Re: Systemd macros (f18+)

2012-09-13 Thread Lennart Poettering 
On Fri, 31.08.12 09:21, Simone Caronni (negativ...@gmail.com) wrote:

 2- What's the status of the back-port of those macros to F16/F17 (with a
 different expansion of course)? Is it under evaluation? Should I wait for
 the resolution of this before starting to add the macros?

Since F16/F17 do not have presets we cannot just port those macros
there. What is one macro in F18 would map to two macros in F16/F17. And
I am pretty sure that introducing a new macro as a stop-gap like this is
a bad idea and we'd never be able to get rid of it again.

Use the macros in F18+, use the old non-macro snippets on older distributions.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Systemd macros (f18+)

2012-09-13 Thread Simone Caronni 
Hello,

On 13 September 2012 08:06, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
 Since F16/F17 do not have presets we cannot just port those macros
 there. What is one macro in F18 would map to two macros in F16/F17.

Can you please point me to the two macros? I only see a small difference.

I applied the macros to some packages, and the only difference I see
in the expansion of the macros after they have been built in koji are
2 words in the postinstall scriptlet:

Fedora 17:

postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then
# Initial installation
/bin/systemctl daemon-reload /dev/null 21 || :
fi

Fedora 18+:

postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then
# Initial installation
/usr/bin/systemctl preset shellinaboxd.service /dev/null 21 || :
fi

So out of the 3 macros in the f18+ systemd snippets there's only one
which needs a different expansion.
It seems a rather trivial change to me; is there anything I'm missing?

Thanks,
--Simone


-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Systemd macros (f18+)

2012-09-13 Thread Lennart Poettering 
On Thu, 13.09.12 08:48, Simone Caronni (negativ...@gmail.com) wrote:

 Hello,
 
 On 13 September 2012 08:06, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
  Since F16/F17 do not have presets we cannot just port those macros
  there. What is one macro in F18 would map to two macros in F16/F17.
 
 Can you please point me to the two macros? I only see a small difference.

On F16/F17 in postinst you have to do systemctl enable to enable a
service. To leave a service disabled you do not invoke systemctl at
all. Whether a service is enabled or not after installation is encoded
in the package itself and hence it is up to the package maintainer
whether he includes the systemctl enable or not. To turn this into a
postinst macro you'd have to introduce two macros: one with and one without the
systemctl enable.

On F18 in postinst you have to do systemctl preset
unconditionally. Whether a service is enabled or not after installation
is no longer encoded in the package itself but in the preset policy of
the distro/spin/admin. Since there's only one possible operation here
we only have one macro for postinst: the one which invokes systemctl
preset.

In other words:

A) There's one postinst script that invokes systemctl enable
B) There's another one that does not invoke systemctl, and leaves the service 
off
C) There's a third one that invokes systemctl preset

In F16/F17 A and B are used. Some packages use A, most packages use B.

In F18 only C is used. All packages use C. 

In F18 we have a macro that implements C. We have no macro that
implements A or B.

Now, you are asking me to provide a macro with the same name and
functionality in F16/F17 as the one we introduced for F18, right? But
how could we do this? If on F18 the macro implements C, what would it
implement on F16/F17? Would it implement A? If so, it would be useless
for all packages whose service needs to stay off after
installation. Would it implement B? If so, it would be useless for all
packages whose service needs to be enabled after installation.

Of course we could introduce new macros for both A and B, so that we'd
have three macros, covering all three operations. But who'd be helped
with that? We should introduce new stuff only for new distros, and maybe
backport it. But this would be adding completely new stuff to old
distros that makes no sense anymore on new distros, and hence we
shouldn't do it.

Hope this clarifies this a bit.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Systemd macros (f18+)

2012-09-13 Thread Simone Caronni 
On 13 September 2012 09:10, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
 On Thu, 13.09.12 08:48, Simone Caronni (negativ...@gmail.com) wrote:
 Hope this clarifies this a bit.

Thanks for the explanation!

Regards,
--Simone


-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

File Archive-Tar-1.90.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik

2012-09-13 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Archive-Tar:

bc4ee1aa0bbf0384edf27e14d7e20a71  Archive-Tar-1.90.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

2012-09-13 Thread Miloslav Trmač 
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com wrote:
 One possible issue is that stale sort tmp files could persist
 in /var/tmp for 30 days even after a reboot.

 I'm going to err on the side of leaving sort(1) as is
 and using /tmp by default, as detailed at:
 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2012-09/msg00139.html

 In summary, sort(1) only needs stateless storage,
 so lets keep it more abstract and default to /tmp,
 rather than worrying about system specifics.

It also needs storage larger than the available virtual memory,
doesn't it?.  AFAICS using /tmp is more or less equivalent to
specifying --buffer-size=[infinity] , which doesn't make sense for
sort.

I do appreciate that there is nothing sort can do to get a reliable
cross-platform default.
Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Systemd macros (f18+)

2012-09-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III 

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:10:45 +0200,
  Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:

In other words:

A) There's one postinst script that invokes systemctl enable
B) There's another one that does not invoke systemctl, and leaves the service 
off
C) There's a third one that invokes systemctl preset

In F16/F17 A and B are used. Some packages use A, most packages use B.

In F18 only C is used. All packages use C.

In F18 we have a macro that implements C. We have no macro that
implements A or B.

Now, you are asking me to provide a macro with the same name and
functionality in F16/F17 as the one we introduced for F18, right? But
how could we do this? If on F18 the macro implements C, what would it
implement on F16/F17? Would it implement A? If so, it would be useless
for all packages whose service needs to stay off after
installation. Would it implement B? If so, it would be useless for all
packages whose service needs to be enabled after installation.

Of course we could introduce new macros for both A and B, so that we'd
have three macros, covering all three operations. But who'd be helped
with that? We should introduce new stuff only for new distros, and maybe
backport it. But this would be adding completely new stuff to old
distros that makes no sense anymore on new distros, and hence we
shouldn't do it.


I believe the suggestions was to have macros for A and B that did A and B 
on f16/f17 and did the same as C on F18+. That way a package could use 
a single macro on all current releases. Then when f18 was the oldest 
current release, packages could switch to using macro C for all releases.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20120913 changes

2012-09-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
Compose started at Thu Sep 13 08:15:10 UTC 2012

Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.12()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.13()(64bit)
[archmage]
archmage-0.2.4-6.fc18.noarch requires python-chm
[chm2pdf]
chm2pdf-0.9.1-12.fc18.noarch requires python-chm
[clutter-gtk010]
clutter-gtk010-0.11.4-6.fc17.i686 requires libcogl.so.9
clutter-gtk010-0.11.4-6.fc17.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
[ease]
ease-0.4-18.fc17.i686 requires libcogl.so.9
ease-0.4-18.fc17.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
[emacs-spice-mode]
emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-9.fc18.noarch requires gwave
[eog-plugins]
eog-plugins-3.4.1-2.fc18.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
[evolution-exchange]
evolution-exchange-3.5.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
evolution-exchange-3.5.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
evolution-exchange-3.5.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libedata-cal-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
evolution-exchange-3.5.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libedata-book-1.2.so.14()(64bit)
evolution-exchange-3.5.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libecal-1.2.so.12()(64bit)
evolution-exchange-3.5.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libebook-1.2.so.13()(64bit)
evolution-exchange-3.5.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libebackend-1.2.so.3()(64bit)
evolution-exchange-3.5.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.36()(64bit)
[fedora-ksplice]
fedora-ksplice-0.5-10.fc18.x86_64 requires ksplice
[flush]
flush-0.9.10-7.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
flush-0.9.10-7.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
flush-0.9.10-7.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libboost_signals-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
flush-0.9.10-7.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
[fontik]
fontik-0.6.1-2.20120305git5dbbc513.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libgee-0.8.so.0()(64bit)
[gcstar]
gcstar-1.7.0-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Table)
gcstar-1.7.0-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::HBox)
gcstar-1.7.0-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Frame)
gcstar-1.7.0-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::EventBox)
[gdb-heap]
gdb-heap-0.5-9.fc18.x86_64 requires glibc(x86-64) = 0:2.15
[gearmand]
gearmand-0.33-2.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
[glom]
glom-1.18.6-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libboost_python.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
glom-libs-1.18.6-1.fc17.i686 requires libboost_python.so.1.48.0
glom-libs-1.18.6-1.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libboost_python.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
[gnome-applets]
1:gnome-applets-3.5.1-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgweather-3.so.0()(64bit)
[gnome-color-manager]
gnome-color-manager-3.5.3-2.fc18.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
[gnome-contacts]
gnome-contacts-3.5.4.1-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
gnome-contacts-3.5.4.1-1.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.39()(64bit)
[gnome-games]
1:gnome-games-gnibbles-3.5.5-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
1:gnome-games-lightsoff-3.5.5-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
1:gnome-games-quadrapassel-3.5.5-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
1:gnome-games-swell-foop-3.5.5-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
[gnome-pilot]
gnome-pilot-eds-2.91.93-5.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libedataserverui-3.0.so.1()(64bit)
gnome-pilot-eds-2.91.93-5.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
gnome-pilot-eds-2.91.93-5.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libecal-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
gnome-pilot-eds-2.91.93-5.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libebook-1.2.so.13()(64bit)
[gnome-shell]
gnome-shell-3.5.5-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
gnome-shell-3.5.5-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.39()(64bit)
[gwibber]
1:gwibber-3.4.2-3.fc18.i686 requires libgee-0.8.so.0
1:gwibber-3.4.2-3.fc18.x86_64 requires libgee-0.8.so.0()(64bit)
[kdeutils]
6:kdeutils-minimal-4.9.1-1.fc19.noarch requires kdf = 0:4.9.1
[leechcraft]
leechcraft-0.5.70-4.fc18.i686 requires 
libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.48.0
leechcraft-0.5.70-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
leechcraft-bittorrent-0.5.70-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
leechcraft-bittorrent-0.5.70-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.48.0()(64bit)
[libmash]
libmash-0.2.0-6.fc18.i686 requires libcogl.so.9
libmash-0.2.0-6.fc18.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.9()(64bit)
[libsyncml]

Re: Fedora multi-arch

2012-09-13 Thread Chris Adams 
Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us said:
 when I was first asked to create the
 multi images it was under the understanding that it would be for use at
 fedora events by ambassadors only. There is no way that Im going to put
 them on the main mirror without consulting with the people that run the
 mirrors first. 

I haven't actually downloaded and looked at one of these multi-arch
images, but one thing that might be nice (and not too much of a load on
mirrors) would be to make a multi-arch/multi-image netinst/rescue image.
How do you create the multi-arch image (i.e. what tools/commands)?
-- 
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora multi-arch

2012-09-13 Thread Tom Callaway 
On 09/13/2012 09:08 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
 I haven't actually downloaded and looked at one of these multi-arch
 images, but one thing that might be nice (and not too much of a load on
 mirrors) would be to make a multi-arch/multi-image netinst/rescue image.
 How do you create the multi-arch image (i.e. what tools/commands)?

http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/spot/public_git/multiboot-media-creator.git/

~tom

==
Fedora Project
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Systemd macros (f18+)

2012-09-13 Thread Lennart Poettering 
On Thu, 13.09.12 07:47, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:

 Of course we could introduce new macros for both A and B, so that we'd
 have three macros, covering all three operations. But who'd be helped
 with that? We should introduce new stuff only for new distros, and maybe
 backport it. But this would be adding completely new stuff to old
 distros that makes no sense anymore on new distros, and hence we
 shouldn't do it.
 
 I believe the suggestions was to have macros for A and B that did A
 and B on f16/f17 and did the same as C on F18+. That way a package
 could use a single macro on all current releases. Then when f18 was
 the oldest current release, packages could switch to using macro C
 for all releases.

But then we'd introduce two macros now, for two old distros, that make
no sense on the next distros anymore but we could never get rid of them
anymore, because we'd break the old packages...

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Systemd macros (f18+)

2012-09-13 Thread Tom Lane 
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
 But then we'd introduce two macros now, for two old distros, that make
 no sense on the next distros anymore but we could never get rid of them
 anymore, because we'd break the old packages...

So what?  It's not like the carrying cost of redundant macros is
anything significant.  Meanwhile, by refusing to do this you are
inconveniencing a lot of package maintainers for whom the costs
of having different specfiles in different branches *are* significant.

regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

2012-09-13 Thread Roberto Ragusa 
On 09/13/2012 03:54 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
 I'm going to err on the side of leaving sort(1) as is
 and using /tmp by default, as detailed at:
 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2012-09/msg00139.html

This is the perfect solution for all the people who
will switch /tmp back to disk immediately after installation.

-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha is hereby declared GOLD

2012-09-13 Thread Jaroslav Reznik 
At the F18 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, the Fedora 18 
Alpha release was declared GOLD. F18 Alpha will be released Tuesday, 
September 18, 2012.

Thanks to everyone who helped to make it possible, to ship Spherical 
Cow out of the doors to the wild journey for Beta and GA! 

Meeting details can be seen here:
Minutes: 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-09-13/f18_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2012-09-13-19.00.html
Log: 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-09-13/f18_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2012-09-13-19.00.log.html

Btw. documentation is requested for common bugs page, see Go/No-Go
log + latest Blocker Review Meeting log.

Jaroslav
Your very happy schedule wrangler

=
#fedora-meeting-1: F18 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting
=


Meeting started by jreznik at 19:00:49 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-09-13/f18_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2012-09-13-19.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* roll call  (jreznik, 19:01:38)
  * jreznik nirik jlk rbergeron kparal tflink adamw present  (jreznik,
19:05:54)

* Purpose of this meeting  (jreznik, 19:06:44)
  * Purpose of this meeting is to see whether or not F18 Alpha is ready
for shipment, according to the release criteria.  (jreznik,
19:07:00)
  * This is determined in a few ways:  (jreznik, 19:07:07)
  * No remaining blocker bugs ;-)  (jreznik, 19:07:43)
  * Test matrices for Alpha are fully completed  (jreznik, 19:07:49)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (jreznik,
19:07:58)
  * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(jreznik, 19:08:06)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test
(jreznik, 19:08:12)
  * LINK:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
(jreznik, 19:08:19)
  * LINK:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
(jreznik, 19:08:26)

* agenda  (jreznik, 19:09:05)
  * 3 Proposed Blockers  (tflink, 19:12:34)
  * 3 non-VERIFIED Accepted Blockers  (tflink, 19:12:56)

* (855849) could not UEFI boot F18 Alpha (TC6 through RC3) DVD or
  netinst written to optical disc or dd'ed to USB: /dev/root does not
  exist  (tflink, 19:13:49)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855849   (tflink,
19:13:52)
  * Proposed Blockers, NEW  (tflink, 19:13:54)
  * AGREED: it is agreed in principle that the relevant release
criterion should be weakened so it only requires any one of the
'normal' UEFI boot paths to work, not several  (adamw, 19:36:07)
  * AGREED: 855849 - RejectedBlocker - With the above modification to
the F18 alpha release requirements, this bug is not considered a
blocker as USB media created with livecd-iso-to-disk is still able
to boot on (u)EFI machines  (tflink, 19:38:14)

* (848305) When kernel modsetting is enabled, laptop screen remians off
  until Xorg starts (ironlake)  (tflink, 19:38:46)
  * ACTION: adamw to propose criterion modification on test list
(adamw, 19:38:47)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848305   (tflink,
19:38:49)
  * Proposed Blockers, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 19:38:52)
  * AGREED: 848305 is rejected as a blocker on the basis that it only
affects certain systems (so a conditional violation, so a judgment
call) and appears to have a relatively simple and documentable
workaround  (adamw, 19:57:39)

* (856938) Native UEFI install from F18 Alpha RC3 DVD written to USB
  with livecd-iso-to-disk fails to boot  (tflink, 19:58:32)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856938   (tflink,
19:58:35)
  * Proposed Blockers, NEW  (tflink, 19:58:38)
  * AGREED: 856938 - RejectedBlocker - While this is a conditional
violation of the F18 alpha release criteria, it was decided that the
current success rates are enough for F18 alpha  (tflink, 20:11:24)

* (856399) RC2 DVD is missing grub2-efi and shim packages  (tflink,
  20:13:06)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856399   (tflink,
20:13:06)
  * Accepted Blockers, MODIFIED  (tflink, 20:13:06)
  * This has been fixed in RC3 and will be moved to VERIFIED shortly
(tflink, 20:13:46)

* (856096) repoclosure failure on 18 Alpha RC2 DVDs (mongodb)  (tflink,
  20:13:56)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856096   (tflink,
20:13:56)
  * Accepted Blockers, ON_QA  (tflink, 20:13:56)
  * this bug has been fixed, needs to be moved to VERIFIED. after enough
karma, the update will be pushed to stable and this bug will be
closed  (tflink, 20:15:57)

* (856836) /etc/fstab is not written correctly after live install (F18
  Alpha RC2+)  (tflink, 20:16:08)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856836   (tflink,
20:16:11)
  * Accepted Blockers, ON_QA  (tflink, 20:16:13)
  * this is reported to be

[perl-Date-Manip] Update to 6.34

2012-09-13 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 
commit 7f638a43d6ead60755b6d91072ec4cbf6b6e61c1
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Sep 12 14:45:58 2012 +0200

Update to 6.34

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-Date-Manip.spec |   15 +--
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 0483e6e..a764c14 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ Date-Manip-6.07.tar.gz
 /Date-Manip-6.30.tar.gz
 /Date-Manip-6.31.tar.gz
 /Date-Manip-6.32.tar.gz
+/Date-Manip-6.34.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Date-Manip.spec b/perl-Date-Manip.spec
index 212fa94..abd99a5 100644
--- a/perl-Date-Manip.spec
+++ b/perl-Date-Manip.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Date-Manip
-Version:6.32
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:6.34
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Date manipulation routines
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ to daylight saving time.
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n Date-Manip-%{version}
-chmod -x examples/*
 
 %build
 perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor
@@ -54,12 +53,16 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null \;
 ./Build test
 
 %files
-%doc HISTORY LICENSE README README.first examples
+%doc HISTORY LICENSE README README.first
 %{perl_vendorlib}/Date/
-%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
-
+%{_mandir}/man[13]/*.[13]*
+%{_bindir}/dm_*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Sep 12 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 6.34-1
+- 6.34 bump
+- examples are included in man pages and bin directory. Remove them from doc.
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 6.32-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 536eda9..8f9281f 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0d5c1ee2f75f6407fb1035e3535f650b  Date-Manip-6.32.tar.gz
+99d474e2d832dd23c9ea889b33f2019a  Date-Manip-6.34.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 853771] perl-Date-Manip-6.34 is available

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853771

Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Manip-6.34-1.fc19
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-09-13 03:06:05

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2012-09-13 Thread Petr Pisar 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-Manifest:

8d72d056722a9424e642aa0e66b6b50b  ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-ExtUtils-Manifest] 1.61 bump

2012-09-13 Thread Petr Pisar 
commit fcf557fb0e96becbf707e5222fb58d29fa6341ec
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Sep 13 09:07:10 2012 +0200

1.61 bump

 .gitignore  |1 +
 perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec |8 +---
 sources |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1b9e033..e8994c3 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /ExtUtils-Manifest-1.60.tar.gz
+/ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
index 70c73a3..f12ae94 100644
--- a/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
+++ b/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-ExtUtils-Manifest
-Version:1.60
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:1.61
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Utilities to write and check a MANIFEST file
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 %install
 make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
@@ -47,6 +46,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 13 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.61-1
+- 1.61 bump
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.60-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ba4527e..a654476 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0146485d2f730a3676d0058cd4bbdd02  ExtUtils-Manifest-1.60.tar.gz
+8d72d056722a9424e642aa0e66b6b50b  ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 856811] perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61 is available

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856811

--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This release tunes tests and VMS support only. No need to back-port.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 856811] perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61 is available

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856811

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61
   ||-1.fc19
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-09-13 03:18:04

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Perl-Critic-Lax-0.009.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2012-09-13 Thread Petr Pisar 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Lax:

2b6e3cd6fb21f0a710980844d96d036e  Perl-Critic-Lax-0.009.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod-0.18.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik

2012-09-13 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for 
perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod:

db4c5e935e68dc16ce6169c35fbb56ae  Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod] Initial import

2012-09-13 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 
commit e0af82dd94a49e60fc62d0de7de948fc77e692c3
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Sep 13 09:47:42 2012 +0200

Initial import

 .gitignore |1 +
 perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod.spec |   64 
 sources|1 +
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..84e80b8 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod-0.18.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod.spec 
b/perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..d431e3f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+Name:   perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod
+Version:0.18
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Module::Install extension to automatically convert POD to a 
README
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Group:  Development/Libraries
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod/
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BI/BINGOS/Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  perl = 1:5.6.0
+BuildRequires:  perl(inc::Module::Install)
+BuildRequires:  perl(base)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Capture::Tiny) = 0.05
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Path)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Install) = 1
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Install::AutoLicense)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Install::Base)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Install::GithubMeta)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Html)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Man)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Text) = 3.13
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.47
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.00
+Requires:   perl(Module::Install) = 1
+Requires:   perl(Pod::Html)
+Requires:   perl(Pod::Man)
+Requires:   perl(Pod::Text) = 3.13
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+
+%description
+Module::Install::ReadmeFromPod is a Module::Install extension that
+generates a README file automatically from an indicated file containing
+POD, whenever the author runs Makefile.PL. Several output formats are
+supported: plain-text, HTML, PDF or manual page.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod-%{version}
+rm -r inc
+sed -i -e '/^inc\// d' MANIFEST
+find -type f -exec chmod -x {} +
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%files
+%doc Changes LICENSE tools
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%changelog
+* Fri Jun 22 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com 0.18-1
+- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..debeeff 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+db4c5e935e68dc16ce6169c35fbb56ae  Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 856813] perl-Perl-Critic-Lax-0.009 is available

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856813

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-Lax-0.009-
   ||1.fc19
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-09-13 03:50:39

--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Pure metadata update. No need to back-port.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 855071] perl-Archive-Tar-1.90 is available

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855071

Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Archive-Tar] Update to 1.90

2012-09-13 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 
commit 9b59b1bf35b8cfb266fe08460997aad2160ba37c
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Sep 13 11:02:04 2012 +0200

Update to 1.90

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-Archive-Tar.spec |7 +--
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 275656a..7eae4e9 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ Archive-Tar-1.64.tar.gz
 /Archive-Tar-1.82.tar.gz
 /Archive-Tar-1.84.tar.gz
 /Archive-Tar-1.88.tar.gz
+/Archive-Tar-1.90.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Archive-Tar.spec b/perl-Archive-Tar.spec
index 92e6c36..e8d2d9c 100644
--- a/perl-Archive-Tar.spec
+++ b/perl-Archive-Tar.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Archive-Tar
-Version:1.88
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:1.90
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:A module for Perl manipulation of .tar files
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ make test
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 13 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.90-1
+- 1.90 bump
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.88-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index cd460bd..58cb83a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a14e171b70cd785301ceb9570ccb9c33  Archive-Tar-1.88.tar.gz
+bc4ee1aa0bbf0384edf27e14d7e20a71  Archive-Tar-1.90.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 855071] perl-Archive-Tar-1.90 is available

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855071

Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Archive-Tar-1.90-1.fc1
   ||9
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-09-13 05:26:01

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 855073] perl-Test-Compile-0.21 is available

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855073

Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Test-Compile-0.21.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik

2012-09-13 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Compile:

632358cf8fb1ff75180220fbc2342b82  Test-Compile-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Test-Compile] Update to 0.21

2012-09-13 Thread Jitka Plesnikova 
commit a1485b7339cc2dd76631e71f949fa7f32e96c1f1
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Sep 13 12:41:09 2012 +0200

Update to 0.21

 .gitignore |1 +
 perl-Test-Compile.spec |   10 ++
 sources|2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 35b2a53..7ed9485 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ Test-Compile-0.13.tar.gz
 /Test-Compile-0.18.tar.gz
 /Test-Compile-0.19.tar.gz
 /Test-Compile-0.20.tar.gz
+/Test-Compile-0.21.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-Compile.spec b/perl-Test-Compile.spec
index aef352f..5a52c3e 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Compile.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Compile.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Test-Compile
-Version:0.20
+Version:0.21
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Check whether Perl module files compile correctly
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -19,9 +19,6 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.88
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
 
 %{?perl_default_filter}
-# Don't provide the internal module
-%global __provides_exclude 
%{?__provides_exclude:%__provides_exclude|}^perl\\(Test::Compile::Internal.*
-%global __requires_exclude 
%{?__provides_exclude:%__provides_exclude|}^perl\\(Test::Compile::Internal.*
 
 %description
 Test::Compile lets you check the validity of a Perl module file or Perl script
@@ -49,6 +46,11 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 13 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.21-1
+- 0.21 bump
+- Remove the filter of ::Internal module. It is no longer 'beta' and could
+  be used directly to test a CPAN distribution.
+
 * Thu Aug 09 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.20-1
 - 0.20 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 8f33789..06a52ec 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5a832a25bda5f2d28201f827af97a132  Test-Compile-0.20.tar.gz
+632358cf8fb1ff75180220fbc2342b82  Test-Compile-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2012-09-13 Thread buildsys 


perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

2012-09-13 Thread buildsys 


perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857030] New: perl-IPC-Run needs explicit require for perl-IO-Pty

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857030

Bug ID: 857030
  Keywords: EasyFix
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
  Severity: unspecified
  Clone Of: 856840
   Version: 16
  Priority: unspecified
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
st...@silug.org, tbeat...@boingo.com
  Assignee: st...@silug.org
   Summary: perl-IPC-Run needs explicit require for perl-IO-Pty
Regression: ---
  Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
  Type: Bug
 Documentation: ---
  Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: ASSIGNED
 Component: perl-IPC-Run
   Product: Fedora

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #856840 +++

Created attachment 612286
Perl script which calls IPC::Run::harness

Description of problem:
Line 1906 of /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/IPC/Run.pm contains require
IO::Pty; but this module is not required by the perl-IPC-Run package.  The
module is used by IPC::Run::harness.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.84-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Remove the perl-IO-Tty package if installed
2. Install perl-IPC-Run if absent
3. Run the attached test script

Actual results:
Can't locate IO/Pty.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib64/perl5
/usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/IPC/Run.pm line 1906.

[...]
--- Additional comment from ppi...@redhat.com on 2012-09-13 11:58:37 GMT ---

Thank you for the report. Indeed, the package is missing `perl(IO::Pty)' from
run-requires:

# rpm -q --requires perl-IPC-Run | sort
perl(Carp)  
perl(constant)  
perl(Exporter)  
perl(Fcntl)  
perl(File::Spec)  
perl(IO::Handle)  
perl(IPC::Run)  
perl(IPC::Run::Debug)  
perl(IPC::Run::IO)  
perl(IPC::Run::Timer)  
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)  
perl(POSIX)  
perl(strict)  
perl(Symbol)  
perl(UNIVERSAL)  
perl(vars)  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1
---

All Fedoras are affected.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857030] perl-IPC-Run needs explicit require for perl-IO-Pty

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857030

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|st...@silug.org |ppi...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-IPC-Run] IO::Pty is required when passing pty argument

2012-09-13 Thread Petr Pisar 
commit be5068d580c6f9eb46543c1e6eeeb44ecddda750
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Sep 13 14:22:10 2012 +0200

IO::Pty is required when passing pty argument

 perl-IPC-Run.spec |6 +-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IPC-Run.spec b/perl-IPC-Run.spec
index 6d6e695..00b50fd 100644
--- a/perl-IPC-Run.spec
+++ b/perl-IPC-Run.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-IPC-Run
 Version:0.89
-Release:8%{?dist}
+Release:9%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl module for interacting with child processes
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Pty) = 1.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.47
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+Requires:   perl(IO::Pty) = 1.00
 
 %description
 IPC::Run allows you run and interact with child processes using files,
@@ -54,6 +55,9 @@ rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man3/IPC::Run::Win32*.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 13 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.89-9
+- IO::Pty is required when passing pty argument (bug #857030)
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.89-8
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-IPC-Run/f18] IO::Pty is required when passing pty argument

2012-09-13 Thread Petr Pisar 
Summary of changes:

  be5068d... IO::Pty is required when passing pty argument (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-IPC-Run/f16] IO::Pty is required when passing pty argument

2012-09-13 Thread Petr Pisar 
commit 67c56096182ab34c97109e653a03adf0d486
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Sep 13 14:22:10 2012 +0200

IO::Pty is required when passing pty argument

 perl-IPC-Run.spec |6 +-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IPC-Run.spec b/perl-IPC-Run.spec
index 1c0599d..32d198f 100644
--- a/perl-IPC-Run.spec
+++ b/perl-IPC-Run.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-IPC-Run
 Version:0.89
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl module for interacting with child processes
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Pty) = 1.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.47
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+Requires:   perl(IO::Pty) = 1.00
 
 %description
 IPC::Run allows you run and interact with child processes using files,
@@ -54,6 +55,9 @@ rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man3/IPC::Run::Win32*.3*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 13 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.89-6
+- IO::Pty is required when passing pty argument (bug #857030)
+
 * Fri Jun 24 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.89-5
 - Perl mass rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857030] perl-IPC-Run needs explicit require for perl-IO-Pty

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857030

--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IPC-Run-0.89-9.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-Run-0.89-9.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857030] perl-IPC-Run needs explicit require for perl-IO-Pty

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857030

--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IPC-Run-0.89-7.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-Run-0.89-7.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857030] perl-IPC-Run needs explicit require for perl-IO-Pty

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857030

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IPC-Run-0.89-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-Run-0.89-6.fc16

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

2012-09-13 Thread buildsys 


perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Regexp-Grammars/f17] Initial import (#851734).

2012-09-13 Thread Bill Pemberton 
Summary of changes:

  545e208... Initial import (#851734). (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857113] perl-Test-Simple need in el6

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857113

Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857113] perl-Test-Simple need in el6

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857113

Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-09-13 11:27:04

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857115] New: perl-Test-Simple need in el6

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857115

Bug ID: 857115
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
  Severity: unspecified
   Version: rawhide
  Priority: unspecified
CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, psab...@redhat.com
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
   Summary: perl-Test-Simple need in el6
Regression: ---
  Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
  Reporter: bazanlui...@gmail.com
  Type: Bug
 Documentation: ---
  Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Test-Simple
   Product: Fedora

Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-Test-Simple
New Branches: el6
Owners: lbazan

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857115] perl-Test-Simple need in el6

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857115

Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857115] perl-Test-Simple need in el6

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857115

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Last Closed||2012-09-13 11:37:04

--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
A perl-Test-Simple package in EPEL-6 would override the Test-Simple modules
included in RHEL's perl package, which is not allowed:

  EPEL packages should only enhance and never disturb the Enterprise Linux
   distributions they were build for. Thus packages from EPEL should never
   replace packages from the target base distribution - including those on
   the base distribution as well as layered products

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857115] perl-Test-Simple need in el6

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857115

--- Comment #2 from Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the extensive information.

Regards!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857030] perl-IPC-Run needs explicit require for perl-IO-Pty

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857030

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-IPC-Run-0.89-9.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-IPC-Run-0.89-9.fc18'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-13925/perl-IPC-Run-0.89-9.fc18
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 665901] Review Request: perl-Gravatar-URL - Make URLs for Gravatars from an email address

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665901

Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

--- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
For the time being there's no chance to get in in the package database, because
Mike B. isn't sponsored yet. Adding FE-NEEDSPONSOR, although I don't know if it
makes sense, because this review request doesn't appear in the »New package
review tickets« list anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 665901] Review Request: perl-Gravatar-URL - Make URLs for Gravatars from an email address

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665901

--- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
It doesn't appear in the reviewable ticket list because the ticket is assigned
and the fedora-review flag has been set.  Those should both be set back to the
defaults, since only a sponsor can review the submissions of someone who is not
yet sponsored.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 665901] Review Request: perl-Gravatar-URL - Make URLs for Gravatars from an email address

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665901

Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co |nob...@fedoraproject.org
   |m   |
  Flags|fedora-review+  |

--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #11)
 It doesn't appear in the reviewable ticket list because the ticket is
 assigned and the fedora-review flag has been set.  Those should both be set
 back to the defaults, since only a sponsor can review the submissions of
 someone who is not yet sponsored.

OK, I will reset them all.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 857221] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.49 is available

2012-09-13 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857221

Bug ID: 857221
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
  Severity: unspecified
   Version: rawhide
  Priority: unspecified
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Assignee: iarn...@gmail.com
   Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.49 is available
Regression: ---
  Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
  Type: ---
 Documentation: ---
  Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
   Product: Fedora

Latest upstream release: 1.49
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.48
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-TimeZone/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Fedora 18 Alpha is hereby declared GOLD

2012-09-13 Thread Jaroslav Reznik 
At the F18 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, the Fedora 18 
Alpha release was declared GOLD. F18 Alpha will be released Tuesday, 
September 18, 2012.

Thanks to everyone who helped to make it possible, to ship Spherical 
Cow out of the doors to the wild journey for Beta and GA! 

Meeting details can be seen here:
Minutes: 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-09-13/f18_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2012-09-13-19.00.html
Log: 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-09-13/f18_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2012-09-13-19.00.log.html

Btw. documentation is requested for common bugs page, see Go/No-Go
log + latest Blocker Review Meeting log.

Jaroslav
Your very happy schedule wrangler

=
#fedora-meeting-1: F18 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting
=


Meeting started by jreznik at 19:00:49 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-09-13/f18_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2012-09-13-19.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* roll call  (jreznik, 19:01:38)
  * jreznik nirik jlk rbergeron kparal tflink adamw present  (jreznik,
19:05:54)

* Purpose of this meeting  (jreznik, 19:06:44)
  * Purpose of this meeting is to see whether or not F18 Alpha is ready
for shipment, according to the release criteria.  (jreznik,
19:07:00)
  * This is determined in a few ways:  (jreznik, 19:07:07)
  * No remaining blocker bugs ;-)  (jreznik, 19:07:43)
  * Test matrices for Alpha are fully completed  (jreznik, 19:07:49)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (jreznik,
19:07:58)
  * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(jreznik, 19:08:06)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test
(jreznik, 19:08:12)
  * LINK:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
(jreznik, 19:08:19)
  * LINK:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
(jreznik, 19:08:26)

* agenda  (jreznik, 19:09:05)
  * 3 Proposed Blockers  (tflink, 19:12:34)
  * 3 non-VERIFIED Accepted Blockers  (tflink, 19:12:56)

* (855849) could not UEFI boot F18 Alpha (TC6 through RC3) DVD or
  netinst written to optical disc or dd'ed to USB: /dev/root does not
  exist  (tflink, 19:13:49)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855849   (tflink,
19:13:52)
  * Proposed Blockers, NEW  (tflink, 19:13:54)
  * AGREED: it is agreed in principle that the relevant release
criterion should be weakened so it only requires any one of the
'normal' UEFI boot paths to work, not several  (adamw, 19:36:07)
  * AGREED: 855849 - RejectedBlocker - With the above modification to
the F18 alpha release requirements, this bug is not considered a
blocker as USB media created with livecd-iso-to-disk is still able
to boot on (u)EFI machines  (tflink, 19:38:14)

* (848305) When kernel modsetting is enabled, laptop screen remians off
  until Xorg starts (ironlake)  (tflink, 19:38:46)
  * ACTION: adamw to propose criterion modification on test list
(adamw, 19:38:47)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848305   (tflink,
19:38:49)
  * Proposed Blockers, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 19:38:52)
  * AGREED: 848305 is rejected as a blocker on the basis that it only
affects certain systems (so a conditional violation, so a judgment
call) and appears to have a relatively simple and documentable
workaround  (adamw, 19:57:39)

* (856938) Native UEFI install from F18 Alpha RC3 DVD written to USB
  with livecd-iso-to-disk fails to boot  (tflink, 19:58:32)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856938   (tflink,
19:58:35)
  * Proposed Blockers, NEW  (tflink, 19:58:38)
  * AGREED: 856938 - RejectedBlocker - While this is a conditional
violation of the F18 alpha release criteria, it was decided that the
current success rates are enough for F18 alpha  (tflink, 20:11:24)

* (856399) RC2 DVD is missing grub2-efi and shim packages  (tflink,
  20:13:06)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856399   (tflink,
20:13:06)
  * Accepted Blockers, MODIFIED  (tflink, 20:13:06)
  * This has been fixed in RC3 and will be moved to VERIFIED shortly
(tflink, 20:13:46)

* (856096) repoclosure failure on 18 Alpha RC2 DVDs (mongodb)  (tflink,
  20:13:56)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856096   (tflink,
20:13:56)
  * Accepted Blockers, ON_QA  (tflink, 20:13:56)
  * this bug has been fixed, needs to be moved to VERIFIED. after enough
karma, the update will be pushed to stable and this bug will be
closed  (tflink, 20:15:57)

* (856836) /etc/fstab is not written correctly after live install (F18
  Alpha RC2+)  (tflink, 20:16:08)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856836   (tflink,
20:16:11)
  * Accepted Blockers, ON_QA  (tflink, 20:16:13)
  * this is reported to be