Re: looking for co-maintainer / new owner
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: Hello, The package barry is used to sync a blackberry device with a desktop. I took it over awhile ago when I owned a blackberry. I've since moved on to own various other devices and don't see myself returning to a blackberry anytime soon. As such I'm wondering if anyone wants to take ownership. There is a semi-active upstream. They have new releases and a few community members contributing. A very responsive main developer - any issues we've had he's helped resolve and accepts patches readily. Its a low maintenance package by most accounts. I'll continue to maintain it if no one steps up for a little. If no one takes it I'll likely drop it around F20 or so. -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel As a Blackberry owner of the 9930 and the Z10 I will be happy to help. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: %doc path
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:03:32 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
Sorry for stupid question - help me to find something like doc must be in
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ but not in %{_docdir}/%{name}/ in
guidelines.
Or there is no such limit?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation
There is no such requirement in there.
Let's not forget that with older versions of RPM, using %doc at the
same time than installing files into %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/
silently overwrote the installed files. Packagers had to work around
that with a local TMP dir to be included via %doc.
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc6.git2.3.fc19.x86_64
loadavg: 0.26 0.24 0.24
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Login to Koji
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:51:37 +0200 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com wrote: ;) Agreed in principle. On the other hand, all these possible solutions require something running on my side permanently :( -- Thomas http://blogtrottr.com/about/ then use your email filters. -- Regards, Frank http//www.frankly3d.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide report: 20130420 changes
Compose started at Sat Apr 20 08:15:31 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.12-4.fc20.x86_64 requires libmgl.so.5()(64bit) [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [amide] amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit) [clementine] clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.7()(64bit) clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libimobiledevice.so.3()(64bit) [connman] connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libxtables.so.7 connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libgnutls.so.26 connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libxtables.so.7()(64bit) connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit) connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19 [eg] eg-1.7.5.2-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(one) eg-1.7.5.2-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(it) eg-1.7.5.2-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(an) [flowcanvas] flowcanvas-0.7.1-8.fc18.i686 requires libgraph.so.5 flowcanvas-0.7.1-8.fc18.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.5()(64bit) [gcc-python-plugin] gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python2-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python3-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 [gnome-applets] 1:gnome-applets-3.5.92-3.fc18.x86_64 requires libgweather-3.so.1()(64bit) [gnome-panel] gnome-panel-3.6.2-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5()(64bit) gnome-panel-devel-3.6.2-6.fc19.i686 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5 gnome-panel-devel-3.6.2-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5()(64bit) [gnome-pie] gnome-pie-0.5.3-3.20120826git1b93e1.fc19.x86_64 requires libbamf3.so.0()(64bit) [gnomint] gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_2_8)(64bit) gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit) gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26()(64bit) [gooddata-cl] gooddata-cl-1.2.56-2.fc19.noarch requires gdata-java [kawa] 1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.x86_64 requires servlet25 [libkolab] php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64 php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64 [mapserver] php-mapserver-6.0.3-9.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64 php-mapserver-6.0.3-9.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64 [matreshka] matreshka-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-mofext-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-mofext-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-ocl-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-ocl-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-uml-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-uml-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-utp-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-utp-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-fastcgi-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-fastcgi-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnarl-4.7.so matreshka-fastcgi-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-fastcgi-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-sql-core-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-sql-core-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-sql-postgresql-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-sql-postgresql-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-sql-sqlite-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-sql-sqlite-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-xml-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-xml-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) [mgetty] mgetty-1.1.36-20.fc20.x86_64 requires /sbin/sendmail mgetty-sendfax-1.1.36-20.fc20.x86_64 requires /sbin/useradd [mygui] mygui-3.2.0-4.fc20.i686 requires libCommon.so mygui-3.2.0-4.fc20.x86_64 requires libCommon.so()(64bit)
OSSD Motivations
Hi Don't know if this is a bit off topic, but I am in real need of you. Thing is, I am a frequent user of open source software, and I am often amazed by the efforts people make in order to provide me with products and services for free. I am now conducting research for a masters' thesis trying to find out what motivates developers to participate in open source projects. I would be pleased if you could fill out a survey and pass it on within the community mail list. The survey only takes 3-5 minutes to fill out, and all information is kept confidential. Again, thank you for your efforts. Please click on this link to get to the survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1XL16GisKPCjw8uk8xdoVDl6mSPN5-d1c8ZX3NKSmLEo/viewform Best Regards Lamine Aknouche Lund University - Sweden -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On 19/04/13 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Last time, we've had this kind of discussions, people were claiming they were querying changelogs from _binary_ rpms and from installed rpms (rpm -q --changelog) I do that. All the time. Sometimes going back a long, long time. I could certainly work around the limitation if the binary RPM changelogs were cut off, but it would require me to change, if anyone cares. Is there a cutoff date that would cover maybe 90% of your use cases? I think that one year would be too short for my use cases as well. But there are packages in the distro with changelogs going back to the RHL/fedora.us days and I personally never go back even half that far. If we chose a date two years or three years or even four years in the past, it might be a reasonable compromise for everyone. I think about 18 months is useful, they do take up a surprisingly large amount of space if you've got a small device like a XO-1. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: looking for co-maintainer / new owner
On Apr 20, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: As a Blackberry owner of the 9930 and the Z10 I will be happy to help. Perfect, ACLs approved. I started to update to the 0.18.4 release from 0.18.3 However they changed some of the udev rules and I wanted to make sure I knew why before I fixed the spec. Once that is done it should basically be maintance free till 0.19 is released. thanks for signing up -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
FirewallD - terminology
Bonjour, I noticed an inconsistency in terminology that can confuse a grandma so she doesn't know with whose fleece to knit. :) *Persistent*(firewalld) vs *Permanent*(firewall-cmd). poma -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?
On 19/04/13 09:44 PM, Alex G. wrote: On 04/19/2013 09:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On 19/04/13 06:16 PM, Alex G. wrote: On 04/15/2013 05:30 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: Is there any guidance as when to trim %changelog down to size? Some packages have thousands of lines of spec file dating back over 15 years which seem kinda redundant now we're using git. I've always seen the %changelog as a relic from times when we didn't have reliable source SCMs. For me, it is redundant (and boring) to have to update the %changelog, while I have the exact same information in the git history. I think the best way to go is to obsolete %changelog, and extract the changelog directly from git history. I don't care as much about how far back it should go. As far as knowing the package version (i.e. 1.2.3-6) for each commit, that can easily be handled with a git hook. So, why bother putting similar information in two places when there are better ways to go? Thanks - I just won a small bet with myself as to when this thread would circle back to that discussion yet again... I respectfully disagree with the assertion that the discussion is circular. Sorry, not within this thread - but any discussion vaguely in this area inevitably winds up with someone suggesting that RPM and git logs get merged somehow. I've done it myself. It's come up probably a half dozen times just since I've been reading the list. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
gradle problem in f{19,20}
hi groovy 2.x series (and other libraries) require gradle for build, but with gradle there is a problem I tried to solve without success in f19 and f20 (in f18 work fine :( ). (the same happen when rebuild gradle in non bootstrap mode) gradle --debug jar javadoc -g /builddir/build/BUILD/hibernate-release-4.1.7.Final/gradlehome -b /builddir/build/BUILD/hibernate-release-4.1.7.Final/buildSrc/build.gradle 10:28:52.228 [DEBUG] [org.gradle.logging.internal.DefaultLoggingConfigurer] Finished configuring with level: DEBUG, configurers: [org.gradle.logging.internal.OutputEventRenderer@14bd4d1, org.gradle.logging.internal.slf4j.Slf4jLoggingConfigurer@180fd99, org.gradle.logging.internal.JavaUtilLoggingConfigurer@18955ea] 10:28:52.282 [ERROR] [org.gradle.BuildExceptionReporter] 10:28:52.284 [ERROR] [org.gradle.BuildExceptionReporter] FAILURE: Build aborted because of an internal error. 10:28:52.287 [ERROR] [org.gradle.BuildExceptionReporter] 10:28:52.288 [ERROR] [org.gradle.BuildExceptionReporter] * What went wrong: 10:28:52.290 [ERROR] [org.gradle.BuildExceptionReporter] Build aborted because of an unexpected internal error. Please file an issue at: http://forums.gradle.org the same using -S (--full-stacktrace) parameter. any ideas? thanks - gil -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?
On 04/20/2013 10:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On 19/04/13 09:44 PM, Alex G. wrote: I respectfully disagree with the assertion that the discussion is circular. Sorry, not within this thread - but any discussion vaguely in this area inevitably winds up with someone suggesting that RPM and git logs get merged somehow. I've done it myself. It's come up probably a half dozen times just since I've been reading the list. My apologies. I did not realize this topic has been tried and beaten in the past. Alex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?
On 20/04/13 10:41 AM, Alex G. wrote: On 04/20/2013 10:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On 19/04/13 09:44 PM, Alex G. wrote: I respectfully disagree with the assertion that the discussion is circular. Sorry, not within this thread - but any discussion vaguely in this area inevitably winds up with someone suggesting that RPM and git logs get merged somehow. I've done it myself. It's come up probably a half dozen times just since I've been reading the list. My apologies. I did not realize this topic has been tried and beaten in the past. Oh, I still think it's a good idea, it just seems to be one of those things that comes up, gets batted around a bit, then forgotten about... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: looking for co-maintainer / new owner
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: On Apr 20, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: As a Blackberry owner of the 9930 and the Z10 I will be happy to help. Perfect, ACLs approved. I started to update to the 0.18.4 release from 0.18.3 However they changed some of the udev rules and I wanted to make sure I knew why before I fixed the spec. Once that is done it should basically be maintance free till 0.19 is released. thanks for signing up -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Thank you. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A requisite for joining GSoC project under fedora team as mentoring organization
Hi, I'm AjayKumar N Kulkarni. I'd like to participate in GSoC and I'd like to submit my proposal to fedora team for review. I'm awaiting your response. As soon as I get back response from you, I'll submit the proposal Thanking you, AjayKumar N Kulkarni -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Math-Clipper
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit) On i386: perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Math-Clipper
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit) On i386: perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 929404] perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111012 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929404 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-04-20 15:10:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4mvpxHgfcAa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 929404] perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111012 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929404 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111012-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mTReXPyzuJa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 947444] PerlIO dead-locks with threaded fork
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947444 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-262.fc19, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=25fX6r2wRha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 924938] wrong provides in latest build
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-262.fc19, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=41uFPsDgVFa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 950017] Unable to use LOG_EMERG level in Sys::Syslog
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950017 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-262.fc19, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y9AoWHX5yGa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 859910] Hint-hash copying can leak
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859910 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-262.fc19, perl-Sys-Syslog-0.32-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cJYQLkgzcIa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 950375] perl-DBD-Multi-0.18 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950375 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DBD-Multi-0.18-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1yRjyuO4PLa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 929408] perl-Module-Build-0.4004 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929408 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Build-0.40.04-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=w3hXuLksxqa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 947755] perl-Filter-1.49 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947755 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Filter-1.49-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rEpYw9pRaUa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 929405] perl-Filter-1.48 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929405 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Filter-1.49-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XdPFvloeFya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 949146] perl-B-Keywords-1.13 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949146 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-04-20 15:50:21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Qq34MWnSuEa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 949146] perl-B-Keywords-1.13 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949146 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-B-Keywords-1.13-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1H2Rt8GzWIa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 948062] New upstream release 0.81 fixes tests to work with DateTime 1.00
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948062 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-Format-Builder-0.8100-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y9ISP7OFyOa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 947238] perl-DateTime-1.01 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947238 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2013-04-02 03:54:02 |2013-04-20 16:03:08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CpUT35oQQqa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 947238] perl-DateTime-1.01 is available
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947238 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.01-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m8N0kBUhnVa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Authen-Simple
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
