EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

2014-03-27 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 704  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
 134  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-12079/bip-0.8.9-1.el6
  51  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
  46  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0483/boinc-client-7.2.33-3.git1994cc8.el6
  36  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6
  12  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0845/asterisk-1.8.26.1-1.el6
  12  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0846/mediawiki119-1.19.13-1.el6
  12  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0852/lighttpd-1.4.35-1.el6
   8  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0888/v8-3.14.5.10-7.el6
   8  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0889/moodle-2.4.9-1.el6
   2  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0938/seamonkey-2.21-5.ESR_24.4.0.el6
   1  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0951/check-mk-1.2.4-1.el6
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0972/munin-2.0.19-2.el6
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0980/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.38-4.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

cscppc-1.0.3-1.el6
cswrap-1.0.3-1.el6
munin-2.0.19-2.el6
open-vm-tools-9.4.0-8.el6
ovirt-engine-cli-3.4.0.5-1.el6
ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.4.0.6-1.el6
perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811-1.el6
perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.38-4.el6
python-iso8601-0.1.10-1.el6
yapet-1.0-1.el6

Details about builds:



 cscppc-1.0.3-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0978)
 A compiler wrapper that runs cppcheck in background

Update Information:

initial packaging

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1066026 - Review Request: cscppc - A compiler wrapper that runs 
cppcheck in background
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066026




 cswrap-1.0.3-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0976)
 Generic compiler wrapper

Update Information:

initial packaging

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1066028 - Review Request: cswrap - Generic compiler wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066028




 munin-2.0.19-2.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0972)
 Network-wide graphing framework (grapher/gatherer)

Update Information:

minor bugfix release:
- BZ# 1081254: Start asyncd after node
- BZ# 1028075: munin-node doesn't get added to chkconfig
Upstream update to 2.0.18, fixes CVE-2013-6359

ChangeLog:

* Wed Mar 26 2014 D. Johnson fenri...@fedoraproject.org - 2.0.19-2
- BZ# 1081254: Start asyncd after node
- BZ# 1028075: munin-node doesn't get added to chkconfig

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1037888 - CVE-2013-6048 CVE-2013-6359 munin: two denial of service 
flaws fixed in 2.0.18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037888




 open-vm-tools-9.4.0-8.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0967)
 Open Virtual Machine Tools for virtual machines hosted on VMware

Update Information:

Added package dependencies to address BZ#1045709 and BZ#1077320.

ChangeLog:

* Wed Mar 26 2014 Ravindra Kumar ravindraku...@vmware.com - 9.4.0-8
- Add missing package dependency on 'which' (BZ#1045709)
* Tue Mar 25 2014 Ravindra Kumar ravindraku...@vmware.com - 9.4.0-7
- Add -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE to suppress warning as suggested in
  https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16632
* Fri Mar 21 2014 Ravindra Kumar ravindraku...@vmware.com - 9.4.0-6
- Add missing package dependencies (BZ#1045709, BZ#1077320)
* Tue Feb 18 2014 Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com - 9.4.0-5
- Fix FTBFS 

RFC: httpd-filesystem proposal

2014-03-27 Thread Joe Orton
We're proposing to add an httpd-filesystem subpackage which will 
simplify some dependency problems; particularly for packages which want 
to contain files owned by the apache user, but don't need a dependency 
on httpd itself.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081453

Any comments welcome, either here on the bug.

Regards, Joe
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: RFC: httpd-filesystem proposal

2014-03-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:41:55AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
 We're proposing to add an httpd-filesystem subpackage which will 
 simplify some dependency problems; particularly for packages which want 
 to contain files owned by the apache user, but don't need a dependency 
 on httpd itself.
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081453
 Any comments welcome, either here on the bug.

+1 to more subpacking for httpd.

I don't think gnome-user-share is installed by default anymore (or used by
anyone?), but maybe we could finally really solve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235682, while we are at it. :)

-- 
Matthew Miller--   Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/27/2014 12:30 AM, William Brown wrote:
 On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 13:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
 On 03/26/2014 10:06 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
 
 snip
 Note that PrivateNetwork=yes should not be used for:
 
 1. Services that actually require network access (with the 
 exception of daemons only needing socket activation) 2.
 Services which may be used to execute arbitrary user or
 administrator supplied programs. (see above) 3. Services which
 might need to resolve non-system user and group names. Since on
 some setups resolving non-system users might require network
 access to an LDAP or NIS server, enabling this option on might
 break resolving of these user names. Note however that system
 users/groups are always resolvable even without network access.
 Hence it is safe to enable this option for daemons which just
 need to resolve their own system user or group name.
 
 This may not be a safe statement to make. I personally know of a
 great many deployments where admins have removed the local
 accounts for their services and instead rely on LDAP accounts.
 (This is mostly to guarantee that the file ownership of these
 services is the same user on all systems, which they may not be
 if the local account was created using the 'get-next-free-id'
 approach).
 
 We'd need to think very hard about whether any service should
 have this turned on by default. If we *do* enable it by default,
 we should also carefully document how to turn it off for those
 services if they rely on centrally-managed accounts.
 
 Would PrivateNetwork break interactions with SSSD? If you used that
 to provide nsswitch, then it may not be such an issue.
 

Hmm, good point. It would be talking to SSSD via a local socket.
Naturally this feature wouldn't affect the SSSD daemon. So yeah, that
would probably work just fine. I didn't think that all the way through
originally.

This probably can break people using nss_ldap or nss_winbind, though.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlM0FEwACgkQeiVVYja6o6NTGwCdFSprsfcoYN52RwfUcL9+ZoGA
rtcAoJnWcV7mC8wO/YHtbQ9UTnhoQKrF
=dOqN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 08:06 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On 03/27/2014 12:30 AM, William Brown wrote:
  On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 13:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
  On 03/26/2014 10:06 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
  
  snip
  Note that PrivateNetwork=yes should not be used for:
  
  1. Services that actually require network access (with the 
  exception of daemons only needing socket activation) 2.
  Services which may be used to execute arbitrary user or
  administrator supplied programs. (see above) 3. Services which
  might need to resolve non-system user and group names. Since on
  some setups resolving non-system users might require network
  access to an LDAP or NIS server, enabling this option on might
  break resolving of these user names. Note however that system
  users/groups are always resolvable even without network access.
  Hence it is safe to enable this option for daemons which just
  need to resolve their own system user or group name.
  
  This may not be a safe statement to make. I personally know of a
  great many deployments where admins have removed the local
  accounts for their services and instead rely on LDAP accounts.
  (This is mostly to guarantee that the file ownership of these
  services is the same user on all systems, which they may not be
  if the local account was created using the 'get-next-free-id'
  approach).
  
  We'd need to think very hard about whether any service should
  have this turned on by default. If we *do* enable it by default,
  we should also carefully document how to turn it off for those
  services if they rely on centrally-managed accounts.
  
  Would PrivateNetwork break interactions with SSSD? If you used that
  to provide nsswitch, then it may not be such an issue.
  
 
 Hmm, good point. It would be talking to SSSD via a local socket.
 Naturally this feature wouldn't affect the SSSD daemon. So yeah, that
 would probably work just fine. I didn't think that all the way through
 originally.
 
 This probably can break people using nss_ldap or nss_winbind, though.

Only people using the old nss_ldap.
nss_ldapd, nss_winbind, like nss_sss talks to a daemon on a local
socket.

I honestly think people should stop using the old nss_ldap, and I think
most already migrated to one of the superior choices in Fedora land, so
I see no particular issue from this point of view.

however there are deployments that still need to access ldap directly in
some case (I am thinking autofs maps store on ldap for example).

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next

2014-03-27 Thread Pete Travis
On Mar 25, 2014 8:27 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
  My point is that it must ALSO be possible to install the preferred
desktop
  directly, without installing GNOME first.


 Exactly this.

 Installing MATE from the spin is not exactly the same thing as
 installing it from the netinstall or the DVD.

 The spin does not include the same packages as the DVD and the
 netinstall due to size constraints.

 If we can keep the netinstall, which allows people to do exactly this,
 then I really could careless what happens with workstation (and I'm
 also a happy camper, as I imagine you and many others would be too).

 Dan
 --

Can this difference be fixed with a mate-firstboot ui, ie these
additional applications are recommended for use with MATE, would you like
to check off the ones that interest you and install them ?

--Pete
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Review swap...

2014-03-27 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
Ive got a package review for compat-qpid-cpp [1] and am willing to trade
reviews.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080583
-- 
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.blogspot.com/
Famous last words:
   I wonder what happens if we do it this way?


pgpbqW8iloRrU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Apache Mesos

2014-03-27 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message -
 Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
  = Proposed Self Contained Change: Apache Mesos =
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ApacheMesos
  
  Change owner(s): Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com
  
  Apache Mesos [1] is a cluster manager for sharing distributed application
  frameworks. This change brings Mesos to Fedora, which many have called a
  micro-kernel for the data center.
 
 Are we clustering Changes by products they may effect, or should be tied to
 in marketing? For example, this and Tachyon seem like natural marketing
 points for Fedora Cloud.

And more are coming. But I added Product field (*) to the EmptyTemplate, it
could be used to sort Changes to products and as heads up for marketing.
Or another possibility is to create Wiki category. I can process both.
We already touched it with Stephen on Server meeting.

(*) it's optional.

Jaroslav

 Bill
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Unresponsive maintainer: wolfy

2014-03-27 Thread Lubomir Rintel
Hello,

Anyone knows how could I contact wolfy? I've tried to reach him at IRC
and known e-mail addresses, without a response. His FAS address bounces
and sponsor does not know how to contact him either.

I hope he's doing fine.

He maintains an EPEL branch of the package (Pound) I'd like to see in
epel7 and I'm wondering if he's willing to maintain the epel7 branch.

Thank you,
Lubo

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Taskotron Data Interfaces

2014-03-27 Thread Kamil Paral
  It's Task-o-tron, it suggests it's meant to execute _tasks_ :-) On
  the other hand, check is more specific than task, it explains the
  purpose better. I guess native speakers will need to deal with
  language subtleties. I just want to be consistent in naming, it helps
  us and our users, that's all.
 
 Yeah, consistency is important. Personally, I'm ok with leaving stuff
 like libtaskotron.check for the moment - that's what we're working on.
 Do you think that changing things over to TaskDetail etc. would make
 taskotron easier to understand?

I think it's OK as it is for the moment. Once we intend to release some public 
API, we can go through it and make it more consistent. Only time will tell if 
'tasks' and 'checks' use the same interface and behave completely the same, or 
if they are two separate things.
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel


Request for help with slic3r crash

2014-03-27 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hi,
I really need help with fixing a crash in slic3r that bothers me for a
long time.

See https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r/issues/1636#issuecomment-31219661
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006

Steps to reproduce:

Run slic3r on F20 from this scratch build:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6603224

1) On Print setting tab, Advanced, Other, Threads enter value  1 (such
as 2)
2) From File menu select Quick slice...
3) Select any (valid) STL* file
4) Observe the crash

* Get one here: http://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/pypy-test.stl

Upstream cannot reproduce the bug (I guess it's Fedora specific) and is
probably not interested in fixing this.

I guess the crash is happening in Wx.

Thanks for any hint.
-- 
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-03-27 17:00 UTC) (next week back to 16:00 UTC)

2014-03-27 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:45:14PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
 2014-03-26 20:51 GMT+01:00 James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org:
  (approval and retirement sections already passed, /opt exception passed)
  #topic #339 software collections in Fedora
  .fpc 339
  https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339
 
 I can't help seeing this on the agenda for a long time (the ticket has
 been opened 7 months ago), including 3 months with no activity in the
 ticket, and now 2 months since last activity in the ticket.  Mailing
 list discussions also vary between vigorous in some months and
 essentially zero in other months.
 
 Is there some work going on elsewhere that I'm missing?  If not, what
 are the constraints that prevent quicker decision making?
 Mirek

There have been many problems in the past which I think I've gone into
elsewhere.

Current things that are being worked on:

I have one set of scls built:
http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/toshio/SCL-Test-Python2.4/

Have to push the lessons from that into the guideline draft and also have to
update it with some more discussion that happened between Jan and myself
(after testing that those proposals will work).

Current build of scl-utils with patches I've found necessary applied:
http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/toshio/SCL-Test-scl-utils/

The filesystem paths patch from that is a blocker but seems to be stalled:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=105

The byte compile patch I have to work on incorporating some feedback from
Jan before trying to push it upstream.

I also need to build something that makes use of statefiles and conf files.
to test this out.  mariadb or a postgresql package are good candidates.
hhorak had mentioned testing this simply by changing the paths in a package
(rather than changing scl-utils) and the general strategy works.

That's pretty much where we're at.

-Toshio


pgpIZXS70xlFa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Miloslav Trmač
2014-03-26 15:06 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
 == Detailed Description ==
 When PrivateDevices=yes is set in the [Service] section of a systemd service
 unit file, the processes run for the service will run in a private file system
 namespace

IIRC the kernel has had some issues with scaling to dozens or hundreds
of namespaces (which was noticeable with Docker).  Can I assume these
are either fixed or not applicable to this usage?

 == Scope ==
 * Policies and guidelines:
 It might be nice to update the packaging policies to also recommend making use
 of these settings.

Yes, it might be.  Do you plan to propose such a guideline update to
FPC, or is this an if somebody else cares item?
Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Miloslav Trmač
2014-03-26 15:06 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
 == Detailed Description ==
 When PrivateDevices=yes...
 Furthermore, the
 CAP_MKNOD capability is removed. Finally, the devices cgroup controller is
 used to ensure that no access to device nodes except the listed ones is
 possible.

 When PrivateNetwork=yes ...
 4. This also disconnects the AF_UNIX abstract namespace
 5. This also disconnects the AF_NETLINK and AF_AUDIT socket families

How much does this overlap existing SELinux policy?  Would it make
sense to have both configured from a single source?  It seems to me
that every inconsistency between the systemd unit file and the SELinux
policy must be a bug; could we eliminate this class of bugs entirely,
or if fully automated extraction of the information between the two
data sets weren't feasible, would it make sense to have and regularly
run tools that compare the two policies?
Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

repo XML file schemas

2014-03-27 Thread Aaron Gray
Hi,

The Fedora XML repo file schemas seem to have disappeared.

metadata xmlns=http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common;
xmlns:rpm=http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/rpm; packages=14364

duke.edu no longer seem to host them !

Looking for a response,

Aaron
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Daniel J Walsh

On 03/27/2014 01:49 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
 2014-03-26 15:06 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
 == Detailed Description ==
 When PrivateDevices=yes...
 Furthermore, the
 CAP_MKNOD capability is removed. Finally, the devices cgroup controller is
 used to ensure that no access to device nodes except the listed ones is
 possible.
 When PrivateNetwork=yes ...
 4. This also disconnects the AF_UNIX abstract namespace
 5. This also disconnects the AF_NETLINK and AF_AUDIT socket families
 How much does this overlap existing SELinux policy?  Would it make
 sense to have both configured from a single source?  It seems to me
 that every inconsistency between the systemd unit file and the SELinux
 policy must be a bug; could we eliminate this class of bugs entirely,
 or if fully automated extraction of the information between the two
 data sets weren't feasible, would it make sense to have and regularly
 run tools that compare the two policies?
 Mirek
It doesn't really overlap with SELinux, just adds another layer of
security.  And gives the administrator more flexibility on how he
configures his services.  I do not think there are two many confined
domains that need mknod, and most confined domains are not allowed to
look at many device nodes.  In a way this can eliminate SELinux avcs,
from apps just doing the equiv of ls -l /dev

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Heads up: Mesa/LLVM rebase and OpenGTL retirement in F20

2014-03-27 Thread Adam Jackson
We'd like to update to Mesa 10.1 in Fedora 20, since the cycle is so
long before F21 and (among other goodies) it enables OpenGL 3.3 on some
newer Radeons.  This implies rebasing LLVM 3.4, and that's where it gets
a little awkward: the OpenGTL package only works up to LLVM 3.3.

However, OpenGTL is dead upstream, and the only thing requiring it in
F20 gold - calligra-krita, by way of libQtGTL - has already been updated
to Obsolete OpenGTL.  As far as I know OpenGTL is the only such package
we have requiring LLVM 3.3, so the rest of the rebase should just be a
matter of updating to match F21.

The following source packages will also be updated for the llvm rebase:

dragonegg
gambas3
pocl
pure
python-llvmpy

If there are no serious objections I'll try to get this all into testing
early next week.  If you _do_ happen to be using OpenGTL for something
in F20, now would be an excellent time for you to start working on
porting it to current LLVM.

- ajax

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Miloslav Trmač
2014-03-27 20:57 GMT+01:00 Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com:

 On 03/27/2014 01:49 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
 2014-03-26 15:06 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
 == Detailed Description ==
 When PrivateDevices=yes...
 Furthermore, the
 CAP_MKNOD capability is removed. Finally, the devices cgroup controller is
 used to ensure that no access to device nodes except the listed ones is
 possible.
 When PrivateNetwork=yes ...
 4. This also disconnects the AF_UNIX abstract namespace
 5. This also disconnects the AF_NETLINK and AF_AUDIT socket families
 How much does this overlap existing SELinux policy?  Would it make
 sense to have both configured from a single source?  It seems to me
 that every inconsistency between the systemd unit file and the SELinux
 policy must be a bug; could we eliminate this class of bugs entirely,
 or if fully automated extraction of the information between the two
 data sets weren't feasible, would it make sense to have and regularly
 run tools that compare the two policies?
 Mirek
 It doesn't really overlap with SELinux, just adds another layer of
 security.
Layers tend to overlap :) in affected areas, if not in specific implementation.

 And gives the administrator more flexibility on how he
 configures his services.  I do not think there are two many confined
 domains that need mknod, and most confined domains are not allowed to
 look at many device nodes.

So, could we generate a starting list of daemons to be restricted by
PrivateDevices by looking for domains that aren't allowed in the
SELinux policy to look at device nodes?  And use the fixes previously
done in the SELinux policy to notice daemons that actually do need
access to devices without ever publishing a RPM with a too constrained
systemd unit to users?

That's where I was going with this--possibly up to possible full
bidirectional synchronization between SELinux and systemd units.
Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike] Created tag perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1.el7

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1.el7' was created 
pointing to:

 bf41294... Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike] Created tag perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1.fc19

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1.fc19' was created 
pointing to:

 bf41294... Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike] Created tag perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1.fc21

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1.fc21' was created 
pointing to:

 bf41294... Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike] Created tag perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1.fc20

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1.fc20' was created 
pointing to:

 bf41294... Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Daniel J Walsh

On 03/27/2014 04:03 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
 2014-03-27 20:57 GMT+01:00 Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com:
 On 03/27/2014 01:49 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
 2014-03-26 15:06 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
 == Detailed Description ==
 When PrivateDevices=yes...
 Furthermore, the
 CAP_MKNOD capability is removed. Finally, the devices cgroup controller 
 is
 used to ensure that no access to device nodes except the listed ones is
 possible.
 When PrivateNetwork=yes ...
 4. This also disconnects the AF_UNIX abstract namespace
 5. This also disconnects the AF_NETLINK and AF_AUDIT socket families
 How much does this overlap existing SELinux policy?  Would it make
 sense to have both configured from a single source?  It seems to me
 that every inconsistency between the systemd unit file and the SELinux
 policy must be a bug; could we eliminate this class of bugs entirely,
 or if fully automated extraction of the information between the two
 data sets weren't feasible, would it make sense to have and regularly
 run tools that compare the two policies?
 Mirek
 It doesn't really overlap with SELinux, just adds another layer of
 security.
 Layers tend to overlap :) in affected areas, if not in specific 
 implementation.

 And gives the administrator more flexibility on how he
 configures his services.  I do not think there are two many confined
 domains that need mknod, and most confined domains are not allowed to
 look at many device nodes.
 So, could we generate a starting list of daemons to be restricted by
 PrivateDevices by looking for domains that aren't allowed in the
 SELinux policy to look at device nodes?  And use the fixes previously
 done in the SELinux policy to notice daemons that actually do need
 access to devices without ever publishing a RPM with a too constrained
 systemd unit to users?

 That's where I was going with this--possibly up to possible full
 bidirectional synchronization between SELinux and systemd units.
 Mirek
Yes I think that is a good idea.  I would look at all domains that need
access to non standard devices and eliminate them from the list.
 
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[perl-Path-Tiny] Created tag perl-Path-Tiny-0.052-1.el7

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.052-1.el7' was created pointing to:

 3487eea... Update to 0.052
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8

2014-03-27 Thread Omair Majid
Hi,

* Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com [2014-03-26 11:55]:
 I would say that there needs to be something a bit larger than a
 rebuild but a mass test so that you end up with finding out that someone's 
 hack
 to make java-7 do something neat isn't java-8 runtime saying 'crash'.

What about holding a Test Day [1] for this? Do you have anything else in
mind?

Thanks,
Omair

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days

-- 
PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95  0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next

2014-03-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 07:40 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
 On Mar 25, 2014 8:27 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
 wrote:
   My point is that it must ALSO be possible to install the preferred
 desktop
   directly, without installing GNOME first.
 
 
  Exactly this.
 
  Installing MATE from the spin is not exactly the same thing as
  installing it from the netinstall or the DVD.
 
  The spin does not include the same packages as the DVD and the
  netinstall due to size constraints.
 
  If we can keep the netinstall, which allows people to do exactly this,
  then I really could careless what happens with workstation (and I'm
  also a happy camper, as I imagine you and many others would be too).
 
  Dan
  --
 
 Can this difference be fixed with a mate-firstboot ui, ie these
 additional applications are recommended for use with MATE, would you like
 to check off the ones that interest you and install them ?

Hum. This is actually kind of an interesting idea.

If we could somehow encode the selected groups in the live image for
anaconda to pass on to the installed system, the post-install tool could
becomes fairly trivial and generic. All it has to do really is a
'yum/dnf groupinstall @installed_group_a @installed_group_b etc etc',
and I think that should fill in any available 'missing packages' from
the repositories, for a live or DVD install.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Heads up: Mesa/LLVM rebase and OpenGTL retirement in F20

2014-03-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:02 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 We'd like to update to Mesa 10.1 in Fedora 20, since the cycle is so
 long before F21 and (among other goodies) it enables OpenGL 3.3 on some
 newer Radeons.  This implies rebasing LLVM 3.4, and that's where it gets
 a little awkward: the OpenGTL package only works up to LLVM 3.3.
 
 However, OpenGTL is dead upstream, and the only thing requiring it in
 F20 gold - calligra-krita, by way of libQtGTL - has already been updated
 to Obsolete OpenGTL.  As far as I know OpenGTL is the only such package
 we have requiring LLVM 3.3, so the rest of the rebase should just be a
 matter of updating to match F21.
 
 The following source packages will also be updated for the llvm rebase:
 
 dragonegg
 gambas3
 pocl
 pure
 python-llvmpy
 
 If there are no serious objections I'll try to get this all into testing
 early next week.  If you _do_ happen to be using OpenGTL for something
 in F20, now would be an excellent time for you to start working on
 porting it to current LLVM.

I can absolutely see the reasons for doing this, but...can it at least
go through a fesco rubber stamp? Let's face it, entirely deprecating a
library we shipped as part of the gold release seems to be a pretty
flagrant violation of the update policy, and really ought to be granted
a formal exception at the very least if it's going to go ahead.

As a result, we should avoid major updates of packages within a stable
release. Updates should aim to fix bugs, and not introduce features,
particularly when those features would materially affect the user or
developer experience.
ABI changes in general are very strongly discouraged

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases

Fedora *is* a platform, not just a set of packages, however half-assedly
we conform to that vision, so I guess I just feel a bit uncomfortable
not at least putting up a few hoops for this to jump through. :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[REGRESSION] ovpn can't build and can't connect to host (SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE)

2014-03-27 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Hi,

please take a look for critical bug[0] in openssl or gnutls (I don't know
howto debug more better where bug)

[0]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081708
--
-Igor Gnatenko
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 26.03.14 11:28, Bill Nottingham (nott...@splat.cc) wrote:

 Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: 
  = Proposed System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes 
  For 
  Long-Running Services =
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork
  
  Change owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering dot net, Dan 
  Walsh, Kay Sievers
  
  Let's make Fedora more secure by default! Recent systemd versions provide 
  two 
  per-service switches PrivateDevices=yes/no and PrivateNetwork=yes/no which 
  enable services to run without access to any physical devices in /dev, or 
  without access to kind of network sockets. So far this has seen little use 
  in 
  Fedora, and with this Fedora Change we'd like to change this, and enable 
  these 
  for all long-running services that do not require device/network access. 
 
 Can you define 'recent' here? While we wouldn't want to change the behavior
 of existing F20 or earlier services, it would be worthwhile to know if
 packages built for EPEL 7 could/should use this feature as well.

Both PrivateDevices= and PrivateNetwork= I'd only advocate to use on F21
really. 

PrivateNetwork= should mostly work the same way on F20 already, however
with one exception. On F20 and older the notification socket systemd
used as backend for sd_notify() and friends was in the abstract
namespace which is affected by PrivateNetwork=. This means
PrivateNetwork= effectively breaks sd_notify() there. On F21 we moved
the socket into the file system instead, which is unaffected by
PrivateNetwork=, hence sd_notify() works fine there, regardless if
PrivateNetwork() is used or not. (Note that moving the socket is not
compat breakage since it was mostly dynamic previously, and hence people
already had to check $NOTIFY_SOCKET for it, which allowed us to cleanly
move it to a different place.

PrivateDevices= is only available in F21.

I filed this as feature for F21, and that's what it is about. Since the
differences in the effect of PrivateNetwork= between F20 and F21 are
hard to explain I really would prefer to focus on F21 only for this.

Hope that makes sense,

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 26.03.14 13:43, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:

  Note that PrivateNetwork=yes should not be used for:
  
  1. Services that actually require network access (with the
  exception of daemons only needing socket activation) 2. Services
  which may be used to execute arbitrary user or administrator 
  supplied programs. (see above) 3. Services which might need to
  resolve non-system user and group names. Since on some setups
  resolving non-system users might require network access to an LDAP
  or NIS server, enabling this option on might break resolving of 
  these user names. Note however that system users/groups are always
  resolvable even without network access. Hence it is safe to enable
  this option for daemons which just need to resolve their own system
  user or group name.
 
 This may not be a safe statement to make. I personally know of a great
 many deployments where admins have removed the local accounts for

Well, this assumption is built into a lot of software we do, for example
all across device management, tmpfiles and suchlike. System users must
be resolvable without network, we cannot delay bootup for these
components, just because the network isn't up yet...

It's OK to if normal users are only resolvable with the network
round. And it's OK to sync system user IDs across the network, but they
must be resolvable at any time -- they are integral part of the core OS
after all. 

People can use a caching daemon (like sssd?) if they like, to make sure
the system users stay in syn across the network, but removing them from
/etc/passwed entirely is nothing we ever supported or should support.

I mean, it's even OK if people hack things that way, if they want to
shoot themselves in the foot, and know what they do. But that really
shouldn't stop us from deploying PrivateNetwork=yes, since there is a
very easy way out for them: just enable nscd. With nscd enabled the NSS
calls will go via the nscd AF_UNIX socket in the fs (which is
connectable, regardless of PrivateNetwork=yes), and then the actual
query is made from nscd. Or actually, to top that, people who have
setups like that, and store their user databases on the network, for
example in LDAP, are the ones nscd has been written for in the first
place, and hence there's really very little changing for them.

But anyway, it's a hack to allow system users to be removed from
/etc/passwd. It's already broken if you want to support that, you have
to file bugs to udev, tmpfiles and so on. And yuck, I don't even see how
that could ever work...

 We'd need to think very hard about whether any service should have
 this turned on by default. If we *do* enable it by default, we should
 also carefully document how to turn it off for those services if they
 rely on centrally-managed accounts.

I think we can cover this one line: if you do something like that,
don't. if you insist, use nscd. And that should be enough.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services

2014-03-27 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 22:59 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
 On Wed, 26.03.14 13:43, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
 
   Note that PrivateNetwork=yes should not be used for:
   
   1. Services that actually require network access (with the
   exception of daemons only needing socket activation) 2. Services
   which may be used to execute arbitrary user or administrator 
   supplied programs. (see above) 3. Services which might need to
   resolve non-system user and group names. Since on some setups
   resolving non-system users might require network access to an LDAP
   or NIS server, enabling this option on might break resolving of 
   these user names. Note however that system users/groups are always
   resolvable even without network access. Hence it is safe to enable
   this option for daemons which just need to resolve their own system
   user or group name.
  
  This may not be a safe statement to make. I personally know of a great
  many deployments where admins have removed the local accounts for
 
 Well, this assumption is built into a lot of software we do, for example
 all across device management, tmpfiles and suchlike. System users must
 be resolvable without network, we cannot delay bootup for these
 components, just because the network isn't up yet...
 
 It's OK to if normal users are only resolvable with the network
 round. And it's OK to sync system user IDs across the network, but they
 must be resolvable at any time -- they are integral part of the core OS
 after all. 
 
 People can use a caching daemon (like sssd?) if they like, to make sure
 the system users stay in syn across the network, but removing them from
 /etc/passwed entirely is nothing we ever supported or should support.
 
 I mean, it's even OK if people hack things that way, if they want to
 shoot themselves in the foot, and know what they do. But that really
 shouldn't stop us from deploying PrivateNetwork=yes, since there is a
 very easy way out for them: just enable nscd. With nscd enabled the NSS
 calls will go via the nscd AF_UNIX socket in the fs (which is
 connectable, regardless of PrivateNetwork=yes), and then the actual
 query is made from nscd. Or actually, to top that, people who have
 setups like that, and store their user databases on the network, for
 example in LDAP, are the ones nscd has been written for in the first
 place, and hence there's really very little changing for them.
 
 But anyway, it's a hack to allow system users to be removed from
 /etc/passwd. It's already broken if you want to support that, you have
 to file bugs to udev, tmpfiles and so on. And yuck, I don't even see how
 that could ever work...
 
  We'd need to think very hard about whether any service should have
  this turned on by default. If we *do* enable it by default, we should
  also carefully document how to turn it off for those services if they
  rely on centrally-managed accounts.
 
 I think we can cover this one line: if you do something like that,
 don't. if you insist, use nscd. And that should be enough.

It is doable without issues and withut needing nscd with sssd, so I do
not think we need to CYA with this line at all.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Heads up: Mesa/LLVM rebase and OpenGTL retirement in F20

2014-03-27 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2014-03-27 17:40 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
 On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:02 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 We'd like to update to Mesa 10.1 in Fedora 20, since the cycle is so
 long before F21 and (among other goodies) it enables OpenGL 3.3 on some
 newer Radeons.  This implies rebasing LLVM 3.4, and that's where it gets
 a little awkward: the OpenGTL package only works up to LLVM 3.3.

 However, OpenGTL is dead upstream, and the only thing requiring it in
 F20 gold - calligra-krita, by way of libQtGTL - has already been updated
 to Obsolete OpenGTL.  As far as I know OpenGTL is the only such package
 we have requiring LLVM 3.3, so the rest of the rebase should just be a
 matter of updating to match F21.

 The following source packages will also be updated for the llvm rebase:

 dragonegg
 gambas3
 pocl
 pure
 python-llvmpy

 If there are no serious objections I'll try to get this all into testing
 early next week.  If you _do_ happen to be using OpenGTL for something
 in F20, now would be an excellent time for you to start working on
 porting it to current LLVM.

 I can absolutely see the reasons for doing this, but...can it at least
 go through a fesco rubber stamp? Let's face it, entirely deprecating a
 library we shipped as part of the gold release seems to be a pretty
 flagrant violation of the update policy, and really ought to be granted
 a formal exception at the very least if it's going to go ahead.

 As a result, we should avoid major updates of packages within a stable
 release. Updates should aim to fix bugs, and not introduce features,
 particularly when those features would materially affect the user or
 developer experience.
 ABI changes in general are very strongly discouraged

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases

 Fedora *is* a platform, not just a set of packages, however half-assedly
 we conform to that vision, so I guess I just feel a bit uncomfortable
 not at least putting up a few hoops for this to jump through. :)

  This patch may be useful:
https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/opengtl/blob/master/opengtl-0.9.18-llvm-3.4.patch

 --
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
 http://www.happyassassin.net

Paulo
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Heads up: Mesa/LLVM rebase and OpenGTL retirement in F20

2014-03-27 Thread Jens Petersen
Hi,

 We'd like to update to Mesa 10.1 in Fedora 20, since the cycle is so
 long before F21 and (among other goodies) it enables OpenGL 3.3 on some
 newer Radeons.  This implies rebasing LLVM 3.4, and that's where it gets
 a little awkward: the OpenGTL package only works up to LLVM 3.3.

One concern from me is that ghc on ARM uses llvm as its compiler backend.
To be honest things are already bad enough for ghc with llvm-3.3 there
that I am not sure if they could get much worse with 3.4... ;)
though really need to test (3.2 was better).  I haven't seen
any Haskell build regressions yet though with llvm-3.4 in Rawhide
relative to 3.3 at least.

(ghc-7.6.3 officially supports only llvm = 3.1, but ghc-7.8, which will be
released soon and I am planning to ship it in F21, will support 3.4.
Maybe I should add Requires: llvm = 3.4 at that time to ghc.spec for ARM.;)

Jens
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1081385] New: CVE-2013-6393 perl-YAML-LibYAML: libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing YAML tags [fedora-all]

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081385

Bug ID: 1081385
   Summary: CVE-2013-6393 perl-YAML-LibYAML: libyaml: heap-based
buffer overflow when parsing YAML tags [fedora-all]
   Product: Fedora
   Version: 20
 Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML
  Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: mmcal...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1033990 (CVE-2013-6393)




This is an automatically created tracking bug!  It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora.

For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the Security Response product referenced in the Blocks field.

For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs

When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link
noted in the next comment(s).  This will include the bug IDs of this
tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs.

Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
Bodhi notes field when available.

Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora.
Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed
when all affected versions are fixed.

[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033990
[Bug 1033990] CVE-2013-6393 libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when
parsing YAML tags
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W6bjOxzSJua=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1033990] CVE-2013-6393 libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing YAML tags

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033990

Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1081385
 Depends On||1081386



--- Comment #41 from Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com ---

Created perl-YAML-LibYAML tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1081385]
Affects: epel-6 [bug 1081386]


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081385
[Bug 1081385] CVE-2013-6393 perl-YAML-LibYAML: libyaml: heap-based buffer
overflow when parsing YAML tags [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081386
[Bug 1081386] CVE-2013-6393 perl-YAML-LibYAML: libyaml: heap-based buffer
overflow when parsing YAML tags [epel-6]
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JaLIZHJJVma=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2014-03-27 Thread buildsys


perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 995748] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.59-1.fc20 does not include s3cl script and manpage

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995748

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1081468




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081468
[Bug 1081468] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple - Simpler
progress bars
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5SVeONxfIFa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML] Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
commit da43da31bb1dba3e2801e062aa179ac8d50aa538
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Thu Mar 27 13:52:30 2014 +

Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525

- Fix LibYAML input sanitization errors (CVE-2014-2525)
- Fix heap-based buffer overflow when parsing YAML tags (CVE-2013-6393)

 YAML-LibYAML-0.41-CVE-2013-6393.patch |  177 +
 YAML-LibYAML-0.41-CVE-2014-2525.patch |   38 +++
 perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec|   14 +++-
 3 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/YAML-LibYAML-0.41-CVE-2013-6393.patch 
b/YAML-LibYAML-0.41-CVE-2013-6393.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..e914e71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/YAML-LibYAML-0.41-CVE-2013-6393.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+# HG changeset patch
+# User Kirill Simonov x...@resolvent.net
+# Date 1391406104 21600
+# Node ID f859ed1eb757a3562b98a28a8ce69274bfd4b3f2
+# Parent  da9bc6f12781a583076c7b60d057df5d7b50f96f
+Guard against overflows in indent and flow_level.
+
+--- LibYAML/scanner.c
 LibYAML/scanner.c
+@@ -615,11 +615,11 @@
+  */
+ 
+ static int
+-yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, int column,
+-int number, yaml_token_type_t type, yaml_mark_t mark);
++yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, ptrdiff_t column,
++ptrdiff_t number, yaml_token_type_t type, yaml_mark_t mark);
+ 
+ static int
+-yaml_parser_unroll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, int column);
++yaml_parser_unroll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, ptrdiff_t column);
+ 
+ /*
+  * Token fetchers.
+@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@
+  */
+ 
+ int required = (!parser-flow_level
+- parser-indent == (int)parser-mark.column);
++ parser-indent == (ptrdiff_t)parser-mark.column);
+ 
+ /*
+  * A simple key is required only when it is the first token in the current
+@@ -1176,6 +1176,9 @@
+ 
+ /* Increase the flow level. */
+ 
++if (parser-flow_level == INT_MAX)
++return 0;
++
+ parser-flow_level++;
+ 
+ return 1;
+@@ -1206,8 +1209,8 @@
+  */
+ 
+ static int
+-yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, int column,
+-int number, yaml_token_type_t type, yaml_mark_t mark)
++yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, ptrdiff_t column,
++ptrdiff_t number, yaml_token_type_t type, yaml_mark_t mark)
+ {
+ yaml_token_t token;
+ 
+@@ -1226,6 +1229,9 @@
+ if (!PUSH(parser, parser-indents, parser-indent))
+ return 0;
+ 
++if (column  INT_MAX)
++return 0;
++
+ parser-indent = column;
+ 
+ /* Create a token and insert it into the queue. */
+@@ -1254,7 +1260,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ static int
+-yaml_parser_unroll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, int column)
++yaml_parser_unroll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, ptrdiff_t column)
+ {
+ yaml_token_t token;
+ 
+--- LibYAML/yaml_private.h
 LibYAML/yaml_private.h
+@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
+ 
+ #include assert.h
+ #include limits.h
++#include stddef.h
+ 
+ /*
+  * Memory management.
+# HG changeset patch
+# User Kirill Simonov x...@resolvent.net
+# Date 1391409843 21600
+# Node ID af3599437a87162554787c52d8b16eab553f537b
+# Parent  0df2fb962294f3a6df1450a3e08c6a0f74f9078c
+Forgot to set the error state.
+
+--- LibYAML/scanner.c
 LibYAML/scanner.c
+@@ -1176,8 +1176,10 @@
+ 
+ /* Increase the flow level. */
+ 
+-if (parser-flow_level == INT_MAX)
++if (parser-flow_level == INT_MAX) {
++parser-error = YAML_MEMORY_ERROR;
+ return 0;
++}
+ 
+ parser-flow_level++;
+ 
+@@ -1229,8 +1231,10 @@
+ if (!PUSH(parser, parser-indents, parser-indent))
+ return 0;
+ 
+-if (column  INT_MAX)
++if (column  INT_MAX) {
++parser-error = YAML_MEMORY_ERROR;
+ return 0;
++}
+ 
+ parser-indent = column;
+ 
+Description: CVE-2013-6393: yaml_stack_extend: guard against integer overflow
+ This is a hardening patch also from Florian Weimer
+ fwei...@redhat.com.  It is not required to fix this CVE however it
+ improves the robustness of the code against future issues by avoiding
+ large node ID's in a central place.
+Origin: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033990
+Bug-RedHat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033990
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737076
+Last-Update: 2014-01-29
+---
+# HG changeset patch
+# User Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com
+# Date 1389274355 -3600
+#  Thu Jan 09 14:32:35 2014 +0100
+# Node ID 034d7a91581ac930e5958683f1a06f41e96d24a2
+# Parent  a54d7af707f25dc298a7be60fd152001d2b3035b
+yaml_stack_extend: guard against integer overflow
+
+--- LibYAML/api.c
 LIBYAML/api.c
+@@ -117,7 +117,12 @@
+ YAML_DECLARE(int)
+ yaml_stack_extend(void **start, void **top, void **end)
+ {
+-void *new_start = yaml_realloc(*start, ((char *)*end - (char *)*start)*2);
++void *new_start;
++
++if ((char *)*end - (char *)*start = INT_MAX / 2)
++  return 0;
++
++new_start = 

[perl-YAML-LibYAML/f20] Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  da43da3... Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1078083] CVE-2014-2525 libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing URLs

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078083



--- Comment #22 from John Eckersberg jecke...@redhat.com ---
Can you please create a tracking bug for epel-all as well?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=myKGdCsLiKa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML/epel7] (3 commits) ...Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  3560fff... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
  3e843d9... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
  da43da3... Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML/f19] (3 commits) ...Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  3560fff... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
  3e843d9... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
  da43da3... Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: mojomojo

2014-03-27 Thread buildsys


mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires 
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires 
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires 
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu

2014-03-27 Thread buildsys


perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide 
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires 
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires 
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On armhfp:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires 
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2014-03-27 Thread buildsys


perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-GnuPG-Interface

2014-03-27 Thread buildsys


perl-GnuPG-Interface has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::HandlesVia)
On i386:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::HandlesVia)
On armhfp:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::HandlesVia)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1081559] perl-YAML-LibYAML bundles yaml-1.0.4

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081559

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-YAML-LibYAML bundler   |perl-YAML-LibYAML bundles
   |yaml-1.0.4  |yaml-1.0.4



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bEE9XGEtUta=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1081559] perl-YAML-LibYAML bundler yaml-1.0.4

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081559

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
   ||/show_bug.cgi?id=498203



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LzgrwKDy9ga=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1081559] New: perl-YAML-LibYAML bundler yaml-1.0.4

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081559

Bug ID: 1081559
   Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML bundler yaml-1.0.4
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML
  Severity: high
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



perl-YAML-LibYAML bundles yaml sources. yaml-1.0.4 with two small modifications
in emmiter.c and scanner.c.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NQ1kUHtESna=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-0.31.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2014-03-27 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet:

2ed5b6ac5d480a14ff3233a58987a2e4  Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-0.31.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet] Import

2014-03-27 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 1ceff8e6ca1ea261e7ae31e572255fbb861dbb60
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Mar 27 16:12:27 2014 +0100

Import

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet.spec |   53 ++
 sources  |1 +
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..05c273b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-0.31.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet.spec b/perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..3ab9256
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+Name:   perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet
+Version:0.31
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:Provide a progress meter if run interactively
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Group:  Development/Libraries
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Term-ProgressBar-Quiet/
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/L/LB/LBROCARD/Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
+BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
+# Run-time:
+BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Interactive)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Term::ProgressBar)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::MockObject)
+# Tests:
+BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
+# Optional tests:
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.14
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+
+%description
+Term::ProgressBar is a wonderful module for showing progress bars on the
+terminal. This module acts very much like that module when it is run
+interactively. However, when it is not run interactively (for example,
+as a cron job) then it does not show the progress bar.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-%{version}
+
+%build
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%files
+%doc CHANGES README
+%{perl_vendorlib}/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%changelog
+* Thu Mar 27 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 0.31-1
+- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..4266a39 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+2ed5b6ac5d480a14ff3233a58987a2e4  Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-0.31.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML/el6] Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 2e17fd3f16300ddd36d5bf1664bd6eee50a8494e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Thu Mar 27 13:52:30 2014 +

Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525

- Fix LibYAML input sanitization errors (CVE-2014-2525)
- Fix heap-based buffer overflow when parsing YAML tags (CVE-2013-6393)

 YAML-LibYAML-0.38-CVE-2013-6393.patch |  105 +
 YAML-LibYAML-0.38-CVE-2014-2525.patch |   38 
 perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec|   16 +-
 3 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/YAML-LibYAML-0.38-CVE-2013-6393.patch 
b/YAML-LibYAML-0.38-CVE-2013-6393.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..61186cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/YAML-LibYAML-0.38-CVE-2013-6393.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+--- LibYAML/api.c
 LibYAML/api.c
+@@ -117,7 +117,12 @@ yaml_string_join(
+ YAML_DECLARE(int)
+ yaml_stack_extend(void **start, void **top, void **end)
+ {
+-void *new_start = yaml_realloc(*start, ((char *)*end - (char *)*start)*2);
++void *new_start;
++
++if ((char *)*end - (char *)*start = INT_MAX / 2)
++  return 0;
++
++new_start = yaml_realloc(*start, ((char *)*end - (char *)*start)*2);
+ 
+ if (!new_start) return 0;
+ 
+--- LibYAML/scanner.c
 LibYAML/scanner.c
+@@ -615,11 +615,11 @@ yaml_parser_decrease_flow_level(yaml_par
+  */
+ 
+ static int
+-yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, int column,
+-int number, yaml_token_type_t type, yaml_mark_t mark);
++yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, ptrdiff_t column,
++ptrdiff_t number, yaml_token_type_t type, yaml_mark_t mark);
+ 
+ static int
+-yaml_parser_unroll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, int column);
++yaml_parser_unroll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, ptrdiff_t column);
+ 
+ /*
+  * Token fetchers.
+@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ yaml_parser_save_simple_key(yaml_parser_
+  */
+ 
+ int required = (!parser-flow_level
+- parser-indent == (int)parser-mark.column);
++ parser-indent == (ptrdiff_t)parser-mark.column);
+ 
+ /*
+  * A simple key is required only when it is the first token in the current
+@@ -1174,6 +1174,11 @@ yaml_parser_increase_flow_level(yaml_par
+ 
+ /* Increase the flow level. */
+ 
++if (parser-flow_level == INT_MAX) {
++parser-error = YAML_MEMORY_ERROR;
++return 0;
++}
++
+ parser-flow_level++;
+ 
+ return 1;
+@@ -1204,8 +1209,8 @@ yaml_parser_decrease_flow_level(yaml_par
+  */
+ 
+ static int
+-yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, int column,
+-int number, yaml_token_type_t type, yaml_mark_t mark)
++yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, ptrdiff_t column,
++ptrdiff_t number, yaml_token_type_t type, yaml_mark_t mark)
+ {
+ yaml_token_t token;
+ 
+@@ -1224,6 +1229,11 @@ yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *p
+ if (!PUSH(parser, parser-indents, parser-indent))
+ return 0;
+ 
++if (column  INT_MAX) {
++parser-error = YAML_MEMORY_ERROR;
++return 0;
++}
++
+ parser-indent = column;
+ 
+ /* Create a token and insert it into the queue. */
+@@ -1252,7 +1262,7 @@ yaml_parser_roll_indent(yaml_parser_t *p
+ 
+ 
+ static int
+-yaml_parser_unroll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, int column)
++yaml_parser_unroll_indent(yaml_parser_t *parser, ptrdiff_t column)
+ {
+ yaml_token_t token;
+ 
+@@ -2572,7 +2582,7 @@ yaml_parser_scan_tag_uri(yaml_parser_t *
+ 
+ /* Resize the string to include the head. */
+ 
+-while (string.end - string.start = (int)length) {
++while ((size_t)(string.end - string.start) = length) {
+ if (!yaml_string_extend(string.start, string.pointer, string.end)) 
{
+ parser-error = YAML_MEMORY_ERROR;
+ goto error;
+--- LibYAML/yaml_private.h
 LibYAML/yaml_private.h
+@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
+ 
+ #include assert.h
+ #include limits.h
++#include stddef.h
+ 
+ /*
+  * Memory management.
diff --git a/YAML-LibYAML-0.38-CVE-2014-2525.patch 
b/YAML-LibYAML-0.38-CVE-2014-2525.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..8dfa5b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/YAML-LibYAML-0.38-CVE-2014-2525.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+Description: CVE-2014-2525: Fixes heap overflow in yaml_parser_scan_uri_escapes
+  The heap overflow is caused by not properly expanding a string before
+  writing to it in function yaml_parser_scan_uri_escapes in scanner.c. 
+
+Origin: backport, 
https://bitbucket.org/xi/libyaml/commits/bce8b60f0b9af69fa9fab3093d0a41ba243de048
+Author: Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
+Last-Update: 2014-03-20
+Applied-Upstream: 0.1.6
+
+--- LibYAML/scanner.c
 LibYAML/scanner.c
+@@ -2617,6 +2617,9 @@ yaml_parser_scan_tag_uri(yaml_parser_t *
+ /* Check if it is a URI-escape sequence. */
+ 
+ if (CHECK(parser-buffer, '%')) {
++if (!STRING_EXTEND(parser, string))
++goto error;
++
+ if (!yaml_parser_scan_uri_escapes(parser,
+ 

File MooX-0.101.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by corsepiu

2014-03-27 Thread corsepiu
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooX:

c35d73fc38aceb7edec1b5560abe4e2d  MooX-0.101.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML] Created tag perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.38-4.el6

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.38-4.el6' was created pointing to:

 2e17fd3... Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML] Created tag perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.el7

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.el7' was created pointing to:

 da43da3... Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML] Created tag perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc21

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc21' was created pointing to:

 da43da3... Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML] Created tag perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc19

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc19' was created pointing to:

 da43da3... Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-YAML-LibYAML] Created tag perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc20

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc20' was created pointing to:

 da43da3... Add fixes for CVE-2013-6393 and CVE-2014-2525
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooX/f20] Initial import.

2014-03-27 Thread corsepiu
Summary of changes:

  b998375... Initial import. (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooX/f19] Initial import.

2014-03-27 Thread corsepiu
Summary of changes:

  b998375... Initial import. (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet/f20] Import

2014-03-27 Thread Petr Pisar
Summary of changes:

  1ceff8e... Import (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1081382] CVE-2014-2525 perl-YAML-LibYAML: libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing URLs [fedora-all]

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081382



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U5lRpNoqxBa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1081385] CVE-2013-6393 perl-YAML-LibYAML: libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing YAML tags [fedora-all]

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081385



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=A8nlS6UTFRa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1081382] CVE-2014-2525 perl-YAML-LibYAML: libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing URLs [fedora-all]

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081382



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dOA7g9ALeda=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1081385] CVE-2013-6393 perl-YAML-LibYAML: libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing YAML tags [fedora-all]

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081385



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.41-4.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wHpJJlgX39a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Net-Amazon-S3] Enable s3cl tool

2014-03-27 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 94ce32ee4e8d6200b94b89badcfcd41214cd
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Mar 27 13:48:11 2014 +0100

Enable s3cl tool

And modernize spec files etc.

 .rpmlint|2 +
 perl-Net-Amazon-S3.spec |  152 ---
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.rpmlint b/.rpmlint
new file mode 100644
index 000..7d0c218
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.rpmlint
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+from Config import *
+addFilter(spelling-error .* (amazonaws|http|scalable));
diff --git a/perl-Net-Amazon-S3.spec b/perl-Net-Amazon-S3.spec
index b32ede4..c76e3ba 100644
--- a/perl-Net-Amazon-S3.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-Amazon-S3.spec
@@ -1,77 +1,58 @@
-# Noarch packages don't generate any debuginfo
-%global debug_package %{nil}
-
-Summary: Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
-Name: perl-Net-Amazon-S3
-Version: 0.59
-Release: 1%{?dist}
-License: GPL+ or Artistic
-Group: Development/Libraries
-URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Amazon-S3/
-Source0: 
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PF/PFIG/Net-Amazon-S3-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
-
-BuildArch: noarch
-# Module Build
+Summary:Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
+Name:   perl-Net-Amazon-S3
+Version:0.59
+Release:2%{?dist}
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Group:  Development/Libraries
+URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Amazon-S3/
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PF/PFIG/Net-Amazon-S3-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires: perl
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.30
-# Module Runtime
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
+# Run-time:
 BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires: perl(Data::Stream::Bulk::Callback)
 BuildRequires: perl(DateTime::Format::HTTP)
 BuildRequires: perl(Digest::HMAC_SHA1)
 BuildRequires: perl(Digest::MD5)
 BuildRequires: perl(Digest::MD5::File)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule)
 BuildRequires: perl(File::stat)
+BuildRequires: perl(Getopt::Long)
 BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Date)
 BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Status)
 BuildRequires: perl(IO::File) = 1.14
 BuildRequires: perl(LWP::UserAgent::Determined)
 BuildRequires: perl(MIME::Base64)
+BuildRequires: perl(MIME::Types)
 BuildRequires: perl(Moose) = 0.85
 BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints)
 BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::StrictConstructor) = 0.16
 BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types::DateTime::MoreCoercions) = 0.07
+BuildRequires: perl(Path::Class)
+BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Usage)
 BuildRequires: perl(Regexp::Common)
+# Term::Encoding is optional
+BuildRequires: perl(Term::ProgressBar::Simple)
 BuildRequires: perl(URI)
 BuildRequires: perl(URI::Escape)
 BuildRequires: perl(URI::QueryParam)
 BuildRequires: perl(XML::LibXML)
 BuildRequires: perl(XML::LibXML::XPathContext)
-# Requirements of s3cl (some not yet in Fedora, so we exclude the script for 
now)
-BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule)
-BuildRequires: perl(Getopt::Long)
-BuildRequires: perl(MIME::Types)
-BuildRequires: perl(Path::Class)
-BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Usage)
-BuildRequires: perl(strict)
-#BuildRequires: perl(Term::Encoding)
-#BuildRequires: perl(Term::ProgressBar::Simple)
-BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
-# Test Suite
+# Tests:
+# English not used
 BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
 BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires: perl(lib)
 BuildRequires: perl(LWP::Simple)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Exception)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
 BuildRequires: perl(vars)
-# Release Tests
-# CHANGES file should be called Changes before t/release-cpan-changes.t can 
work
-#BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Changes)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Meta)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Meta::JSON)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::DistManifest)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::MinimumVersion)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Mojibake)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoTabs)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.41
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Portability::Files)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Synopsis)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Vars)
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::Version)
-# Runtime
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
-
+# Optional tests:
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Script) = 1.05
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
 
 %description
 This module provides a Perlish interface to Amazon S3. From the
@@ -84,96 +65,39 @@ inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to 
run its own
 global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of
 scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.
 
-To find out more about S3, please visit: http://s3.amazonaws.com/
+To find out more about S3, please visit http://s3.amazonaws.com/.
 
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n Net-Amazon-S3-%{version}
-
 # Get rid of unnecessary exec bits
-find lib -name '*.pm' -exec chmod -c -x {} ';'
-
+find lib -name '*.pm' -exec chmod -c -x {} +
+# Fix 

[perl-Net-Amazon-S3/f20] Enable s3cl tool

2014-03-27 Thread Petr Pisar
Summary of changes:

  94ce32e... Enable s3cl tool (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 995748] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.59-1.fc20 does not include s3cl script and manpage

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995748

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.59-2.f
   ||c21



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H26krYa4jKa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1064271] perl-Net-SSLeay tests failing on s390(x) with glibc-2.18.90-21.fc21

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271



--- Comment #21 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
reduced reproducer
- install F-20
- update glibc from http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/glibc-2.18.90-20.fc21.dh.1/ -
it is glibc-2.18.90-20.fc21 + commit 93a45ff1
- rpmbuild --rebuild
http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/perl-Net-SSLeay-1.58-1.fc21.src.rpm


for every failed test following info appears in kernel log:

[ 6672.505145] User process fault: interruption code 0x6003B in
SSLeay.so[3fff665+89000]
[ 6672.505155] failing address: 0
[ 6672.505159] CPU: 0 PID: 16420 Comm: perl Not tainted 3.13.6-200.fc20.s390x
#1
[ 6672.505162] task: 72333c98 ti: 5859c000 task.ti:
5859c000
[ 6672.505176] User PSW : 070500018000 03fff66b682c (0x3fff66b682c)
[ 6672.505178]R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:1 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0
EA:3
User GPRS: 88af88e8  887cc010 
[ 6672.505185]03fffcedc360 0001 0020
03fff66db0e8
[ 6672.505188] 0001 88aca5a8
03fffd1ed3a0
[ 6672.505192]03fffcebb000 03fff66ceff0 03fff66b6826
03852bd8
[ 6672.505202] User Code: 03fff66b681a: e320b016llgf   
%r2,0(%r11)
   03fff66b6820: c0e5fffd273c   brasl   %r14,3fff665b698
  #03fff66b6826: e31026b80004   lg  %r1,1720(%r2)
  03fff66b682c: e3101014   lg  %r1,16(%r1)
   03fff66b6832: e3201002   ltg %r2,0(%r1)
   03fff66b6838: e320b016   llgf%r2,0(%r11)
   03fff66b683e: a78402ed   brc 8,3fff66b6e18
   03fff66b6842: c0e5fffd272b   brasl   %r14,3fff665b698
[ 6672.505324] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
[ 6672.505328]  [03fffcecf64e] 0x3fffcecf64e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IZYuDYNbLHa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 995748] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.59-1.fc20 does not include s3cl script and manpage

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995748



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IO-Interactive-0.0.6-1.fc20, perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple-0.03-1.fc20,
perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-0.31-1.fc20, perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.59-2.fc20 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.59-2.fc20,perl-Term-ProgressBar-Simple-0.03-1.fc20,perl-IO-Interactive-0.0.6-1.fc20,perl-Term-ProgressBar-Quiet-0.31-1.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6b9CyZlB2Ha=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta ownership changed

2014-03-27 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned by pghmcfc

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Module-Install-AutoLicense ownership changed

2014-03-27 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Module-Install-AutoLicense in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned by pghmcfc

To make changes to this package see:
  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Module-Install-AutoLicense
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod ownership changed

2014-03-27 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned by 
pghmcfc

To make changes to this package see:
  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike:

cc9113b5dfb29189f6383da2b55ef61d  MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike] Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
commit bf41294b1fbf2095fdfa33473820de56ba9013a1
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Thu Mar 27 19:10:47 2014 +

Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)

This module provides a more general version of the Str type. If coercions 
are
enabled, it will accept objects that overload stringification and coerces 
them
into strings.

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike.spec |   56 +
 sources   |1 +
 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..6ba62fc 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/MooseX-Types-Stringlike-[0-9.]*.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike.spec 
b/perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..57a509e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+Name:  perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike
+Summary:   Moose type constraints for strings or string-like objects
+Version:   0.002
+Release:   1%{?dist}
+License:   ASL 2.0
+URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-Stringlike/
+Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN/MooseX-Types-Stringlike-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildArch: noarch
+# Module Build
+BuildRequires: perl
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.17
+# Module Runtime
+BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types)
+BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types::Moose)
+BuildRequires: perl(overload)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
+# Test Suite
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions)
+BuildRequires: perl(List::Util)
+BuildRequires: perl(Moose)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.96
+# Optional Test Requirements
+BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta)
+BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Requirements)
+# Runtime
+Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+
+%description
+This module provides a more general version of the Str type. If coercions are
+enabled, it will accept objects that overload stringification and coerces them
+into strings.
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n MooseX-Types-Stringlike-%{version}
+
+%build
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%files
+%doc Changes CONTRIBUTING LICENSE README
+%{perl_vendorlib}/MooseX/
+%{_mandir}/man3/MooseX::Types::Stringlike.3*
+
+%changelog
+* Thu Mar 27 2014 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.002-1
+- Initial RPM version
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..297e8a5 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+cc9113b5dfb29189f6383da2b55ef61d  MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta/epel7] (3 commits) ...0.26 bump

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  4e92866... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
  1492d70... 0.24 bump (*)
  eb77dff... 0.26 bump (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta] Created tag perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta-0.26-1.el7

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta-0.26-1.el7' was created 
pointing to:

 eb77dff... 0.26 bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike/epel7] Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  bf41294... Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1) (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Module-Install-AutoLicense] Created tag perl-Module-Install-AutoLicense-0.08-4.el7

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Install-AutoLicense-0.08-4.el7' was created 
pointing to:

 7ab6f54... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike/f20] Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  bf41294... Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1) (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod/epel7] (3 commits) ...0.22 bump

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  85236ad... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
  c1a039e... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
  f0b9ca3... 0.22 bump (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod] Created tag perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod-0.22-1.el7

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Install-ReadmeFromPod-0.22-1.el7' was created 
pointing to:

 f0b9ca3... 0.22 bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Unicode-UTF8/epel7] Update to 0.60

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  c43958d... Update to 0.60 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike/f19] Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1)

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  bf41294... Initial import (perl-MooseX-Types-Stringlike-0.002-1) (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Unicode-UTF8] Created tag perl-Unicode-UTF8-0.60-1.el7

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Unicode-UTF8-0.60-1.el7' was created pointing to:

 c43958d... Update to 0.60
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Path-Tiny/epel7] (14 commits) ...Update to 0.052

2014-03-27 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  903ae30... Update to 0.032 (*)
  377cfde... Update to 0.033 (*)
  98b5658... Update to 0.034 (*)
  f7b7c3d... Update to 0.035 (*)
  d7330cf... Update to 0.037 (*)
  803eaaa... Update to 0.038 (*)
  201e3e3... Update to 0.040 (*)
  6f37b27... Update to 0.041 (*)
  b895f8d... Update to 0.042 (*)
  8356598... Update to 0.043 (*)
  88fced6... Update to 0.044 (*)
  b00bff7... Update to 0.049 (*)
  9ac1162... Update to 0.051 (*)
  3487eea... Update to 0.052 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1055297] perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811 is available

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055297

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811-1.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811-1.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0973/perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811-1.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=R4FpCbiLCEa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1064271] perl-Net-SSLeay tests failing on s390(x) with glibc-2.18.90-21.fc21

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271



--- Comment #22 from Carlos O'Donell codon...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #20)
 and
 
 commit 93a45ff1ca6d459618bb0cf93580c4b2809a4b61
 Author: Andreas Krebbel kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
 Date:   Tue Jan 7 09:36:31 2014 +0100
 
 S/390: Make jmp_buf extendible.
 
 is the problem ...

I've contacted Andreas upstream and asked him for help looking into this since
he is the author of the patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fSZy67uKnZa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1078083] CVE-2014-2525 libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing URLs

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078083

Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1081856



--- Comment #23 from Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com ---

Created libyaml tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: epel-all [bug 1081856]


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081856
[Bug 1081856] CVE-2014-2525 libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when
parsing URLs [epel-all]
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Izp1yAhq3Ua=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1078083] CVE-2014-2525 libyaml: heap-based buffer overflow when parsing URLs

2014-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078083



--- Comment #24 from Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to John Eckersberg from comment #22)
 Can you please create a tracking bug for epel-all as well?

Done. Sorry about that!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DBuyg1kaYza=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47655 - Improve import logging and abort handling

2014-03-27 Thread Mark Reynolds

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47655

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47655/0001-Ticket-47655-Improve-import-logging-and-abort-proces.patch

--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47756 - Improve import logging and abort handling

2014-03-27 Thread Mark Reynolds

Had the wrong ticket number

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47756

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47756/0001-Ticket-47756-Improve-import-logging-and-abort-proces.patch

--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel