Re: Red Hat and Fedora Working Groups
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:24:33AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/08/2013 08:02 AM, David Tardon wrote: On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 03:29:57AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: Shall we talk about how Red Hat employees have been granted all kinds of privileges within our community without as even bother to introduce themselves to the community even to the extent that fesco is now judging people if they are socially ready for proven packagers while Red Hat employees walk around and are granted those privileges freely? That is an utter fabrication. Red Hat packagers have to go exactly through the same process to became packagers as anyone else (well, it may be easier for them to find a sponsor, but sponsored they must be); they have to go through the same process to became proven packagers etc. In fedora's history, there have been many examples which demonstrate the contrary. There have been many cases, where RH teams where mutually approving their team mates as packagers, where RH supervisors where approving their subordinates as proven packagers, and where RH office/team mates rushed through package reviews ping pong style. Which is not what he is saying. It is sad that such things happen at all, but he claims they happen routinely, as a matter of fact. That is an accusation I strongly object to. Btw, proven packagers are approved by FESCo. I fail to see how any Red Hat supervisor could go around that. Btw, these things are hardly limited to Red Hat. E.g., who is to stop two packagers trying to get a set of packages into Fedora from perfunctorily reviewing each others packages? I respectfully suggest that you be silent if you do not know the facts. Your credibility is diminishing rapidly with every untrue statement you put forth. I respectfully disagree with you. Suit yourself. D. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: python-urlgrabber, yum: blatant disregard for packaging guidelines and common sense
On 8. 10. 2013 at 19:06:21, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I was looking for examples of nice packages for upcoming packaging workshop
we are doing in Brno. I made the terrible mistake of doing fedpkg clone
python-urlgrabber.
If there was some normal packaging issue I'd most likely just file a bug in
bugzilla, but this made my blood boil. This is one of our core components!
snippet from spec:
Source0: urlgrabber-%{version}.tar.gz
Patch1: urlgrabber-HEAD.patch
Guess what? The patch is 100k big. The tarball is actually smaller! Of
course the package does not even follow post-release versioning
guidelines[1]. The only good thing is that the tarball sha actually matches
upstream released version from 2009.
Now I *get* that yum uses new features of urlgrabber. But package maintainer
is also upstream developer. Just do the damn release ffs! Oh fun fact: yum
is actually in the same boat.
A sad remain from times long gone. Yum and related components don't do
upstream releases, I'm not sure why besides historical reasons (James might
know a bit more on this one). However fixing this now would be like fixing a
sail on a boat that has a hole in the trunk.
Yum is not going to be in Fedora for much longer and starting releases in
upstream about a year before dnf takes over makes only a little sense to me.
Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-10-09)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC' Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #1178 Fedora 21 scheduling strategy .fesco 1178 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1178 #topic #1179 Interactions of the various Products .fesco 1179 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1179 = New business = #topic #1180 Build virt-preview in Koji .fesco 1180 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1180 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
nas license corrected to MIT
I spotted the `nas' package license declaration was wrong since the very beginning. So I changed it from `Public Domain' to 'MIT'. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Orphaning Lanuchy
Hello, I want to orphan Launchy, MacOS-like launcher. If you want to adopt, please contact me off-list, thank you. LZ -- Later, Lukas lzap Zapletal irc: lzap #theforeman -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On 3 Oct 2013 16:48, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:31 +0100, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: that you can do successfully complete a graphical DVD default package install with 512MB of RAM, or a text network default package install. I believe a text install may even work in 384MB, though I don't absolutely remember, and you may have to pass the parameter that disable's anaconda's RAM check to try it. Graphical network installs require more than 512MB - network installs need extra RAM before swap space comes online, as they go out and get package lists. Actually you could probably do an ugly hack around that by passing an intentionally invalid repo=, going through the storage spoke, and *then* setting the correct repo interactively, but that'd be hideous. I tried doing an F20 live install on a 512 MB machine and wasn't able to get it to work. There was no swap drive available though. The install configuration was extremely slow and seemed to have some of the subparts terminate. I never got to the part where I could start the install transaction. At some point I might try using an install image on the machine and see if that works better. At least on Fedora 18 on the olpc xo-1 with 256mb of ram and no swap fedora runs OK with a full GUI. Not had the time to check later releases but I'm not sure much has changed in that regard. Peter Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gnome-boxes downgrade in F-19
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:38 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Dan Williams wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote: Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between provenpackagers and the maintainers of the packages they touch [1]? Here is another case of lack of communication between people touching the same package. On Aug 8, Zeeshan Ali built gnome-boxes-3.8.4-1.fc19 and submitted update FEDORA-2013-14567. On Aug 9, Christophe Fergeau built gnome-boxes-3.8.4-2.fc19. Instead of editing the existing update, Christophe chose to create a competing update, FEDORA-2013-14530. Seems like there's something wrong with Bodhi here, because every time I create an update when there's already an older update pending, Bodhi obsoletes the old one and adds all the bugs from the old one to the new update. Even if somebody else filed the older update and I'm creating the new one. AFAIK, normal procedure is that you *don't* edit the old update at all, but each package NVR should get a new Bodhi update (so Christophe was correct in creating a new competing one) but that Bodhi takes care of obsoleting the old one. I have had this sort of thing happening to me a few times. From what I remember, Bodhi doesn't seems to obsolete packages that are in the pending state for updates-testing, so if you submit a new build within a day or so of the previous one (for example if a security update comes out just after another build) then bodhi may not obsolete the older build automatically. This sounds broken ... have you filed a bodhi ticket? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Rebase of automake-1.13.4 to automake 1.14
Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
during Thursday Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
Even if it does not seem to be, it is just a minor version update, see
NEWS file in tarball (new versioning scheme).
To sum actual changes up for distro POV: no obvious change which may break
building packages was done, _yet_, but some new warnings (related to future
breakage in automake 2.0) were added, so please don't ignore them.
Testing package:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6040826
Pavel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default Implementation
= Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default Implementation = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default Note: Change requested by FESCo in advance for targeted Fedora. Change owner(s): Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com, Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com Up until now, Fedora has used Python 2 as the default Python implementation. This change proposes switching to Python 3. The details of the term switching are explained thoroughly in the Scope section. == Detailed description == Python 3 is the next generation of Python programming language. It is currently mature and stable, since it has been under active development for five years - version 3.0 was released in December 2008, current latest stable version is 3.3.2 released in May 2013. The main reason to switch to Python 3 as the default implementation is that Python 2 is in maintenance mode, thus only bugfixes and security fixes are accepted upstream. Further reasons are mentioned in the Benefit to Fedora section. For this Change to be carried out successfully, it is necessary that the key packages in the Fedora software stack be ported to Python 3. These are parts of the minimal buildroot, the default package manager, programs present on the LiveCD etc. More information on the packages involved can be found in Dependencies. While porting of some packages is rather trivial, other packages need significant amount of work to get rid of the Python 2 dependence. == Scope == The main goal is switching to Python 3 as a default, in which state: * DNF is the default package manager instead of Yum, which only works with Python 2 * Python 3 is the only Python implementation in the minimal buildroot * Python 3 is the only Python implementation on the LiveCD * Anaconda and all of its dependencies run on Python 3 * cloud-init and all of its dependencies run on Python 3 (see Dependencies for the list of packages that need to be ported) This will also require revisiting Python guidelines (broader discussion with community and FPC approval - TBD). The result of the discussion will reflect in this Change in further instructions for Fedora packagers. There are basically two types of packages that need to undergo the conversion: * Python extension modules and libraries that provide Python bindings - assuming that there is upstream support, these can receive python3- subpackage anytime without any damage to Fedora; we can then just utilize this subpackage when switching to Python 3 (instead of using current python- subpackage). * Packages that build with some sort of embedded Python support, like gdb, or Rhythmbox with its plugins. In these cases, it makes no sense to do a python3- subpackage, since the whole package would need to be duplicated (e.g. python3-gdb). These packages should be tested with Python 3 locally without any modifications to how they're currently built in Fedora. When we get a Koji side tag, these packages will switch and build against Python 3 in the side tag. Work in Fedora 21 Timeframe * Proposal owners: ** Discussing changes in Python packaging guidelines with Fedora community and FPC ** Helping upstreams with porting to Python 3 ** Introducing python3- packages where appropriate, testing packages that only build with Python once (e.g. gdb, Rhythmbox) * Other developers: ** Hopefully the same as proposal owners. * Release engineering: ** Nothing in F21 timeframe * Policies and guidelines: ** As mentioned above, this will require a discussion with community and FPC and preparation of changes to Python packaging guidelines. The changes related to the actual switch should however be merged in F22 timeframe and only if the switch is successful. Work in Fedora 22 Timeframe * Proposal owners: ** Continue the work from F21 timeframe ** Request Koji side tag and encourage packagers to rebuilt their packages with Python 3 there ** If the switch to Python 3 is achieved in the side tag: *** Modify comps accordingly *** Apply the changes to Python packaging guidelines *** Ask relengs to merge the side tag into F22 ** Else: *** Postpone the Change for another release *** Do not merge side tag into F22 *** Do not apply changes to Python packaging guidelines * Other developers: ** Introduce python3- subpackages where appropriate, build against Python 3 in the side tag where appropriate * Release engineering: ** Create the Koji side tag ** Merge the side tag back in F22 if the switch is achieved * Policies and guidelines: ** Apply the changes to Python guidelines if the switch is achieved ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:40:17 +0100, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: At least on Fedora 18 on the olpc xo-1 with 256mb of ram and no swap fedora runs OK with a full GUI. Not had the time to check later releases but I'm not sure much has changed in that regard. The 512mb laptop runs Fedora OK. I was just having an issue with the Live install. A yum upgrade should work. I suspect that an anaconda install from an install iamge would probably do better than a live install. The day I tried, I was testing the games spin, so I wanted to try the live install. Soon I'll bring it from F19 to F20 by some means. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Rebase of automake-1.13.4 to automake 1.14
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 13:00:07 +0200,
Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
during Thursday Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
Is this just for rawhide? It may not be the best timing for f20 as we
are close to beta freeze and if there is a risk of breaking package builds,
this isn't a good time for that.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Gnome Test Day, October 10th
Hi, This Thursday, 10th of October, is Fedora Gnome Test day. Check out the test day page [1] if you are interested. You can test new Gnome 3.10 features [2] from Fedora 20 Live images and help to make this release better. Only YOU can test some new exciting features, including, but not only: * Gnome Software * Gnome Music * Gnome Maps * Wayland support ... and MUCH more. Join IRC #fedora-test-day on FreeNode if you get into trouble. Report all bugs preferably at upstream bugzilla [3] or Red Hat bugzilla [4]. You can also report other Fedora bugs not related to this Test Day. Feel free to ask on IRC, if you don't know against which component or on what bugzilla you should fill the report. Best Regards, Jan Sedlák, jsedlak Fedora QE, Red Hat Brno --- [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-10_Gnome_3.10. [2] https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.10/ [3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/ [4] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gnome-boxes downgrade in F-19
Hi, On 10/09/2013 01:08 PM, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:38 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Dan Williams wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote: Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between provenpackagers and the maintainers of the packages they touch [1]? Here is another case of lack of communication between people touching the same package. On Aug 8, Zeeshan Ali built gnome-boxes-3.8.4-1.fc19 and submitted update FEDORA-2013-14567. On Aug 9, Christophe Fergeau built gnome-boxes-3.8.4-2.fc19. Instead of editing the existing update, Christophe chose to create a competing update, FEDORA-2013-14530. Seems like there's something wrong with Bodhi here, because every time I create an update when there's already an older update pending, Bodhi obsoletes the old one and adds all the bugs from the old one to the new update. Even if somebody else filed the older update and I'm creating the new one. AFAIK, normal procedure is that you *don't* edit the old update at all, but each package NVR should get a new Bodhi update (so Christophe was correct in creating a new competing one) but that Bodhi takes care of obsoleting the old one. I have had this sort of thing happening to me a few times. From what I remember, Bodhi doesn't seems to obsolete packages that are in the pending state for updates-testing, so if you submit a new build within a day or so of the previous one (for example if a security update comes out just after another build) then bodhi may not obsolete the older build automatically. This sounds broken ... have you filed a bodhi ticket? +1 I've been bitten by this too, and I too consider this a bodhi bug and would like to see it fixed. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: gnome-boxes downgrade in F-19
Let's see how many bugs are existed now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/bodhi -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Rebase of automake-1.13.4 to automake 1.14
Hello all, I would like to inform you that I plan to realize ${Subject}
during Thursday Friday (#976973), if there are no objections.
Is this just for rawhide? It may not be the best timing for f20 as we
are close to beta freeze and if there is a risk of breaking package builds,
this isn't a good time for that.
Yes, I should have mentioned that. Thanks for comment.
Pavel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Rebase of automake-1.13.4 to automake 1.14
Yes, I should have mentioned that. Thanks for comment. I mean, yes, it is mentioned to be rebased only in Rawhide. :) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default Implementation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:07:12 +0200 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: ** Request Koji side tag and encourage packagers to rebuilt their packages with Python 3 there python is not in the minimal build root python-libs is pulled in by deps. So all the koji parts of the change proposal are irrelevant Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlJVaOEACgkQkSxm47BaWffHvACfY9Iwxin2/NgmsSh7/ZMz6nAa jZcAnAqDP9BdIBst6A2t3FTDEsYzbMOQ =e62K -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: python-urlgrabber, yum: blatant disregard for packaging guidelines and common sense
the original urlgrabber maintainer left long time ago, but the yum team
adopted the code, because it was critical to yum, so this is cause why
there has been no upstream release.
yum shold make upstream releases in more frequently, instead of adding very
large patches to latest git HEAD.
yum-utils releases was made by me, but I have not had so much time to spend
on yum-utils, so there has not been any releases for a long time.
dnf is not in a state to replace yum yet, and it will take awhile to get
there, a lot of tool uses yum api and dnf has no stable api yet, so yum
will properly stay here for years to come
so there is no excuses to not make upstream releases more frequent :)
Tim
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 8. 10. 2013 at 19:06:21, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I was looking for examples of nice packages for upcoming packaging
workshop
we are doing in Brno. I made the terrible mistake of doing fedpkg clone
python-urlgrabber.
If there was some normal packaging issue I'd most likely just file a bug
in
bugzilla, but this made my blood boil. This is one of our core
components!
snippet from spec:
Source0: urlgrabber-%{version}.tar.gz
Patch1: urlgrabber-HEAD.patch
Guess what? The patch is 100k big. The tarball is actually smaller! Of
course the package does not even follow post-release versioning
guidelines[1]. The only good thing is that the tarball sha actually
matches
upstream released version from 2009.
Now I *get* that yum uses new features of urlgrabber. But package
maintainer
is also upstream developer. Just do the damn release ffs! Oh fun fact:
yum
is actually in the same boat.
A sad remain from times long gone. Yum and related components don't do
upstream releases, I'm not sure why besides historical reasons (James might
know a bit more on this one). However fixing this now would be like fixing
a
sail on a boat that has a hole in the trunk.
Yum is not going to be in Fedora for much longer and starting releases in
upstream about a year before dnf takes over makes only a little sense to
me.
Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
custom kernel, how to revert patch
I'm trying to track down a btrfs regression and need to revert a ~10 month old patch using 3.12.0-rc4 as the basis. This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has ApplyPatch examples in the spec file, which works fine. Is there an inverse command? Or do I need to do it manually with patch -p0 -R ? Chris Murphy-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: custom kernel, how to revert patch
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: I'm trying to track down a btrfs regression and need to revert a ~10 month old patch using 3.12.0-rc4 as the basis. This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has ApplyPatch examples in the spec file, which works fine. Is there an inverse command? Or do I need to do it manually with patch -p0 -R ? You can call ApplyPatch with -R. e.g. ApplyPatch old-btrfs-commit.patch -R Or you could generate a revert commit from git and just apply that. (BTW, questions like this are better suited to the Fedora kernel list.) josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: custom kernel, how to revert patch
On 10/9/13 10:25 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: This http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel has ApplyPatch examples in the spec file, which works fine. Is there an inverse command? Or do I need to do it manually with patch -p0 -R ? You could generate the reverse patch with: $ git show 1234abcd patch_to_revert.patch $ interdiff patch_to_revert.patch /dev/null revert-patch.patch and then ApplyPatch that one. (though you'll have to work out whether it applies cleanly, 10 months is a long time in btrfs-time...) -Eric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: python-urlgrabber, yum: blatant disregard for packaging guidelines and common sense
Quoting tim.laurid...@gmail.com (2013-10-09 16:48:31) the original urlgrabber maintainer left long time ago, but the yum team adopted the code, because it was critical to yum, so this is cause why there has been no upstream release. yum shold make upstream releases in more frequently, instead of adding very large patches to latest git HEAD. yum-utils releases was made by me, but I have not had so much time to spend on yum-utils, so there has not been any releases for a long time. My beef was mostly with python-urlgrabber (since that's used by more tools than just yum), but Zdenek managed to get permissions to do upstream releases so current F20/rawhide has been updated and is mostly fine. There's few minor problems and obsolete parts but that can be worked out later... dnf is not in a state to replace yum yet, and it will take awhile to get there, a lot of tool uses yum api and dnf has no stable api yet, so yum will properly stay here for years to come so there is no excuses to not make upstream releases more frequent :) I really like relase-early-release-often but for that you need a nice testuite so you don't screw up too badly :-) Now I am wondering how dnf is going to approach testing, regressions etc. It sure would be nice to have a big testuite for such a component. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default Implementation
Is DNF ready for prime time, the is no API at the moment, so it is not possible to convert tool using the yum api to use a DNF api I am working on a Python 3 version af yumex, there is package manager for the XFCE spin, I have isolated all the yum actions in DBUS services, but they will require yum and python2 until DNF has a usable API to do the same. Tim On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:07:12 +0200 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: ** Request Koji side tag and encourage packagers to rebuilt their packages with Python 3 there python is not in the minimal build root python-libs is pulled in by deps. So all the koji parts of the change proposal are irrelevant Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlJVaOEACgkQkSxm47BaWffHvACfY9Iwxin2/NgmsSh7/ZMz6nAa jZcAnAqDP9BdIBst6A2t3FTDEsYzbMOQ =e62K -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: phpMyAdmin: security bugs
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote: 3.5.8.2 was released time ago with several bugs fixed: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/959946 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.5.8.1 Welcome to phpMyAdmin 3.5.8.2, a security release. I updated all branches in fedora and epel to 3.5.8.2. These are now in updates-testing. Please test and give karma so we can push this into stable. Well bug says phpMyAdmin-4.0.8 is available, I think we need a new maintainer ... I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses this package wishes to take maintainership, please do! Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-10 16:00 UTC)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2013-10-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2013-10-10 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2013-10-10 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2013-10-10 16:00 Thu UTC - 2013-10-10 17:00 Thu Europe/London BST 2013-10-10 18:00 Thu Europe/Paris CEST 2013-10-10 18:00 Thu Europe/Berlin CEST 2013-10-10 21:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta IST --new day-- 2013-10-11 00:00 Fri Asia/Singapore SGT 2013-10-11 00:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong HKT 2013-10-11 01:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo JST 2013-10-11 02:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane EST Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12 = Followups = (DEFERRED) #topic #339 software collections in Fedora .fpc 339 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339 = New business = #topic #347 minetest - jthread bundle .fpc 347 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/347 #topic #348 LangPacks Naming Guidelines draft .fpc 348 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/348 #topic #349 bundling exception for LINPACK DQRDC2 .fpc 349 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/349 #topic #350 Bundled library exception for codimension-parser .fpc 350 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/350 #topic #352 BLAS and LAPACK packaging .fpc 352 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/352 #topic #353 Update autodep filter guidelines to mention changes to rpm in F20+ .fpc 353 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/353 #topic #354 PHP Guildelines small addition .fpc 354 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/354 #topic #355 How to package noarch packages which require a binary dependency which doesn't build on all archs? .fpc 355 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/355 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review swaps: perl-Parse-DebControl, devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring, jetring + question: where to install keyrings?
Hi Sandro, Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend I wanted to work on fedora (your review, but also my packages). It's only today that I've come back to work and started catching up with mails and I'm glad you found someone for the review. I've quickly tried to run a fedora-review when I was sick, but it failed (I've also tried to tweak the command line to review it on fc21, but I still got the missing dep). So I gave up and came back to bed... Please let me know if there is another package of yours to review. Best Regards, Dridi On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ... I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will be approved. haven't we enter in loop here ?, I think we are waiting for rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 , to be able to install devscripts without have conflicts with rpmdevtools . Don't wait for that, just remove rpmdevtools while reviewing devscripts. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=101#c15 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review swaps: perl-Parse-DebControl, devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring, jetring + question: where to install keyrings?
On 09.10.2013 18:56, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Hi Sandro, Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend I wanted to work on fedora (your review, but also my packages). It's only today that I've come back to work and started catching up with mails and I'm glad you found someone for the review. I've quickly tried to run a fedora-review when I was sick, but it failed (I've also tried to tweak the command line to review it on fc21, but I still got the missing dep). So I gave up and came back to bed... Please let me know if there is another package of yours to review. Best Regards, Dridi Hi Dridi, No problem, health is certainly far more important. I've got nothing up for review atm, but no worries, I'll finish your review regardless once you upload the new SRPM ;) Best, Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Fedora ARM status meeting 2013-10-09
Good day all, Please join us today (Wednesday, October 9th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC) for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. On the agenda so far.. 1) Kernel Status Update 2) Aarch64 - Status Update - Koji Update 3) F20 Beta TC2 Testing 4) Open Floor If there is something that you would like to discuss that isn't mentioned please feel free to bring it up at the end of the meeting or send an email to the list. Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo Meeting (2013-10-09)
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-10-09) === Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:03 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-10-09/fesco.2013-10-09-18.01.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (mmaslano, 18:04:37) * #1178 Fedora 21 scheduling strategy (mmaslano, 18:04:44) * AGREED: schedule on hold by January, then no earlier than August (+5,-1,0) (mmaslano, 18:29:36) * #1179 Interactions of the various Products (mmaslano, 18:40:18) * #1180 Build virt-preview in Koji (mmaslano, 18:42:41) * ACTION: mmaslano will ask about arm in copr (mmaslano, 18:50:36) * ACTION: mmaslano will ask about automatically produce repo config files by copr (mmaslano, 18:54:35) * Next week's chair (mmaslano, 18:56:28) * ACTION: sgallagh will be chairman on 16th (mmaslano, 18:57:41) * Open Floor (mmaslano, 18:57:48) Meeting ended at 19:00:37 UTC. Action Items * mmaslano will ask about arm in copr * mmaslano will ask about automatically produce repo config files by copr * sgallagh will be chairman on 16th Action Items, by person --- * mmaslano * mmaslano will ask about arm in copr * mmaslano will ask about automatically produce repo config files by copr * sgallagh * sgallagh will be chairman on 16th * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * sgallagh (83) * mmaslano (64) * mattdm (46) * handsome_pirate (30) * tflink (29) * mitr (22) * jreznik (20) * pjones (17) * notting (15) * rwmjones (12) * dgilmore (9) * zodbot (7) * mclasen (5) * crobinso (3) * nirik (0) * abadger1999 (0) * t8m (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Differences between Fakeroot and Mock Suggested method
Hi folks. It's taking a bit of time, but I plan to start packaging a couple of packages that are not currently available for either Red Hat nor Fedora. The main reason for it taking a bit longer really has to do with personal infrastructure and setting up my build host, etc. However, that doesn't really pertain to the question at hand. I come from a Debian centric environment, and have come back to Red Hat and Fedora after more than a decade. As such, I have quite a bit more experience building my packages with fakeroot, than I do with mock, and I'm wondering what the differences between the two packages/processes are. Will using mock in this environment be more beneficial to using fakeroot? Will it be harder for lack of a better word, to build from within the build system using fakeroot , once I get to that point or, is Koji flexible enough so that it really wouldn't matter from an infrastructure point of view as to whether or not I use one or the other? As I am more familiar with fakeroot, I'd like to keep using that, but at the same time, I'd like to do it the Red Hat way to ensure that the package conforms to both Red Hat and Fedora packaging standards. Thanks in advance for your guidance. M -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Differences between Fakeroot and Mock Suggested method
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:32:08PM -0700, Matt Eskes wrote: Will using mock in this environment be more beneficial to using fakeroot? Will it be harder for lack of a better word, to build from within the build system using fakeroot , once I get to that point or, is Koji flexible enough so that it really wouldn't matter from an infrastructure point of view as to whether or not I use one or the other? Koji is going to use mock whatever you do. So there's that. :) I usually build my packages in my home directory with neither mock nor fakeroot until I'm satisifed that they're basically right (because this is fastest) and then use mock to do a test build before pushing to koji for the real build. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ mat...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Differences between Fakeroot and Mock Suggested method
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Matt Eskes mes...@gmail.com wrote: As I am more familiar with fakeroot, I'd like to keep using that, but at the same time, I'd like to do it the Red Hat way to ensure that the package conforms to both Red Hat and Fedora packaging standards. Mock would be recommended as it's the way packages are built on koji... Mock is really just a python wrapper that allows you to build packages for different versions of Fedora in a clean chroot with just the build requirements specified in the spec file installed (and some standard ones). It caches packages to make building the chroot faster and that way you only start with a clean chroot unless your specify otherwise. I'm not familiar with fakeroot but I assume you set it up and leave the fake root installed? Check out the following links and it should get you started: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Mock_to_test_package_builds Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Fedora ARM Status Meeting Minutes 2013-10-09
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for those unable the minutes are posted below: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-10-09/fedora-meeting-1.2013-10-09-20.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-10-09/fedora-meeting-1.2013-10-09-20.00.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-10-09/fedora-meeting-1.2013-10-09-20.00.log.html #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora ARM status meeting Meeting summary --- * 1) Kernel Status Update (pwhalen, 20:03:37) * kylem got the BBB working over the last week, commit forthcoming (pwhalen, 20:05:31) * 2a) Aarch64 - Status Update (pwhalen, 20:12:20) * 2b) Aarch64 - Koji Update (pwhalen, 20:17:24) * 3) F20 Beta TC2 Testing (pwhalen, 20:18:43) * LINK: Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test (pwhalen, 20:18:50) * LINK: Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test (pwhalen, 20:18:50) * LINK: Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test (pwhalen, 20:18:50) * 4) Open Floor (pwhalen, 20:23:46) * AGREED: Next fedora-arm meeting on Nov 6 (bconoboy, 20:35:31) * AGREED: ARM Status Meetings to be scheduled on the first Wednesday of every month - next meeting Nov 6th (pwhalen, 20:35:32) Meeting ended at 20:36:58 UTC. Action Items Action Items, by person --- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * pwhalen (50) * bconoboy (25) * kylem (14) * handsome_pirate (14) * zodbot (8) * ahs3 (4) * dmarlin (4) * dgilmore (3) * jcapik (1) * msalter (0) * jdisnard (0) * pbrobinson (0) * ctyler (0) * agreene (0) * jonmasters (0) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Sunday 13th of October: SSD cache test day
Hi All, The Fedora SSD Cache is this sunday October 13th 2013. This Fedora Test Day will focus on bcache based SSD Caching in Fedora 20. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-13_SSD_Cache If you're interested in trying out the new bcache SSD caching functionality step by step instructions are available for: - bcache on physical hardware - bcache in a virtual machine - non-root FS on bcache (with or without LVM) - root FS on bcache (wtih or without LVM) The objective of this Test day is to demonstrate a working Fedora 20 system using bcache. Te be more specific: * The system boots OK; after booting bcache is operating as expected * The system updates (yum update) OK. After updating specifically the kernel the system boots OK. * The system is bootable when the caching device is disabled. Although testing on real hardware is closest to the real thing, testing in a VM may also provide good insights on the proper working of bcache (except for performance). If you can't make the date of the test day, adding test case results to the wiki anytime next week is fine as well. Though if you do plan on showing up to the test day, please add your name to the participant list on the wiki, and when the day arrives, pop into #fedora-test-day on freenode and give us a shout! If you can't make the date of the test day, adding test case results to the wiki anytime next week is fine as well. Though if you do plan on showing up to the test day, add your name to the participant list on the wiki, and when the day arrives, pop into #fedora-test-day on freenode and give us a shout! The Wiki page is still under development, so expect some improvements before sunday. Thanks, Igor Gnatenko Rolf Fokkens -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
%ifarch note
Since I hit this, I'd imagine other people might.
If your package has:
BuildArch: noarch
It will set %{_target_cpu} to noarch.
If you also use %ifarch in that spec file, you might be expecting it to
match %{_arch} (the architecture of the build server). It does not. It
matches %{_target_cpu}.
If you need to conditionalize on the value of %{_arch} in such a spec
file, you need to do it explicitly:
%if %{_arch} == x86_64 || %{_arch} == i686
Hope that helps other folks,
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1010057] `perldoc perldoc`: No documentation found for perldoc.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010057 --- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Thank you for testing. This bug report gets closed automatically once the updated packages become into stable repository. There is not action needed from you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nvGGP0YXj7a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-File-MimeInfo] 0.20 bump
commit e145d57cf55ca344861552baeb4062c873b08544
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 9 09:28:48 2013 +0200
0.20 bump
File-MimeInfo-0.19-exe_files.patch | 11 ---
perl-File-MimeInfo.spec|9 -
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-MimeInfo.spec b/perl-File-MimeInfo.spec
index 8ebb865..5b8f020 100644
--- a/perl-File-MimeInfo.spec
+++ b/perl-File-MimeInfo.spec
@@ -1,14 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-File-MimeInfo
-Version:0.19
+Version:0.20
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Determine file type and open application
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-MimeInfo/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MI/MICHIELB/File-MimeInfo-%{version}.tar.gz
-
-# RT#89328 mimetype, mimeopen should be set as executable files
-Patch0: File-MimeInfo-0.19-exe_files.patch
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
@@ -46,7 +43,6 @@ implement the freedesktop specification for a shared MIME
database.
%prep
%setup -q -n File-MimeInfo-%{version}
-%patch0 -p1
%build
perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -69,6 +65,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Oct 09 2013 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.20-1
+- 0.20 bump
+
* Tue Oct 08 2013 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.19-1
- 0.19 bump, make is used instead of Build
- Fix RT#89328
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File File-MimeInfo-0.20.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-MimeInfo: e87420787db163c03e5dd7fb47a3ef27 File-MimeInfo-0.20.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-File-MimeInfo] 0.20 bump
commit 9d875f7e7b028d97dffbd4babb19d8aa34378b7d Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Wed Oct 9 09:32:19 2013 +0200 0.20 bump .gitignore |1 + sources|2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 3c1a4a7..9303f2a 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ File-MimeInfo-0.15.tar.gz /File-MimeInfo-0.17.tar.gz /File-MimeInfo-0.18.tar.gz /File-MimeInfo-0.19.tar.gz +/File-MimeInfo-0.20.tar.gz diff --git a/sources b/sources index 763bfb0..ded3811 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -5768e2d717de2f0020893ae1aeab397d File-MimeInfo-0.19.tar.gz +e87420787db163c03e5dd7fb47a3ef27 File-MimeInfo-0.20.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1016898] perl-File-MimeInfo-0.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016898 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-File-MimeInfo-0.20-1.f ||c21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-10-09 03:53:52 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Gs8nTQBsz7a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1016693] updates-testing MODULE_COMPAT confusion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016693 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2013-10-09 06:15:53 --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 992666 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Xm6eBflsBla=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 992666] perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992666 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||woodsj...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1016693 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=l64zTborUea=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: slic3r
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Padre
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-BerkeleyDB
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21 On i386: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21 On armhfp: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Padre
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: slic3r
slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-BerkeleyDB] Rebuild against libdb 5.3.28
commit d95f4077248f258fcd76333a6eaf1106f7dbea26
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 9 15:33:46 2013 +0200
Rebuild against libdb 5.3.28
perl-BerkeleyDB.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec b/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
index 397b708..67c29e0 100644
--- a/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
+++ b/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Name: perl-BerkeleyDB
Version:0.53
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Interface to Berkeley DB
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/BerkeleyDB.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Oct 09 2013 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.53-2
+- Rebuild against libdb 5.3.28
+
* Fri Aug 16 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 0.53-1
- Update to 0.53
- BerkeleyDB 0.52 failed to build on 5.18.1RC3 (CPAN RT#87771)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-BerkeleyDB/f20] Rebuild against libdb 5.3.28
commit d584b7d3b1b5b038264c464631839aad9e1c708d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 9 16:45:48 2013 +0200
Rebuild against libdb 5.3.28
perl-BerkeleyDB.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec b/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
index 397b708..67c29e0 100644
--- a/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
+++ b/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Name: perl-BerkeleyDB
Version:0.53
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Interface to Berkeley DB
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/BerkeleyDB.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Oct 09 2013 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.53-2
+- Rebuild against libdb 5.3.28
+
* Fri Aug 16 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 0.53-1
- Update to 0.53
- BerkeleyDB 0.52 failed to build on 5.18.1RC3 (CPAN RT#87771)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1012402] please update perl Future to version 0.18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012402 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Future-0.18-1.fc19 |perl-Future-0.18-1.fc20 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Future-0.18-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ayb8coPDgOa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1006785] perl-Config-Any-0.24 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006785 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Config-Any-0.24-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-10-09 10:49:02 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Config-Any-0.24-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8dKXnyN6MEa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1013089] abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013089 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||abi-compliance-checker-1.99 ||.8.4-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-10-09 10:48:41 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.4-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ErmVpVB6yVa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Path-Tiny-0.040.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-Tiny: a7169251b8d72c02eef51e0a356f97a4 Path-Tiny-0.040.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Path-Tiny/f20] Update to 0.040
Summary of changes: 201e3e3... Update to 0.040 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Path-Tiny] Created tag perl-Path-Tiny-0.040-1.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.040-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 201e3e3... Update to 0.040 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Path-Tiny] Update to 0.040
commit 201e3e3bcb673d6941eef70ecfd1b759c36b91b3
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 15:54:53 2013 +0100
Update to 0.040
- New upstream release 0.040
- The 'filehandle' method now offers an option to return locked handles
based on the file mode
- The 'filehandle' method now respects default encoding set by the
caller's
open pragma
perl-Path-Tiny.spec |9 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Path-Tiny.spec b/perl-Path-Tiny.spec
index 5fbd0a8..d6e95e3 100644
--- a/perl-Path-Tiny.spec
+++ b/perl-Path-Tiny.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Path-Tiny
-Version: 0.038
+Version: 0.040
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: File path utility
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -98,6 +98,13 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/Path::Tiny.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Oct 9 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.040-1
+- Update to 0.040
+ - The 'filehandle' method now offers an option to return locked handles
+based on the file mode
+ - The 'filehandle' method now respects default encoding set by the caller's
+open pragma
+
* Wed Oct 2 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.038-1
- Update to 0.038
- Added 'is_rootdir' method to simplify testing if a path is the root
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 607345b..3523c97 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-eb1cdf85145fb32cf6fc6122f5fa71f5 Path-Tiny-0.038.tar.gz
+a7169251b8d72c02eef51e0a356f97a4 Path-Tiny-0.040.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Path-Tiny] Created tag perl-Path-Tiny-0.040-1.fc20
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.040-1.fc20' was created pointing to: 201e3e3... Update to 0.040 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File CPAN-Changes-0.25.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Changes: f123c91e84b8c4596bb1542d20a5d36f CPAN-Changes-0.25.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-CPAN-Changes] Update to 0.25
commit f710ec1edfdbc1590b30e764efa4003e8966a8cb
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 16:18:06 2013 +0100
Update to 0.25
- New upstream release 0.25:
- Fix Dist::Zilla date parsing: now puts timezone data in note section
(Github #17)
- Move Text::Wrap usage to proper module
- Typo fix
perl-CPAN-Changes.spec | 10 +-
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Changes.spec b/perl-CPAN-Changes.spec
index f7f2666..1d32d73 100644
--- a/perl-CPAN-Changes.spec
+++ b/perl-CPAN-Changes.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-CPAN-Changes
Summary: Read and write Changes files
-Version: 0.23
+Version: 0.25
Release: 1%{?dist}
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ BuildRequires:perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Path)
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Usage)
BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.96
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.00
@@ -60,6 +61,13 @@ make test TEST_FILES=$(echo $(find xt/ -name '*.t'))
%{_mandir}/man3/Test::CPAN::Changes.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Oct 9 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.25-1
+- Update to 0.25:
+ - Fix Dist::Zilla date parsing: now puts timezone data in note section
+(Github #17)
+ - Move Text::Wrap usage to proper module
+ - Typo fix
+
* Thu Aug 15 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.23-1
- Update to 0.23:
- Bump spec version to 0.03
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index cd566e3..00ec03d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c32f31550825090b565789754f9d4bf9 CPAN-Changes-0.23.tar.gz
+f123c91e84b8c4596bb1542d20a5d36f CPAN-Changes-0.25.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File IPC-System-Simple-1.23.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IPC-System-Simple: 9e8c9ad98aa04b39eb27f850eae700ad IPC-System-Simple-1.23.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-CPAN-Changes/f20] Update to 0.25
Summary of changes: f710ec1... Update to 0.25 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IPC-System-Simple] Update to 1.23
commit f62ffa171eb13a4395715761c57f4dddca1c4f19
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 16:44:15 2013 +0100
Update to 1.23
- New upstream release 1.23
- Silence Statement unlikely to be reached warning
- Repository information fix, and typo fixes
- Converted to using dzil
- Specify all dependencies
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
- Restore EL-5 compatibility
.gitignore |3 +--
perl-IPC-System-Simple.spec | 37 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 19f8b56..738054f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-IPC-System-Simple-1.18.tar.gz
-/IPC-System-Simple-1.21.tar.gz
+/IPC-System-Simple-[0-9.]*.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-IPC-System-Simple.spec b/perl-IPC-System-Simple.spec
index 9ec938a..1da0796 100644
--- a/perl-IPC-System-Simple.spec
+++ b/perl-IPC-System-Simple.spec
@@ -1,30 +1,35 @@
Name: perl-IPC-System-Simple
-Version: 1.21
-Release: 8%{?dist}
+Version: 1.23
+Release: 1%{?dist}
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
Summary: Run commands simply, with detailed diagnostics
-Url: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IPC-System-Simple
-Source:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PJ/PJF/IPC-System-Simple-%{version}.tar.gz
+URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IPC-System-Simple
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PJ/PJF/IPC-System-Simple-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -un)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(BSD::Resource)
BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Config)
+BuildRequires: perl(constant)
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.30
BuildRequires: perl(File::Basename)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
BuildRequires: perl(List::Util)
+BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Coverage::TrustPod)
BuildRequires: perl(POSIX)
+BuildRequires: perl(re)
BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(Test)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Kwalitee)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Perl::Critic)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.08
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
Calling Perl's in-built 'system()' function is easy; determining if it
@@ -50,13 +55,16 @@ perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \; 2/dev/null
%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
%check
-make test TEST_AUTHOR=1
+make test TEST_AUTHOR=1 AUTHOR_TESTING=1 RELEASE_TESTING=1
+
+%clean
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
%files
%doc Changes LICENSE README examples/
@@ -64,6 +72,15 @@ make test TEST_AUTHOR=1
%{_mandir}/man3/IPC::System::Simple.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Oct 9 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.23-1
+- Update to 1.23
+ - Silence Statement unlikely to be reached warning
+ - Repository information fix, and typo fixes
+ - Converted to using dzil
+- Specify all dependencies
+- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
+- Restore EL-5 compatibility
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.21-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index d70e538..3c57cba 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8215b62fe1b8447b99e17861e2255288 IPC-System-Simple-1.21.tar.gz
+9e8c9ad98aa04b39eb27f850eae700ad IPC-System-Simple-1.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-CPAN-Changes] Created tag perl-CPAN-Changes-0.25-1.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-CPAN-Changes-0.25-1.fc21' was created pointing to: f710ec1... Update to 0.25 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-CPAN-Changes] Created tag perl-CPAN-Changes-0.25-1.fc20
The lightweight tag 'perl-CPAN-Changes-0.25-1.fc20' was created pointing to: f710ec1... Update to 0.25 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IPC-System-Simple/f20] Update to 1.23
Summary of changes: f62ffa1... Update to 1.23 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IPC-System-Simple] Created tag perl-IPC-System-Simple-1.23-1.fc20
The lightweight tag 'perl-IPC-System-Simple-1.23-1.fc20' was created pointing to: f62ffa1... Update to 1.23 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IPC-System-Simple] Created tag perl-IPC-System-Simple-1.23-1.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-IPC-System-Simple-1.23-1.fc21' was created pointing to: f62ffa1... Update to 1.23 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Test-CheckDeps-0.010.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CheckDeps: c1893b187e9b2efee7d40b1799218576 Test-CheckDeps-0.010.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-CheckDeps/f20] Update to 0.010
Summary of changes: 970a1e5... Update to 0.010 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-CheckDeps] Created tag perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.010-1.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.010-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 970a1e5... Update to 0.010 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-CheckDeps] Created tag perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.010-1.fc20
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CheckDeps-0.010-1.fc20' was created pointing to: 970a1e5... Update to 0.010 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1005986] perl-Date-Manip-6.41 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005986 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=arL9vmUoMDa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1013089] abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013089 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-1.99 |abi-compliance-checker-1.99 |.8.4-1.fc20 |.8.4-1.fc19 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.4-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=E7zMXTLbxia=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1005991] perl-List-Compare-0.38 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005991 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-List-Compare-0.38-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gtznwmSXUTa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1012103] please update perlIO::Async to version 0.60
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012103 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-IO-Async-0.60-1.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-IO-Async-0.60-1.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18678/perl-IO-Async-0.60-1.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RjzNODwxTVa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1005991] perl-List-Compare-0.38 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005991 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-List-Compare-0.38-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LYFyQ2bUz5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1005986] perl-Date-Manip-6.41 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005986 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2O53D7pDala=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File XML-TreeBuilder-5.0.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by rlandmann
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-TreeBuilder: 5549d05bb87b862c31b64d9d21ef34a0 XML-TreeBuilder-5.0.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-XML-TreeBuilder/f20] new upstream
commit c7767933d7d103c7304e51a8427e9bef34b3b95b
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 10 11:31:36 2013 +1000
new upstream
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec | 74 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 7dd769c..b78b235 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
XML-TreeBuilder-3.09.tar.gz
/XML-TreeBuilder-4.0.tar.gz
/XML-TreeBuilder-4.2.tar.gz
+/XML-TreeBuilder-5.0.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec b/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec
index 774cf9d..93543fe 100644
--- a/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec
+++ b/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec
@@ -1,27 +1,29 @@
Summary: Parser that builds a tree of XML::Element objects
Name: perl-XML-TreeBuilder
-Version: 4.2
+Version: 5.0
Release: 0%{?dist}
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-TreeBuilder/
-Source:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-authors/id/J/JF/JFEARN/XML-TreeBuilder-%{version}.tar.gz
+# have to:
+# push the patch upstream
+Source:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/XML/XML-TreeBuilder-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Perl::Critic)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
-BuildRequires: perl(Devel::Cover)
-BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Exception)
BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Element) = 4.1
BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Tagset)
BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)
-Requires: perl(HTML::Element) = 4.1 perl(HTML::Tagset) perl(XML::Parser)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+BuildRequires: perl(XML::Catalog) = 1.0.0
+BuildRequires: perl(Devel::Cover)
+BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Exception)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Perl::Critic)
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(HTML::Element) perl(HTML::Tagset) perl(XML::Parser)
%description
perl-XML-TreeBuilder is a Perl module that implements a parser
@@ -39,10 +41,8 @@ that builds a tree of XML::Element objects.
%install
%{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0
-
-### Clean up buildroot
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name .packlist -exec %{__rm} {} \;
+./Build pure_install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
%clean
%{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
@@ -54,44 +54,14 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name .packlist -exec %{__rm} {} \;
%{perl_vendorlib}/XML/
%changelog
-* Mon Jul 15 2013 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com 4.2-0
-- New upstream with CDATA support.
-
-* Wed Aug 15 2012 Daniel Mach dm...@redhat.com - 4.0-8.1
-- Rebuild for perl 5.16
-
-* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 4.0-8
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Fri Jun 15 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4.0-7
-- Perl 5.16 rebuild
-
-* Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 4.0-6
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Wed Jul 20 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com - 4.0-5
-- Perl mass rebuild
-
-* Wed Feb 09 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 4.0-4
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
-
-* Tue Jan 4 2011 Rüdiger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com - 4.0-3
-- Add Test::More to build requires
-
-* Thu Dec 23 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 4.0-2
-- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
-
-* Thu Dec 02 2010 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com - 4.0-1
-- New upstream
-
-* Fri May 07 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 3.09-19
-- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
+* Fri Oct 04 2013 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com - 5.0-0
+- Support entity expansion.
-* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 3.09-18
-- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
+* Fri Jan 25 2013 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com - 4.1-0
+- Support XML::Parser ParseParamEnt parameter
-* Mon Nov 16 2009 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com - 3.09-17
-- Fix Requires
+* Mon Jun 21 2010 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com - 4.0-1
+- new upstream version.
* Tue Sep 29 2009 Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com - 3.09-16
- Stupid man! Don't eat entities :(
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index a6293c3..7b5ba00 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c43a1394089b33fc816e461196ca618a
[Bug 1017480] New: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017480 Bug ID: 1017480 Summary: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F18 Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: perl-XML-Catalog Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: r.landm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Please update perl-XML-Catalog to = 1.0.0 in F18 so I can build the new version of perl-XML-TreeBuilder against it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sw9WaizNjua=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1017481] New: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017481 Bug ID: 1017481 Summary: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F19 Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: perl-XML-Catalog Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: r.landm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Please update perl-XML-Catalog to = 1.0.0 in F19 so I can build the new version of perl-XML-TreeBuilder against it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SBKJlj9aRLa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1017482] New: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017482 Bug ID: 1017482 Summary: Please update to = 1.0.0 in F20 Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: perl-XML-Catalog Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: r.landm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Please update perl-XML-Catalog to = 1.0.0 in F20 so I can build the new version of perl-XML-TreeBuilder against it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aaob1fJi87a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Gtk2-1.248.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by spot
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Gtk2: bc037a6eb12eeb7992962a67b94eb52f Gtk2-1.248.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Gtk2] update to 1.248
commit f4588787d1a0576541918c4e99902c6c414b097e
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 22:21:28 2013 -0400
update to 1.248
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Gtk2.spec | 29 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e2e3f13..0221eea 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ Gtk2-1.203.tar.gz
/Gtk2-1.245.tar.gz
/Gtk2-1.246.tar.gz
/Gtk2-1.247.tar.gz
+/Gtk2-1.248.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2.spec b/perl-Gtk2.spec
index fe2c72f..998fce0 100644
--- a/perl-Gtk2.spec
+++ b/perl-Gtk2.spec
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
# cat provides.txt | sort -n | uniq
Name: perl-Gtk2
-Version:1.247
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:1.248
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl interface to the 2.x series of the Gimp Toolkit library
Group: Development/Libraries
License:LGPLv2+
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::Fixed)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::FontButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::FontSelection)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Frame)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::GammaCurve)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::GC)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::GammaCurve)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Cairo)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Color)
@@ -121,23 +121,23 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Types)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Visual)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Window)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::X11)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::HandleBox)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HBox)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HButtonBox)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HPaned)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HRuler)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::HSV)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HScale)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HScrollbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HSeparator)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::HSV)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::HandleBox)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMContext)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMContextSimple)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMMultiContext)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::IconFactory)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::IconTheme)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::IconView)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Image)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ImageMenuItem)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMContext)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMContextSimple)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMMultiContext)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::InfoBar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::InputDialog)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Invisible)
@@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::SizeGroup)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Socket)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::SpinButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Spinner)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::Statusbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::StatusIcon)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::Statusbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Stock)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Style)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Table)
@@ -212,12 +212,12 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::TextView)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToggleAction)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToggleButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToggleToolButton)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::Toolbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolItem)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolItemGroup)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolPalette)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolShell)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::Toolbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Tooltip)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Tooltips)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::TreeDnd)
@@ -232,13 +232,13 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::TreeViewColumn)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::UIManager)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VBox)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VButtonBox)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::Viewport)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::VolumeButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VPaned)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VRuler)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VScale)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VScrollbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VSeparator)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::Viewport)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::VolumeButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Widget)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Window)
@@ -278,6 +278,9 @@ chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Oct 9 2013 Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org - 1.248-1
+- update to 1.248
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.247-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
@@ -422,7 +425,7 @@ chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
* Mon Jun 27 2005 Jose Pedro Oliveira jpo at di.uminho.pt - 1.082-1
- Update to 1.082.
-* Fri Apr 7 2005 Michael Schwendt mschwendt[AT]users.sf.net
+* Fri Apr 8 2005 Michael Schwendt mschwendt[AT]users.sf.net
- rebuilt
* Thu Mar 10 2005 Jose Pedro Oliveira jpo at di.uminho.pt - 1.080-2
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0a03f4d..1ef617c 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b65b0293cce3ac3786c37a7fa508e506 Gtk2-1.247.tar.gz
+bc037a6eb12eeb7992962a67b94eb52f Gtk2-1.248.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Gtk2/f20] update to 1.248
commit 9a3b768d70277510d6f6f54630bf221bd4a03ee9
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Oct 9 22:21:59 2013 -0400
update to 1.248
perl-Gtk2.spec | 29 -
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2.spec b/perl-Gtk2.spec
index fe2c72f..998fce0 100644
--- a/perl-Gtk2.spec
+++ b/perl-Gtk2.spec
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
# cat provides.txt | sort -n | uniq
Name: perl-Gtk2
-Version:1.247
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:1.248
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl interface to the 2.x series of the Gimp Toolkit library
Group: Development/Libraries
License:LGPLv2+
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::Fixed)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::FontButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::FontSelection)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Frame)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::GammaCurve)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::GC)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::GammaCurve)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Cairo)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Color)
@@ -121,23 +121,23 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Types)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Visual)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Window)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Gdk::X11)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::HandleBox)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HBox)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HButtonBox)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HPaned)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HRuler)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::HSV)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HScale)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HScrollbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::HSeparator)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::HSV)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::HandleBox)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMContext)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMContextSimple)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMMultiContext)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::IconFactory)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::IconTheme)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::IconView)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Image)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ImageMenuItem)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMContext)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMContextSimple)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::IMMultiContext)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::InfoBar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::InputDialog)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Invisible)
@@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::SizeGroup)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Socket)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::SpinButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Spinner)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::Statusbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::StatusIcon)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::Statusbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Stock)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Style)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Table)
@@ -212,12 +212,12 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::TextView)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToggleAction)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToggleButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToggleToolButton)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::Toolbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolItem)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolItemGroup)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolPalette)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::ToolShell)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::Toolbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Tooltip)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Tooltips)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::TreeDnd)
@@ -232,13 +232,13 @@ Provides: perl(Gtk2::TreeViewColumn)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::UIManager)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VBox)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VButtonBox)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::Viewport)
-Provides: perl(Gtk2::VolumeButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VPaned)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VRuler)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VScale)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VScrollbar)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::VSeparator)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::Viewport)
+Provides: perl(Gtk2::VolumeButton)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Widget)
Provides: perl(Gtk2::Window)
@@ -278,6 +278,9 @@ chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Oct 9 2013 Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org - 1.248-1
+- update to 1.248
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.247-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
@@ -422,7 +425,7 @@ chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
* Mon Jun 27 2005 Jose Pedro Oliveira jpo at di.uminho.pt - 1.082-1
- Update to 1.082.
-* Fri Apr 7 2005 Michael Schwendt mschwendt[AT]users.sf.net
+* Fri Apr 8 2005 Michael Schwendt mschwendt[AT]users.sf.net
- rebuilt
* Thu Mar 10 2005 Jose Pedro Oliveira jpo at di.uminho.pt - 1.080-2
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0a03f4d..1ef617c 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b65b0293cce3ac3786c37a7fa508e506 Gtk2-1.247.tar.gz
+bc037a6eb12eeb7992962a67b94eb52f Gtk2-1.248.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 828221] perl-Gtk2-1.248 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828221 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Gtk2-1.248-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-1.248-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k2A8GnoT0Na=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Net-IP-Minimal] 0.06 bump
commit b08b6471e1957dafb73fad1ceb5fa38650c3a840
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 10 14:21:10 2013 +0900
0.06 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-IP-Minimal.spec | 18 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 0bdd664..aac394f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
/Net-IP-Minimal-0.02.tar.gz
+/Net-IP-Minimal-0.06.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Net-IP-Minimal.spec b/perl-Net-IP-Minimal.spec
index 728d16d..e00e3e9 100644
--- a/perl-Net-IP-Minimal.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-IP-Minimal.spec
@@ -1,18 +1,22 @@
Name: perl-Net-IP-Minimal
-Version:0.02
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Version:0.06
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Minimal functions from Net::IP
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-IP-Minimal/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BI/BINGOS/Net-IP-Minimal-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# Tests only
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval $(perl -V:version); echo
$version))
%description
Net::IP is very feature complete, but I found I was only using three of its
@@ -26,9 +30,8 @@ perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} +
%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
%check
@@ -40,6 +43,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Oct 10 2013 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.06-1
+- 0.06 bump
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.02-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 8b3553d..ed0f72e 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-03dbb34d357cdeed993027bfd2fd4fd7 Net-IP-Minimal-0.02.tar.gz
+249981458e9502b877145153dac3b9cf Net-IP-Minimal-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Net-IP-Minimal-0.06.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-IP-Minimal: 249981458e9502b877145153dac3b9cf Net-IP-Minimal-0.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-POE-Component-Logger] Update source URL
commit 6ed88d121c74164af32f133f25e0060f7ff5e175
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 10 14:55:16 2013 +0900
Update source URL
- Modernize the spec a bit
perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec | 19 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec b/perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec
index 0fdc65b..663bf94 100644
--- a/perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec
+++ b/perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-POE-Component-Logger
Version:1.10
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Release:7%{?dist}
Summary:A POE logging class
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Logger
-Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MS/MSERGEANT/POE-Component-Logger-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DO/DOLMEN/POE-Component-Logger-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(base)
BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(POE) = 0.11
BuildRequires: perl(Test)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval $(perl -V:version); echo $version))
%description
POE::Component::Logger provides a simple logging component that uses
@@ -40,14 +40,13 @@ process the next event.
%setup -q -n POE-Component-Logger-%{version}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=%{optflags}
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find %{buildroot} -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} +
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} +
chmod -R u+w %{buildroot}/*
%check
@@ -60,6 +59,10 @@ make test
%changelog
+* Thu Oct 10 2013 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.10-7
+- Update source URL
+- Modernize the spec a bit
+
* Sun Aug 04 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.10-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[389-devel] switch to F19 for autogen?
In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok with switching to using F19 to run autogen? -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: [389-devel] switch to F19 for autogen?
On 10/09/2013 01:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok with switching to using F19 to run autogen? Ack. If we want to enforce that for master, we could update the version checks in autogen.sh to require the F19 versions as a minimum. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: [389-devel] switch to F19 for autogen?
(2013年10月09日 15:24), Rich Megginson wrote: On 10/09/2013 04:12 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote: On 10/09/2013 01:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok with switching to using F19 to run autogen? Ack. If we want to enforce that for master, we could update the version checks in autogen.sh to require the F19 versions as a minimum. Any objections? Speak now or be required to use F19 for autotool changes . . . noriko No objections. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
