Re: Need karma on fedpkg update for F15
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 07:39:25PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:48 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: Trying to get the fedpkg rewrite out into stable. Got karma for f16, still need enough karma to overcome earlier bad karma on earlier update versions for f15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15270 Thanks for helping! P.S. Could use the same for el6 if any of you are epel inclined. When you get bad karma then fix the problem and edit the update, it's worth pinging the bad-karma-leavers directly to ask them to update their feedback for the fixed build; that gets you double results (if someone new leaves a +1 it only balances out to 0, as the -1 stays in effect; but if a person who left a -1 later leaves a +1, the -1 is canceled, and the total goes to +1). I believe there's an open issue against Bodhi for not resetting karma after an update is edited (though this is probably something that needs slightly more complex handling; you wouldn't necessarily want to lose all karma on a 99-package update if it's edited to change just one package). Mads! Petr! Please update your karma. :) The problem is I've migrated to F16, I guess this is the reason why reporters did not re-evaluated F15 builds. -- Petr pgpAz22d7JYqn.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: systemd: root device on iscsi
Bill Nottingham wrote: Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said: Hi - is an iscsi root device a supported configuration setup with F16 and systemd? I asked on #systemd, and got pointed here. We're using dracut to boot diskless systems with root devices on iscsi. This works fine for booting using Fedora 16 and systemd. Unfortunately, on shutdown the system hangs. It stops the network interface before mounting the root device read-only or stopping the iscsi service (leaving the fedora iscsi target in a confused state too). On Fedora 14, this worked fine with the old fashioned init system. In the old init system you used to be able to put a _netdev flag in fstab, which would fix this problem. This doesn't seem to work now. What are you using for networking - the old network service or NetworkManager? The old network service. The root device is cloned from a non-iscsi installation, however, as kickstart didn't like to install onto a non- partitioned iscsi device: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757106 I thought that the _netdev option would be sufficient to get the ordering correct. Jeremy -- http://jeremysanders.net/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Hello
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 08:19:14 schrieb Dipesh Acharya: I think it makes sense, that is why I wanted to maintain or co-maintain it. I can push changes for testing as soon as I modify the extension. Also, I would be watching all the bug reports, etc. and would be more involved in making the extension better. Yes that would be cool. And how do I apply to be a co-maintainer? I think you should contact the existing maintainer. Thank you :) np Dipesh Acharya http://motorscript.com http://twitter.com/xtranophilist On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de wrote: Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 07:47:38 schrieb Dipesh Acharya: This is the package https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnome-shell-extension-cpu -t emperature It is already being maintained by fab. Should I post it for review again? Thank you :) Dipesh Acharya http://motorscript.com http://twitter.com/xtranophilist I don't think this makes sense - your extension is already included in Fedora. But you can apply for comaintainer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainer_policy#Co-Maintainership . Or you can work on another application. Greg On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 01:58 +0545, Dipesh Acharya wrote: Hello, this is Dipesh Acharya. I will be packaging and updating gnome-shell-extension-cpu- temperature since I develop it. Thank you :) Dipesh Acharya http://motorscript.com http://twitter.com/xtranophilist hey Dipesh, Thank you. Please do post a link to the review ticket here once you've submitted it. :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Life is one long struggle in the dark. -- Titus Lucretius Carus -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- oh okay. my mistake. Yafcot:atj(*), mark * Yet another fool coming over this: according to joey -- m...@mail.novare.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: updating xcb-util to 0.3.8 in rawhide?
On 11/28/2011 11:38 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: Hi there, is it possible to update rawhide's xcb-util to the current version which was released earlier this year? SONAMES changed so dependent packages will need (at least) a rebuild. Apparently, when it was released there was some confusion regarding the splitting of some parts into a seperate repo and the merging of -atom, -aux and -event into a single library (libxcb-util). A clarifying mail can be found here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2011-May/053079.html It would be very nice to get this in in time for F17. As far as I see Mandriva is packaging it in Cooker. Debian and Ubuntu are also shipping it. Michal (Nowak), as you're the maintainer, is there any specific reason it wasn't updated yet? Are there any issues with xcb-util 0.3.8 (or its dependants) that prevent the new release from going into Fedora until they are solved? Or is it just that there wasn't enough time yet? Thank you. Lars Thanks for pointing that out. My packages needed more love for a quite some time, so I released xcb-utils for another maintainer -- see separate post. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Orphaned packages
I've just orphaned following packages: * xcb-util * gnome-colors-icon-theme (and retired) * khmeros-fonts * kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts * libev * libxdg-basedir * monkeysphere (I guess Bernie needs co-maintainer) Feel free to take them. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F16 possible glibc 2.14.90-19 problems
Hi, I've got 15 daemons writen in python that run php tasks. When I start all daemons I see a lot of segfaults in logs. [137969.485410] php[23201]: segfault at 50018 ip 005910d9 sp 7fff4160bd90 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [138037.623654] php[23469]: segfault at bc072fa35 ip 005910d9 sp 7fffd0fda110 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [138189.585367] php[24055]: segfault at 17f73 ip 005910d9 sp 7fffbe262110 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [138447.809834] php[25042] general protection ip:5bcc8d sp:7fff0aeac680 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] [138526.771017] php[25274] general protection ip:5a1d94 sp:7fffe2e11850 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] [139180.948140] php[27884] general protection ip:5910d9 sp:7fffd9708f30 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] [139476.383179] php[28974] general protection ip:5910d9 sp:7fffd3cdd460 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] [139485.007395] php[28902]: segfault at bc0dcc21c ip 005910d9 sp 7fffcf113cb0 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [139860.124330] php[30470]: segfault at 14 ip 7f515ba0c7d8 sp 7fff64d4a2d0 error 4 in ld-2.14.90.so[7f515b9f8000+22000] [139911.992581] php[30706]: segfault at 0 ip 7fc84670ac34 sp 7fff40d61168 error 4 in libc-2.14.90.so[7fc84668a000+1aa000] [14.293107] php[31001] general protection ip:5a1d91 sp:7fff31d74e40 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] [140085.313565] php[31380]: segfault at 0 ip 7fbc81bd5c34 sp 7fffe711a248 error 4 in libc-2.14.90.so[7fbc81b55000+1aa000] [140120.294446] php[31548] general protection ip:5910d9 sp:774b5020 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] [140270.083455] php[32167]: segfault at 0 ip 005ac672 sp 7fff4c80b1f0 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [140274.462653] php[32184]: segfault at 4 ip 005bd4e9 sp 7fff71035ae0 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [140305.552332] php[32258]: segfault at 416f6681 ip 005cd749 sp 7fffdb040c10 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [140343.753005] php[32471] general protection ip:5910d9 sp:7fff22a9dc50 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] [140386.823934] php[32590] general protection ip:5a1d91 sp:7fff3f3b8cf0 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] [140396.070389] php[32649]: segfault at 69027d11e4 ip 005911be sp 7fff2fc46b80 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [140408.000815] php[32718]: segfault at 10 ip 005a1d94 sp 7fffaf578200 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] This problem occurs on glibc 2.14.90-19, after downgrade to 2.14.90-14 problem disappeared. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaned packages
Why did you retire gnome-colors-icon-theme? On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com wrote: I've just orphaned following packages: * xcb-util * gnome-colors-icon-theme (and retired) * khmeros-fonts * kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts * libev * libxdg-basedir * monkeysphere (I guess Bernie needs co-maintainer) Feel free to take them. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide java versioning issue?
so I was trying to fix xorg-x11-docs, which uses fop which uses java, which means I've no idea. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3549524 The main error is below so I suspect the problem is that some apache/avalon framework jar file is build with the 1.7 jdk but the buildroot installed the 1.6 jdk. Should something have its dependency bumped? Dave. usr/bin/xmlto: line 316: local: can only be used in a function GENfonts.ps /usr/bin/xmlto: line 316: local: can only be used in a function Making portrait pages on A4 paper (210mmx297mm) java virtual machine used: /usr/lib/jvm/jre/bin/java classpath used: /usr/share/java/commons-io.jar:/usr/share/java/batik-all.jar:/usr/share/java/avalon-framework-api.jar:/usr/share/java/avalon-framework-impl.jar:/usr/share/java/xmlgraphics-commons.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-logging.jar:/usr/share/java/fop.jar: main class used: org.apache.fop.cli.Main flags used: options used: arguments used: -fo /tmp/xmlto.1D9adG/fonts.proc -ps /builddir/build/BUILD/xorg-docs-1.6/general/fonts/fonts.ps Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0 at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142) at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277) at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) at org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.init(FopFactory.java:153) at org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.newInstance(FopFactory.java:177) at org.apache.fop.cli.CommandLineOptions.init(CommandLineOptions.java:121) at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.startFOP(Main.java:157) at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.main(Main.java:204) make[2]: *** [fonts.ps] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xorg-docs-1.6/general/fonts' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xorg-docs-1.6/general' -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaned packages
Well he stated otherwise in his initial e-mail. I didn't have a look at the pkgdb yet, so it might be different actually. On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote: Why did you retire gnome-colors-icon-theme? They're not retired, they're orphaned. It means he doesn't have time to maintain them or doesn't use them anymore. Package maintainers that are interested are able to pick up the maintenance of them if they are interested in them or use them. Peter On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com wrote: I've just orphaned following packages: * xcb-util * gnome-colors-icon-theme (and retired) * khmeros-fonts * kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts * libev * libxdg-basedir * monkeysphere (I guess Bernie needs co-maintainer) Feel free to take them. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 758123] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.35 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758123 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-SQLite-1.35-1.fc17 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-11-29 07:28:57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Orphaned packages
I've just orphaned following packages: * xcb-util * gnome-colors-icon-theme (and retired) * khmeros-fonts I took this, I need it for Moodle. -J * kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts * libev * libxdg-basedir * monkeysphere (I guess Bernie needs co-maintainer) Feel free to take them. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 758126] perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.76 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758126 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.76 ||-1.fc17 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-11-29 08:11:09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Reminder: Fedora password and ssh key change deadline looms (2 days left!)
I don't want to change my ssh key that I use for many other purposes. What is the suggested method to generate a new key to be used only for fedora? Kevin Fenzi wrote: Just a friendly reminder: If you are a Fedora account system account holder, and haven't changed your password and uploaded a new ssh key since we announced the mandatory change, you best do so NOW. The deadline is 2011-11-30 (only 2 days away). http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-October/003005.html If you don't, you may no longer have access to groups you currently do (like packager, or sysadmin or ambassador). Go take a few minutes, read the announcement and security information linked to it, and change your password and upload a new ssh public key. If you aren't a Fedora contributor, the information linked in our announcement is still a great read and may just help you be more secure on your machines. :) kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Reminder: Fedora password and ssh key change deadline looms (2 days left!)
Am 29.11.2011 14:26, schrieb Neal Becker: I don't want to change my ssh key that I use for many other purposes. What is the suggested method to generate a new key to be used only for fedora? ~/.ssh/config Host whatever User user IdentityFile path-to-file __ -i identity_file [harry@rh:~]$ ssh --help usage: ssh [-1246AaCfgKkMNnqsTtVvXxYy] [-b bind_address] [-c cipher_spec] [-D [bind_address:]port] [-e escape_char] [-F configfile] [-I pkcs11] [-i identity_file] [harry@rh:~]$ scp --help usage: scp [-1246BCpqrv] [-c cipher] [-F ssh_config] [-i identity_file] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Reminder: Fedora password and ssh key change deadline looms (2 days left!)
Neal Becker píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 08:26 -0500: I don't want to change my ssh key that I use for many other purposes. What is the suggested method to generate a new key to be used only for fedora? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cryptography should have the answers Dan Kevin Fenzi wrote: Just a friendly reminder: If you are a Fedora account system account holder, and haven't changed your password and uploaded a new ssh key since we announced the mandatory change, you best do so NOW. The deadline is 2011-11-30 (only 2 days away). http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-October/003005.html If you don't, you may no longer have access to groups you currently do (like packager, or sysadmin or ambassador). Go take a few minutes, read the announcement and security information linked to it, and change your password and upload a new ssh public key. If you aren't a Fedora contributor, the information linked in our announcement is still a great read and may just help you be more secure on your machines. :) kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Reminder: Fedora password and ssh key change deadline looms (2 days left!)
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 08:26:48AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: I don't want to change my ssh key that I use for many other purposes. What is the suggested method to generate a new key to be used only for fedora? Do: ssh-keygen -b 4096 -f ~/.ssh/id_rsa-fedora Then edit .ssh/config and add: # Use a different key to work around Fedora key policy idiocy. Host *.fedoraproject.org fedorapeople.org *.fedorahosted.org IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa-fedora You may also need to add the passphrase to your ssh agent. Works for me. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaned packages
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 11:28 +0100, Michal Nowak wrote: I've just orphaned following packages: * libev Just took this, as I was already a co-maintainer. -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpmbuild: variables in %post
On 11/29/2011 01:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hi, i have a little problem with rpmbuild on the begin of my spec-file: %define kernel_uname_r %(echo $(uname -r)) this works fine in %files, but is ignored in %post FATAL: Could not open '/boot/System.map-': No such file or directory why? Does it help if you use %global instead of %define ? Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide java versioning issue?
* David Airlie airl...@redhat.com [2011-11-29 05:36]:
so I was trying to fix xorg-x11-docs, which uses fop which uses java, which
means I've no idea.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3549524
The main error is below so I suspect the problem is that some apache/avalon
framework jar file is build with the 1.7 jdk but the buildroot installed the
1.6 jdk. Should something have its dependency bumped?
Hi David,
Java 7 needs to become the default JDK for rawhide. We will start working
on this over the coming few days. Until done, Java stuff might be broken
here and there.
As a workaround, you can manually install java-1.7.0-openjdk{,-devel}
and it should be fine.
Cheers,
Deepak
Dave.
usr/bin/xmlto: line 316: local: can only be used in a function
GENfonts.ps
/usr/bin/xmlto: line 316: local: can only be used in a function
Making portrait pages on A4 paper (210mmx297mm)
java virtual machine used: /usr/lib/jvm/jre/bin/java
classpath used:
/usr/share/java/commons-io.jar:/usr/share/java/batik-all.jar:/usr/share/java/avalon-framework-api.jar:/usr/share/java/avalon-framework-impl.jar:/usr/share/java/xmlgraphics-commons.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-logging.jar:/usr/share/java/fop.jar:
main class used: org.apache.fop.cli.Main
flags used:
options used:
arguments used: -fo /tmp/xmlto.1D9adG/fonts.proc -ps
/builddir/build/BUILD/xorg-docs-1.6/general/fonts/fonts.ps
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException :
Unsupported major.minor version 51.0
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634)
at
java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266)
at org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.init(FopFactory.java:153)
at org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.newInstance(FopFactory.java:177)
at
org.apache.fop.cli.CommandLineOptions.init(CommandLineOptions.java:121)
at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.startFOP(Main.java:157)
at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.main(Main.java:204)
make[2]: *** [fonts.ps] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xorg-docs-1.6/general/fonts'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xorg-docs-1.6/general'
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpmbuild: variables in %post
Am 29.11.2011 14:44, schrieb Paul Howarth: On 11/29/2011 01:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: hi, i have a little problem with rpmbuild on the begin of my spec-file: %define kernel_uname_r %(echo $(uname -r)) this works fine in %files, but is ignored in %post FATAL: Could not open '/boot/System.map-': No such file or directory why? Does it help if you use %global instead of %define ? this does the trick! thank you very much! if will cross-post a link to my src.rpm of open-vm-tools on fedora-users/devel, rpmfusion-users and open-vmtools since they are retired for F15 in the rpmfusion-repos and hardly needed if someone is using fedora-guests on vSphere with HA-Clustering signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: A software center for Fedora
On 25 November 2011 23:31, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: These? app-install (and friends) still pending review it seems, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488962 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 If the objections truly have been dropped, I'd be happy to help move this along. I got burned by the whole process. I got zero help from anyone in the fedora infrastructure team, and was asked to change the format of the data twice, and was asked to make the generation tools use less RAM, then less CPU, then told that there was not enough disk IO to generate the rawhide daily metadata. I'm still happy to generate the appstream-compatible data and write a trivial UI for this (or to fork and port ubuntu-app-install) but Fedora infrastructure either needs to want to host this on the servers and do the work integrating it into the compose tools, or it needs to accept that we ship a package full of cached data like I've been suggesting all along, and like Ubuntu have been doing for over 5 years. Actually doing the work is pretty easy, but I've not got the energy to fight for the application data in Fedora anymore. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaned packages
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 11:28 +0100, Michal Nowak wrote: I've just orphaned following packages: * xcb-util Taken. Thanks for looking after it! - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: updating xcb-util to 0.3.8 in rawhide?
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 23:38 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote: Hi there, is it possible to update rawhide's xcb-util to the current version which was released earlier this year? I've taken ownership of xcb-util, and submitted a build for 0.3.8. The following packages depend on it in F17: boinc-manager-0:6.12.35-1.r24014svn.fc17.i686 i3-0:4.0.1-2.fc17.i686 startup-notification-0:0.12-1.fc16.i686 xorg-x11-drv-intel-0:2.17.0-2.fc17.i686 xorg-x11-utils-0:7.5-4.fc17.i686 I'll kick rebuilds for these momentarily. - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: A software center for Fedora
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:23:31PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: On 25 November 2011 23:31, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: These? app-install (and friends) still pending review it seems, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488962 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 If the objections truly have been dropped, I'd be happy to help move this along. I got burned by the whole process. I got zero help from anyone in the fedora infrastructure team, Funny... I remember talking to you on multiple occassions, letting you know what pkgdb currently was storing in this area, what it could store if the code showed up, and the two people who had worked on that portion of pkgdb code in the past that you should talk to. Perhaps you're forgetting all of that since you ran into some stumbling block past that stage. Looking at your list of gripes and the review request, I'd also note that while you seem to be blaming Fedora Infrastructure for all your woes, you've actually been talking to at least three separate groups that have had input on the matter. Fedora Releng and Fedora Legal seem to be the other two groups whose concerns needed addressing. -Toshio pgpU7E03Bms85.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Reminder: Fedora password and ssh key change deadline looms (2 days left!)
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 08:26:48 -0500, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: I don't want to change my ssh key that I use for many other purposes. What is the suggested method to generate a new key to be used only for fedora? Smooge did a detailed post on how to do this shortly after the announcement: http://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2011/10/how-to-create-new-ssh-key.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: systemd: root device on iscsi
Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said: What are you using for networking - the old network service or NetworkManager? The old network service. The root device is cloned from a non-iscsi installation, however, as kickstart didn't like to install onto a non- partitioned iscsi device: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757106 I thought that the _netdev option would be sufficient to get the ordering correct. Ah, crud. The issue is that we're checking /etc/mtab for _netdev, which is now /proc/mounts, which doesn't transfer over random options such as these into its data store. So, we either need it to start doing that (cc: kzak), or we need to have th code cross-reference devices against /etc/fstab. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: Ask Fedora
I want to get out of discussion ,what i should do? I want to stop receiving mailplease help me. On 11/28/11, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 03:17 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi Forwarding with permission for discussions FWIW - I haven't looked at Ask Fedora yet, but all Stefano's points sound absolutely sensible and appropriate to me based on what experience I have, and are obviously borne of experience. It's very gracious of him to pass them along. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Hello
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 12:32 +0545, Dipesh Acharya wrote: view again? Thank you :) Dipesh Acharya http://motorscript.com http://twitter.com/xtranophilist Ah! No. Not required :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Unscribe from list was: Re: Fwd: Ask Fedora
On 29/11/11 17:28, sarfraj khanjade wrote: I want to get out of discussion ,what i should do? I want to stop receiving mailplease help me. Go here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Scroll near the bottom: Read the instruction there. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: systemd: root device on iscsi
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:18:03PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said: What are you using for networking - the old network service or NetworkManager? The old network service. The root device is cloned from a non-iscsi installation, however, as kickstart didn't like to install onto a non- partitioned iscsi device: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757106 I thought that the _netdev option would be sufficient to get the ordering correct. Ah, crud. The issue is that we're checking /etc/mtab for _netdev, which is now /proc/mounts, which doesn't transfer over random options such as these into its data store. So, we either need it to start doing that (cc: kzak), or we need to have th code cross-reference devices against /etc/fstab. libmount manages the option _netdev in userspace (in /run/mount/utab -- but this private libmount file is not part of any API, so don't read it), use findmnt(8): $ grep _netdev /etc/fstab /dev/sdb1 /mnt ext3defaults,_netdev0 $ findmnt --mtab /mnt TARGET SOURCEFSTYPE OPTIONS /mnt /dev/sdb1 ext3 rw,relatime,errors=continue,barrier=0,data=ordered,_netdev $ mount | grep /mnt /dev/sdb1 on /mnt type ext3(rw,relatime,errors=continue,barrier=0,data=ordered,_netdev) Note that things like _netdev are ugly hacks, it would be nice to found a better way how mark/detect some specific devices. Karel -- Karel Zak k...@redhat.com http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Improvements Eclipse Installation
On 11/01/2011 10:56 AM, sami wagiaalla wrote: [...] One note, I don't like macros that span multiple scriptlets. Having a macro for each scriptlet (or forgoing a macro if the resulting code is simple enough) seems to be about the right level of indirection. It does not look pretty I agree, but my motivation is to make things simple for plugin packagers. Also, it makes it simple to update the macro when bugs show up without having to update the packages with additional macros. They just get the update when they are rebuilt. Hi Toshio, I hope you are OK with the above. I will be requesting an update to the guidelines soon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About: Orphaned packages
Hi, when upgrade Fedora, some programs that we had used was been dropped because are orphaned but many times it is because we have better choices . So my idea is that we may have a data base of possible replacement of the package that has been orphaned . For example smb4k have been dropped on F16, have we any replacement that search the windows network neighborhood ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F16 possible glibc 2.14.90-19 problems
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:28:49 +0100, MP (Michał) wrote: Hi, I've got 15 daemons writen in python that run php tasks. When I start all daemons I see a lot of segfaults in logs. [139860.124330] php[30470]: segfault at 14 ip 7f515ba0c7d8 sp 7fff64d4a2d0 error 4 in ld-2.14.90.so[7f515b9f8000+22000] [139911.992581] php[30706]: segfault at 0 ip 7fc84670ac34 sp 7fff40d61168 error 4 in libc-2.14.90.so[7fc84668a000+1aa000] [14.293107] php[31001] general protection ip:5a1d91 sp:7fff31d74e40 error:0 in php[40+2ca000] This problem occurs on glibc 2.14.90-19, after downgrade to 2.14.90-14 problem disappeared. It isn't too difficult to get in contact with the glibc maintainers, http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/glibc even a communication attempt in the Fedora Updates System for the most recent test update (2.14.90-20) might lead to something: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/glibc -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Test-Announce] Fedora 16 QA Retrospective: recommendations filed, tickets up for grabs!
Hi, folks. I wanted to let everyone know that I've gone through all the issues raised in the Fedora 16 QA Retrospective: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_QA_Retrospective and taken action on each item where possible. For most items I've added a recommendation to the Recommendations section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_QA_Retrospective#Recommendations so that section now lists the trac tickets (in most cases) and mailing list threads relevant to each item. I've also brought forward some still-outstanding action items from the F15 retrospective, listed under 'Brought forward from Fedora_15_QA_Retrospective' sub-sections within the Recommendations. Here's a list of the specific tasks that are now outstanding in QA trac as a direct result of the Retrospective: it would be great if people could volunteer to pick these up. Please, if you'd like to help out, just assign one of the tickets to yourself and go do it! There are no hoops to jump through. I'll try and add links in each ticket to the relevant processes for creating test cases and so on. * http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/256 Add EFI data to installation / base results matrices * http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/257 Create and maintain F17 install test plan * http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/258 Create EC2 test cases and integrate into validation matrices * http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/259 Review Fedora 17 feature list and co-ordinate with owners of significant features to create test plans * http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/260 Cover USB-written images better in installation validation testing * http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/261 Revise upgrade test case set There were a couple of items where the action didn't really fit comfortably into the 'Recommendations' section, so for the record, I'll list those here: adamw - when there are showstoppers in anaconda early we tend to just sit around and wait for them to get fixed, but without much urgency; which means we're getting no idea of what bugs are lurking behind the showstoppers, and we wind up trying to fix a lot of blockers in a small amount of time once the showstoppers are finally fixed adamw - when we hit an obvious showstopper we tend to focus in on it exclusively until it's fixed, iterate, and then be surprised when there are bugs hidden behind it; we should work harder to try and workaround showstoppers in a way that has as small an impact as possible, and continue testing, to avoid this problem. e.g. RHBZ #730863 hid behind RHBZ #729563, but we could have exposed it by editing /etc/selinux/config in the installed system prior to rebooting from the installer adamw - need to do more direct personal pinging of maintainers who seem unresponsive to blockers; some respond when contacted directly but do not appear to place a high priority on bug reports There isn't really any specific action to be taken on these right now, they're more things to keep in mind while validating F17. items 5-8 are just notes of what bugs blocked Alpha RC spins, no specific action was really needed in relation to any of those adamw - it wasn't an A+ idea for both rpm maintainers to be on vacation at the same time, with no cover in place, during a critical freeze period The action I took here was fairly RH-internal, as this is really an RH staffing issue: I poked Tom Callaway to ask about putting a cover policy in place for RH-employed maintainers of key Fedora components adamw - NFS testing instructions may need to be more precise to avoid pilot errors, and may need to account for NFSv4 quirks This one's pretty much already taken care of, we did tweak the NFS test cases somewhat during the f16 cycle tflink - Maybe it was due to the high number of TC/RC spins that we did for F16 but it would be awesome to have some more automation around image generation for testing. I'm not talking about any rel-eng processes but it would be nice to be able to request generation of a boot.iso made from custom packages and packages in koji in order to do testing. I can see this being helpful for test day coordination as well but there are issues with complexity and hosting so this is a bit of a pony list item. tflink - Since qemu/kvm VMs are all legacy BIOS emulation, it would be awesome to do EFI emulation. There are some projects out there on using EFI in qemu VMs but it is unknown whether they actually work. Either way, it might be good to look into them in order to evaluate whether their use is practical These are sort of 'blue sky' ideas from tflink that don't lead to any immediate action items that anyone could take care of: I'm relying on him to keep thinking about them and turn them into more concrete proposals. I don't really want to file open-ended tickets for rough ideas. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
Re: About: Orphaned packages
Sérgio Basto wrote: For example smb4k have been dropped on F16, have we any replacement that search the windows network neighborhood ? smb4k simply needs somebody to sign up as a new maintainer and get this through rereview… (Yet another victim of our aggressive pruning, and the rereview requirement really makes it a PITA to resurrect stuff if you missed it in the list of stuff getting orphaned.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 758123] New: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.35 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.35 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758123 Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.35 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-DBD-SQLite AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: st...@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Latest upstream release: 1.35 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.33 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-SQLite/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 746941] perl-Mojolicious-2.34 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-2.32 is|perl-Mojolicious-2.34 is |available |available --- Comment #22 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-29 06:35:48 EST --- Latest upstream release: 2.34 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.99 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758125] New: perl-PAR-1.003 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-PAR-1.003 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758125 Summary: perl-PAR-1.003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-PAR AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Latest upstream release: 1.003 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.002 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758126] New: perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.76 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.76 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758126 Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.76 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-POE-Component-IRC AssignedTo: cw...@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Latest upstream release: 6.76 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 6.75 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-IRC/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758124] New: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.06 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.06 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758124 Summary: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-Module-ScanDeps AssignedTo: st...@silug.org ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: st...@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Latest upstream release: 1.06 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.05 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ScanDeps/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758123] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.35 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758123 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758125] perl-PAR-1.003 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758125 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758124] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.06 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758124 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|st...@silug.org |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758126] perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.76 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758126 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|cw...@alumni.drew.edu |psab...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File DBD-SQLite-1.35.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-SQLite: d9752e4a26fa54e74aa893dafd02ceda DBD-SQLite-1.35.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DBD-SQLite] 1.35 bump (potentially breaks compatibility)
commit 15154042b720275647b8f5a7713ff70077ecc3cc
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 29 13:12:59 2011 +0100
1.35 bump (potentially breaks compatibility)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBD-SQLite.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1146877..426b6a4 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
DBD-SQLite-1.29.tar.gz
/DBD-SQLite-1.31.tar.gz
/DBD-SQLite-1.33.tar.gz
+/DBD-SQLite-1.35.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec b/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec
index 5a7b70c..455eb6d 100644
--- a/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec
+++ b/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-DBD-SQLite
-Version:1.33
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.35
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:SQLite DBI Driver
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Tue Nov 29 2011 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.35-1
+- 1.35 bump
+
* Tue Jun 21 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.33-2
- Perl mass rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3e1d312..5c71b89 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-623e1340f98d4df1d2f313b49489471c DBD-SQLite-1.33.tar.gz
+d9752e4a26fa54e74aa893dafd02ceda DBD-SQLite-1.35.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Module-ScanDeps-1.06.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ScanDeps: 0b7e4b5f217ca0ddf9ce87505113942b Module-ScanDeps-1.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ScanDeps] 1.06 bump
commit d739e0c8f02d15e1add64a10418829e741d1107a
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 29 13:32:26 2011 +0100
1.06 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec | 15 ---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 0827d45..da10e45 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ Module-ScanDeps-0.97.tar.gz
/Module-ScanDeps-1.02.tar.gz
/Module-ScanDeps-1.04.tar.gz
/Module-ScanDeps-1.05.tar.gz
+/Module-ScanDeps-1.06.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec b/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec
index 4daccb9..4798b77 100644
--- a/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Module-ScanDeps
Summary:Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
-Version:1.05
+Version:1.06
Release:1%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -56,12 +56,10 @@ Test/More.pm). The values are hash references.
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
-
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
%check
make test
@@ -74,6 +72,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Nov 29 2011 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.06-1
+- 1.06 bump
+
* Thu Nov 03 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.05-1
- 1.05 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 448723f..b03e019 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3894474a5daa4eef56123b7990ff1dd7 Module-ScanDeps-1.05.tar.gz
+0b7e4b5f217ca0ddf9ce87505113942b Module-ScanDeps-1.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758124] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.06 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758124 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.06-1 ||.fc17 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-11-29 07:41:42 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File PAR-1.003.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PAR: bfdb92cd2c1b507e5704859469ce9a4e PAR-1.003.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PAR] 1.003 bump
commit 675133dd08a570d9aa8c39e14afa8ef691456e9a
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 29 13:43:41 2011 +0100
1.003 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-PAR.spec | 28
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 37055bf..fff5586 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
PAR-1.000.tar.gz
/PAR-1.002.tar.gz
+/PAR-1.003.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-PAR.spec b/perl-PAR.spec
index 1c98bed..3a379ea 100644
--- a/perl-PAR.spec
+++ b/perl-PAR.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-PAR
-Version:1.002
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:1.003
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl Archive Toolkit
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR/
-Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SM/SMUELLER/PAR-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RS/RSCHUPP/PAR-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(Archive::Zip) = 1
BuildRequires: perl(Compress::Zlib) = 1.3
@@ -29,28 +28,25 @@ libraries from which Perl modules can be loaded.
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
-
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
%check
make test
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog README TODO
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Nov 29 2011 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.003-1
+- 1.003 bump
+- Update Source URL
+- It's time to drop Buildroot and defattr here as well
+
* Tue Jul 19 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 1.002-4
- Perl mass rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 5d6290f..151cf43 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-789a0768881cd051ad7bc2b9d89a56fb PAR-1.002.tar.gz
+bfdb92cd2c1b507e5704859469ce9a4e PAR-1.003.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 758125] perl-PAR-1.003 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758125 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-PAR-1.003-1.fc17 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-11-29 07:57:08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File POE-Component-IRC-6.76.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-IRC: dcfb9f4a2eb781c1a08fcf7d1a83c904 POE-Component-IRC-6.76.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-POE-Component-IRC] 6.76 bump
commit 84f57a76836d6d3c9e5e5afd152948a3feb46fb3
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 29 14:02:45 2011 +0100
6.76 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 7639a15..8bc34d9 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ POE-Component-IRC-6.14.tar.gz
/POE-Component-IRC-6.71.tar.gz
/POE-Component-IRC-6.74.tar.gz
/POE-Component-IRC-6.75.tar.gz
+/POE-Component-IRC-6.76.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec b/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec
index 802e1e8..206c46b 100644
--- a/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec
+++ b/perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Name: perl-POE-Component-IRC
Summary:A POE component for building IRC clients
-Version:6.75
+Version:6.76
Release:1%{?dist}
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.pm' -exec chmod -x {}
2/dev/null ';'
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Tue Nov 29 2011 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 6.76-1
+- 6.76 bump
+
* Mon Nov 14 2011 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 6.75-1
- 6.75 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index a753256..d62d8d7 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2569d283014793f8aae9a6c0bc9440be POE-Component-IRC-6.75.tar.gz
+dcfb9f4a2eb781c1a08fcf7d1a83c904 POE-Component-IRC-6.76.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 757043] Please update to version 1.24 (or later) in Fedora 15/16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757043 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-29 20:56:24 EST --- Package perl-Glib-1.241-1.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Glib-1.241-1.fc15' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16593/perl-Glib-1.241-1.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
