twolame - legal
I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a legal reason for that? twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion on Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on the official repos. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419597 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps mach64_drv. In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little attention to anything except the big 3: current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel graphics. 3D [alpha blending, etc.] has taken developer resources away from any device which is 2D-only (cannot [does not] run Gnome shell.) It's not true - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ServerKMSDrivers Servers generally ship with fairly simple GPU hardware that can provide scanout and a small amount of VRAM. Currently we use X.org drivers to drive these chipsets. However a set of simple KMS drivers could be written along with a single X.org driver to drive this hardware. Bringing the featureset of KMS to these chipsets. Jaroslav -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: twolame - legal
On 08/16/2012 05:27 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a legal reason for that? twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion on Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on the official repos. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419597 Unfortunately, yes, this is legally blocked in Fedora at this time. ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: twolame - legal
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a legal reason for that? twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion on Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on the official repos. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419597 Debian also has implementations of H264 in the official repos. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[HEADS-UP] move eject to util-linux, retire volname
The new util-linux 2.22 release contains eject(1) command, it means that we can retire the original eject package (with inactive upstream). The small disadvantage is that util-linux does not implement command volname(1) from the eject package. The volname returns the volume name for a device formatted with an ISO-9660 file system. This command duplicate blkid (or findmnt or lsblk) code and functionality ... so util-linux upstream does not plan to reimplement this command. For Fedora we have two cases: 1) create tiny package with only volname (volunteers?) 2) retire volname at all (because it's unnecessary, unmaintained, ...) I vote for 2, it does not make sense to maintain volname if we have _better_ FS probing code in libblkid and better command line interfaces like blkid or lsblk. Comments objections? Karel -- Karel Zak k...@redhat.com http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Readonly-XS] Specify all dependencies
commit 6c5b0bb048cc3e5998d5d151579567da35dad5dc
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 16 15:54:28 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Readonly-XS.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Readonly-XS.spec b/perl-Readonly-XS.spec
index 275b422..10e3f4f 100644
--- a/perl-Readonly-XS.spec
+++ b/perl-Readonly-XS.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Readonly-XS
Version: 1.05
-Release: 12%{?dist}
+Release: 13%{?dist}
Summary: Companion module for Readonly
Group: Development/Libraries
License: GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
# Build
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
# Module
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(vars)
BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
@@ -20,6 +21,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(XSLoader)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
# Runtime
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires: perl(Carp)
Requires: perl(Readonly) = 1.02
# Obsolete/provide old -tests subpackage (can be removed in F19 development
cycle)
@@ -71,6 +73,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/Readonly::XS.3pm*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 16 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.05-13
+- Specify all dependencies
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.05-12
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Boost.Thread in Boost 1.50
Hi there, if you had problems with linking or detection of Boost.Thread due to a message that looks similar to this: /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccAv0B8G.o: undefined reference to symbol '_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' /usr/bin/ld: note: '_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' is defined in DSO /lib64/libboost_system-mt.so.1.50.0 so try adding it to the linker command line /lib64/libboost_system-mt.so.1.50.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation ... then this is caused by Boost.Thread pulling in Boost.System. Because this symbol is brought in by includes, it appears as undefined in the linked binary itself, and it needs to be linked not only with -lboost_thread-mt, but also -lboost_system-mt. This was fixed by latest boost build, which replaces libbost_thread-mt.so with a linker script, that does this automatically. That is in Rawhide, and a bodhi update request for Fedora 18 was filed: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/boost-1.50.0-4.fc18 So if you had to put in any hacks to have your script detect Boost.Thread, or to link one of the binaries, it should shortly be possible to remove them. Thanks, PM P.S. this is tracked upstream at: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7241 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:11 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
In the X.log I see:
[ 182.375] Backtrace:
[ 182.375] 0: Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x36) [0x464d46]
[ 182.375] 1: Xorg (0x40+0x69d99) [0x469d99]
[ 182.375] 2: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f315a2bf000+0xefe0)
[0x7f315a2cdfe0]
[ 182.375] 3: Xorg (UnloadSubModule+0xf) [0x475fbf]
[ 182.375] 4: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/mach64_drv.so
(0x7f3157146000+0x183c3) [0x7f315715e3c3]
[ 182.375] 5: Xorg (InitOutput+0x8ba) [0x4843ca]
[ 182.375] 6: Xorg (0x40+0x23246) [0x423246]
[ 182.375] 7: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xf5)
[0x7f3158f46735]
[ 182.375] 8: Xorg (0x40+0x236bd) [0x4236bd]
[ 182.375]
[ 182.375] Segmentation fault at address (nil)
[ 182.375]
Fatal server error:
[ 182.375] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting
This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps mach64_drv.
I'm quite sure this is a bug in the X server itself:
% eu-addr2line -e **/mach64_drv.so.debug 0x183c3
/usr/src/debug/xf86-video-mach64-6.9.1/src/atipreinit.c:729
% cat -n **/atipreinit.c | grep -C 7 '\729\'
722 #else
723 pATI-pInt10 = pInt10Info;
724 pATI-pVBE = pVBE;
725 pVBE = NULL;
726 pInt10Info = NULL;
727 #endif /* TV_OUT */
728
729 if (ConfiguredMonitor !(flags PROBE_DETECT))
730 {
731 xf86PrintEDID(ConfiguredMonitor);
732 xf86SetDDCproperties(pScreenInfo, ConfiguredMonitor);
733 }
734
735 /* DDC module is no longer needed at this point */
736 xf86UnloadSubModule(pDDCModule);
That's the UnloadSubModule call that's crashing, and pDDCModule should
be non-NULL by this point since we've just done DDC, so clearly loading
it worked. But! The ddc module was merged into xserver core a while
back, which means unloading it ought to be a no-op. And due to a bug,
it was instead fatal. There's a fix for this issue in current xserver:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=dafc327f3c75205cf7e5360e9ccd71c7457f61a5
But it appears to not be in the 1.12 branch. Which is a little odd, I
thought 1.12 branched from master after that point. I'll nominate it
for the 1.12 branch, but unfortunately that won't fix the F17 install
media since those don't get updated.
In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little attention
to anything except the big 3: current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel graphics.
3D [alpha blending, etc.] has taken developer resources away from
any device which is 2D-only (cannot [does not] run Gnome shell.)
Yeah, sorry that the devices that need the most work are the ones that
get the most work. In the future we'll be sure to focus on end-of-lifed
hardware with feature-complete drivers.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On 08/16/2012 06:24 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps mach64_drv. In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little attention to anything except the big 3: current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel graphics. 3D [alpha blending, etc.] has taken developer resources away from any device which is 2D-only (cannot [does not] run Gnome shell.) It's not true - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ServerKMSDrivers My experience is that Rage* and non-current Radeon get ignored. I still use such cards (and current cards, too.) Radeon 9250 (RV 280, does not run Gnome3 shell; manufacturer discontinued four years ago) was *advertised* for $50 on August 3 in major metropolitan newspaper by Fry's Electronics, a leading US retailer. I see many such cards still running in desktops. Because of the tax accounting rules for US businesses (5-year depreciation on computers), I expect to see more such cards over the next couple years. The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented, so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha. However, the wiki page also says MGA SE or AST only. What about a KMS vesafb? -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On 08/16/2012 07:13 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:11 -0700, John Reiser wrote: In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little attention to anything except the big 3: current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel graphics. 3D [alpha blending, etc.] has taken developer resources away from any device which is 2D-only (cannot [does not] run Gnome shell.) Yeah, sorry that the devices that need the most work are the ones that get the most work. In the future we'll be sure to focus on end-of-lifed hardware with feature-complete drivers. New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August 3; advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP. There are thousands of such cards appearing in used equipment channels because of the US tax accounting rules (5-year depreciation on computers.) Yes, Diamond MultiMedia discontinued manufacturing these cards in June 2008. That was only four years ago; the second lifetime has just begun. -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 07:47 -0700, John Reiser wrote: New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August 3; advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP. There are thousands of such cards appearing in used equipment channels because of the US tax accounting rules (5-year depreciation on computers.) Yes, Diamond MultiMedia discontinued manufacturing these cards in June 2008. That was only four years ago; the second lifetime has just begun. And? - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Scalar-List-Utils] Correct dependencies
commit f2f0b8cf54e928fc7810ecdeba7d856e3cf96d1e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 16 16:51:59 2012 +0200
Correct dependencies
perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec b/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec
index 1e7d947..7fece79 100644
--- a/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec
+++ b/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec
@@ -1,27 +1,30 @@
Name: perl-Scalar-List-Utils
Version:1.25
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:A selection of general-utility scalar and list subroutines
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Scalar-List-Utils/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Scalar-List-Utils-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRequires: perl(bignum)
+BuildRequires: perl(base)
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Config)
-BuildRequires: perl(Devel::Peek)
+BuildRequires: perl(constant)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::File)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::Handle)
-BuildRequires: perl(List::Util)
BuildRequires: perl(Math::BigInt)
-BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(Symbol)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Tie::Handle)
+BuildRequires: perl(Tie::Scalar)
BuildRequires: perl(vars)
+BuildRequires: perl(XSLoader)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(Carp)
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 16 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.25-4
+- Correct dependencies
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.25-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] move eject to util-linux, retire volname
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:53:36PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: The new util-linux 2.22 release contains eject(1) command, it means that we can retire the original eject package (with inactive upstream). The small disadvantage is that util-linux does not implement command volname(1) from the eject package. The volname returns the volume name for a device formatted with an ISO-9660 file system. This command duplicate blkid (or findmnt or lsblk) code and functionality ... so util-linux upstream does not plan to reimplement this command. For Fedora we have two cases: 1) create tiny package with only volname (volunteers?) 2) retire volname at all (because it's unnecessary, unmaintained, ...) I vote for 2, it does not make sense to maintain volname if we have _better_ FS probing code in libblkid and better command line interfaces like blkid or lsblk. Comments objections? Sounds fine. Should probably add a release note about it that includes an example common volname command line and the recommended comandline to replace it. -Toshio pgpVHDeJ5XyEQ.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: Yeah, sorry that the devices that need the most work are the ones that get the most work. In the future we'll be sure to focus on end-of-lifed hardware with feature-complete drivers. Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around advice. For example, Airlie told me how to disable AGP in order to prevent lockups on my rv280. Other than possibly being a little slower than it should be, that has kept the card working fine. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Boost.Thread in Boost 1.50
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 16:05:35 +0200, Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote: So if you had to put in any hacks to have your script detect Boost.Thread, or to link one of the binaries, it should shortly be possible to remove them. Thanks for this update. I had one case where upstream had already addressed the issue but was still pondering how I wanted to handle this in another case. Just being able to rebuild will be nice. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On 08/16/2012 07:52 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 07:47 -0700, John Reiser wrote: New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August 3; advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP. There are thousands of such cards appearing in used equipment channels because of the US tax accounting rules (5-year depreciation on computers.) Yes, Diamond MultiMedia discontinued manufacturing these cards in June 2008. That was only four years ago; the second lifetime has just begun. And? I disagree with the resource allocation decision that RV280 is not worthy of the attention that is necessary to provide the functionality required by Gnome3. Now that current Radeon cards work, what would it take to make RV280 work? How much help can be provided by additional generally-able developers, testers, etc? Or, is the work too arcane except for experienced veterans? Meanwhile I am discarding Gnome3 in favor of XFCE. The fallback mode of Gnome3 is too buggy and non-functional, sometimes complicated by toolkits and/or apps that don't accommodate fallback mode. When teaching a desktop to new Linux adopters, there are too many exceptional situations that must be explained, where the documentation disagrees with the reality of fallback mode. -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On 08/16/2012 08:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around advice. For example, Airlie told me how to disable AGP in order to prevent lockups on my rv280. Other than possibly being a little slower than it should be, that has kept the card working fine. Is this the one you refer to [radeon.agpmode=-1 on the kernel command line]? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583319#c17 If not, then please share. -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote: The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented, so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha. However, the wiki page also says MGA SE or AST only. What about a KMS vesafb? What would a KMS vesafb even be? -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On 08/16/2012 11:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented,
so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha.
However, the wiki page also says MGA SE or AST only.
What about a KMS vesafb?
What would a KMS vesafb even be?
Something good enough so that the combination of {kernel, Xorg server,
Xorg device driver} would satisfy Gnome3's desires for a display
that did not suffer fallback mode.
--
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 12:28 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
On 08/16/2012 11:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
What about a KMS vesafb?
What would a KMS vesafb even be?
Something good enough so that the combination of {kernel, Xorg server,
Xorg device driver} would satisfy Gnome3's desires for a display
that did not suffer fallback mode.
That's entirely a function of the 3D driver, not of being KMS instead of
UMS.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:28:43PM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
Something good enough so that the combination of {kernel, Xorg server,
Xorg device driver} would satisfy Gnome3's desires for a display
that did not suffer fallback mode.
Vesa should already be running llvmpipe and not triggering fallback.
There's not really a lot that can be done to improve vesa, what with
vesa having no features.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:21:16 -0700, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote: On 08/16/2012 08:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around advice. For example, Airlie told me how to disable AGP in order to prevent lockups on my rv280. Other than possibly being a little slower than it should be, that has kept the card working fine. Is this the one you refer to [radeon.agpmode=-1 on the kernel command line]? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583319#c17 If not, then please share. Yes. If I don't do that my system will lock up fairly quickly in firefox or colossus. With it, things work fine. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:06 -0700, John Reiser wrote: I disagree with the resource allocation decision that RV280 is not worthy of the attention that is necessary to provide the functionality required by Gnome3. Of the approximately nine functionally different generations of radeons on the market, you're upset that the oldest one that might possibly work - a card you'd have to go out of your way to purchase and install at this point, and that's _more expensive_ than significantly faster and more featureful supported hardware [1] - doesn't. Yeah, okay, that's a thing one can be upset about. I hate seeing hardware not work too. But there's an awful lot of hardware in the world that doesn't work, so I try not to let it get me down. Or at least, let it get me down in proportion to the quality of the hardware in question. As for resource allocation, I'm sorry that your priorities are different from those of the people doing the work, but that does seem to suggest a straightforward solution. Now that current Radeon cards work, what would it take to make RV280 work? How much help can be provided by additional generally-able developers, testers, etc? Or, is the work too arcane except for experienced veterans? How long is a piece of string? It's hard to say without having investigated it recently. I do know that when we tried to enable shell on nv30/40 that one of the big problems actually ended up being a clutter/cogl bug (which a simple revert fixed) instead of a Mesa bug. It's entirely possible that R200-class cards do work now. Certainly they work for most of GL, approximately as well as they ever did. Mere testing never fixes bugs though. [1] - http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/ASUS-AMD-ATI-5450-Silent-DDR3-512MB-Low-Profile-Bracket/2652770.aspx - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
FUDCon EMEA, Paris 2012, any FabLab idea?
Hi there, Our FUDCon would be for 3 days, with the last 2 at the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie, a building in Paris dedicated to opening minds to sciences. They are actually building a FabLab: they have few makerbots (like a 3D printer) and some other goodies. Do you see something that we can propose as a workshop (if it works with the organization of course)? I mean, doing something else than printing a box for our raspberry pi.. ;). If some of you are hacking in the domain of makerbot or other software of this kind, provide some idea and we would see if we can make something interesting. To register: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Paris_2012#Pre-registration More at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2012-August/003099.html Cheers, -- Kévin Raymond (Shaiton) pgpkWMLxwIZjS.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[HEADS-UP] move eject to util-linux, retire volname
OT: I've noticed that fedoraproject wiki has a page How to Create an RPM Package [1]. In this page,we can see eject is an example of spec instruction,should we remove it and replace with another spec file? [1] -https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
preteen entertainment
interested in teen preteen exotic activity - pic videos -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:7 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the test list [7]. Create Fedora 18 Alpha test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284 F18 Alpha Blocker tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=752654 F18 Alpha Nice-To-Have tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=752662 [1] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] move eject to util-linux, retire volname
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 09:10 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: OT: I've noticed that fedoraproject wiki has a page How to Create an RPM Package [1]. In this page,we can see eject is an example of spec instruction,should we remove it and replace with another spec file? It's a wiki, just go ahead and edit it. ;) -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Pod-POM] Specify all dependencies
commit 049e0b19106d30a4f1f62f8f38c04d3682b9ee49
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 16 09:13:34 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Pod-POM.spec | 20 ++--
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-POM.spec b/perl-Pod-POM.spec
index 59b155f..9699796 100644
--- a/perl-Pod-POM.spec
+++ b/perl-Pod-POM.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: perl-Pod-POM
Version:0.27
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:Object-oriented interface to Perl POD documents
@@ -13,8 +13,21 @@ Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AN/ANDREWF/Pod-POM-%{ve
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::More), perl(File::Slurp), perl(Text::Wrap)
+BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path)
+# Run-time:
+BuildRequires: perl(base)
+BuildRequires: perl(constant)
+BuildRequires: perl(Encode)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(parent)
+BuildRequires: perl(Text::Wrap)
+# Tests:
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Slurp)
+BuildRequires: perl(lib)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(YAML::Tiny)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
@@ -65,6 +78,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 16 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.27-8
+- Specify all dependencies
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.27-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Starlet/f16] (6 commits) ...Merge cleanup.
Summary of changes: e6a95ec... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) 7b8fd3b... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*) 987c5b7... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*) 714da63... Upstream update. (*) d09c781... Merge cleanup. (*) e0a31a9... Merge cleanup. (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Starlet/f16: 6/6] Merge cleanup.
commit e0a31a9a965dd353666f4cae73953d24eecc06f0 Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Aug 16 10:22:05 2012 +0200 Merge cleanup. perl-Starlet.spec |3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Starlet.spec b/perl-Starlet.spec index 753656b..61d8c48 100644 --- a/perl-Starlet.spec +++ b/perl-Starlet.spec @@ -50,9 +50,6 @@ make test * Tue Aug 14 2012 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.15-1 - Upstream update. -* Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.14-2 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild - * Sat Nov 26 2011 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org 0.14-1 - Spec file cleanup. - Abandon fedora 15. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PPI] Specify all dependencies
commit bbaeda401ec1515ca484d4cc88b163a08100633e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 16 11:31:08 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-PPI.spec | 39 +--
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec
index 71a109a..f60998f 100644
--- a/perl-PPI.spec
+++ b/perl-PPI.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
+# PPI::XSAccessor is experimental
+%if 0%{?rhel} = 7
+%bcond_with XSAccessor
+%else
+%bcond_without XSAccessor
+%endif
+
Name: perl-PPI
Version:1.215
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -8,21 +15,29 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPI/
Source0:http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AD/ADAMK/PPI-%{version}.tar.gz
Patch0: PPI-1.215-UTF8.patch
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-BuildRequires: perl(List::Util) = 1.20
-BuildRequires: perl(Storable) = 2.17
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Class::Inspector) = 1.22
BuildRequires: perl(Clone) = 0.30
+BuildRequires: perl(constant)
+BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
BuildRequires: perl(Digest::MD5) = 2.35
-BuildRequires: perl(File::Remove) = 1.42
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) = 0.84
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::String) = 1.07
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Remove) = 1.42
+BuildRequires: perl(List::Util) = 1.20
BuildRequires: perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.16
BuildRequires: perl(Params::Util) = 1.00
-BuildRequires: perl(Task::Weaken)
+BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
+BuildRequires: perl(Storable) = 2.17
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.86
BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Object) = 0.07
BuildRequires: perl(Test::SubCalls) = 1.07
+BuildRequires: perl(Task::Weaken)
# Circular dependencies in release tests, so don't do them when bootstrapping:
# Perl::MinimumVersion - PPI
%if 0%{!?perl_bootstrap:1}
@@ -35,6 +50,11 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 0.101080
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
%endif
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+%if %{with XSAccessor}
+Requires: perl(Class::XSAccessor)
+%endif
+# Run-require Task::Weaken, see Changes for more details.
+Requires: perl(Task::Weaken)
# Filter out redundant unversioned provides
%global __provides_exclude ^perl\\(PPI::.+\\)$
@@ -49,6 +69,10 @@ Parse, analyze and manipulate Perl (without perl).
# Re-code docs as UTF-8
%patch0 -p1
+%if %{without XSAccessor}
+rm lib/PPI/XSAccessor.pm
+sed -i '/^lib\/PPI\/XSAccessor\.pm$/d' MANIFEST
+%endif
%build
perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -77,6 +101,9 @@ make test TEST_FILES=xt/*.t RELEASE_TESTING=1
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 16 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.215-8
+- Specify all dependencies
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.215-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server On i386: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 848775] New: perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848775 Bug ID: 848775 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Assignee: mmasl...@redhat.com Summary: perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.16 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: perl-PPIx-EditorTools Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.16 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.15 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPIx-EditorTools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 848776] New: perl-Socket-2.004 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848776 Bug ID: 848776 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Summary: perl-Socket-2.004 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: perl-Socket Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.004 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.002 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Socket/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Socket-2.004.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Socket: 2bbc0cf6a8be73b8dec7f56ce2f935a6 Socket-2.004.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Socket] 2.004 bump
commit 9ef23f208b4222d9a94e7654b53222053db1eacd
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 16 14:21:59 2012 +0200
2.004 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Socket.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5919c64..29821f8 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
/Socket-2.000.tar.gz
/Socket-2.001.tar.gz
/Socket-2.002.tar.gz
+/Socket-2.004.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Socket.spec b/perl-Socket.spec
index e402b61..d6febc6 100644
--- a/perl-Socket.spec
+++ b/perl-Socket.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%global cpan_version 2.002
+%global cpan_version 2.004
Name: perl-Socket
Version:%(eval echo '%{cpan_version}' | tr '_' '.')
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 16 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.004-1
+- 2.004 bump
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.002-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index de7553d..2fa24ea 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-02cecfa6e31c274c41b4455107419b8a Socket-2.002.tar.gz
+2bbc0cf6a8be73b8dec7f56ce2f935a6 Socket-2.004.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server On i386: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 848776] perl-Socket-2.004 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848776 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Socket-2.004-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-08-16 08:38:23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-Dropbox-API/f18] Requires perl(LWP::Protocol::https)
Summary of changes: fb4dd53... Requires perl(LWP::Protocol::https) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Readonly] Specify all dependencies
commit 807dc78a9ea67e11150aeba775c3433d97150386
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 16 15:21:29 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Readonly.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Readonly.spec b/perl-Readonly.spec
index 2b015bd..b0ad7e2 100644
--- a/perl-Readonly.spec
+++ b/perl-Readonly.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Readonly
Version: 1.03
-Release: 20%{?dist}
+Release: 21%{?dist}
Summary: Facility for creating read-only scalars, arrays, hashes
Group: Development/Libraries
License: GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -9,12 +9,14 @@ Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RO/ROODE/Readonly-%{version}.t
Patch0:Readonly-1.03-interpreter.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(vars)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires: perl(Carp)
# Speed it up since we can
Requires: perl(Readonly::XS)
@@ -67,6 +69,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/Readonly.3pm*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 16 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.03-21
+- Specify all dependencies
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.03-20
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-Dropbox-API/f16] (2 commits) ...Requires perl(LWP::Protocol::https)
Summary of changes: 1b7d038... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*) fb4dd53... Requires perl(LWP::Protocol::https) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Plack-1.0002.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by corsepiu
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Plack: 0dbe943918e25909a4e9782415f5ecf0 Plack-1.0002.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Plack] Upstream update.
commit e34a468a8e2b8fe505aa7dde912ac8fc2ba73112
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Aug 16 15:42:30 2012 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Plack.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4b2ffa6..9a89973 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/Plack-1.0001.tar.gz
+/Plack-1.0002.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Plack.spec b/perl-Plack.spec
index 4ab9e4c..b32ef1c 100644
--- a/perl-Plack.spec
+++ b/perl-Plack.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Plack
-Version:1.0001
+Version:1.0002
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI
toolkit)
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ make test %{?_with_apache:TEST_APACHE2=1 TEST_FCGI_CLIENT=1}
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 16 2012 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org 1.0002-1
+- Upstream update.
+
* Mon Jul 30 2012 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org 1.0001-1
- Upstream update.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index cd5039b..15fe9bc 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-9a131c78929615c40735e27f614f0529 Plack-1.0001.tar.gz
+0dbe943918e25909a4e9782415f5ecf0 Plack-1.0002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Plack/f18] Upstream update.
Summary of changes: e34a468... Upstream update. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Plack/f17] (2 commits) ...Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f18' into f17
Summary of changes: e34a468... Upstream update. (*) 26a6a9b... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f18' into f17 (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Plack/f17: 2/2] Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f18' into f17
commit 26a6a9b35c00896d1be690d1eb6a270d7f29feb5 Merge: 67cb845 e34a468 Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Aug 16 15:44:25 2012 +0200 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f18' into f17 .gitignore |2 +- perl-Plack.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Plack/f16] (3 commits) ...Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f17' into f16
Summary of changes: e34a468... Upstream update. (*) 26a6a9b... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f18' into f17 (*) d95c8c9... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f17' into f16 (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Plack/f16: 3/3] Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f17' into f16
commit d95c8c93fd03f6144722a00fbb50d7fcc9abeaa6 Merge: bd005b8 26a6a9b Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Aug 16 15:45:36 2012 +0200 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f17' into f16 .gitignore |2 +- perl-Plack.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 577669] perl independent sub-package tracking bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577669 Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2012-08-16 13:46:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 577669] perl independent sub-package tracking bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577669 --- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a notice that Fedora 14 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 14. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At this time, all open bugs with a Fedora 'version' of '14' have been closed as WONTFIX. (Please note: Our normal process is to give advanced warning of this occurring, but we forgot to do that. A thousand apologies.) Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, feel free to reopen this bug and simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were unable to fix it before Fedora 14 reached end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on Clone This Bug (top right of this page) and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 844953] Upgrade to new upstream version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844953 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-No-Worries-0.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 844953] Upgrade to new upstream version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844953 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-No-Worries-0.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 505766] No IPv6 support in Perl::Net::Server (hurts Munin and others)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505766 Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2012-08-16 17:40:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 505766] No IPv6 support in Perl::Net::Server (hurts Munin and others)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505766 --- Comment #6 from Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a notice that Fedora 14 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 14. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At this time, all open bugs with a Fedora 'version' of '14' have been closed as WONTFIX. (Please note: Our normal process is to give advanced warning of this occurring, but we forgot to do that. A thousand apologies.) Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, feel free to reopen this bug and simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were unable to fix it before Fedora 14 reached end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on Clone This Bug (top right of this page) and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 664090] [abrt] gscan2pdf-0.9.31-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664090 Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2012-08-16 17:47:48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 848961] New: perl rawhide update to 5.16.1-230.fc19 breaks dependencies not listed as broken by rawhide report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848961 Bug ID: 848961 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, lkund...@v3.sk, mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, psab...@redhat.com, rc040...@freenet.de, tcall...@redhat.com Assignee: mmasl...@redhat.com Summary: perl rawhide update to 5.16.1-230.fc19 breaks dependencies not listed as broken by rawhide report Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: mic...@harddata.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: perl Product: Fedora Description of problem: An attempt to run update which pulls perl-5.16.1-230.fc19 fails with: Error: Package: perl-CGI-3.59-227.fc18.noarch (@rawhide/18) Error: Package: perl-Version-Requirements-0.101022-227.fc18.noarch (@rawhide/18) Error: Package: 3:perl-version-0.99-227.fc18.noarch (@rawhide/18) Error: Package: perl-JSON-PP-2.27200-227.fc18.noarch (@rawhide/18) Error: Package: perl-Perl-OSType-1.002-227.fc18.noarch (@rawhide/18) All these require perl-5.16.0-227.fc18 and at least perl-version and perl-Version-Requirements prior to 5.16.1-230.fc19 were subpackages of perl.rpm and AFAICT are not made now obsolete. None of the above is listed in Broken deps of rawhide report. Moreover an attempt to remove packages in question tries to remove quite a list of further packages due to dependencies and not even all of them perl-...; like for example gnucash still present in rawhide repositories. What gives? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.16.1-230.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 848997] New: Missing requirement on perl(Email::Date::Format)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848997
Bug ID: 848997
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 18
Priority: unspecified
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcall...@redhat.com
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
Summary: Missing requirement on perl(Email::Date::Format)
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: boche...@fedoraproject.org
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Simple
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
At line 11 of /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Email/Simple/Creator.pm, one can
see:
sub _date_header {
require Email::Date::Format;
Email::Date::Format::email_date();
}
Perhaps it's because the requirement is declared inside a function that
rpmbuild doesn't pick it up automatically?
However, it is required for proper operation of the package.
Example script
[mathieu@localhost ~]$ cat testmail.pl
use strict;
use Email::Sender::Simple qw(sendmail);
use Email::Simple;
use Email::Simple::Creator;
use Email::Sender::Transport::SMTP;
# -- Change to appropriate values
my $from = 'f...@example.com';
my $to = 'f...@example.com';
my $smtp = '10.0.0.1';
#
open(my $fh, $0);
my $body = join(, $fh);
close($fh);
my $email = Email::Simple-create(
header = [
To = $to,
From= $from,
Subject = Perl module to send emails,
],
body = $body,
);
my $transport = Email::Sender::Transport::SMTP-new({
host = $smtp,
port = 25,
});
sendmail($email, { transport = $transport });
Script output
[mathieu@localhost ~]$ perl testmail.pl
Can't locate Email/Date/Format.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Email/Simple/Creator.pm line 12.
===
Once I manually install perl-Email-Date-Format, the above script sends the
email properly.
Running repoquery with the --releasever parameter, I can see that the package
is missing the requirement in all versions of Fedora (from 16 to 18) and EPEL
(5 and 6).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
