aarch64 bugs
Yesterday a bunch of bugs were opened up regarding aarch64 support in some packages. I'd like to do my part in fixing these, but is there a way to actually run test builds? I know that there's ARM support in the works, but I haven't really kept up with the details. -- Jeff Ollie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: aarch64 bugs
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 09:14:52 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: Yesterday a bunch of bugs were opened up regarding aarch64 support in some packages. I'd like to do my part in fixing these, but is there a way to actually run test builds? I know that there's ARM support in the works, but I haven't really kept up with the details. I was going to ask the same question. At the moment there is not. We're working on the platform bring up and in the coming weeks there will an initial Fedora 19 based image released that will be able to run on the free ARM Foundation model [1]. Eventually there will be hardware available but I'm not sure when that will be as there's not been anything publicly announced. Ultimately we're very much in the prep stages for a mass rebuild of Fedora for aarch64 when we eventually get actual HW, at the moment a build of something like gcc takes days. Peter [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/AArch64/FoundationModel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: aarch64 bugs
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:12:13PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 09:14:52 -0500,
Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Yesterday a bunch of bugs were opened up regarding aarch64 support in
some packages. I'd like to do my part in fixing these, but is there a
way to actually run test builds? I know that there's ARM support in
the works, but I haven't really kept up with the details.
I was going to ask the same question.
At the moment there is not. We're working on the platform bring up and
in the coming weeks there will an initial Fedora 19 based image
released that will be able to run on the free ARM Foundation model
[1]. Eventually there will be hardware available but I'm not sure when
that will be as there's not been anything publicly announced.
Ultimately we're very much in the prep stages for a mass rebuild of
Fedora for aarch64 when we eventually get actual HW, at the moment a
build of something like gcc takes days.
Peter
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/AArch64/FoundationModel
Peter,
I spent a few minutes searching for details of AArch64, such as its
endianness and what processor features (ie. 'flags' in /proc/cpuinfo)
it has.
It seems the endianness is switchable like MIPS, which I guess is a
good thing. What endianness will Fedora use? What about other Linux
distros?
We will be using little endian. All ARM processors have the ability to
switch endianness.
Do you know what processor features ('flags') will be available in the
first shipping hardware?
Nope, although I will find out, what particular bits do you need to
know, or just all of them?
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?
Miloslav Trmač wrote: BTW determining this accurately should be fairly doable[1]. Just look for symlink() and link() calls (and recursively through wrapper APIs / language bindings). These syscalls are fairly rare. That checks for PROGRAMS which run into this. It catches neither admin's custom scripts nor ln commands run directly by the users. Who knows on how many machines manually created symlinks point to inodes owned by different users? [1] Well, fairly doable when compared to the /tmp-on-tmpfs, which is just impossible. It's still man-weeks of work. Pragmatically speaking, It did not break Ubuntu is not a QA technique that makes me happy, but might be good enough anyway. Well, /tmp-on-tmpfs is just broken, disabled on my machines and should be reverted in Fedora ASAP. It is not a good example to follow (and neither is UsrMove, whose consequences we're still suffering, see the recent thread about RPM dependencies on binaries). Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- With rebuilding perl-5.16.3-265 on f19, then $ rpmdiff --ignore T ./perl-5.16.3-265.fc19.i686.rpm ./perl-5.16.3-265.fc20.i686.rpm 21 | tee 30.txt removed REQUIRES perl-libs = 4:5.16.3-265.fc19 added REQUIRES perl-libs = 4:5.16.3-265.fc20 removed PROVIDES perl(x86-32) = 4:5.16.3-265.fc19 added PROVIDES perl(Carp) added PROVIDES perl(DB) = 1.37 added PROVIDES perl(DB::fake) added PROVIDES perl(bytes) added PROVIDES perl(utf8) added PROVIDES perl(x86-32) = 4:5.16.3-265.fc20 S.5 /usr/bin/a2p S.5 /usr/bin/perl S.5 /usr/bin/perl5.16.3 ..5 /usr/bin/perlbug ..5 /usr/bin/perlthanks S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/Config_heavy.pl S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/_h2ph_pre.ph ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/B/B.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Devel/PPPort/PPPort.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Devel/Peek/Peek.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Fcntl/Fcntl.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/File/Glob/Glob.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/GDBM_File/GDBM_File.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Hash/Util/FieldHash/FieldHash.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Hash/Util/Util.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/I18N/Langinfo/Langinfo.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/IO/IO.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/IPC/SysV/SysV.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/MIME/Base64/Base64.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Math/BigInt/FastCalc/FastCalc.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/NDBM_File/NDBM_File.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/ODBM_File/ODBM_File.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Opcode/Opcode.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/POSIX/POSIX.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/PerlIO/encoding/encoding.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/PerlIO/mmap/mmap.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/PerlIO/scalar/scalar.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/PerlIO/via/via.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/SDBM_File/SDBM_File.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Storable/Storable.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Sys/Hostname/Hostname.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Sys/Syslog/Syslog.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Tie/Hash/NamedCapture/NamedCapture.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Time/HiRes/HiRes.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Unicode/Collate/Collate.so S.5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Unicode/Normalize/Normalize.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/arybase/arybase.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/attributes/attributes.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/mro/mro.so ..5 /usr/lib/perl5/auto/re/re.so So something changed outside of perl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PIuNLOb7G5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alekc...@googlemail.com --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- *** Bug 925969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5kELhUME1aa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 925969] false Provides: perl(Carp)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925969 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||fed...@famillecollet.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2013-03-23 02:28:28 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 924938 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Xvyy6mLN6Aa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Also, perl-5.16.3-264.fc20 does not provide perl(Carp), however rebuilding perl-5.16.3-264.fc20 with _current_ f20 now provides perl(Carp). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZKq1487i9fa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yan...@declera.com --- Comment #7 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- It seems to be an accidental %if/%endif breakage inroduced here http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl.git/commit/?id=b4857c8d7ca4f03d3bdd0e9fd885a5e8bdc1f96b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nTjkKZGT4za=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 926020] New: perl-File-pushd-1.005 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926020 Bug ID: 926020 Summary: perl-File-pushd-1.005 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-pushd Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: mmasl...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.005 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.004 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-pushd/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ehcf6dGcaIa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- Ok, sorry for the noise. This time I actually tested this and its the rawhide change from file-5.11-9 to file-5.14-1 that causes the change in provides -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PssPZi1Dkwa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Math-Clipper
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit) On i386: perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Math-Clipper
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit) On i386: perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tm...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de --- *** Bug 924882 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hhuPP3p9p7a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkal...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Well, - with first trying rpmbuild -bc perl-5.16.3-265.fc20 with file-5.11-9 - and rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit with the same file-5.11-9 does not show perl(Carp) - however now after upgrading file to 5.14-1 and rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit now adds perl(Carp) so definitely related to file rpm change. And rpm -qlp file-5.16.3-265.fc20.rpm | grep -v /usr/share/doc | /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides does not show perl(Carp) provides, so this seems related to rpm internal dependency generator. file maintainer, any idea? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S4CJu7TQG4a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext
f19 f20 (perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext-1.27-12.fc19 perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext-1.27-10.fc19) Please fix the(se) issue(s) as soon as possible. --- This report generated by Fedora Release Engineering, using http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=releng;a=blob;f=scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py;hb=HEAD -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de --- Imho the file package is not blame here. 5.11 misdetected Carp.pm as an AWK script, while 5.14 correctly says it is a Perl script. So what happens iiuc is (that despite the %exclude) RPMs internal dependency generator now considers Carp.pm for Perl provides (which it did not before), and so the perl(Carp) provides gets into the final RPM (and also some others). Or to say it differently: The bug fix in the file package uncovered a bug in the perl specfile, and some additional filters need to be added. As a side note, there could be a bug in the RPM dependency generator, which should probably ignore %excluded files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=X28ueK6jUaa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Net-SSLeay-1.54.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSLeay: 26e758fff1c90cb00e9358fea7e1e22f Net-SSLeay-1.54.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-SSLeay] Update to 1.54
commit d4bac335e956b4bd184594a769d1e5f522bbfe0c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Mar 23 19:06:37 2013 +
Update to 1.54
- New upstream release 1.54
- added support for SSL_export_keying_material where present (i.e. in
OpenSSL
1.0.1 and later)
- changed t/handle/external/50_external.t to use www.airspayce.com
instead of
perldition.org, who no longer have an https server
- patch to fix a crash: P_X509_get_crl_distribution_points on an X509
certificate with values in the CDP extension that do not have an ia5
string
would cause a segmentation fault when accessed
- change in t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t to not use
Net::SSLeay::ASN1_INTEGER_get, since it works differently on 32 and 64
bit
platforms
- updated author and distribution location details to airspayce.com
- improvement to test 07_sslecho.t so that if set_cert_and_key fails we
can
tell why
perl-Net-SSLeay.spec | 22 +++---
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-SSLeay.spec b/perl-Net-SSLeay.spec
index f1d959c..cc670ee 100644
--- a/perl-Net-SSLeay.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-SSLeay.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Net-SSLeay
-Version: 1.52
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Version: 1.54
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Perl extension for using OpenSSL
Group: Development/Libraries
License: OpenSSL
@@ -92,8 +92,24 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/Net::SSLeay::Handle.3pm*
%changelog
+* Sat Mar 23 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.54-1
+- update to 1.54
+ - added support for SSL_export_keying_material where present (i.e. in OpenSSL
+1.0.1 and later)
+ - changed t/handle/external/50_external.t to use www.airspayce.com instead of
+perldition.org, who no longer have an https server
+ - patch to fix a crash: P_X509_get_crl_distribution_points on an X509
+certificate with values in the CDP extension that do not have an ia5 string
+would cause a segmentation fault when accessed
+ - change in t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t to not use
+Net::SSLeay::ASN1_INTEGER_get, since it works differently on 32 and 64 bit
+platforms
+ - updated author and distribution location details to airspayce.com
+ - improvement to test 07_sslecho.t so that if set_cert_and_key fails we can
+tell why
+
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.52-2
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
+- rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jan 9 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.52-1
- update to 1.52
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 7d7915c..d7f0a27 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b885d173d5733b103355658aa4b3c60d Net-SSLeay-1.52.tar.gz
+26e758fff1c90cb00e9358fea7e1e22f Net-SSLeay-1.54.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-SSLeay/f19] Update to 1.54
Summary of changes: d4bac33... Update to 1.54 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-SSLeay] Created tag perl-Net-SSLeay-1.54-1.fc19
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-SSLeay-1.54-1.fc19' was created pointing to: d4bac33... Update to 1.54 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
This simple patch seems to fix it here:
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 2db2cc9..16b7cb7 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
# intentionally (unversioned perl(DB) is removed and versioned one is kept)
%global __provides_exclude_from
.*/auto/.*\\.so$|.*/%{perl_archlib}/.*\\.so$|%{_docdir}
%global __requires_exclude_from %{_docdir}
-%global __provides_exclude perl\\((VMS|Win32|BSD::|DB\\)$)
+%global __provides_exclude perl\\((Carp|VMS|Win32|BSD::|DB\\)$)
# unicore::Name - it's needed by perl, maybe problem of rpm
# FCGI is external dependency after install of perl-CGI, remove it during RC
releases
%global __requires_exclude
perl\\((VMS|BSD::|Win32|Tk|Mac::|Your::Module::Here|unicore::Name|FCGI)
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
Name: perl
Version:%{perl_version}
# release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be
broken otherwise
-Release:265%{?dist}
+Release:266%{?dist}
Epoch: %{perl_epoch}
Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
Group: Development/Languages
@@ -3327,6 +3327,9 @@ sed \
# Old changelog entries are preserved in CVS.
%changelog
+* Sat Mar 23 2013 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com - 4:5.16.3-266
+- No longer provide perl(Carp). (bug #924938)
+
* Fri Mar 22 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4:5.16.3-265
- Conflict perl-autodie with older perl (bug #911226)
- Sub-package Env (bug #924619)
Scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5162650
Can folks confirm?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TME6n2QXpua=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Jeff Makey j...@makey.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@makey.net --- Comment #13 from Jeff Makey j...@makey.net --- perl-5.16.3-266.fc20.x86_64.rpm from the scratch build in Comment 12 requires but does not provide perl-Carp, so the latter is automatically installed by yum along with the former. This should solve the problems raised in this bug. There may be similar problems for the modules identified by this command sequence: (rpm -q --requires perl ; rpm -q --provides perl) | sort | uniq -d with the new RPM its output is this: perl(Config) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Math::BigInt) perl(Tie::Hash) perl(bytes) perl(charnames) perl(utf8) The list included perl(Carp) with the previous RPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uGqtIRd7f6a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Jeff Makey j...@makey.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||925121 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8hxtfQ6Tvsa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
