EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 509 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 28 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11198/filezilla-3.7.3-1.el6 23 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11393/nagios-3.5.1-1.el6 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11417/graphite-web-0.9.12-1.el6 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11445/perl-Crypt-DSA-1.17-10.el6 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11453/python-pyrad-2.0-3.el6 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11499/roundcubemail-0.9.4-1.el6 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11507/tinyproxy-1.8.3-1.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11525/moodle-2.4.6-1.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11556/openstack-swift-1.7.4-3.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11550/Django14-1.4.7-1.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11552/glpi-0.83.9.1-4.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing aoetools-36-3.el6 diskimage-builder-0.0.1-8.el6 libnetfilter_acct-1.0.2-1.el6 opendnssec-1.4.2-1.el6 pgp-tools-1.1.4-3.el6 python-cliff-1.4.4-1.el6 python-stevedore-0.11-1.el6 sipcalc-1.1.6-4.el6 testdisk-6.14-1.el6 zabbix20-2.0.8-2.el6 Details about builds: aoetools-36-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11562) ATA over Ethernet Tools Update Information: Update to the backward-compatible current upstream ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 10 2013 Ed Cashin ecas...@coraid.com - 36-3 - Do not store udev rules in lookaside cache - Revert accidental change to spec file changelog * Tue Sep 10 2013 Christopher Meng r...@cicku.me - 36-2 - Cleanup the spec. - Add noreplace flag for udev rules file. - Preserve the timestamp. * Mon Sep 9 2013 Ed Cashin ecas...@coraid.com - 36-1 - New upstream release (aoe-sancheck and bugfixes) - Update package description: aoetools supports 2.6+ kernels - Include udev rules needed for creation of aoe character devices * Sat Aug 3 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 30-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Feb 13 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 30-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 18 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 30-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jan 12 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 30-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 7 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 30-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Aug 30 2010 Patrick Jima Laughton j...@fedoraproject.org 30-1 - New upstream release - Added coraid-update binary/manual diskimage-builder-0.0.1-8.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11566) Image building tools for OpenStack Update Information: Fixed: kpartx issue when generating Fedora image on RHEL hosts, missing argparse require Rebase to first released tarball New diskimage-builder package References: [ 1 ] Bug #990279 - Review Request: diskimage-builder - Image building tools for OpenStack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990279 libnetfilter_acct-1.0.2-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11561) A library providing interface to extended accounting infrastructure Update Information: update to lastest 1.0.2 release. ChangeLog: * Fri Sep 13 2013 Hushan Jia hushan@gmail.com - 1.0.2-1 - Update to upstream 1.0.2 * Sat Aug 3 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.0.0-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Feb 14 2013
Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:39:29PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: I really do not think we can integrate this into our release processes right now. What work would need to be done in order to make it possible to integrate this into the release process? -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Package name conflict with retired package
On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation library). How should one proceed in such situations? Does the old repository needs to be deleted before the new one is created? Please do not reuse package names for unrelated software. It is quite confusing and can interfere with all kinds of tracking/package mapping efforts. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18
2013/9/12 Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com: On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:42:20 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote: I'm afraid that's just adds additional work for maintainers w/o any visible benefits. The benefits are the stable Fedora release does not break 3rd party applications during its deployment/lifecycle. Let's move further instead of backporting - that's just a leafnode app so nobody got hurt by a potential dependency issue. wireshark.rpm contains many commandline utilities which may be used by 3rd party sysadmin scripts (and maybe even 3rd party C applications). Don't worry about that. If these people processed external data for two months with software containing more than 30+ exploitable vulnerabilities then they either dead/offline permanently, or already hacked. In both cases they lost control over their hardware and won't complain. Regarding command line utilities - they are quite stable in terms of CLI interface and compatible. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Package name conflict with retired package
Also, I guess it would be nice to have a package name that gives some indication of what it is about (unless ofcourse the name itself is well and widely known ) On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation library). How should one proceed in such situations? Does the old repository needs to be deleted before the new one is created? Please do not reuse package names for unrelated software. It is quite confusing and can interfere with all kinds of tracking/package mapping efforts. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/develhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-**of-conducthttp://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: numatop: %{optflags} fail the 32bit build
The issue has been solved by my reviewer, so thank you all because as
usual I've learned interesting things :)
Comments inlined.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/12/2013 02:11 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
This version should work in 32 bit mode, and only in 32 bit mode:
void
cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx,
unsigned int *edx)
{
__asm volatile
(push %%ebx\n\t
cpuid\n\t
mov %%ebx, (%1)\n\t
pop %%ebx
: =a (*eax),
=S (ebx),
=c (*ecx),
=d (*edx)
: 0 (*eax));
}
I kind of understand what you're doing here, but it's not all clear.
I get the push/pop instructions save and restore the reserved ebx
register, which is needed because apparently the cpuid instruction
would otherwise overwrite it.
I don't understand the mov instruction, but I suppose you're storing
ebx's value from cpuid somewhere else before restoring it with the
pop instruction.
Correct, the intent is to write the %ebx register value to the address in
the %esi register. (%1) is a pointer dereference, as oppose to plain %1.
I don't understand the last 5 lines of __asm in both functions, I've
never seen this syntax before.
These are register constraints. a, c, d, S refer to the %eax, %ecx,
%edx, %esi registers, respectively. = marks output constraints. The
constraints before the final : are output registers, and after colon,
there are the input registers. There's just one, and 0 means to reuse the
first output register.
Okay, silly me, I should have listed S among the output registers, instead
the inputs:
Actually, this morning (in the train) I've tested your code with my
tmp variable and it works if I remove the deref!
mov %%ebx, %1
(btw, what do %1 and %4 mean ?)
I could painlessly add a println in my patch since the file already
includes stdio.h. Normal and hardened build provide the same cpuid
values.
void
cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx,
unsigned int *edx)
{
__asm volatile
(push %%ebx\n\t
cpuid\n\t
mov %%ebx, (%4)\n\t
pop %%ebx
: =a (*eax),
=c (*ecx),
=d (*edx)
: 0 (*eax),
S (ebx));
}
I also forget that for full correctness, there should now be a memory
clobber as well (in the clobber section after yet another colon):
What would it do ? A compiler memory barrier ?
void
cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx,
unsigned int *edx)
{
__asm volatile
(push %%ebx\n\t
cpuid\n\t
mov %%ebx, (%4)\n\t
pop %%ebx
: =a (*eax),
=c (*ecx),
=d (*edx)
: 0 (*eax),
S (ebx)
: memory);
}
It's a good thing my reviewer submitted a patch, because I wouldn't
feel that confident with mine :)
By the way, we could generate much better code if the registers were passed
as an array or struct, so that they are in consecutive memory:
struct regs {
unsigned eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
};
void
cpuid(struct regs *r)
{
__asm volatile
(push %%ebx\n\t
cpuid\n\t
mov %%eax, (%0)\n\t
mov %%ebx, 4(%0)\n\t
mov %%ecx, 8(%0)\n\t
mov %%edx, 12(%0)\n\t
pop %%ebx
:
: S (r)
: eax, ecx, edx, memory);
}
Obviously, this needs adjustments to the callers.
Yup, but for the sake of simplicity, I wouldn't do that.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
Dridi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Oracle considering DB6 license
On 09/12/2013 09:56 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 09/12/2013 07:16 AM, Jan Staněk wrote: Hello, some time back Oracle released new version of Berkeley DB under AGPL, which is incompatible with Fedora licensing politics. However, https://forums.oracle.com/message/11184885#11184885 If you are interested in DB6, consider leaving feedback there :) Week later... it turns out that Oracle might consider re-licensing it back :) JBG Can you provide some more info about re-licensing, please? Where did you learn about it? Honza -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: numatop: %{optflags} fail the 32bit build
On 09/13/2013 10:12 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Actually, this morning (in the train) I've tested your code with my tmp variable and it works if I remove the deref! Yes, that should work as well, because the value itself is an output register. mov %%ebx, %1 (btw, what do %1 and %4 mean ?) These are placeholders for the register names and are replaced with the actual register names chosen by the compiler, based on the specified constraints and the surrounding code the compiler generated from the C source. I also forget that for full correctness, there should now be a memory clobber as well (in the clobber section after yet another colon): What would it do ? A compiler memory barrier ? Correct. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: numatop: %{optflags} fail the 32bit build
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:46:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
This is the offending function:
void
cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx,
unsigned int *edx)
{
__asm volatile
(cpuid\n\t
: =a (*eax),
=b (*ebx),
=c (*ecx),
=d (*edx)
: a (*eax));
}
The cryptic GCC error message (inconsistent operand constraints in
an ‘asm’) refers to the fact that in PIC mode (which is activated
by the hardening flags), %ebx is a reserved register.
This version should work in 32 bit mode, and only in 32 bit mode:
void
cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx,
unsigned int *edx)
{
__asm volatile
(push %%ebx\n\t
cpuid\n\t
mov %%ebx, (%1)\n\t
pop %%ebx
: =a (*eax),
=S (ebx),
=c (*ecx),
=d (*edx)
: 0 (*eax));
}
I have not actually tested this. There are other solutions
floating around, but they are clearly incorrect and produce wrong
code.
A better fix would be to rip all this out, and use reads from
/dev/cpu/*/cpuid, which is arch agnostic, and also takes care of cpu affinity
problems.
Dave
On my ubuntu machine at work, I have this:
$ ls /dev/cpu/
microcode
Also, wouldn't it be a problem on a chrooted environment ?
And during my tests I've noticed that numatop calls cpuid once for
each core on my laptop. It should discard the affinity problem,
shouldn't it ?
Tanks again for your help, it's been very interesting for me !
Dridi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firewall blocking desktop features
On Friday 13 September 2013 01:51:00 drago01 wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il wrote: - This means that any privileged service controlled by GUI client (e.g: NetworkManager) is still only as secure as it's controller (e.g: nm-applet). This is wrong. That's not how controlling the service works. Care to explain? * Let's assume someone exploit a buffer overflow in nm-applet to execute arbitrary code. * Now she can ask (over dbus) from NM to do legitimate operations without the user consent/knowledge -- e.g: connect to some random-joe wireless network, etc. (btw, the user can still discover the truth via other client which isn't subverted -- like nmcli, the kde widget, etc.) * I don't claim this attack is easy, because the arbitrary code would have to hook into all relevant dbus callbacks for the wanted transaction to complete successfully, but I don't see any theoretical show-stopper. * IMO, all this just set some upper bound to our security expectations. Privilege separation of services into controller-controlled pair is an improvement over the previous state of affairs, but a verified-good controller can still become rogue during runtime due to a buffer overflow -- it than still have the same power it had before :-( -- Oron Peled Voice: +972-4-8228492 o...@actcom.co.il http://users.actcom.co.il/~oron It's not the software that's free; it's you. - billyskank on Groklaw -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Package name conflict with retired package
On 13.09.2013 09:54, Florian Weimer wrote: On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation library). How should one proceed in such situations? Does the old repository needs to be deleted before the new one is created? Please do not reuse package names for unrelated software. It is quite confusing and can interfere with all kinds of tracking/package mapping efforts. Ok, I guess I'll go with avl-analysis or something similar. It would probably be more user friendly to rename the the existing avl to libavl, but I take that again interferes with package mapping efforts? Thanks, Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firewall blocking desktop features
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il wrote: On Friday 13 September 2013 01:51:00 drago01 wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il wrote: - This means that any privileged service controlled by GUI client (e.g: NetworkManager) is still only as secure as it's controller (e.g: nm-applet). This is wrong. That's not how controlling the service works. Care to explain? Yes. What I meant is nm-applet is not more privileged then any other application in the session. The policy says the active session is allowed to do foo not nm-applet is allowed to do foo. So you can securing the controller wont help you much as long as any other app from the active session can be exploited. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend
OCaml 4.01.0 is a new major release of the language. I'm not expecting any incompatibilities, but it will require a mass rebuild of the 100 or so Fedora OCaml packages in Rawhide, which I will do this weekend. I'm also planning to: - update the ARM code generator - enable debuginfo generation, since the OCaml compiler has generated useful debuginfo for a while now - tidy up the spec files and try to come up with a modern set of packaging guidelines, since the de-facto packaging rules have diverged a little from the guidelines published back in 2008 For people not using OCaml (or even those that are) there shouldn't be any significant disruption. More about the new release here: https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2013-09/msg00173.html Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Package name conflict with retired package
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation library). How should one proceed in such situations? Does the old repository needs to be deleted before the new one is created? Please do not reuse package names for unrelated software. It is quite confusing and can interfere with all kinds of tracking/package mapping efforts. That could be documented. It would be wrong for an old retired (!) avl to block that component name forever. What if that project has been abandoned or renamed? I can't reach the old git.fruit.je/avl currently, but the README in the old F14 package calls it AVLTREE, AVLTree and AVL-Tree library, and the Fedora src.rpm uses the libavl source tarball from Debian. = It could (should?) have been named libavl or avltree. Again related to the General Naming Guidelines, FPC ticket #336. If the AVL-Tree project were still alive, what would happen in a new package review request at Fedora? Would a different pair of submitter and reviewer approve the same avl as libavl? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page
Hi,I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the FAS is providing OpenID facility. How can I implement a login with FAS in my web page. Could you give me a direction Thanks Regards, Malintha Adikari, Department Of Computer Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Legal approved: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2013-September/002232.html So I am confused. In your request to legal you say Release Engineering asked for legal to okay it. However I dont remember ever asking you to get legal's okay. Who in releng asked you to? nirik did I really do not think we can integrate this into our release processes right now. Why? -- -Elad Alfassa. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:56:03PM +0600, Malintha Adikari wrote: * Hi, I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the FAS is providing OpenID facility. How can I implement a login with FAS in my web page. Could you give me a direction Hi, You might want to port this question over to the infrastructure list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure However, to answer it, it all depends on how your application was written. Is there not an OpenID plugin for the framework you used? If so, then it's probably the easiest starting point. Could we have some more information about your application? (language, sources, framework, goal?) Thanks, Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Oracle considering DB6 license
On 09/13/2013 08:14 AM, Honza Horak wrote: On 09/12/2013 09:56 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 09/12/2013 07:16 AM, Jan Staněk wrote: Hello, some time back Oracle released new version of Berkeley DB under AGPL, which is incompatible with Fedora licensing politics. However, https://forums.oracle.com/message/11184885#11184885 If you are interested in DB6, consider leaving feedback there :) Week later... it turns out that Oracle might consider re-licensing it back :) JBG Can you provide some more info about re-licensing, please? Where did you learn about it? It was poor attempt of humour afaik at least in this point in time Oracle is not thinking about re-licensing it back but since they have start playing that licensing game ( changing licenses ) they are likely to do it again... JBG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 17:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: So I am confused. In your request to legal you say Release Engineering asked for legal to okay it. However I dont remember ever asking you to get legal's okay. Who in releng asked you to? nirik I'm going to not continue this, because it's not actually my argument and I am not a lawyer. Please go talk to fedora-legal. I really do not think we can integrate this into our release processes right now. Thankfully, we're not asking for it for 'right now'. We want it for f21. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page
Hi, I am using PHP as my language, and codeigniter as my framework. The goal is to provide facility to people to register for fedora event. They can use their FAS account to authenticate identity to register for the events. Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:14:00 +0200 From: pin...@pingoured.fr To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:56:03PM +0600, Malintha Adikari wrote: * Hi, I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the FAS is providing OpenID facility. How can I implement a login with FAS in my web page. Could you give me a direction Hi, You might want to port this question over to the infrastructure list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure However, to answer it, it all depends on how your application was written. Is there not an OpenID plugin for the framework you used? If so, then it's probably the easiest starting point. Could we have some more information about your application? (language, sources, framework, goal?) Thanks, Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Oracle considering DB6 license
On 09/13/2013 12:26 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 09/13/2013 08:14 AM, Honza Horak wrote: On 09/12/2013 09:56 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 09/12/2013 07:16 AM, Jan Staněk wrote: Hello, some time back Oracle released new version of Berkeley DB under AGPL, which is incompatible with Fedora licensing politics. However, https://forums.oracle.com/message/11184885#11184885 If you are interested in DB6, consider leaving feedback there :) Week later... it turns out that Oracle might consider re-licensing it back :) JBG Can you provide some more info about re-licensing, please? Where did you learn about it? It was poor attempt of humour afaik at least in this point in time Oracle is not thinking about re-licensing it back but since they have start playing that licensing game ( changing licenses ) they are likely to do it again... Yeah, sorry, my sense for humor approaches zero when comes for licensing issues :) Before I had to solve the first license problem I'd never thought re-licensing from one free to another free license can bring so many problems and can make couple of people quite desperate. Honza -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Package name conflict with retired package
On 13.09.2013 11:48, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation library). How should one proceed in such situations? Does the old repository needs to be deleted before the new one is created? Please do not reuse package names for unrelated software. It is quite confusing and can interfere with all kinds of tracking/package mapping efforts. That could be documented. It would be wrong for an old retired (!) avl to block that component name forever. What if that project has been abandoned or renamed? I can't reach the old git.fruit.je/avl currently, but the README in the old F14 package calls it AVLTREE, AVLTree and AVL-Tree library, and the Fedora src.rpm uses the libavl source tarball from Debian. = It could (should?) have been named libavl or avltree. I would definitely prefer this option. Should I file a rel-eng ticket or what would the procedure be? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Atlas update
Hi list, Atlas currently bundles Lapack. I want to update Atlas to 3.10.1 and unbundle Lapack as well. This will require rebuild of dependent packages and maybe adding explicit dependency on Lapack. Would anyone object to that? If I understand things correctly, Lapack in Fedora uses Atlas and not its own Blas implementation. Frantisek Kluknavsky PS: DSDP MUMPS MUMPS-openmpi Macaulay2 R-RScaLAPACK SuperLU apbs armadillo arpack cp2k cp2k-mpich cp2k-mpich2 cp2k-openmpi cp2k-smp csdp csdp-tools ergo freefem++ freefem++-glx freefem++-mpi ga-mpich2 ga-openmpi grass-libs gretl gsl iml jblas lapack levmar libghemical linbox mpqc ncl numpy ocaml-lacaml octave octave-control octave-odepkg octave-optim pocketsphinx psfex python-cvxopt python-scikit-learn python3-cvxopt python3-numpy python3-scipy qrupdate scilab scipy sextractor sphinxbase sphinxbase-libs sphinxtrain suitesparse wannier90 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Atlas update
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:16:46 +0200 Frantisek Kluknavsky fkluk...@redhat.com wrote: Hi list, Atlas currently bundles Lapack. I want to update Atlas to 3.10.1 and unbundle Lapack as well. This will require rebuild of dependent packages and maybe adding explicit dependency on Lapack. Would anyone object to that? ATLAS doesn't really bundle LAPACK, since it uses the static library from the Fedora LAPACK package. But yes, it does duplicate the libraries in binary form. I'd think twice about debundling. For instance OpenBLAS actually replaces some LAPACK routines with more efficient implementations, and because of this OpenBLAS also includes a bunch functions from the lapack package. So, please check with ATLAS upstream whether you can safely unbundle LAPACK. If I understand things correctly, Lapack in Fedora uses Atlas and not its own Blas implementation. Yes and no. The LAPACK library you get from the blas package doesn't contain any BLAS routines, so you can in principle choose what BLAS library you want to use it with. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Atlas update
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:24:28 +0300 Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:16:46 +0200 Frantisek Kluknavsky fkluk...@redhat.com wrote: Atlas currently bundles Lapack. I want to update Atlas to 3.10.1 and unbundle Lapack as well. This will require rebuild of dependent packages and maybe adding explicit dependency on Lapack. I'd think twice about debundling. For instance OpenBLAS actually replaces some LAPACK routines with more efficient implementations, and because of this OpenBLAS also includes a bunch functions from the lapack package. So, please check with ATLAS upstream whether you can safely unbundle LAPACK. Actually, this is stated pretty clearly on the ATLAS page: At present, it provides C and Fortran77 interfaces to a portably efficient BLAS implementation, as well as a few routines from LAPACK. So, if you remove LAPACK from ATLAS, you'll also prevent compiling LAPACK dependent packages against ATLAS. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Malintha Adikari malintha.adik...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using PHP as my language, and codeigniter as my framework. The goal is to provide facility to people to register for fedora event. They can use their FAS account to authenticate identity to register for the events. Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:14:00 +0200 From: pin...@pingoured.fr To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:56:03PM +0600, Malintha Adikari wrote: * Hi, I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the FAS is providing OpenID facility. How can I implement a login with FAS in my web page. Could you give me a direction Hi, You might want to port this question over to the infrastructure list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure However, to answer it, it all depends on how your application was written. Is there not an OpenID plugin for the framework you used? If so, then it's probably the easiest starting point. Could we have some more information about your application? (language, sources, framework, goal?) Thanks, Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Hi Malintha, The media-wiki auth [0] and wordpress auth plugin for FAS [1] will help you to get in to the track. Those things were written in PHP too. You can write the fas-auth as Codeigniter auth plugin. -- [0] - https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-infrastructure.git/tree/scripts/Auth_FAS_MediaWiki/Auth_FAS.php?id=ba6349c6aee8e2ee588cfe358aca49e85a8fb3f0 [1] - https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-infrastructure.git/tree/plugins/wordpress-mu-plugin-fasauth/fasauth.php?id=ba6349c6aee8e2ee588cfe358aca49e85a8fb3f0 -- - UD - -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Atlas update
On 09/13/2013 06:26 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:24:28 +0300 Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:16:46 +0200 Frantisek Kluknavsky fkluk...@redhat.com wrote: Atlas currently bundles Lapack. I want to update Atlas to 3.10.1 and unbundle Lapack as well. This will require rebuild of dependent packages and maybe adding explicit dependency on Lapack. I'd think twice about debundling. For instance OpenBLAS actually replaces some LAPACK routines with more efficient implementations, and because of this OpenBLAS also includes a bunch functions from the lapack package. So, please check with ATLAS upstream whether you can safely unbundle LAPACK. Actually, this is stated pretty clearly on the ATLAS page: At present, it provides C and Fortran77 interfaces to a portably efficient BLAS implementation, as well as a few routines from LAPACK. So, if you remove LAPACK from ATLAS, you'll also prevent compiling LAPACK dependent packages against ATLAS. I think you can do -latlas -llapack. The problem with the current atlas is that it wants the lapack *source* not just the library as the current version did. It would been a bundling exception. Might be okay since lapack doesn't change much, probably not many security concerns. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page
I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the FAS is providing OpenID facility. How can I implement a login with FAS in my web page. Could you give me a direction Hi Malintha, I'm doing a GSoC this year too, and although it uses Ruby on Rails, building a web application for designers. I had added FAS-OpenID support to the application, and had blogged about that here[1]. I'm not sure how much it would be of use to you, but you might want to take a look at it too :) [1]- http://thirstyforcola.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/setting-up-openid-on-rails/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
File ParseUtil-Domain-2.30.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ParseUtil-Domain: d998aacd52ed1490d24cc1b04206b234 ParseUtil-Domain-2.30.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Atlas update
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:44:50 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: On 09/13/2013 06:26 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote: So, if you remove LAPACK from ATLAS, you'll also prevent compiling LAPACK dependent packages against ATLAS. I think you can do -latlas -llapack. Yes, but this is because currently -llapack -latlas uses the ATLAS version of the LAPACK library... which is very ugly: $ find /usr/lib64/atlas -type f /usr/lib64/atlas/libf77blas.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libatlas.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/liblapack.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libptcblas.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libclapack.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libptf77blas.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libcblas.so.3.0 This is in addition to the library provided by the LAPACK package: /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3.4.2 Ideally, ATLAS would only ship a single library containing everything, much the same way OpenBLAS does. The problem with the current atlas is that it wants the lapack *source* not just the library as the current version did. It would been a bundling exception. Might be okay since lapack doesn't change much, probably not many security concerns. This is probably something that can be patched out. I had to do the same thing for OpenBLAS. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page
On Sep 13, 2013 6:56 AM, Sarup Banskota sbanskot...@gmail.com wrote: I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the FAS is providing OpenID facility. How can I implement a login with FAS in my web page. Could you give me a direction Hi Malintha, I'm doing a GSoC this year too, and although it uses Ruby on Rails, building a web application for designers. I had added FAS-OpenID support to the application, and had blogged about that here[1]. I'm not sure how much it would be of use to you, but you might want to take a look at it too :) [1]- http://thirstyforcola.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/setting-up-openid-on-rails/ Yeah, openid is the way to go for now. The WordPress auth module is from before we had reliable openid and the ability to check your groups from openid. (That is available via an extension to openid now). But to pause for one moment - do either of these apps have a goal of running on fedora infrastructure? If so you should know that all of our own apps that we have to do maintenance on are written in python with a distinct preference for the flask and pyramid web frameworks. We run some third party apps, well maintained upstream, written in php. And we do not run any java or ruby apps (the latter we might be able to start using under similar rules to our third party php apps once we get rid of puppet (migration to ansible is happening but slowly)). No idea what it would take for us to run java apps. -Toshio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
File Config-Tiny-2.17.tgz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Tiny: 6cbd7e5bb433fee17a2337f42a7e418e Config-Tiny-2.17.tgz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
abrt Bugzilla summary
Hello, a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text produced by abrt has been filed. Before I start changing the bug summary format I'd like to do a little survey: What would you like see in the bug summaries produced by abrt? Regards Jakub 1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005762 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firewall blocking desktop features
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 11:23 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: On Friday 13 September 2013 01:51:00 drago01 wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il wrote: - This means that any privileged service controlled by GUI client (e.g: NetworkManager) is still only as secure as it's controller (e.g: nm-applet). This is wrong. That's not how controlling the service works. Care to explain? * Let's assume someone exploit a buffer overflow in nm-applet to execute arbitrary code. * Now she can ask (over dbus) from NM to do legitimate operations without the user consent/knowledge -- e.g: connect to some random-joe wireless network, etc. (btw, the user can still discover the truth via other client which isn't subverted -- like nmcli, the kde widget, etc.) nm-applet can certainly *ask* NetworkManager to do something. Depending on the policy that an administrator has set, NetworkManager will ask the user to authorize the request via PolicyKit. Only if the request is authorized, will that request be granted. If your user must authorize before you can obtain the ModifySystem and ModifyOwn permissions, then no, nm-applet can't ask NetworkManager to connect to malicious networks unless that trojan also somehow subverts PolicyKit. Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[perl-NetAddr-IP] Update to 4.070
commit 78cdd666a368a7f70556b8263e98cf008cfae7ad
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Sep 13 16:39:27 2013 +0100
Update to 4.070
- New upstream release 4.070
- Yet another documention error fixed
- Add new6, RFC4291 compliant ipv4-ipV6 new in Lite.pm
perl-NetAddr-IP.spec |9 +++--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec b/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
index a566a27..85f591f 100644
--- a/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
+++ b/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-NetAddr-IP
-Version:4.069
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:4.070
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets
# Lite/Util/Util.xs is GPLv2+
# Other files are (GPLv2+ or Artistic clarified)
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/NetAddr::IP::UtilPP.3pm*
%changelog
+* Fri Sep 13 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 4.070-1
+- Update to 4.070
+ - Yet another documention error fixed
+ - Add new6, RFC4291 compliant ipv4-ipV6 new in Lite.pm
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 4.069-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 1dbea83..25ee3bb 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7721135fcea390327f75421a6b701144 NetAddr-IP-4.069.tar.gz
+74aa1dcdab7824e228528a64f48ad5a0 NetAddr-IP-4.070.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Config-Tiny] Created tag perl-Config-Tiny-2.17-1.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-Config-Tiny-2.17-1.fc21' was created pointing to: be705c0... Update to 2.17 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpmdiff causing failing build
Hi all, I'm trying to build the new colord for F20. All the arches build file, but the task fails with: BuildError: mismatch when analyzing colord-extra-profiles-1.1.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm, rpmdiff output was: added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA27L_coated.icc Task here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5931690 Any ideas? Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rpmdiff causing failing build
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:56:51 +0100 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to build the new colord for F20. All the arches build file, but the task fails with: BuildError: mismatch when analyzing colord-extra-profiles-1.1.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm, rpmdiff output was: added /usr/share/color/icc/colord/FOGRA27L_coated.icc Task here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5931690 Any ideas? Thanks, the reason for the failure is that the noarch sub-packages differ between the arm/i686/x86_64 arches, IIRC you disabled building profiles on non-x86 arches some time ago when there were problems with OOM conditions on ARM and s390 Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: abrt Bugzilla summary
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200 Jakub Filak jfi...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text produced by abrt has been filed. Before I start changing the bug summary format I'd like to do a little survey: What would you like see in the bug summaries produced by abrt? I actually disagree with the reporter of the bug. I prefer to have the component name in the subject of the bug. It's true that you can look this up by going to the bug on the web and that it's in the initial email, but after that the context of update emails is not there, so it's harder for me to know _which_ of the many abrt bugs this is. My thought would be: Current: [abrt] util-linux-2.23.2-2.fc19: recount_geometry: Process /usr/sbin/fdisk was killed by signal 8 (SIGFPE) New: [abrt] util-linux: fdisk:recount_geometry() killed by SIGFPE kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:28:09 -0400 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 17:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: So I am confused. In your request to legal you say Release Engineering asked for legal to okay it. However I dont remember ever asking you to get legal's okay. Who in releng asked you to? nirik I'm going to not continue this, because it's not actually my argument and I am not a lawyer. Please go talk to fedora-legal. Note that I was simply saying that this is the issue that the previous plan ran into. :) It doesn't mean thats the only issue to be overcome. I really do not think we can integrate this into our release processes right now. Thankfully, we're not asking for it for 'right now'. We want it for f21. Great. I still think it would be good to look at and come to a plan sooner rather than wait for f21. (If things could get done in rawhide when they are agreed on that would be good). kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page
On 09/13/2013 10:35 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: We want to make sure people don't enter their fas information into any 3rd party forms or websites. You should only enter your fas login/password to a fedoraproject.org site. Ah shoot! I'm going to have to write that nice Nigerian prince and see if we can still do the $100,000,000 transfer with only my personal information and without my FAS credentials. :D Fingers crossed! -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Get FAS account authentication facility for my Web page
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:53:36 +0530 Uditha Bandara Wijerathna udin...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi Malintha, The media-wiki auth [0] and wordpress auth plugin for FAS [1] will help you to get in to the track. Those things were written in PHP too. You can write the fas-auth as Codeigniter auth plugin. Just as a note here... you can use openid, but you shouldn't use direct FAS unless your application really is running inside Fedora Infrastructure. We want to make sure people don't enter their fas information into any 3rd party forms or websites. You should only enter your fas login/password to a fedoraproject.org site. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Orphaning Package: cfengine
It's been a long time since I've had time or interest to maintain the cfengine package in Fedora and EPEL. I've informally reached out through other channels and found a few interested parties, but nobody ended up actually stepping up to take ownership. So I'm officially orphaning cfengine in hopes that one of you great people will be willing to take it over. -Jeff -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ibus-typing-booster Obsoletes failure
What is going on in package ibus-typing-booster? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ibus-typing-booster.git/plain/ibus-typing-booster.spec It attempts at obsoleting various packages, but since it does that with a specific dist tag and without retiring those packages, it fails entirely, because the packages have been bumped and rebuilt several times. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life If you need help, feel free to contact me. Once the supposed to be retired packages have been blocked by rel-eng, it becomes easier to determine the necessary Obsoletes versions. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: php-gettext
What's the full story here? php-gettext php-gettext-0:1.0.11-5.fc20.noarch isn't obsoleted php-gettext-0:1.0.11-4.fc19.noarch isn't obsoleted php-gettext-0:1.0.11-3.fc18.noarch isn't obsoleted php-gettext-0:1.0.9-3.fc15.noarch is oldest php-gettext 0:1.0.11-3 obsoleted by php-php-gettext-0:1.0.11-8.fc20.noarch No reply. :-( Filed bugs 1008026 and 1008027. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping
a few days ago i upgraded to F19 and my cron-script checking for updates as well as yum check-update reports these warnings - unsure where to report a bug because it's not a specific package, so i post it here Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. You should report this problem to the owner of the updates-testing repository. Update notice FEDORA-2013-15734 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-2013-15106 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-2013-14132 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-2013-14172 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Self Introduction
Hi, I am a student of computer science, and systems administrator for a University using el. I have been using Fedora as my primary OS for a number of years now. I have had some intermittent exposure to many projects here such as MATE, isc-dhcp and FreeIPA. Sadly in the past, I have not been able to dedicate as much time to these as I would have liked, but a small number of my patches have been accepted. I generally focus on server and networking systems, but I am willing to contribute to anything that I see that needs fixing. (IE writing SELinux policy) -- Sincerely, William Brown pgp.mit.edu http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x3C0AC6DAB2F928A2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping
On 14/09/13 08:51, Reindl Harald wrote: a few days ago i upgraded to F19 and my cron-script checking for updates as well as yum check-update reports these warnings - unsure where to report a bug because it's not a specific package, so i post it here Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. You should report this problem to the owner of the updates-testing repository. Update notice FEDORA-2013-15734 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-2013-15106 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-2013-14132 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-2013-14172 (von updates-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Evidently this is a bodhi bug that's been around for a while, being tracked in bug 960642.[1] -- Regards, Theo [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960642 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1007755] New: Needs runtime dependency on perl(version)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007755 Bug ID: 1007755 Summary: Needs runtime dependency on perl(version) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: p...@city-fan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Trying to update perl-NetAddr-IP to 4.070: $ perl Makefile.PL ... snip ... Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Can't locate version.pm in @INC (you may need to install the version module) (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm line 2706. $ rpm -qf /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.76-1.fc21.noarch $ rpm -q --requires perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker /usr/bin/perl perl = 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.1) perl(AutoSplit) perl(Carp) perl(Config) perl(Cwd) perl(DirHandle) perl(Exporter) perl(ExtUtils::Command) perl(ExtUtils::Install) perl(ExtUtils::Installed) perl(ExtUtils::Liblist) perl(ExtUtils::Liblist::Kid) perl(ExtUtils::MM) perl(ExtUtils::MM_Any) perl(ExtUtils::MM_Unix) perl(ExtUtils::MM_Win32) perl(ExtUtils::MY) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Config) perl(ExtUtils::Manifest) perl(ExtUtils::Packlist) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) = 0.8 perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(Pod::Man) perl(Test::Harness) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Ku3teJXi7a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1007755] Needs runtime dependency on perl(version)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007755 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- This issue is also present in perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.72-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iioIEMJmGia=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1007775] New: perl-NetAddr-IP-4.070 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007775 Bug ID: 1007775 Summary: perl-NetAddr-IP-4.070 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-NetAddr-IP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: andr...@bawue.net Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: andr...@bawue.net, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 4.070 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 4.069-3.fc20 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/NetAddr-IP/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j3QZQvoZdha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1007776] New: perl-Time-modules-2013.0912 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007776 Bug ID: 1007776 Summary: perl-Time-modules-2013.0912 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Time-modules Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, xav...@bachelot.org Latest upstream release: 2013.0912 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 2011.0517-8.fc20 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-modules/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GNWMDnQjgha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1007755] Needs runtime dependency on perl(version)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007755 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1007775 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j5GZxvNATVa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1007775] perl-NetAddr-IP-4.070 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007775 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org Depends On||1007755 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=e6XQGULVZca=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Padre
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-IPTables-libiptc
perl-IPTables-libiptc has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: slic3r
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On armhfp: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-ParseUtil-Domain
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6 On armhfp: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.6 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.x86_64 requires libswipl.so.6.2.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.i686 requires libswipl.so.6.2.6 On armhfp: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.armv7hl requires libswipl.so.6.2.6 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On armhfp: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6 On armhfp: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.6 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Padre
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: slic3r
slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On armhfp: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-ParseUtil-Domain
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ParseUtil-Domain] Update to 2.30 for Perl 5.18 support (#992709)
commit 2ba71f26ba6d780de0a050ffc2aeddab53a538fd
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Sep 13 15:00:00 2013 +0100
Update to 2.30 for Perl 5.18 support (#992709)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ParseUtil-Domain.spec | 15 ---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 63589ff..911eb21 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
/ParseUtil-Domain-2.22.tar.gz
+/ParseUtil-Domain-2.30.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-ParseUtil-Domain.spec b/perl-ParseUtil-Domain.spec
index e52a81a..ff4e5ed 100644
--- a/perl-ParseUtil-Domain.spec
+++ b/perl-ParseUtil-Domain.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Name: perl-ParseUtil-Domain
Summary:Utility for parsing a domain name into its components
-Version:2.22
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:2.30
+Release:1%{?dist}
# - ParseUtil::Domain is GPL+ or Artistic (the Perl license)
# - data/effective_tld_names.txt is MPLv2.0
@@ -15,15 +15,15 @@ Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HE/HEYTRAV/ParseUtil-Domain-%{v
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(base)
-BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp) = 1.17
BuildRequires: perl(lib)
-BuildRequires: perl(List::MoreUtils)
BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose)
BuildRequires: perl(namespace::autoclean)
BuildRequires: perl(Net::IDN::Encode) = 2.003
BuildRequires: perl(Net::IDN::Nameprep) = 1.101
-BuildRequires: perl(Net::IDN::Punycode)
+BuildRequires: perl(Net::IDN::Punycode) = 1.100
+BuildRequires: perl(perl5i::2) = 2.12.0
BuildRequires: perl(Perl6::Export::Attrs)
BuildRequires: perl(Perl::Critic)
BuildRequires: perl(Regexp::Assemble::Compressed)
@@ -36,8 +36,6 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::Perl::Critic)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Routine)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Routine::Util)
BuildRequires: perl(Unicode::CharName) = 1.07
-BuildRequires: perl(YAML)
-
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -79,6 +77,9 @@ perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor
%changelog
+* Fri Sep 13 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 2.30-1
+- Update to 2.30 for Perl 5.18 support (#992709)
+
* Fri Aug 09 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.22-5
- Perl 5.18 rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 950a86c..f55dcfa 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-653c68c05a16b7acfe15ce2e295c634f ParseUtil-Domain-2.22.tar.gz
+d998aacd52ed1490d24cc1b04206b234 ParseUtil-Domain-2.30.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ParseUtil-Domain/f20] Update to 2.30 for Perl 5.18 support (#992709)
Summary of changes: 2ba71f2... Update to 2.30 for Perl 5.18 support (#992709) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ParseUtil-Domain] Created tag perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 2ba71f2... Update to 2.30 for Perl 5.18 support (#992709) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ParseUtil-Domain] Created tag perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc20
The lightweight tag 'perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc20' was created pointing to: 2ba71f2... Update to 2.30 for Perl 5.18 support (#992709) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 992709] perl-ParseUtil-Domain: FTBFS in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992709 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BtAzHG1yOKa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Config-Tiny] Update to 2.17
commit be705c0a562e779d0c2c4da6d5814d941877fc06
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Sep 13 16:07:53 2013 +0100
Update to 2.17
- New upstream release 2.17
- Remove the file tests -efr during calls to read(); the open() tests for
any
error
- The -f test was reporting /dev/null as a directory, not a file
(CPAN RT#36974)
- Clean up some error messages slightly
perl-Config-Tiny.spec | 10 +-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Config-Tiny.spec b/perl-Config-Tiny.spec
index 15ab16a..c3cc7db 100644
--- a/perl-Config-Tiny.spec
+++ b/perl-Config-Tiny.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Config-Tiny
-Version: 2.16
+Version: 2.17
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Perl module for reading and writing .ini style configuration
files
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -54,6 +54,14 @@ make test TEST_FILES=xt/*.t AUTOMATED_TESTING=1
%{_mandir}/man3/Config::Tiny.3pm*
%changelog
+* Fri Sep 13 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 2.17-1
+- Update to 2.17
+ - Remove the file tests -efr during calls to read(); the open() tests for any
+error
+ - The -f test was reporting /dev/null as a directory, not a file
+(CPAN RT#36974)
+ - Clean up some error messages slightly
+
* Fri Sep 6 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 2.16-1
- Update to 2.16
- Replace Path::Tiny with File::Spec, because the former's list of
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 945b06b..bd35328 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-03587c4c0ac6e16ba8a148d93a2e Config-Tiny-2.16.tgz
+6cbd7e5bb433fee17a2337f42a7e418e Config-Tiny-2.17.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Config-Tiny] Created tag perl-Config-Tiny-2.17-1.fc20
The lightweight tag 'perl-Config-Tiny-2.17-1.fc20' was created pointing to: be705c0... Update to 2.17 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File NetAddr-IP-4.070.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetAddr-IP: 74aa1dcdab7824e228528a64f48ad5a0 NetAddr-IP-4.070.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Config-Tiny/f20] Update to 2.17
Summary of changes: be705c0... Update to 2.17 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 992709] perl-ParseUtil-Domain: FTBFS in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992709 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-16655/perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.30-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zgWwg0Ei0ya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1000737] after 'yum install bugzilla' checksetup.pl fails. dependancies missing and incorrect.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000737 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Email-Send-2.199-1.fc1 ||8 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-09-13 22:28:20 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Email-Send-2.199-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=E08VmuxZ0ra=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1000737] after 'yum install bugzilla' checksetup.pl fails. dependancies missing and incorrect.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000737 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Email-Send-2.199-1.fc1 |perl-Email-Send-2.199-1.fc1 |8 |9 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Email-Send-2.199-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WV0X9lsG7Za=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47512 - backend txn plugin fixup tasks should be done in a txn
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47512 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47512/0001-Ticket-47512-backend-txn-plugin-fixup-tasks-should-b.patch -- Mark Reynolds 389 Development Team Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: [389-devel] RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size
On 09/12/2013 07:08 PM, David Boreham wrote: On 9/11/2013 11:41 AM, Howard Chu wrote: Just out of curiosity, why is keeping a count per key a problem? If you're using BDB duplicate key support, can't you just use cursor-c_count() to get this? I.e., BDB already maintains key counts internally, why not leverage that? afaik you need to pass the DB_RECNUM flag at DB creation time to get record counting behavior, and it imposes a performance and concurrency penalty on writes. Also afaik 389DS does not set that flag except on VLV indexes (which need it, and coincidentally were the original reason for the feature being added to BDB). I'm using bdb 4.7 on RHEL 6. Looking at the code, it appears the dbc-count method for btree is __bamc_count() in bt_cursor.c. I'm not sure, but it looks as though this function has to iterate each page counting the duplicates on each page, which makes it a non-starter. Unless I'm mistaken, it doesn't look as though it keeps a counter on each update, then simply returns the counter. I don't see any code which would make the behavior different depending on if DB_RECNUM is used when the database is created. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: [389-devel] RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size
On 09/13/2013 02:39 PM, David Boreham wrote:
On 9/13/2013 2:18 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/12/2013 07:08 PM, David Boreham wrote:
On 9/11/2013 11:41 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why is keeping a count per key a problem? If
you're using BDB duplicate key support, can't you just use
cursor-c_count() to get this? I.e., BDB already maintains key
counts internally, why not leverage that?
afaik you need to pass the DB_RECNUM flag at DB creation time to get
record counting behavior, and it imposes a performance and
concurrency penalty on writes. Also afaik 389DS does not set that
flag except on VLV indexes (which need it, and coincidentally were
the original reason for the feature being added to BDB).
I'm using bdb 4.7 on RHEL 6.
Looking at the code, it appears the dbc-count method for btree is
__bamc_count() in bt_cursor.c. I'm not sure, but it looks as though
this function has to iterate each page counting the duplicates on
each page, which makes it a non-starter. Unless I'm mistaken, it
doesn't look as though it keeps a counter on each update, then simply
returns the counter. I don't see any code which would make the
behavior different depending on if DB_RECNUM is used when the
database is created.
The DB_RECNUM count feature is not accessed via dbc-count() but
through the dbc-c_get() call, passing DB_GET_RECNO, positioning at
the last key. You do also need to use nested btrees for it to count
the dups, afaik (but we're doing that in the DS indexes already I
believe).
I wrote a small bdbtest.py script which uses the python bdb interface.
https://github.com/richm/scripts/blob/master/bdbtest.py
This creates an env, opens a db with
bsddb.db.DB_DUPSORT|bsddb.db.DB_RECNUM, adds several non-dup and dup
records, opens a cursor and iterates them. This is the output:
open dbenv in /var/tmp/dbtest
open db /var/tmp/dbtest/dbtest.db4
no txn records
key=key0 val=data0
extra=('', '\x01\x00\x00\x00')
snip
key=key9 val=data9
extra=('', '\n\x00\x00\x00')
key=multikey val=multidata0
extra=('', '\x0b\x00\x00\x00')
snip
key=multikey val=multidata9
extra=('', '\x0b\x00\x00\x00')
The extra is the str() output of cur.get(bsddb.db.DB_GET_RECNO)
So for all of the dup records, the recno is the same '\b' == 11?
I'm probably missing something, but how do I use this to get the number
of duplicates?
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Review Request 52: Clean leftovers missed in reviews
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/52/ --- Review request for blockerbugs. Repository: blockerbugs Description --- While going through documentation and commits since last release I found some leftovers missed in reviews. Diffs - blockerbugs/controllers/main.py a41627485a77daecc07c8d33f41dc5a17e2ebb97 blockerbugs/cli.py 7151337aa1e16e571d0cf165c87c3c6f50276b90 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/52/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Krizek ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/ --- (Updated Sept. 13, 2013, 11:21 p.m.) Review request for blockerbugs. Changes --- Fix flask-admin 1.0.5 support (flask-admin 1.0.5 is used on el6) Repository: blockerbugs Description --- Implement new admin interface with flask-admin Add build support Diffs (updated) - testing/testfunc_update_sync.py 70c600515ccc5e97ed17b4cadd40d76277794b67 testing/testfunc_bugsync.py 496f2994dda81bc82f2e270944a3fb2b391d9d91 testing/testfunc_bugmodel.py a50f3458b2154f13736ab1f93cb3d1a86a48fcb1 testing/test_spinmodel.py PRE-CREATION testing/test_controllers.py 702d2a5390e42910176d327461ef628e6bf8b849 testing/test_api.py e92dda539117f94f3283f6ce262d65295a5e32c1 setup.py 89621b0debb5d368a027a4801de7da62fa961eab sass/admin_layout.scss PRE-CREATION requirements.txt 98eab5da9306a101a41dd13708df1900e9fd1018 blockerbugs/util/koji_interface.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/templates/spin_list.html c455ff4edec0991a453a94cd0e38d959e1757672 blockerbugs/templates/admin_layout.html PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/templates/admin/modify_release.html a3bb0d95c49414ff977e82f828ffdd111e105cc6 blockerbugs/templates/admin/main.html 251b1df1647e307e89bcda365422f1cee59b9a35 blockerbugs/templates/admin/generate_api_key.html PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/templates/admin/edit_userinfo.html PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/templates/admin/admin_nav.html 34a0c2a966c265ab66166b3170f5f6d507014149 blockerbugs/templates/admin/add_spin.html be44830da436e4e87700fe940a7c5197b32d1e82 blockerbugs/templates/admin/add_release.html 931001b23f52dd1b75fe0feb8d0311b76fcc907e blockerbugs/static/js/admin.js PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/models/userinfo.py 069ca9406d6d0e301a2a3a8d9703a940301db0bc blockerbugs/models/update.py 9660d038720bcecae8e4f7401e09e26bd6589189 blockerbugs/models/spin.py fa8e0e9a887f269cf31e850baa90678ff7055b78 blockerbugs/models/release.py cca27cff41875528c1ee13d95194de5f237f31d4 blockerbugs/models/milestone.py 31667f6467ed111c3594cdd86d1c933f73b7dfc2 blockerbugs/models/build.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/models/__init__.py 0223fff2996290005bd50412c844979304ce38a2 blockerbugs/controllers/users.py f05ea6b7e0af260545ff3cf340b73d15f55138d1 blockerbugs/controllers/main.py a41627485a77daecc07c8d33f41dc5a17e2ebb97 blockerbugs/controllers/api/utils.py 38144dd48f3190f709a9bafa3a5a425dfdfffbdf blockerbugs/controllers/api/errors.py aaab9107521873100043e9026d1a4b4ea9705983 blockerbugs/controllers/api/api.py d6df7d34170da05bd817b12545596f34b43b9da6 blockerbugs/controllers/admin/spin.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/controllers/admin/build.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/controllers/admin/auth.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/controllers/admin/__init__.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/controllers/admin.py 4ce6c9f58b5513c280312c8d1dd92c341d259d0a blockerbugs/config.py e9b2fbc83c98a66ce963eec596e0cb90b66f87b0 blockerbugs/__init__.py bf0daed0c198868e8d56f444bf9a320c85d65362 blockerbugs.spec c5c2409e5ad5fe96c145cf3ec65c8c1778681b6c alembic/versions/f9e369bf00d_added_spin_type_cons.py PRE-CREATION alembic/versions/3b0500a49ea7_added_api_key_hash_t.py PRE-CREATION alembic/versions/1162fb4d4358_added_build_table.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/diff/ Testing --- I've tested on my develop instance. Thanks, Ilgiz Islamgulov ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
