[Test-Announce] CANCELLED: 2012-07-23 Fedora QA Meeting
I hate to feel like I keep blowing off meetings, but hey, sticking with the 'nothing to meet about' principle, we don't need one this week either. It seems like there's been a general lack of Major Topics in QA-land lately; activating Paranoid Mode, does anyone think there are any negative reasons for this, or is it more just that things are sort of ticking along smoothly and we shouldn't fix anything that ain't broken? Opinions welcome =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Macro L_cuserid missing in /usr/include/stdio.h in F17 ?
On 07/23/2012 08:03 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 07/23/2012 07:56 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> #include
>> #include
>> main () {
>> fprintf (stderr,"L_cuserid = %d",L_cuserid);
>> }
> Do you need to add -D_GNU_SOURCE to your compile line?
>
Yes, it compiles too with -D_GNU_SOURCE
--
Joachim Backes
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Macro L_cuserid missing in /usr/include/stdio.h in F17 ?
On 07/23/2012 07:56 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
#include
#include
main () {
fprintf (stderr,"L_cuserid = %d",L_cuserid);
}
Do you need to add -D_GNU_SOURCE to your compile line?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Macro L_cuserid missing in /usr/include/stdio.h in F17 ?
The man page of getlogin(3) says that L_cuserid is declared in
. But if I try to compile (gcc-4.7.0-5.fc17.x86_64) a little
source using L_cuserid
#include
#include
main () {
fprintf (stderr,"L_cuserid = %d",L_cuserid);
}
I get an error:
x.c: In function ‘main’:
x.c:4:34: error: ‘L_cuserid’ undeclared (first use in this function)
x.c:4:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
each function it appears in
The source compiles correctly if I use -D_XOPEN_SOURCE
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > These are fixed: - hydrogen - lash This one did not have any problems. Just a plain rebuild "fixed" it: - clementine This one seems like a bug in doxygen, rather than a bug in the package: - slv2 [1] Apparently doxygen-1.8.1.1 generates a manpage file with a weird filename: /usr/share/man/man3/_builddir_build_BUILD_slv2-0.6.6_slv2_.3.gz I also see that the same problem exists in a few other packages, e.g. sord [2], suil [3]. I imagine there are other ones suffering the same issue. Downgrading to doxygen-1.8.0-1.fc18 eliminates the problem. Does anyone have a solution/workaround for this bug? Thanks, Orcan [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=431 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4313528 [3] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4314730 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > I've fixed and rebuilt * python-unidecode * python-migrate0.5 -Toshio pgpmm2dWGoHjR.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Any ETA for OpenCL support in Mesa?
> > Hello All! > Since March 2012 can be built with --enable-opencl (see this - > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEwMTE ) so maybe > it's time to enable it in Fedora? Actually I really don't know what's > the status of OpenCL support in Nouveay/Radeon drivers - according to > various Phoronix articles some work was already done and some patches > still have to be merged. Could someone summarize the current status > of > OpenCL support in the drivers as well as in the high-level libraries? I made a first pass at packaging it and starting feeling ill at the pain, the big problem was pacakging libclc, its horribly developed, got what I think is a handwritten build system in python (or a port of one), requires a fair few patches to even get close to being useful. I'm sort of waiting for AMD to say when they think things are more ready, from a radeon pov, and from what I know nouveau support still isn't merged into mesa. So at the moment I get the feeling that you could probably run clinfo and not much more. Dave. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Hello, VirtualGL fails to build in rawhide due to bugzilla #839060. I can try to rebuild that package as soon as that bug is fixed. I just tried now and its still failing due to libglapi being not linked against pthread. Sorry about that. Thanks, -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Thanks for the notification. I fixed driftnet that failed to compile * Sun Jul 22 2012 Paul Wouters - 0.1.6-25.20040426cvs - Change obsoleted libpng png_set_gray_1_2_4_to_8() to png_set_expand_gray_1_2_4_to_8() Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On 07/22/2012 10:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:28:28 +0100 Peter Robinson wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting. The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild. Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners? Yep: http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f18-failures.html I'm not sure if it was updated before Dennis had to leave for the airport however. kevin First time on this list; I try to handle adobe-source-libraries which failed. It's just I don't know what to do. The build failed because recent gcc update revealed a bug in current boost. This bug is fixed in boost 1.50 which is scheduled for F18 OTOH, there are no boost 1.50 packages to test against; I don't even know if 1.50 will make it for F18. The bugfix means API changes, so backporting to 1.48 is not an option IMHO. Now, what do I do? Just sit down waiting for boost 1.50? Or? --alec -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:28:28 +0100 Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 > >> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix > >> up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that > >> only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on > >> 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 > >> > >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved > >> over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure > >> stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > >> reporting. > > > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, > > they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > > Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners? Yep: http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f18-failures.html I'm not sure if it was updated before Dennis had to leave for the airport however. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that >> we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up >> in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives >> a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we >> will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 >> >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over >> when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. >> please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the >> reporting. > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners? Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that > we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up > in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives > a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we > will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 > > This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over > when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. > please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > reporting. The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild. Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
