Re: To Require or not to Require?
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:30:10 +0100, MG (Matthew) wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:26:33AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 04:40:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: Upstream can change the ABI as much as they want without bumping the SONAME providing that the old interfaces are also present. It's entirely possible to end up with a situation where external binaries built against 1.0.1 won't run on 1.0.0 - the problem isn't limited to subpackages. Sure. But in this case, upstream isn't changing the public ABI. It's a different level of mistake that's being practiced here. What difference does it make? Even if you stick to the public ABI you can't guarantee that a matching SONAME is sufficient. You need to depend on the package version you build against. With the difference that a library subpackage dependency can be _exact_ always, being an equal to dependency on full NEVR and staying correct throughout the lifetime of this package set. On the contrary, any separate package could at most depend on a library package with a = dependency on full NEV (or NEVR), or else a minor version upgrade of the lib would break that dependency already. The dependency would still only be a snapshot made at some point in time, which would not be refreshed with updates of the library package, and which would still not protect against unexpected accidental ABI/API changes in future library updates -- and not against Epoch bumps either (e.g. with an Epoch bump, 1.0.0 suddenly would be larger than 1.0.1 as required by the external program package). An equal to dep on full NEVR (not even NEV might suffice) would be an expensive work-around only, because it forces packages to be rebuilt for every minor lib update. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: To Require or not to Require?
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:08:50 -0400, SS (Simo) wrote: If rpmbuild does not add an implicit requires with libraryX = version we built against then it is certainly broken. One could also argue that an activity like yum install ... ought to search for and apply the latest available updates of needed packages. Such behaviour has been rejected some years ago, if memory serves correctly. [Obviously. Because if something provides SONAME and is installed already, it can be assumed that it isn't necessary to look for something newer that also provides SONAME. A matter of definition. In the buildsys we build against latest packages, so it would be natural to let package installers drag in updates always, too -- instead of adding extra deps everywhere, which aren't future-proof.] -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [PATCH] macros: Globally add --disable-silent-rules to configure
Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:45:15 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote: If a package fails to build in a mass rebuild because -Werror was enabled then that's additional work for several people to fix something that may not have ever actually been broken. 99% of warnings will not lead to user visible bugs. Finding that remaining 1% of bugs (warnings) takes more than 100x time than to fix the warnings. I base my -Werror recommendation on this assumption, YMMV. Nice argument. I agree wholeheartedly with your numbers and with the recommendation to use -Werror and as many -W___ options as you/upstream can bear. However, it does depend on the version of gcc you use, especially if you use some of the newer warning options. Not too long ago, coreutils was getting invalid warning/errors from F15's gcc 4.6.x. Luckily, the bug was fixed in gcc-4.7.x, so I opted to use the newer gcc and retain those rather aggressive warnings. Besides, they're enabled only when you configure coreutils with --enable-gcc-warnings. Whether to invest in enabling -Werror for all packages in a mass rebuild however is another question. There will be many build failures, and some will be unwarranted. Having non-upstream take time to avoid the warnings may not be productive, since there are many ways to avoid them, and the way you choose may not suit upstream. Also, do you want to invest in avoiding warnings that affect only test-related code? That said, if there are thick-skinned volunteers with the expertise and enough time/energy, enabling -Werror globally (or even in a few selected packages) and addressing failures would be great. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [PATCH] macros: Globally add --disable-silent-rules to configure
On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Whether to invest in enabling -Werror for all packages in a mass rebuild however is another question. Pardon, but this is not a question, this is beyond reason and foolish. There will be many build failures, and some will be unwarranted. Exactly ... and ... depending upon the gcc version, OS and architecture being in use, many of them will be bogus. That said, if there are thick-skinned volunteers with the expertise and enough time/energy, enabling -Werror globally (or even in a few selected packages) and addressing failures would be great. Well, I don't see any thing great in this proposal - I find is silly and not even close to being discussworthy. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
Hi there, Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases? It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step. Any thoughts? -Ilyes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases? It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step. Any thoughts? Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:23 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases? It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step. Any thoughts? Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide report: 20110813 changes
Compose started at Sat Aug 13 08:15:29 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcryptui.so.0()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26()(64bit) assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) bluetile-0.5.3-11.fc16.x86_64 requires ghc(xmonad-contrib-0.9.2) = 0:d669bbdb9b9f7adb145fcb61825dec73 cluster-snmp-0.18.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires rvm-tools coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-18.noarch requires comoonics-base-py comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-24.noarch requires comoonics-base-py contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1 contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.10()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-applet dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-5.fc15.noarch requires gwave exaile-0.3.2.1-1.fc16.noarch requires hal fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libgvc.so.5 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libgraph.so.4 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libcdt.so.4 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgvc.so.5()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.4()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libcdt.so.4()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgeos-3.2.1.so()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_signals-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) flaw-1.2.4-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libSDL_gfx.so.0()(64bit) fldigi-3.21.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk_images.so.1.1()(64bit) fldigi-3.21.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) flush-0.9.10-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) flush-0.9.10-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) flush-0.9.10-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_signals-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) flush-0.9.10-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) fuse-encfs-1.7.4-1.fc16.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.1 fuse-encfs-1.7.4-1.fc16.i686 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.46.1 fuse-encfs-1.7.4-1.fc16.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.1 fuse-encfs-1.7.4-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) fuse-encfs-1.7.4-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) fuse-encfs-1.7.4-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) garden-1.0.8-3.fc15.x86_64 requires liballeg.so.4.2()(64bit) glom-1.18.3-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libepc-1.0.so.2()(64bit) glom-libs-1.18.3-1.fc16.i686 requires libepc-1.0.so.2 glom-libs-1.18.3-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libepc-1.0.so.2()(64bit) gmediaserver-0.13.0-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libupnp.so.3()(64bit) gmediaserver-0.13.0-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1-2.fc12.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.i686 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point. So? You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it. Sure. I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point. So? You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: conflict in packages in fedora 15
does tags: f17 in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=257227 it's not pushed to 15, not even to 16 $ repoquery --whatrequires netxen-firmware netxen-firmware-0:4.0.534-4.fc15.noarch what packages requires this netxen-firmware ? just itslef ? can't get it -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
Ilyes Gouta wrote: I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. According to PathScale's license document their products are partly free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts? Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: conflict in packages in fedora 15
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:14:38 +0300, MA (Muayyad) wrote: does tags: f17 in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=257227 it's not pushed to 15, not even to 16 No, it isn't. Is it a major problem to you? Do you need that firmware? Did you try to install it? Or was it installed on your machine by Anaconda, the Fedora installer? The firmware is available in the linux-firmware package, too, which is installed on all machines. http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/netxen-firmware http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/linux-firmware in case you want to submit a bug report. I don't know since when this file conflict exists, but only https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/linux-firmware-20110601-1.fc15 has been updated in June, which may have altered the file. I assume none of the testers had the netxen-firmware package installed. $ repoquery --whatrequires netxen-firmware netxen-firmware-0:4.0.534-4.fc15.noarch what packages requires this netxen-firmware ? just itslef ? can't get it Yes, according to the repoquery it is fully optional. Unlike the linux-firmware package, which is required by the kernel, for example. And the netxen-firmware package is not listed in the comps.xml file either. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200
Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora.
According to PathScale's license document their products are partly
free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free
parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts?
Björn Persson
http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath4-open-source-announcement
June 13th, 2011
PathScale announced today that the EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite is now
available as an open source project and free download for Linux,
FreeBSD and Solaris. This release includes documentation and the
complete development stack, including compiler, debugger, assembler,
runtimes and standard libraries. EKOPath is the product of years of
ongoing development, representing one of the industries highest
performance Intel 64 and AMD C, C++ and Fortran compilers.
The sources seem to be available at
https://github.com/path64
The compiler part is GPLv3, the debugger is CDDL. I tried to get the
compiler packaged for a few hours, but ran into some problems in the
build phase; the compiler segfaulted in the bootstrap phase. This was
on Fedora 15. My spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to
build.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
# Git snapshot version
%global gitver 20326a5
# Version of system GCC
%global gccver 4.6
Name: path64-compiler
Version: 4.0.10
Release: 1.%{gitver}git%{?dist}
Summary: PathScale EKOPath compiler suite
Group: Development/Languages
License: GPLv3
URL: http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath-compiler-suite
# Tarball got from https://github.com/path64/compiler/tarball/4.0.10
# it is automatically generated, so checksums might not match
Source0: path64-compiler-%{version}-0-g%{gitver}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
ExclusiveArch: x86_64 %{ix86}
BuildRequires: cmake
BuildRequires: gcc-gfortran
BuildRequires: glibc-static%{?_isa}
%description
The PathScale® EKOPath Compiler Suite offers programmers a rich set of tools
and one of the world's most sophisticated optimization infrastructures to
maximize program performance on any Intel® 64 or AMD64 platform supporting
Intel® MMXâ¢, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AMD SSE4A and AVX.
* Intel® 64 AMD64 performance tuned
* ISO C99/C++ 2003 GNU compatible
* Fortran 90/95 and 2003
* Industry proven robustness and quality
%prep
%setup -q -n %{name}-%{gitver}
%build
mkdir objdir-%{_target_platform}
cd objdir-%{_target_platform}
gccdir=`echo %{_target_platform} | sed 's|-gnu||g'`
gccdir=/usr/lib/gcc/$gccdir/%{gccver}
%ifarch x86_64
export plat=x86_64
%else
export plat=x86_32
%endif
# The build will use the compiled compiler. Need to remove GNU specific flags from OPTFLAGS
#export CFLAGS=`echo %{optflags} | sed s|-fstack-protector||g;s|--param=ssp-buffer-size=4||g;s|-mtune=generic||g`
export CFLAGS=-Wall
export CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
export FFLAGS=$CFLAGS
%{cmake} \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_TARGETS=${plat} \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_MATHLIBS=ON \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_FORTRAN=ON \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_HUGEPAGES=ON \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_OPENMP=ON \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DPSC_CRT_PATH_${plat}=%{_libdir} \
%ifarch x86_64
-DPSC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_${plat}=/%{_lib}/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 \
%else
-DPSC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_${plat}=/%{_lib}/ld-linux.so.2 \
%endif
-DPSC_CRT_PATH_${plat}=%{_libdir} \
-DPSC_LIBSUPCPP_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
-DPSC_LIBSTDCPP_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
-DPSC_LIBGCC_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
-DPSC_LIBGCC_EH_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
-DPSC_LIBGCC_S_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
..
#make %{?_smp_mflags} VERBOSE=1
make VERBOSE=1
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
make -C objdir-%{_target_platform} install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc
%changelog
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F-16 Branched report: 20110813 changes
Compose started at Sat Aug 13 13:15:22 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_regex-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_regex-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_regex-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libGLEW.so.1.5 OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_python-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_regex-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.5()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_python-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) QuantLib-test-1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.46.1()(64bit) acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcryptui.so.0()(64bit) 1:anerley-0.2.14-7.fc16.i686 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26 1:anerley-0.2.14-7.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26()(64bit) apvlv-0.0.9.8-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libpoppler.so.13()(64bit) apvlv-0.0.9.8-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libpoppler-glib.so.6()(64bit) assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.9-7.fc16.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.1()(64bit) cluster-snmp-0.18.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires rvm-tools coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) collectd-snmp-4.10.3-7.fc16.x86_64 requires
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
We should also target and package a clearly stated and defined (features) version of the compiler, that has been tested and validated. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote: Ilyes Gouta wrote: I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. According to PathScale's license document their products are partly free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts? Björn Persson http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath4-open-source-announcement June 13th, 2011 PathScale announced today that the EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite is now available as an open source project and free download for Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris. This release includes documentation and the complete development stack, including compiler, debugger, assembler, runtimes and standard libraries. EKOPath is the product of years of ongoing development, representing one of the industries highest performance Intel 64 and AMD C, C++ and Fortran compilers. The sources seem to be available at https://github.com/path64 The compiler part is GPLv3, the debugger is CDDL. I tried to get the compiler packaged for a few hours, but ran into some problems in the build phase; the compiler segfaulted in the bootstrap phase. This was on Fedora 15. My spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to build. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
wicd unuseable if NetworkManager still installed?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until NetworkManager gets remove completely from the system? - -- Regards, Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk5Gn7QACgkQ/zGbOvPHkcJ5UgD9H+SGjg6o0v13Qpkl0JMiOzvg Ot2/0fIh/Mizkh1NxYYBAOb25pi1su+5ZnRaNEMKZ0sJKatIfFBFfHXoALr8p60C =5YxK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [PATCH] macros: Globally add --disable-silent-rules to configure
Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Whether to invest in enabling -Werror for all packages in a mass rebuild however is another question. Pardon, but this is not a question, this is beyond reason and foolish. There will be many build failures, and some will be unwarranted. Exactly ... and ... depending upon the gcc version, OS and architecture being in use, many of them will be bogus. That said, if there are thick-skinned volunteers with the expertise and enough time/energy, enabling -Werror globally (or even in a few selected packages) and addressing failures would be great. Well, I don't see any thing great in this proposal - I find is silly and not even close to being discussworthy. Hi Ralf, Your opinion might carry more weight if you backed up your abrasive comments with data, code or anything else that might be construed as constructive. Toning down the abrasiveness (or, gasp! even trying to seem pleasant) would also have the advantage of encouraging people to participate rather than pushing them away. Whether to use -Werror as proposed really is not a black and white issue. It all depends on which warnings are enabled along with -Werror. Obviously, if you enable no other warning option, then there's no risk at all. If we're talking about just a few that are carefully chosen to minimize false positives, then a large percentage of the resulting build failures will correspond to real bugs. I'd start with -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 and something like this subset of -Wall: -Warray-bounds -Wchar-subscripts -Wsequence-point That's just off the top of my head, since those are useful and, IME, seldom provoke false positives. Note also that if you choose carefully, then compiler/glibc versions need not come into play. It's only if you choose brand new (or otherwise unstable) warning options that the version of the compiler matters. Once you've resolved all of those, start adding ones like -Wformat=2 that, while still very useful, do evoke more false positives. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: wicd unuseable if NetworkManager still installed?
On 08/13/2011 09:30 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until NetworkManager gets remove completely from the system? What SELinux errors? Do you have a bug report? Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: wicd unuseable if NetworkManager still installed?
Am 13.08.2011 20:25, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 08/13/2011 09:30 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until NetworkManager gets remove completely from the system? What SELinux errors? Do you have a bug report? Rahul Mainly the following ones: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730479 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730482 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730483 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730484 The anoying thing is that restoring the context doesn't the problem because it seems that they are set back to there old values on every boot. So the selinux errors are raised after every boot. -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Single remaining F16 Alpha blocker bug is in rpm, and needs help
Hey, folks. We're down to a single confirmed blocker without a fix preventing us composing Fedora 16 Alpha RC4, but it's in rpm and we haven't really had much feed-in from the rpm maintainers. Can anyone who thinks they could play an rpm developer on TV please take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728707 and see if you can help? It seems the issue is to do with rpm's handling of directory names in file lists: it treats /some/path/ and /some/path differently, and winds up removing the directory if the entry changes from one format to the other...this combined with a bug in one specific rpm build which appended a trailing / to the file list entry for any directory in the package, even if the spec didn't specify one, to cause trouble. Details are in the bug, thanks to Kalev Lember for some of the investigative work on this one. thanks all! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Strange rpath behavior
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for uwsgi server in this ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682704 however I am trying to fix the rpath issues I commented there because otherwise i think it simply won't pass. I am faced with some... weird behavior. The software does not use the standard configure/makefile approach, instead it is built using a python program (uwsiconfig.py) to decide what flags it should use, then simply calls them (os.system(bla)) to build it. When I build the package using the python program I get warnings about rpath being present (sure enough I inspect the binaries and I can see /usr/lib64 in there) but, when I basically pipe the output of the program to another shell file (sans comments) and execute that shell file, I get no warning whatsoever and /usr/lib64 is nowhere to be found in the binaries. Now, I could cheat and patch uwsgiconfig.py to write the shell script instead of calling os.system (actually I have a patch/spec I just tested and works just fine) but that sounds like bad form. Can any of you veterans tell me why this is happening? My initial thought would be: python _has_ rpath issues, which the binaries inherit because they are compiled under python's scope Thoughts? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Strange rpath behavior
Jorge Gallegos wrote, at 08/14/2011 09:22 AM +9:00: Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for uwsgi server in this ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682704 however I am trying to fix the rpath issues I commented there because otherwise i think it simply won't pass. I am faced with some... weird behavior. The software does not use the standard configure/makefile approach, instead it is built using a python program (uwsiconfig.py) to decide what flags it should use, then simply calls them (os.system(bla)) to build it. When I build the package using the python program I get warnings about rpath being present (sure enough I inspect the binaries and I can see /usr/lib64 in there) but, when I basically pipe the output of the program to another shell file (sans comments) and execute that shell file, I get no warning whatsoever and /usr/lib64 is nowhere to be found in the binaries. Now, I could cheat and patch uwsgiconfig.py to write the shell script instead of calling os.system (actually I have a patch/spec I just tested and works just fine) but that sounds like bad form. Can any of you veterans tell me why this is happening? My initial thought would be: python _has_ rpath issues, which the binaries inherit because they are compiled under python's scope Thoughts? Only commenting about rpath issue here (fixing packaging issues is also needed). Try finding LD_RUN_PATH string in uwsgi source. This string is actually there and this causes rpath to be embedded in built binaries. Note that there seems some API change in jansson and your srpm won't build in F-16 currently. Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Devel-PatchPerl-0.48.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-PatchPerl: 1c5634d246f401d8195dae4d024f9aea Devel-PatchPerl-0.48.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-PatchPerl] update to 0.48
commit 7fb835ea231ae548719377736fa79ca37f330a8b
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 09:56:47 2011 +0200
update to 0.48
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 05267b9..9bc8c48 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.30.tar.gz
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.36.tar.gz
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.40.tar.gz
+/Devel-PatchPerl-0.48.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec b/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
index e788453..9089c8a 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Devel-PatchPerl
-Version:0.40
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:0.48
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.48-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Sun Jun 19 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.40-3
- Perl mass rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 78ce0fb..c110b54 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-aebf7bb245dcc67c17bc85a1ec491e57 Devel-PatchPerl-0.40.tar.gz
+1c5634d246f401d8195dae4d024f9aea Devel-PatchPerl-0.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-PatchPerl/el6] perl(File::pushd) is available now on ppc64
commit a513933d574702ba2ce5eae9c2a73e20ea41a3f5
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 10:04:00 2011 +0200
perl(File::pushd) is available now on ppc64
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec b/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
index 4743728..1598a5f 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Devel-PatchPerl
Version:0.40
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
Requires: perl(File::pushd) = 1.00
Requires: perl(IPC::Cmd) = 0.40
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
-# perl(File::pushd) isn't available in RHEL6 ppc64
-ExcludeArch:ppc64
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -52,6 +50,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.40-2
+- perl(File::pushd) is available now on ppc64
+
* Fri Jun 10 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.40-1
- update to latest upstream version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-PatchPerl/el6] update to 0.48 (cherry picked from commit 7fb835ea231ae548719377736fa79ca37f330a8b)
commit b848cdab7b6d99650f8dc06dd6a2e62a927e96b5
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 09:56:47 2011 +0200
update to 0.48
(cherry picked from commit 7fb835ea231ae548719377736fa79ca37f330a8b)
Conflicts:
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 05267b9..9bc8c48 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.30.tar.gz
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.36.tar.gz
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.40.tar.gz
+/Devel-PatchPerl-0.48.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec b/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
index 1598a5f..abf6afa 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Devel-PatchPerl
-Version:0.40
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.48
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.48-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.40-2
- perl(File::pushd) is available now on ppc64
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 78ce0fb..c110b54 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-aebf7bb245dcc67c17bc85a1ec491e57 Devel-PatchPerl-0.40.tar.gz
+1c5634d246f401d8195dae4d024f9aea Devel-PatchPerl-0.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-PatchPerl/f16] update to 0.48
Summary of changes: 7fb835e... update to 0.48 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-PatchPerl/f15] (3 commits) ...update to 0.48
Summary of changes: cda65c0... Perl mass rebuild (*) bd3c92b... Perl mass rebuild (*) 7fb835e... update to 0.48 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-PatchPerl/f14] (3 commits) ...update to 0.48
Summary of changes: cda65c0... Perl mass rebuild (*) bd3c92b... Perl mass rebuild (*) 7fb835e... update to 0.48 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-PatchPerl/el5] update to 0.48 (cherry picked from commit 7fb835ea231ae548719377736fa79ca37f330a8b)
commit 2b494847d055ec990a9572990f1c8ec376ca977a
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 09:56:47 2011 +0200
update to 0.48
(cherry picked from commit 7fb835ea231ae548719377736fa79ca37f330a8b)
Conflicts:
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 05267b9..9bc8c48 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.30.tar.gz
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.36.tar.gz
/Devel-PatchPerl-0.40.tar.gz
+/Devel-PatchPerl-0.48.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec b/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
index e907f1c..f667782 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Devel-PatchPerl
-Version:0.40
+Version:0.48
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.48-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Fri Jun 10 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.40-1
- update to latest upstream version
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 78ce0fb..c110b54 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-aebf7bb245dcc67c17bc85a1ec491e57 Devel-PatchPerl-0.40.tar.gz
+1c5634d246f401d8195dae4d024f9aea Devel-PatchPerl-0.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perlbrew: f1c4dd8dca73b0338c896b4a56e112d9 App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 04:30:50 EDT --- perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 04:30:21 EDT --- perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 04:30:36 EDT --- perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 04:30:43 EDT --- perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 04:30:29 EDT --- perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.48-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew] update to 0.28
commit c9529b718f49d0dd2d733281d91fc5b552921cf3
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 10:41:02 2011 +0200
update to 0.28
.gitignore|1 +
perlbrew.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ca48836..8749060 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
/App-perlbrew-0.23.tar.gz
/App-perlbrew-0.24.tar.gz
/App-perlbrew-0.27.tar.gz
+/App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index 876a1da..86e6359 100644
--- a/perlbrew.spec
+++ b/perlbrew.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perlbrew
-Version:0.27
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:0.28
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Manage perl installations in your $HOME
License:MIT
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.0
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::PatchPerl)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path::Tiny)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Path::Class)
@@ -61,6 +62,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.28-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Thu Jul 21 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 0.27-3
- Perl mass rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 1694f5e..fd65df7 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-cfe29d49235c6f37e7a155d457579e12 App-perlbrew-0.27.tar.gz
+f1c4dd8dca73b0338c896b4a56e112d9 App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew/f16] update to 0.28
Summary of changes: c9529b7... update to 0.28 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew/f15] (3 commits) ...update to 0.28
Summary of changes: a607a31... Perl mass rebuild (*) 7163626... Perl mass rebuild (*) c9529b7... update to 0.28 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew/f14] update to 0.28 (cherry picked from commit c9529b718f49d0dd2d733281d91fc5b552921cf3)
commit e4e027bd593bd6bdfdee9c323f7d850741be6f46
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 10:41:02 2011 +0200
update to 0.28
(cherry picked from commit c9529b718f49d0dd2d733281d91fc5b552921cf3)
Conflicts:
perlbrew.spec
.gitignore|1 +
perlbrew.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ca48836..8749060 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
/App-perlbrew-0.23.tar.gz
/App-perlbrew-0.24.tar.gz
/App-perlbrew-0.27.tar.gz
+/App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index ac9b650..834fa94 100644
--- a/perlbrew.spec
+++ b/perlbrew.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perlbrew
-Version:0.27
+Version:0.28
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Manage perl installations in your $HOME
License:MIT
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.0
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::PatchPerl)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path::Tiny)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Path::Class)
@@ -62,6 +63,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.28-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Wed Jul 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.27-1
- update to latest upstream
- BR perl(File::Temp)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 1694f5e..fd65df7 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-cfe29d49235c6f37e7a155d457579e12 App-perlbrew-0.27.tar.gz
+f1c4dd8dca73b0338c896b4a56e112d9 App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew/el5] update to 0.28
commit dd74a40df3286b4fa5e476ad2fe9a8072d8e9676
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 11:05:37 2011 +0200
update to 0.28
.gitignore|2 ++
perlbrew.spec |7 ++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 97d3d06..8749060 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -8,3 +8,5 @@
/App-perlbrew-0.22.tar.gz
/App-perlbrew-0.23.tar.gz
/App-perlbrew-0.24.tar.gz
+/App-perlbrew-0.27.tar.gz
+/App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index b0031f1..d86d021 100644
--- a/perlbrew.spec
+++ b/perlbrew.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perlbrew
-Version:0.24
+Version:0.28
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Manage perl installations in your $HOME
License:MIT
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.0
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::PatchPerl)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path::Tiny)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Path::Class)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Exception)
@@ -73,6 +75,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.28-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Wed Jun 08 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.24-1
- update to latest upstream version
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3cc1309..fd65df7 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2618a5a879f40da2f364216088c07b99 App-perlbrew-0.24.tar.gz
+f1c4dd8dca73b0338c896b4a56e112d9 App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew/el6] perl(Devel::PatchPerl) is available on ppc64 now
commit f2bc390956e4c0f2009d56f6e385496b82400a93
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 11:06:56 2011 +0200
perl(Devel::PatchPerl) is available on ppc64 now
perlbrew.spec |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index 21f7784..0bb22f4 100644
--- a/perlbrew.spec
+++ b/perlbrew.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perlbrew
Version:0.24
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Manage perl installations in your $HOME
License:MIT
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -22,9 +22,6 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Try::Tiny)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
Requires: perl(Devel::PatchPerl) = 0.26
Requires: curl
-# perl(Devel::PatchPerl) isn't available in EPEL6 ppc64
-# because perl(File::pushd) isn't available in RHEL6 ppc64
-ExcludeArch:ppc64
# maybe someone expects to find
Provides: perl-App-perlbrew = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -76,6 +73,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.24-2
+- perl(Devel::PatchPerl) is available on ppc64 now
+
* Wed Jun 08 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.24-1
- update to latest upstream version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew/el6] update to 0.28
commit 80b58bcae6ded7ec385ed3a7d4073fffa56bf6c4
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 11:05:37 2011 +0200
update to 0.28
.gitignore|2 ++
perlbrew.spec |9 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 97d3d06..8749060 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -8,3 +8,5 @@
/App-perlbrew-0.22.tar.gz
/App-perlbrew-0.23.tar.gz
/App-perlbrew-0.24.tar.gz
+/App-perlbrew-0.27.tar.gz
+/App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index 0bb22f4..ede8d3f 100644
--- a/perlbrew.spec
+++ b/perlbrew.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perlbrew
-Version:0.24
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.28
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Manage perl installations in your $HOME
License:MIT
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.0
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::PatchPerl)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path::Tiny)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::All)
BuildRequires: perl(Path::Class)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Exception)
@@ -73,6 +75,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.28-1
+- update to latest upstream version
+
* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.24-2
- perl(Devel::PatchPerl) is available on ppc64 now
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3cc1309..fd65df7 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2618a5a879f40da2f364216088c07b99 App-perlbrew-0.24.tar.gz
+f1c4dd8dca73b0338c896b4a56e112d9 App-perlbrew-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 715559] perl-Mojolicious-1.76 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715559 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-1.74 is|perl-Mojolicious-1.76 is |available |available --- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 06:42:12 EDT --- Latest upstream release: 1.76 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.65 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew/el5] better workaround for lack of done_testing
commit 80718838b6042135e012a96df1b500f0dc05c126
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 16:11:16 2011 +0200
better workaround for lack of done_testing
older-Test-More.patch | 36
perlbrew.spec | 10 +++---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index d86d021..427652e 100644
--- a/perlbrew.spec
+++ b/perlbrew.spec
@@ -6,8 +6,6 @@ License:MIT
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-perlbrew/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GU/GUGOD/App-perlbrew-%{version}.tar.gz
-# allow tests to run on older Test::More for EPEL
-Patch0: older-Test-More.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.0
@@ -40,7 +38,6 @@ almost like an isolated perl environments.
%prep
%setup -q -n App-perlbrew-%{version}
-%patch0 -p1
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -61,6 +58,12 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
rm t/installation.t
# no Test::Spec (yet)
rm t/installation2.t
+rm t/10.resolve.t
+# Test::More in EPEL doesn't understand done_testing; use no_plan instead
+for test in t/*.t ; do
+ grep -q '^plan tests' $test \
+ || sed -i 's/use Test::More;/use Test::More no_plan;/;/done_testing;/d'
$test
+done
make test
%clean
@@ -77,6 +80,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.28-1
- update to latest upstream version
+- better workaround for lack of done_testing
* Wed Jun 08 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.24-1
- update to latest upstream version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perlbrew/el6] better workaround for lack of done_testing (cherry picked from commit 80718838b6042135e012a96df1b500
commit 974f4f75dddb094db6dd3a860aaac05e1640e597
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Aug 13 16:11:16 2011 +0200
better workaround for lack of done_testing
(cherry picked from commit 80718838b6042135e012a96df1b500f0dc05c126)
older-Test-More.patch | 36
perlbrew.spec | 10 +++---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perlbrew.spec b/perlbrew.spec
index ede8d3f..b943455 100644
--- a/perlbrew.spec
+++ b/perlbrew.spec
@@ -6,8 +6,6 @@ License:MIT
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-perlbrew/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GU/GUGOD/App-perlbrew-%{version}.tar.gz
-# allow tests to run on older Test::More for EPEL
-Patch0: older-Test-More.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.0
@@ -40,7 +38,6 @@ almost like an isolated perl environments.
%prep
%setup -q -n App-perlbrew-%{version}
-%patch0 -p1
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -61,6 +58,12 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
rm t/installation.t
# no Test::Spec (yet)
rm t/installation2.t
+rm t/10.resolve.t
+# Test::More in EPEL doesn't understand done_testing; use no_plan instead
+for test in t/*.t ; do
+ grep -q '^plan tests' $test \
+ || sed -i 's/use Test::More;/use Test::More no_plan;/;/done_testing;/d'
$test
+done
make test
%clean
@@ -77,6 +80,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.28-1
- update to latest upstream version
+- better workaround for lack of done_testing
* Sat Aug 13 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.24-2
- perl(Devel::PatchPerl) is available on ppc64 now
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Eval-LineNumbers
perl-Eval-LineNumbers has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4) On i386: perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.20-3.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.20-3.fc15.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires perl(tmpl_var) perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires main_module) perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires perl(tmpl_var On i386: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires perl(tmpl_var) perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires main_module) perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires perl(tmpl_var Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Switch use in awstats
Hi, Petr. I noticed yesterday that you had patched awstats to use if statements instead of the switch module. The switch module is now back in Fedora (it was removed from Perl core in 5.14 and is now a package in its own right) so feel free to remove your patch, awstats should build fine without it. Emmanuel -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Eval-LineNumbers] Bump to build against perl 5.14.1
commit 99cacfe017882c9329b9c1e7d8aca25de6fdbec1
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sat Aug 13 18:59:20 2011 +0200
Bump to build against perl 5.14.1
perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec b/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec
index 7012c71..965b5df 100644
--- a/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec
+++ b/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Eval-LineNumbers
Version:0.31
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Add line numbers to hereis blocks that contain perl source code
License:Artistic 2.0 or LGPLv2+
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -37,5 +37,8 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/Eval::LineNumbers.3pm.gz
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 0.31-2
+- Bump to build against perl 5.14.1
+
* Thu Jul 28 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 0.31-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Eval-LineNumbers/f16] Bump to build against perl 5.14.1
commit 64f24af46012393871356ccf4b13bda8fee58047
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sat Aug 13 18:59:20 2011 +0200
Bump to build against perl 5.14.1
perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec b/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec
index 7012c71..965b5df 100644
--- a/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec
+++ b/perl-Eval-LineNumbers.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Eval-LineNumbers
Version:0.31
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Add line numbers to hereis blocks that contain perl source code
License:Artistic 2.0 or LGPLv2+
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -37,5 +37,8 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/Eval::LineNumbers.3pm.gz
%changelog
+* Sat Aug 13 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 0.31-2
+- Bump to build against perl 5.14.1
+
* Thu Jul 28 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 0.31-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 13:29:46 EDT --- perlbrew-0.28-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perlbrew-0.28-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 13:30:35 EDT --- perlbrew-0.28-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perlbrew-0.28-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 13:30:30 EDT --- perlbrew-0.28-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perlbrew-0.28-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 13:28:55 EDT --- perlbrew-0.28-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perlbrew-0.28-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 730279] perlbrew-0.28 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730279 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-13 13:30:37 EDT --- perlbrew-0.28-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perlbrew-0.28-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DateTime-Format-XSD/el6] Import rhbz#729649
Summary of changes: 56d294d... Import rhbz#729649 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DateTime-Format-XSD] Created tag perl-DateTime-Format-XSD-0.2-1.el6
The unsigned tag 'perl-DateTime-Format-XSD-0.2-1.el6' was created. Tagger: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch Date: Sat Aug 13 21:14:09 2011 +0200 Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. Change RPM_BUILD_ROOT for %buildroot. Change PERL_INSTALL_ROOT for DESTDIR. Add BR: perl(Test::More) Changes: Fedora Release Engineering (1): Initial setup of the repo Steve Traylen (1): Import rhbz#729649 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DateTime-Format-XSD/el5] Import rhbz#729649
Summary of changes: 56d294d... Import rhbz#729649 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DateTime-Format-XSD] Created tag perl-DateTime-Format-XSD-0.2-1.el5
The unsigned tag 'perl-DateTime-Format-XSD-0.2-1.el5' was created. Tagger: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch Date: Sat Aug 13 21:15:30 2011 +0200 Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. Change RPM_BUILD_ROOT for %buildroot. Change PERL_INSTALL_ROOT for DESTDIR. Add BR: perl(Test::More) Changes: Fedora Release Engineering (1): Initial setup of the repo Steve Traylen (1): Import rhbz#729649 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2011-08-14
Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch from fedora-epel-testing-6-ppc64 unresolved deps: perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
