scrambles to find the agenda 17:37:00 nirik I don't know if we want to push back on this more today or not, but thought I would mention it. 17:37:24 nirik Also, I think there's some folks ( rbergeron and abadger1999 at least I think) that were interested in revamping our feature process. 17:37:39 nirik that won't of course affect anything today, but thought I would mention it. 17:37:49 nirik Anyone have general feature comments before we start on them? 17:38:04 mmaslano rbergeron: ^ 17:38:18 abadger1999 Yeah we ewere interested but haven't gotten our act together. 17:38:31 abadger1999 I'll let rbergeron lead on that since she's the current feature wrangler :-) 17:38:45 * nirik thinks it needs revamping too, but also has not had time to do anything about it. 17:39:31 nirik ok, diving in then... 17:39:32 mclasen I think we can do better if we look at different features differently 17:39:32 mmaslano we should care more about changes. New packages like cloud feature could be only mentioned in release notes 17:39:51 mmaslano mclasen: I agree 17:39:51 mclasen there cleanups, version updates, default changes,... 17:40:07 nirik yeah, I think things that are release notes/docs/press should be a bit different from things that need coordination, etc. 17:40:10 nirik mclasen: yep. 17:40:12 gholms How about feature removals? 17:40:35 nirik gholms: like removing hal? 17:40:41 gholms Hal, Xen, you-name-it 17:40:59 mjg59 Hey, sorry 17:41:16 nirik sure, it would be good to note those for rel-notes, etc too. 17:41:27 mmaslano two categories will be enough. Could break other packages, can't break. 17:42:02 nirik anyhow, dunno if we can redo the process here today, but do be thinking about it and coming up with proposals to fix it. 17:42:36 mmaslano probably not, wait for rbergeron 17:42:55 nirik #topic #589 Porting from sysVinit init scripts to systemd unit files 17:42:55 nirik .fesco 589 17:42:56 zodbot nirik: #589 (Porting from sysVinit init scripts to systemd unit files) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/589 17:43:16 nirik https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd 17:44:02 nirik this was one mether noted about release notes I think. 17:44:46 nirik I'd add that we should submit our systemd units files upstream as well as they are made. 17:45:30 nirik votes? comments? 17:45:33 mmaslano I'm not sure if all units files will be created on time. 17:45:43 mmaslano Do they have any tracker? 17:45:52 mclasen https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability ? 17:45:59 mjg59 Expecting 100% completion in 6 months would probably be unrealistic 17:46:04 mjg59 But I think it's something to aim for 17:46:18 nirik yeah, I'm sure there will be stragglers... 17:46:46 gholms I don't see anything in
Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)
On 1 Jun 2011 19:44, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I still get regular kernel abrt crashes on resume. Is it even marked stable in the upstream kernel yet? Have you filed bugs for these crashes? Yes. Well at least I've submitted them using abrt to wherever is sends the kernel crash dumps. Not done a manual separate bug though. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)
Peter Robinson wrote: Yes. Well at least I've submitted them using abrt to wherever is sends the kernel crash dumps. Not done a manual separate bug though. If you add the BZ#s here or CC Josef on them I'm sure he'd be glad to help. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Installing bash-completion by default in F-16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647 I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is out. Why I'm writing here is that I'd like to hear opinions to which default-installed comps group should it be added (and set as default there) - in my opinion the serious candidates are admin-tools and base. admin-tools doesn't sound right because bash-completion is not really an admin tool (unless one considers interactive shell usage as admin activity in general), so I'm inclined to add it to base. Thoughts? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Appointment to the Fedora Board and reminder of upcoming elections
The Fedora Board consists of five elected seats and four appointed seats. In this elections cycle, there will be two openings for appointed Board seats and three opening for elected Board seats. As part of the normal Board succession process[0], one Board appointment is made before Board elections and the other is made after the election cycle. I'm happy to announce that Guillermo Gomez has accepted the responsibility of serving on the Fedora Board. Guillermo has demonstrated his commitment to Fedora through his tireless efforts on a number of different fronts, including working on packaging, development, and ambassador programs. He has also shown his ability to mentor new contributors and help grow the Fedora community. I have no doubt that he'll continue these efforts while on the Board, and that he'll bring his perspective to help the Board as it makes decisions affecting the direction that Fedora takes. I would like to publicly thank Guillermo for his willingness to serve, and I hope the entire Fedora community will join me in welcoming him to the Board. Guillermo will fill seat A4 (see the Board History[1] for a list of the seats), which has been held by Stephen Smoogen for the past year. I'd also like to take this opportunity to publicly thank Stephen for the work he's done on behalf of the Fedora Board. Elections for the three open elected seats on the Board (as well as FESCo elections) will begin on June 2nd at UTC 0001, as shown on the Fedora wiki's Elections page[2]. All community members are encouraged to cast their vote until the elections close at the end of the day (UTC time) on June 8th. Within a week or two of the end of elections, another appointment will be made for the remaining Board seat (seat A3). If you have interest in serving on the Fedora Board, please don't hesitate to contact me directly to indicate your willingness to serve. [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/SuccessionPlanning [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/History [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections -- Jared Smith Fedora Project Leader ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: tomboy orphaned
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: It doesn't integrate into GNOME 3 any more, since it relies on a panel applet and GNOME 3 doesn't support those. It seems to work really well in Gnome 3. The applet sits down in the notification bar (like empathy) and is almost as convenient to use as it used to be. I just wish I could figure out how to get it to start that way using gnome-session-properties ... it only seems to include a persistent notification bar icon if you start it after logging in. /Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
build system hung?
koji watch-task 3103524 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3103524 build (dist-rawhide, /mercurial:cd1aebcad31e13ea42fdf0d51be65eb7230ffc66): free nothing happening... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: build system hung?
On 2011-06-01 07:03:55 PM, Neal Becker wrote: koji watch-task 3103524 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3103524 build (dist-rawhide, /mercurial:cd1aebcad31e13ea42fdf0d51be65eb7230ffc66): free nothing happening... There was an unplanned outage for this yesterday and today: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-June/000803.html It's currently waiting on newRepo tasks before builds will go through again. Thanks, Ricky pgptjZ0upNNds.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: build system hung?
On 06/01/2011 04:03 PM, Neal Becker wrote: koji watch-task 3103524 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3103524 build (dist-rawhide, /mercurial:cd1aebcad31e13ea42fdf0d51be65eb7230ffc66): free nothing happening... Hi, Neal. According to Kevin Fenzi, the build system had an unplanned outage due to a needed fsck on the build hosts; and until that is complete, new builds will wait, queued. You can follow the status of this on the Fedora Infrastructure ticket below: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2800 I believe this is the cause of the hang you are experiencing. Hope that helps. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) pe...@thecodergeek.com Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F15 / VirtualBox
I've seen some reports of F15 not working in Virtualbox. There's a few notes online about possible fixes. Is there some way we can better test this in the future (I'm thinking about QA but that might not be the right place). Smolt has virtualbox rated as pretty common: http://smolts.org/static/stats/stats.html Just seems like we're potentially missing a lot of potential users there. It's preventing the default live CD from running. -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
memtest86+
Best I can tell the current version of memtest86+ in Fedora is v4.10 which is too old for Sandy Bridge which needs version v4.20. Anyone know if there is some reason we haven't updated to the current version (released January 2011) ? Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: memtest86+
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote: Best I can tell the current version of memtest86+ in Fedora is v4.10 which is too old for Sandy Bridge which needs version v4.20. Anyone know if there is some reason we haven't updated to the current version (released January 2011) ? Thanks. report a bug or send a e-mail to the package owner to update it. Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: memtest86+
On 06/01/2011 09:59 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: Best I can tell the current version of memtest86+ in Fedora is v4.10 which is too old for Sandy Bridge which needs version v4.20. Anyone know if there is some reason we haven't updated to the current version (released January 2011) ? This also means anyone using the memtest86+ from install (F15 or F14) will not be able to run it if they have Sandy Bridge - it just hangs. Probably worth noting that in the wiki somewhere too .. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)
On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 15:16:28 Kevin Fenzi wrote: 18:09:20 ajax would be good to expose some of the different features of BTRFS via anaconda. which? RAID. -- Garry Williams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Task-Perl-Critic-1.007.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Task-Perl-Critic: 0a1e57fd2eff60868f0fee7409f5d027 Task-Perl-Critic-1.007.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Task-Perl-Critic] Import
commit 65cb4ad57e98be09411254473b97cffb743c19f3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 1 09:23:10 2011 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec | 65
sources|1 +
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..26371d7 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Task-Perl-Critic-1.007.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec b/perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..ef6d266
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+Name: perl-Task-Perl-Critic
+Version:1.007
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Install everything Perl::Critic
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Group: Development/Libraries
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Task-Perl-Critic/
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/E/EL/ELLIOTJS/Task-Perl-Critic-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
+# Other requires from META.yml are not needed at build and check time. There
+# is no code, no provided modules. Do not BuildRequire them.
+# Tests only:
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.04
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(criticism) = 1.01
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic) = 1.085
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::Bangs) = 1.00
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::Compatibility) = 1.000
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::Lax) = 0.007
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::More) = 1.000
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::Nits) = 1.00
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::PetPeeves::JTRAMMELL) = 0.01
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp) = 3
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::Storable)
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::StricterSubs) = 0.03
+# Perl::Critic::Swift: 1.03 is decimal notion for 1.0.3 version
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::Swift) = 1.0.3
+Requires: perl(Perl::Critic::Tics) = 0.005
+Requires: perl(Test::Perl::Critic) = 1.01
+Requires: perl(Test::Perl::Critic::Progressive) = 0.02
+
+%description
+This module does nothing but act as a placeholder. See Task.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Task-Perl-Critic-%{version}
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor
+./Build
+
+%install
+./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+./Build test
+
+%files
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%changelog
+* Tue Jan 25 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 1.007-1
+- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
+- Do not BuildRequire run-time dependencies, they are not used at build and
+ check time indeed.
+- Remove BuildRoot stuff
+- Remove explicit defattr
+
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..571 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+0a1e57fd2eff60868f0fee7409f5d027 Task-Perl-Critic-1.007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Task-Perl-Critic] Change license of spec file.
commit 21e7d51b593a3b14cd412e375c6c3c537d3d9ceb
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 1 09:31:37 2011 +0200
Change license of spec file.
perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec b/perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec
index ef6d266..5f04fae 100644
--- a/perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec
+++ b/perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+# This file is licensed under the terms of GNU GPLv2+.
Name: perl-Task-Perl-Critic
Version:1.007
Release:1%{?dist}
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 709663] New: perl-Log-Log4perl-1.33 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Log-Log4perl-1.33 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709663 Summary: perl-Log-Log4perl-1.33 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-Log-Log4perl AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Latest upstream release: 1.33 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.32 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Log4perl/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 709666] New: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.012.2 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.012.2 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709666 Summary: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.012.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-MIME-EncWords AssignedTo: xav...@bachelot.org ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: xav...@bachelot.org, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Latest upstream release: 1.012.2 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.012.1 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MIME-EncWords/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 709664] New: perl-ORLite-1.49 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-ORLite-1.49 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709664 Summary: perl-ORLite-1.49 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-ORLite AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Latest upstream release: 1.49 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.48 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ORLite/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Log-Log4perl-1.33.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Log-Log4perl: 80478bfcc06890718375c126c3d84206 Log-Log4perl-1.33.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Log-Log4perl] 1.33 bump clean spec from defattr, clean section rm -rf
commit 2f5e63274112930b6e22c4a139a2d333d35c662a
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 1 12:59:18 2011 +0200
1.33 bump
clean spec from defattr, clean section rm -rf
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Log-Log4perl.spec | 12 +---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 9c16500..6c12f89 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
Log-Log4perl-1.24.tar.gz
/Log-Log4perl-1.30.tar.gz
/Log-Log4perl-1.32.tar.gz
+/Log-Log4perl-1.33.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec b/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec
index e52d8e5..476422b 100644
--- a/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec
+++ b/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Log-Log4perl
-Version:1.32
+Version:1.33
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Log4j implementation for Perl
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ find lib -name *.pm -exec chmod -c a-x {} ';'
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
@@ -53,12 +52,7 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null ';'
make test L4P_ALL_TESTS=1
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes LICENSE README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/*
@@ -67,6 +61,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Wed Jun 1 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.33-1
+- 1.33 bump
+- clean spec from defattr, clean section rm -rf
+
* Mon Feb 28 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 1.32-1
- 1.32 bump, bugfix release
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3d88e22..0b1a442 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a92ef7387e46923c14dc2020a00125ad Log-Log4perl-1.32.tar.gz
+80478bfcc06890718375c126c3d84206 Log-Log4perl-1.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 709663] perl-Log-Log4perl-1.33 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709663 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|psab...@redhat.com |mmasl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 709697] New: Please upgrade to MailTools 2.08
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please upgrade to MailTools 2.08 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709697 Summary: Please upgrade to MailTools 2.08 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-MailTools AssignedTo: p...@city-fan.org ReportedBy: j...@kamens.brookline.ma.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: p...@city-fan.org, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- The author of MailTools just uploaded 2.08 to CPAN. It should show up their publicly soon. Please upgrade. It's got a bug fix to allow messages to be sent from a Mail::Internet object using Net::SMTP::SSL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Perl 5.14
Now that Fedora 15 is out, I was hoping we would work perl 5.14 in rawhide quickly enough as to be able to fix all the resulting bugs in time for Fedora 16 release. Is anything planned? Emmanuel -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Perl 5.14
On 06/01/2011 03:28 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: Now that Fedora 15 is out, I was hoping we would work perl 5.14 in rawhide quickly enough as to be able to fix all the resulting bugs in time for Fedora 16 release. Is anything planned? Emmanuel On perl porters were reported serious bugs with 5.14.0, so we are waiting for 5.14.1 anyway. At the moment I and Petr are working on new filters, better generating of provides and requires and automatic script for rebuild of related packages. We'd like to push all changes in test build target in koji. Hopefully, this time it will be easier than rebuild for perl5.12. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/perl5.14 -- Marcela Mašláňová BaseOS team Brno -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File MailTools-2.08.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MailTools: 0245bf7985c6661e0cf31a59657a18f0 MailTools-2.08.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 613872] Request for support in EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613872 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-01 10:05:08 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '13'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MailTools] Update to 2.08 (#709697)
commit e1381314bc5a4ffb7f3d438655ce602a08284f13
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Jun 1 15:12:50 2011 +0100
Update to 2.08 (#709697)
- New upstream release 2.08:
- Respect errors on closing a Mail::Mailer::smtp/::smtps connection
- Mail::Internet should accept Net::SMTP::SSL as well (CPAN RT#68590)
- Document that Mail::Mailer::smtps needs Authen::SASL
- Use patch rather than iconv to convert docs to UTF8 encoding
.gitignore|2 +-
MailTools-2.08-UTF8.patch | 65 +
perl-MailTools.spec | 15 +++---
sources |2 +-
4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index eae87af..c5156d1 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/MailTools-2.07.tar.gz
+/MailTools-[0-9.]*.tar.gz
diff --git a/MailTools-2.08-UTF8.patch b/MailTools-2.08-UTF8.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..a41cbf8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/MailTools-2.08-UTF8.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+--- MailTools-2.08/ChangeLog 2011-06-01 12:55:38.0 +0100
MailTools-2.08/ChangeLog 2011-06-01 14:41:45.004502111 +0100
+@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
+ - express more clearly that Authen::SASL needs to be installed
+ manually if you need the functionality
+
+- - support for smtps via Net::SMTP::SSL, by [Maciej Żenczykowski]
++ - support for smtps via Net::SMTP::SSL, by [Maciej Żenczykowski]
+
+ version 2.05: Fri Dec 18 22:39:21 CET 2009
+
+@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
+ - Mail::Field::_require_dir complained on 5.10 about a closed
+ dirhandle. rt.cpan.org#37114 [Manuel Hecht]
+
+- - Bcc line removed before collecting addresses. [Jørgen Thomsen]
++ - Bcc line removed before collecting addresses. [Jørgen Thomsen]
+
+ Improvements:
+
+@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
+
+ Fixes:
+
+- - Netware needs to use smtp as well [Günter Knauf]
++ - Netware needs to use smtp as well [Günter Knauf]
+
+ - Mail::Field::extract() fixed. Reported by [Andrea Venturol]
+
+@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
+
+ - Extended explanation that Mail::Address is limited.
+
+- - Added examples/mail-mailer.pl, contributed by [Bruno Negrão]
++ - Added examples/mail-mailer.pl, contributed by [Bruno Negrão]
+
+ - use Mail::Mailer qw(mail) sets default mailer. Doc update by
+ [Slavan Rezic]
+@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
+
+ - [Erik Van Roode] Mail::Mailer::test.pm - Mail::Mailer::testfile.pm
+
+- - [Jérôme Dion] corrected the folding of lines: folds start only
++ - [Jérôme Dion] corrected the folding of lines: folds start only
+ with one blank according to rfc2822.
+
+ - Added a big warning against automatic sender email address
+@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@
+ time ago, broke the parser. As example
+ Mark Overmeer mailto...@overmeer.net (mailtools maintainer)
+ was parsed into two separate objects wrong.
+- [Nicholas Oxhøj] reversed the patch.
++ [Nicholas Oxhøj] reversed the patch.
+
+ version 1.47: Fri Jul 5 12:02:55 CEST 2002
+
+@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@
+ - check in $ENV{HOME} is defined
+
+ Mail::Address
+- - Fix capitalization problems with names like Ließegang
++ - Fix capitalization problems with names like LieÃegang
+
+ Change 290 on 1999/03/31 by gb...@pobox.com (Graham Barr)
+
diff --git a/perl-MailTools.spec b/perl-MailTools.spec
index 03caeb1..e265585 100644
--- a/perl-MailTools.spec
+++ b/perl-MailTools.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
Summary: Various mail-related perl modules
Name: perl-MailTools
-Version: 2.07
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Version: 2.08
+Release: 1%{?dist}
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MailTools/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MA/MARKOV/MailTools-%{version}.tar.gz
+Patch0:MailTools-2.08-UTF8.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
@@ -30,8 +31,7 @@ done
cd -
# Fix character encodings
-/usr/bin/iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf8 ChangeLog ChangeLog.utf8
-%{__mv} ChangeLog.utf8 ChangeLog
+%patch0 -p1
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ cd -
%{_mandir}/man3/Mail::Util.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Jun 1 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 2.08-1
+- Update to 2.08 (#709697)
+ - Respect errors on closing a Mail::Mailer::smtp/::smtps connection
+ - Mail::Internet should accept Net::SMTP::SSL as well (CPAN RT#68590)
+ - Document that Mail::Mailer::smtps needs Authen::SASL
+- Use patch rather than iconv to convert docs to UTF8 encoding
+
* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.07-2
- Rebuilt for
[perl-MailTools] Nobody else likes macros for commands
commit 5d8856b50476334cd40dc5f3f0a8ae4869483b17
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Jun 1 15:17:34 2011 +0100
Nobody else likes macros for commands
perl-MailTools.spec | 27 ++-
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MailTools.spec b/perl-MailTools.spec
index e265585..2b285f1 100644
--- a/perl-MailTools.spec
+++ b/perl-MailTools.spec
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ Group: Development/Libraries
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MailTools/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MA/MARKOV/MailTools-%{version}.tar.gz
Patch0:MailTools-2.08-UTF8.patch
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
BuildArch: noarch
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
BuildRequires: perl(Date::Format), perl(Date::Parse), perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More), perl(Test::Pod), perl = 3:5.8.1
@@ -22,33 +22,33 @@ MailTools is a set of Perl modules related to mail
applications.
# Set up example scripts
cd examples
for file in *.PL; do
- %{__perl} $file
+ perl $file
done
-%{__chmod} -x *_demo
+chmod -x *_demo
# Remove example-generation scripts, no longer needed
# It causes warnings from MakeMaker, but we don't care
-%{__rm} *.PL
+rm *.PL
cd -
# Fix character encodings
%patch0 -p1
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
-%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
-%{__make} pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
-/usr/bin/find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec %{__rm} -f {} ';'
-/usr/bin/find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec /bin/rmdir {} ';' 2/dev/null
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
+find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} ';' 2/dev/null
%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
%check
-%{__make} test
+make test
%clean
-%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ cd -
- Mail::Internet should accept Net::SMTP::SSL as well (CPAN RT#68590)
- Document that Mail::Mailer::smtps needs Authen::SASL
- Use patch rather than iconv to convert docs to UTF8 encoding
+- Nobody else likes macros for commands
* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.07-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Chart] (5 commits) ...Merge branch 'el6'
Summary of changes: e58f339... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 2c5eaeb... Initialize branch EL-6 for perl-Chart (*) d695411... dist-git conversion (*) f103aa5... Update to 2.4.2 (merge with master) 9d8648f... Merge branch 'el6' (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Chart: 4/5] Update to 2.4.2 (merge with master)
commit f103aa5e931fcc5435cb1b2fea156886e00a8eea
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Jun 1 16:36:34 2011 +0100
Update to 2.4.2 (merge with master)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Chart.spec | 30 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index d00acc3..bc598c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
Chart-2.4.1.tar.gz
+/Chart-2.4.2.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Chart.spec b/perl-Chart.spec
index e9e4af1..9a61f4b 100644
--- a/perl-Chart.spec
+++ b/perl-Chart.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Name: perl-Chart
-Version:2.4.1
-Release:8%{?dist}
-Summary:Perl module for producing many types of charts
+Version:2.4.2
+Release:3%{?dist}
+Summary:Series of charting modules
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Chart/
@@ -9,12 +9,13 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/C/CH/CHARTGRP/Chart-%{version}.ta
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-#BuildRequires: perl(GD) = 1.20
BuildRequires: perl(GD)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%description
-%{summary}.
+This module is an attempt to build a general purpose graphing module that
+is easily modified and expanded. Chart uses Lincoln Stein's GD module for
+all of its graphics primitives calls.
%prep
%setup -q -n Chart-%{version}
@@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
+rm -rf t/{mountain.t,mountain_2.t}
make test
%clean
@@ -48,6 +50,24 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/Chart.3*
%changelog
+* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.4.2-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
+
+* Wed Dec 15 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.4.2-2
+- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
+
+* Sun Dec 12 2010 Steven Pritchard st...@kspei.com 2.4.2-1
+- Update to 2.4.2.
+- Improve Summary and description.
+- Use PERL_INSTALL_ROOT instead of DESTDIR while installing.
+
+* Fri Apr 30 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.4.1-10
+- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
+- remove two tests failing
+
+* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 2.4.1-9
+- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
+
* Sat Jul 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.4.1-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e866e60..1b823dc 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5e7a80badfb8bf6e29b21879689bcc2f Chart-2.4.1.tar.gz
+a75183d33b58f77e2e717165b93dbf79 Chart-2.4.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Chart: 5/5] Merge branch 'el6'
commit 9d8648f7897af0c9e50f1a8d71fafe4b10bcb95b Merge: b606ea1 f103aa5 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Wed Jun 1 16:37:39 2011 +0100 Merge branch 'el6' --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Chart/el6] (10 commits) ...Merge branch 'el6'
Summary of changes: a206114... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) d688ada... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*) 78fb8a7... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) 418ca95... Fix failure. (*) 201457c... dist-git conversion (*) 56a6f21... Update to 2.4.2. Improve Summary and description. Use PERL_ (*) 1dd4d64... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*) b606ea1... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*) f103aa5... Update to 2.4.2 (merge with master) (*) 9d8648f... Merge branch 'el6' (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-SSLGlue/f15] update to 0.7
commit b33edcbae50234977a70e06af0f7038398df84ec
Author: remi fed...@famillecollet.com
Date: Thu Jun 2 07:50:18 2011 +0200
update to 0.7
.gitignore|5 +++--
perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5049d1e..2ef3a31 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
-Net-SSLGlue-0.4.tar.gz
-/Net-SSLGlue-0.5.tar.gz
+*~
+/Net-SSLGlue-0.6.tar.gz
+/Net-SSLGlue-0.7.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec b/perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec
index d8d8009..5d20ba2 100644
--- a/perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Net-SSLGlue
-Version:0.5
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.7
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2011 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com - 0.7-1
+- update to 0.7
+
* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.5-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 004df5c..bbb7e46 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-aad39c1ddf23e8fa659d60036de2a1cd Net-SSLGlue-0.5.tar.gz
+c30d3f7ed486eff0d7c0bef9421cebbe Net-SSLGlue-0.7.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
