[EPEL-devel] [Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux] #23: EpSCO Request: Please write Wrangler Guidelines/Policy
#23: EpSCO Request: Please write Wrangler Guidelines/Policy + Reporter: maxamillion | Owner: epel-wranglers Type: task| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Policy problem |Version: Keywords: | + I would like to request a formal guideline/policy be put into place for how to handle old/broken/vulnerable packages that need fixing by the EPEL Wranglers group. This will allow for a specific order of operations be followed and current package maintainers who may have an EPEL Wranger step in to fix their package on their behalf will know why as per the guideline/policy. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/epel/ticket/23 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: [EPEL-devel] [Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux] #2: How to handle systemd service activation defaults in EPEL7
#2: How to handle systemd service activation defaults in EPEL7 -+ Reporter: orion | Owner: epel-wranglers Type: task| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: EPEL-7 Component: Policy problem |Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -+ Comment (by kevin): Yeah, I guess I am ok with just copying the fedora presets into epel- release and hoping we don't have to do much tweaking. ;) -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/epel/ticket/2#comment:6 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: [EPEL-devel] [Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux] #2: How to handle systemd service activation defaults in EPEL7
#2: How to handle systemd service activation defaults in EPEL7 -+ Reporter: orion | Owner: epel-wranglers Type: task| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: EPEL-7 Component: Policy problem |Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -+ Comment (by bstinson): I'm leaning toward +1 on adding it into epel-release, if it is widely announced and added to our docs. I wonder if there are those out there who simply deploy /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo rather than installing the epel- release package. We would need to let people know that we are adding functionality to epel-release. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/epel/ticket/2#comment:7 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 902 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 233 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6 120 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1616/puppet-2.7.26-1.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2750/libsrtp-1.4.4-10.20101004cvs.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2719/nodejs-0.10.32-1.el6,v8-3.14.5.10-14.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2742/TeXmacs-1.0.7.2-3.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2713/putty-0.63-3.el6 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2811/nodejs-qs-0.6.6-3.el6 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2821/nodejs-send-0.3.0-4.el6 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2981/check-mk-1.2.4p5-2.el6 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3024/rssh-2.3.4-1.el6 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3064/mediawiki119-1.19.20-1.el6 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3082/golang-1.3.3-1.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3202/python-oauth2-1.5.211-8.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2850/nginx-1.0.15-8.el6 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3264/getmail-4.46.0-2.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing docker-io-1.2.0-3.el6 exim-4.72-7.el6 getmail-4.46.0-2.el6 ghc-cmdtheline-0.2.3-1.el6 ghc-monad-unify-0.2.2-1.el6 ghc-pattern-arrows-0.0.2-1.el6 golang-github-BurntSushi-toml-0-0.2.gitbd2bdf7.el6 golang-github-influxdb-influxdb-0.8.0-0.3.rc4.git67f9869.el6 mod_qos-11.5-1.el6 python-igraph-0.7-1.el6 razorqt-0.5.2-20.el6 Details about builds: docker-io-1.2.0-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3262) Automates deployment of containerized applications Update Information: Resolves: rhbz#1139415 - correct path for bash completion Resolves: rhbz#1132824 - update to v1.2.0 ChangeLog: * Thu Oct 9 2014 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org - 1.2.0-3 - Resolves: rhbz#1139415 - correct path for bash completion /usr/share/bash-completion/completions - sysvinit script update as per upstream commit 640d2ef6f54d96ac4fc3f0f745cb1e6a35148607 - don't own dirs for vim highlighting, bash completion and udev * Thu Sep 25 2014 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org - 1.2.0-2 - Resolves: rhbz#1145660 - support /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage From: Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com - patch to ignore selinux if it's disabled https://github.com/docker/docker/commit/9e2eb0f1cc3c4ef000e139f1d85a20f0e00971e6 From: Dan Walsh dwa...@redhat.com - Resolves: rhbz#1139415 - correct path for bash completion - init script waits upto 5 mins before terminating daemon * Sat Aug 23 2014 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org - 1.2.0-1 - Resolves: rhbz#1132824 - update to v1.2.0 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1139415 - docker.bash shell completion is in /etc not /usr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139415 [ 2 ] Bug #1132824 - docker-io-1.2.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132824 exim-4.72-7.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3269) The exim mail transfer agent Update Information: This is an update fixing problem with dynamically loadable modules. ChangeLog: * Fri Oct 10 2014 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com - 4.72-7 - Do not override LFLAGS (problem reported by Todd Lyons) getmail-4.46.0-2.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3264) POP3, IMAP4 and SDPS mail retriever with Maildir delivery Update Information: update to 4.46.0 ChangeLog: * Sat Jun 7 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 4.46.0-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Apr
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 902 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 234 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6 121 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1616/puppet-2.7.26-1.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2750/libsrtp-1.4.4-10.20101004cvs.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2719/nodejs-0.10.32-1.el6,v8-3.14.5.10-14.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2742/TeXmacs-1.0.7.2-3.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2713/putty-0.63-3.el6 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2811/nodejs-qs-0.6.6-3.el6 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2821/nodejs-send-0.3.0-4.el6 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2981/check-mk-1.2.4p5-2.el6 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3024/rssh-2.3.4-1.el6 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3064/mediawiki119-1.19.20-1.el6 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3082/golang-1.3.3-1.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3202/python-oauth2-1.5.211-8.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2850/nginx-1.0.15-8.el6 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3264/getmail-4.46.0-2.el6 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3279/php-ZendFramework-1.12.9-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing php-ZendFramework-1.12.9-1.el6 Details about builds: php-ZendFramework-1.12.9-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3279) Leading open-source PHP framework Update Information: Contains fixes for two security relevant bugs: * ZF2014-05: Anonymous authentication in ldap_bind() function of PHP, using null byte (http://framework.zend.com/security/advisory/ZF2014-05) * ZF2014-06: SQL injection vector when manually quoting values for sqlsrv extension, using null byte (http://framework.zend.com/security/advisory/ZF2014-06) ChangeLog: * Fri Oct 10 2014 Felix Kaechele hef...@fedoraproject.org - 1.12.9-1 - update to 1.12.9 - fixes http://framework.zend.com/security/advisory/ZF2014-05 - fixes http://framework.zend.com/security/advisory/ZF2014-06 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1151276 - CVE-2014-8088 php-ZendFramework: null byte issue, connect to LDAP without knowing the password (ZF2014-05) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151276 [ 2 ] Bug #1151277 - CVE-2014-8089 php-ZendFramework: SQL injection issue when using the sqlsrv PHP extension (ZF2014-06) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151277 ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2748/nodejs-0.10.32-1.el7,v8-3.14.5.10-14.el7 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2825/nginx-1.6.2-1.el7 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2861/nodejs-qs-0.6.6-3.el7 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2870/nodejs-send-0.3.0-4.el7 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2992/check-mk-1.2.4p5-2.el7 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3070/phpMyAdmin-4.2.9.1-1.el7 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3062/golang-1.3.3-1.el7 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3236/python-oauth2-1.5.211-8.el7 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3283/php-ZendFramework2-2.3.3-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing caja-1.8.2-1.el7 eom-1.8.1-1.el7 exim-4.84-4.el7 gdl-0.9.5-1.el7 ghc-cmdtheline-0.2.3-1.el7 ghc-monad-unify-0.2.2-1.el7 ghc-pattern-arrows-0.0.2-1.el7 marco-1.8.2-2.el7 mate-control-center-1.8.3-1.el7 php-ZendFramework2-2.3.3-1.el7 php-pear-phing-2.8.2-1.el7 python-igraph-0.7-1.el7 qemu-2.0.0-1.el7.2 Details about builds: caja-1.8.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3274) File manager for MATE Update Information: - update to 1.8.2 release - removed upstreamed caja_font-color-desktop.patch ChangeLog: * Mon Sep 29 2014 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.8.2-1 - update to 1.8.2 release - removed upstreamed caja_font-color-desktop.patch eom-1.8.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3273) Eye of MATE image viewer Update Information: - update to 1.8.1 release ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 30 2014 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.8.1-1 - update to 1.8.1 release exim-4.84-4.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3277) The exim mail transfer agent Update Information: This is an update fixing problem with dynamically loadable modules. ChangeLog: * Fri Oct 10 2014 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com - 4.84-4 - Do not override LFLAGS (problem reported by Todd Lyons) * Tue Aug 26 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 4.84-3 - Perl 5.20 rebuild * Sat Aug 16 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 4.84-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild gdl-0.9.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3278) GNU Data Language Update Information: Update to 0.9.5: * lots of improvements in widgets related code. Available widgets: WIDGET_DRAW, WIDGET_BASE, WIDGET_BUTTON, WIDGET_DROPLIST, WIDGET_COMBOBOX, WIDGET_LIST, WIDGET_SLIDER, WIDGET_TAB, WIDGET_TEXT, WIDGET_LABEL, CW_BGROUP Controlling routines: WIDGET_EVENT, WIDGET_CONTROL, XMANAGER * TIC and TOC * !CONST system variable * initial import of NetCDF-4 related codes: NCDF_GROUPSINQ, NCDF_GROUPNAME, NCDF_GROUPDEF, NCDF_FULLGROUPNAME, NCDF_GROUPPARENT, NCDF_DIMIDSINQ, NCDF_NCIDINQ, NCDF_VARIDSINQ * introducing the NULL device type for Unix like systems without X11 * better free format for print, preserving precision digits * ISA() and TYPENAME() * full support for projections (see MAP_INSTALL for details) Re-enable openmp. Appears to be working now. ChangeLog: * Wed Oct 8 2014 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 0.9.5-1 - Update to 0.9.5 * Fri Oct 3 2014 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 0.9.4-7 - Re-enable openmp. Appears to be working now. ghc-cmdtheline-0.2.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3276) Declarative command-line option parsing and
Re: rpm 4.12 and weak dependencies
On 10/09/2014 10:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:05:03 +0200 Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de wrote: On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:03:20AM -0400, Miloslav Trma?? wrote: [...] That documentation belongs upstream (and should _not_ be just repeated within our packaging guidelines IMHO). From an rpm upstream point of view, we don't know much about what those dependencies do. We simply relay the information from the packager to the dependency solver tool. Rather, there are Fedora-specific questions to figure out. * That page says that Suggests/Enhances: will prompt the user. Do any of the Fedora tools actually do that? Do the _relevant_ tools do that? If not, we shouldn???t be using these tags I guess. DNF does not do anything with Suggests/Enhances. Libsolv uses them to tiebreak decisions if multiple packages provide something. ok. That helps resolve (ha) most of my concerns. I also took a closer look at the packages using these currently: bcfg2 - false positive, it's actually defined out in fedora. ceph - This seems like a bug to me. It has a Suggests: logrotate but it's installing logrotate files, so I would think it should just be Requiring it since it needs something to make those directories? dreamchess - This behaves completely the same in yum or dnf. The Suggests: gnuchess doesn't do anything at all (since as you say it only would use it as a tiebreaker). So, as long as both dnf and yum essentially ignore these for now we should be ok. I'm really not sure why someone would add them actually since they don't do anything, but ok. Note that Michael is talking about Suggests and Enhances specifically: these very weak dependencies are ignored by dnf. Recommends and Supplements do affect dnf operation (although its probably libsolv pulling the strings here), so yum, dnf and anything using them for depsolving behave differently if these are present. - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rpm 4.12 and weak dependencies
On 10/09/2014 05:29 PM, Jerry James wrote: Added most of your improvements to the page. Thanks! Florian PS: The rpm.org wiki is locked down because of spam. But people inerested in improving the contents and documentation can just create an account and ask for edit privileges on the mailing lists or #rpm.org @freenode. -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/ Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Charles Peters -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 03 October 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:32:08 +0200 Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com wrote: Dennis, how can I help you to figure out image publishing process? Let me know if I can be any help, we should definitely move forward on this and it probably doesn't make sense vote until you say we have a workflow how to ship the image. Vašek A big hurdle we have right now is that docker does not support an api at all to update the registry. so all updates will need people to manually do things. The other big one is that they do not want us to push updates daily like we really should for rawhide. Dennis On 3.10.2014 08:56, Václav Pavlín wrote: Hi I will be traveling to Prague in the afternoon so I'd suggest to cancel this meeting as 2 members are not going to be there and I my bus might get delay. Vašek On 3.10.2014 02:57, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:28:40 +0200 Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com wrote: Unfortunately tomorrow is a public holiday in Germany, but if someone else from the WG would run the meeting i've put together a proposed agenda for tomorrow to give a few updates: Agenda: - Update buildrequires cleanup work (davids) - Update Alpha base image - Open Floor Thanks regards, Phil I will be missing the meeting due to being on PTO Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJULfRzAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRB7kQAKkrlI37MubsAPVtpgHl8riB +kzk4owFeyxRMOwhEahRWDNAPOj9GA2gB53DjE9sWfTrlBfgIQxK+vjrOGCUfkaJ hvPRVOTp1yrpchea6FnR7H8ZWD1HEcFgTt8ffpCHegnWJCfGlRgE4Ac1FZ75DicC wPx3z9iSzYTMNei13QgDFjsUyVROI7BDT0eQAuCGAqoJ5waGhoNzIuGf7HiNYpi5 VhYUuHXrOWRGBf8rRnxo94MLZWJKuLCd0mGNklMnZoA7eyJ1fxclfAEUf4NBFc7/ mfpK1zpQRiHkfsQSfZFOghTNOepWCWxKlLJIC2aYEbWDSQFTyzyigX8cm6tflfzi pBGuukHq/SNhcBtrnnNCKLGfB4T2kzPr3ph52urqqcKlDOLXTJ16nD2GdDmMdG8F ija2QmhZBEHO5b99J/b74iTgGmbrA+5XPrCF2c0hD6YG+CIcxI0e+uie6Y2e2zsC AoJnOf94eavkEWCJhIzKOhieLBo/pZ0JfwAuvR//euf52tUlaAvE2/aEehY5Ezb+ PaZ8fKgH71BST/r3exNKKv7BOWkQkcyBXeFhOkPuaToEOX17UoHisJdDrdxx/tAk AeZAAGvJSYeEt57HzObCbeS/OEZ+cCfnJu4s+zmuSiXImWkbyYV04xLTmLxzE+oP NvsU1+XAno8as7nylz5U =DLam -END PGP SIGNATURE- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUN5vuAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRqHUP/j9zqZVmq/xb8KpzoqJWBCxS ogp4ZDwC1XmDgIADTMzU5ry9/1dL/gG1lfWrFm3NmWoqluLle5rykTWnLS+Dzt4e 9+bn6kMbd1YywGPcj1mPJzoa28k56H4zK4NeELTmIc1WpmFCD2+ZGsvzXlmSAQWH DEwURBU565JDPWBJs+LLxlidF7AaTscx7TFVhfAdYCoaiwa5xxves8mytphpFnl0 h5IAObJVNqQLdGyz4hkTFAT7O7oauMp3NTnAtAbuaYlfwJBBJf1QGKdGkv6+tQH1 6g9kdvcfuA5yBjQDscYl0nGxLXfIeo0PevVelbvpwlwgal8nH/Ohd4pJ1miHeFsH qYZVfCKYHuEl6+/8RTr8DuBk3jbVQ/88JTr+WtYWnrqcJYwDYaqdWLEZEgMd7BhU 37Hfj1jyIYOpysnTdB5au8e/bp6rbAR+5eEatnpgNxS8Gs3c6NMvYLwSZeL/8jgp h6YyCZTpdAndpktDK/oTxdF7zTv1Hm0VbtlEMBSXv5eV4JUmWqv6xCUDQrTXzMea +LEwejmTw3UMgK/4BQ4Afq7IufX0pGKK8iB9KrWfb1wvEBL1s6UP0yiQ1EEydiRg lR+RlzkzdPrEVOs3YIbVBmAO7pe22TFy7TWJoQ20mJOOxdKGT7I72B1+JkFhWdad rUilxS+UigB1YXPPQ/zn =lLVF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: bugzilla usage trends
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who either work on the infrastructure or are curious about long-term collaboration trends in Fedora. I checked the date of reporting of every 10,000th bug (bugzilla #1, #1, etc, all the way to the recent 115---see attached data). Some bugs were private so I didn't have access to their info, but I got enough data to calculate bug velocity (increase in the bug number divided by the time interval) over time. The data is a little noisy, but you can clearly see the ever-increasing trend. I'm afraid there are a couple of problems with this analysis: - Automated bugs (eg from abrt) may or may not be considered to be real bug reports. - Bugzilla has both imported large bug sets from other databases at various times (when Red Hat acquired other companies), and also has had periods when it didn't allocate bug numbers sequentially. At one point IIRC each new bug report incremented the bug ID by 10. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
F-21 Branched report: 20141010 changes
Compose started at Fri Oct 10 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudclient.so.2
[authhub]
authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.armv7hl requires libjson.so.0
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[cduce]
cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) =
0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
[cp2k]
cp2k-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21
cp2k-mpich-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires
rubygem(cloudservers)
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires
rubygem(cloudfiles)
[django-recaptcha]
django-recaptcha-0.1-7.20091212svn6.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[edelib]
edelib-2.1-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
edelib-devel-2.1-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
[eucalyptus]
eucalyptus-common-java-3.3.0-0.5.20130408git32052445.fc20.armv7hl
requires hibernate3-jbosscache = 0:3.6.10-7
[fatrat]
1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.21.beta2.fc21.armv7hl requires
libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[flush]
flush-0.9.12-10.fc21.armv7hl requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[freesteam]
freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc21.armv7hl requires
libascend.so.1
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc =
0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python2-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires
libpython3.3dm.so.1.0
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc =
0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires libpython3.3m.so.1.0
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[gedit-valencia]
gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.armv7hl requires
libvala-0.24.so.0
[gnome-python2-desktop]
gnome-python2-metacity-2.32.0-18.fc21.armv7hl requires
libmetacity-private.so.0
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) = 0:0.16.0
[leiningen]
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires maven-ant-tasks
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires classworlds
[libghemical]
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.armv7hl requires libf77blas.so.3
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.armv7hl requires libatlas.so.3
[libmygpo-qt]
libmygpo-qt5-devel-1.0.8-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libmygpo-qt5{?_isa} =
0:1.0.8-1.fc21
[libopensync-plugin-irmc]
1:libopensync-plugin-irmc-0.22-7.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenobex.so.1
[ltsp]
ltsp-client-5.4.5-8.fc21.armv7hl requires fuse-unionfs
ltsp-server-5.4.5-8.fc21.armv7hl requires cdialog
[meshmagick]
meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires
libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
[monodevelop-vala]
monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.armv7hl requires vala 0:0.25.0
[netdisco]
netdisco-1.1-7.fc21.noarch requires perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Bay)
[ocaml-pa-do]
ocaml-pa-do-0.8.16-3.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) =
0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
[openslides]
openslides-1.3.1-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django 0:1.5
[openstack-nova]
openstack-nova-compute-2014.1.2-1.fc21.noarch requires
libvirt-daemon-xen
[openvas-client]
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_omp.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_nasl.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_misc.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_hg.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_base.so.6
[perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth]
perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth-0.11-5.fc21.noarch requires rt3
[perl-RT-Extension-CommandByMail]
perl-RT-Extension-CommandByMail-0.07-10.fc21.noarch requires
perl(RT::Interface::Email)
[pipelight-selinux]
pipelight-selinux-0.2.1-2.fc21.noarch requires pipelight-common
pipelight-selinux-0.2.1-2.fc21.noarch requires pipelight-common
pipelight-selinux-0.2.1-2.fc21.noarch requires pipelight
pipelight-selinux-0.2.1-2.fc21.noarch requires pipelight
[pootle]
pootle-2.1.6-8.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-askbot-fedmsg]
python-askbot-fedmsg-0.1.0-2.fc21.noarch requires
rawhide report: 20141010 changes
Compose started at Fri Oct 10 05:15:05 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [Agda] ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) ghc-Agda-devel-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-devel-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-devel-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc-devel(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) ghc-Agda-devel-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(terminfo-0.3.2.5-61e0dc43a1465e327dacd9ab37bbe1a3) ghc-Agda-devel-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686 requires libaudclient.so.2 [authhub] authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libjson.so.0 [aws] aws-devel-3.1.0-6.fc21.i686 requires libgrypt-devel [cab] cab-0.1.9-12.fc22.i686 requires cabal-dev [collectd] collectd-onewire-5.4.1-9.fc22.i686 requires libowcapi-2.9.so.5 [darcs] darcs-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so darcs-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so darcs-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(terminfo-0.3.2.5-61e0dc43a1465e327dacd9ab37bbe1a3) darcs-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) ghc-darcs-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-darcs-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-darcs-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(terminfo-0.3.2.5-61e0dc43a1465e327dacd9ab37bbe1a3) ghc-darcs-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) ghc-darcs-devel-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc-devel(terminfo-0.3.2.5-61e0dc43a1465e327dacd9ab37bbe1a3) ghc-darcs-devel-2.8.4-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc-devel(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) [debconf] debconf-1.5.53-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires rubygem(cloudservers) deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires rubygem(cloudfiles) [django-recaptcha] django-recaptcha-0.1-7.20091212svn6.fc21.noarch requires python-django14 [dnssec-check] dnssec-check-1.14.0.1-4.fc20.i686 requires libval-threads.so.14 dnssec-check-1.14.0.1-4.fc20.i686 requires libsres.so.14 [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21 [edelib] edelib-2.1-5.fc22.i686 requires libedelib.so edelib-devel-2.1-5.fc22.i686 requires libedelib.so [eucalyptus] eucalyptus-common-java-3.3.0-0.5.20130408git32052445.fc20.i686 requires hibernate3-jbosscache = 0:3.6.10-7 [fatrat] 1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.21.beta2.fc22.i686 requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7 [flush] flush-0.9.12-10.fc22.i686 requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7 [gedit-valencia] gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.i686 requires libvala-0.24.so.0 [ghc-hjsmin] ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.7-3.fc22.i686 requires libHSoptparse-applicative-0.9.0-ghc7.6.3.so [gnome-python2-desktop] gnome-python2-metacity-2.32.0-18.fc21.i686 requires libmetacity-private.so.0 [gofer] ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) = 0:0.16.0 [golang-github-influxdb-influxdb] golang-github-influxdb-influxdb-datastore-0.8.0-0.3.rc4.git67f9869.fc22.noarch requires golang(github.com/influxdb/gomdb) [gorm] gorm-1.2.18-5.fc20.i686 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.23 [hledger] ghc-hledger-0.19.3-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-hledger-0.19.3-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-hledger-0.19.3-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) ghc-hledger-devel-0.19.3-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc-devel(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) hledger-0.19.3-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so hledger-0.19.3-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so hledger-0.19.3-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(terminfo-0.3.2.5-61e0dc43a1465e327dacd9ab37bbe1a3) hledger-0.19.3-5.fc22.i686 requires ghc(haskeline-0.7.0.3-775b029f16a4b58f3cc6b4cb4f7e7ac5) [idris] idris-0.9.9.1-3.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so idris-0.9.9.1-3.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so idris-0.9.9.1-3.fc22.i686 requires
Re: Giving away all of my packages
Thanks Tuan. It is yours now. On 10 October 2014 03:51, Truong Anh. Tuan tua...@iwayvietnam.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Christof Damian chris...@damian.net To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Fedora PHP development team php-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:12:42 PM Subject: Re: Giving away all of my packages Remaining packages up for grabs: - python-progressbar ( hasn't changed for ages, might be time to retire it) AFAICS, there is only one left so I can take this if you want. At a glance, I see it maybe useful so it is worth to keep it. FAS: tuanta. Kind regards, Tuan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 10 October 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting
Agenda: - Update buildrequires cleanup work (davids nils!) - Update Alpha base image - Open Floor Thanks regards, Phil -- Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470 Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com Wankelstrasse 5 | Web: http://www.redhat.com/ D-70563 Stuttgart, Germany -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Action Required: Shipping larger application icons in Fedora 22
On 29 September 2014 12:36, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: Updated packages should be built for F22 (rawhide) before the end of October So far very few packages have been built for F22 that contain larger icons. I'm still all set to start mass-filing bugs at the end of October. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Action Required: Shipping larger application icons in Fedora 22
- Original Message - In Fedora 21 we show any valid application in the software center with an application icon of 32x32 or larger. Currently a 32x32 icon has to be padded with 16 pixels of whitespace on all 4 edges, and *also* has to be scaled x2 to match other UI elements on HiDPI screens. This looks fuzzy, out of alignment and lowers the quality of an otherwise beautiful installing experience. For Fedora 22 we are planning to increase the minimum icon size to 48x48, with recommended installed sizes of 24x24, 48x48, 64x64, 256x256 (or SVG). Modern desktop applications typically ship multiple sizes of icons in known locations, and it's very much the minority of packages in Fedora that only ship such small icons. jreznik kmousetool (kmousetool.desktop) Upstream bug https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339844 This icon really deserves more love by upstream. Thanks for reminder Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Anyone else seen systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 setting /dev perms to 0600?
Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 this morning. Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two that broke stuff. Anyone seen this? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rpm 4.12 and weak dependencies
- Original Message - On Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: especially as we are taking the RPM-level control away from the users completely in cloud How is that? We ship filesystem images with many installed packages. Removing the packages from an existing image is possible but fairly pointless because it will not decrease the maximum image size. And the way to spin up a new VM quickly is to clone a disk image, not to install it from a set of RPMs. RPMs still exist but are not something users interact with the way we keep updating one RPM at a time in workstations. and Atomic images already. See: https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2014-October/msg5.html Interesting. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Engineering Representiatve for the new Fedora Council
Hey all Fedora distribution developers, engineers, builders, and infrastructure people! As I hope you've seen by now, we're creating a new Fedora Council as a top-level project leadership and governance body. (If you missed it, see inode0's general announcement to the community https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-October/003234.html and the new charter at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Council.) One seat of the new Council is selected by FESCo to represent all of the groups that logically fall under that committee — not in the ruleship sense, but in the sense that it makes a natural place for coordination and representation of the technical concerns. We have a FESCo ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1355 for selecting this representative, but the conversation is larger than just the members of FESCo, so I'm bringing it here. Help FESCo decide who can best represent you, your groups, and your work in the project. -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Engineering Representiatve for the new Fedora Council
Hey all Fedora distribution developers, engineers, builders, and infrastructure people! As I hope you've seen by now, we're creating a new Fedora Council as a top-level project leadership and governance body. (If you missed it, see inode0's general announcement to the community https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-October/003234.html and the new charter at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Council.) One seat of the new Council is selected by FESCo to represent all of the groups that logically fall under that committee — not in the ruleship sense, but in the sense that it makes a natural place for coordination and representation of the technical concerns. We have a FESCo ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1355 for selecting this representative, but the conversation is larger than just the members of FESCo, so I'm bringing it here. Help FESCo decide who can best represent you, your groups, and your work in the project. -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: bugzilla usage trends
On 10/10/2014 06:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who either work on the infrastructure or are curious about long-term collaboration trends in Fedora. I checked the date of reporting of every 10,000th bug (bugzilla #1, #1, etc, all the way to the recent 115---see attached data). Some bugs were private so I didn't have access to their info, but I got enough data to calculate bug velocity (increase in the bug number divided by the time interval) over time. The data is a little noisy, but you can clearly see the ever-increasing trend. I'm afraid there are a couple of problems with this analysis: - Automated bugs (eg from abrt) may or may not be considered to be real bug reports. Just a COUPLE? Thank you, kind Sir---I would have said it's rife with problems. For one thing it totally ignores the distinction of Fedora vs. EPEL and RedHat bugs. Still, it gives an order of magnitude estimate and the trend. No matter what the origin of the bugs, they still have to be dealt with somehow. - Bugzilla has both imported large bug sets from other databases at various times (when Red Hat acquired other companies), and also has had periods when it didn't allocate bug numbers sequentially. At one point IIRC each new bug report incremented the bug ID by 10. Ah so that's where the spikes come from. I was wondering. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
No Mesa 10.3-1 in F21 (instead of rc3)?
Hi, I'm wondering why Mesa 10.3-1 (so not the rc3 but the official 10.3 release) has not made it to F21. It fixes a bunch of crashes with Radeon r300 (and hence gnome-shell) for me. Thanks, Patrick -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Self Introduction Carlos Morel-Riquelme
Hi folks, mi name is carlos morel-riquelme, i start using linux since 2008 with ubuntu but i change to fedora since fedora 15, now in fedora always try to collaborate in testing and translate to spanish some wiki pages. Now i made a little Ruby app it's my first package for fedora so, i need to somebody check this. Please :) bugzilla review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462 wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:N0oir Regards. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: No Mesa 10.3-1 in F21 (instead of rc3)?
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 18:03 +0200, Patrick Laimbock wrote: Hi, I'm wondering why Mesa 10.3-1 (so not the rc3 but the official 10.3 release) has not made it to F21. It fixes a bunch of crashes with Radeon r300 (and hence gnome-shell) for me. Thanks, Patrick According to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11757/mesa-10.3-1.20140927.fc21 it only reached the stable karma threshold yesterday, so it will hit the mirrors sometime tomorrow, most likely. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Anyone else seen systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 setting /dev perms to 0600?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 15:57:12 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 this morning. Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two that broke stuff. Anyone seen this? I have reported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139034 because this broken sound for me. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Anyone else seen systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 setting /dev perms to 0600?
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 15:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 this morning. Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two that broke stuff. I've seen /dev/net/tun get mode 0600 but hadn't actually correlated it with anything, and it wasn't consistently doing it. -- dwmw2 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:4 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Workstation and Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test The Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary combines the result tables from all the pages, without the instructions. Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Create Fedora 21 Beta test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010 Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-21/f-21-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: No Mesa 10.3-1 in F21 (instead of rc3)?
Hi Stephen, On 10/10/2014 07:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: [snip] According to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11757/mesa-10.3-1.20140927.fc21 it only reached the stable karma threshold yesterday, so it will hit the mirrors sometime tomorrow, most likely. That's good to hear. I didn't know that a (core) component during the dev cycle needed to go through the karma process so thanks for pointing that out. Cheers, Patrick -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: No Mesa 10.3-1 in F21 (instead of rc3)?
Hi On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Patrick Laimbock wrote: That's good to hear. I didn't know that a (core) component during the dev cycle needed to go through the karma process so thanks for pointing that out. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched explains the process Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Dash as default shell
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:12:12 +0100 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: I'd be curious of the results if someone wants to take a stock Fedora 21 install and switch /bin/sh to point to dash and report if they can still boot login to GNOME. I did a smaller run on a server without GNOME. Had to chage the parts of initscripts that you have foreseen and nothing else. The unpleasant part was that iptables won't start. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1141117] perl Tk applications crash with perl 5.20.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141117 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 99411 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #2) (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1) Applying upstream patches helps. Then all Tk tests pass except one. See CPAN RT#98831. liberation-sans-fonts is needed. The test is sensitive to fonts. This was fixed by upstream commit: commit 39ce3fa564b0843a00553f5444b2110ed5e9701e Author: Slaven Rezic sla...@rezic.de Date: Sat Sep 20 21:46:54 2014 +0200 entry.t tweaking This should fix the (font-related) issues described in RT #98831. Then only t/font.t fails without liberation-sans-fonts because it checks for number of font families available (see https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=99411). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=35shlSrAyOa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 628655] perl segfaults when joining a thread and using perl-Tk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628655 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- It crashes in F20: tcl-8.5.14-1.fc20.x86_64 perl-5.18.4-290.fc20.x86_64 perl-threads-1.92-1.fc20.x86_64 perl-Tk-804.031-4.fc20.x86_64 It does not crash in F22: tcl-8.6.2-1.fc22.x86_64 perl-5.20.1-309.fc22.x86_64 perl-threads-1.96-1.fc22.x86_64 perl-Tk-804.032-4.fc22.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NJJst02kbAa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Qt
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit) On i386: perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires libperl.so.5.18 On armhfp: perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.18 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File IO-Socket-SSL-1.999.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL: 4f59cb143df2cf2664c83f3360febafb IO-Socket-SSL-1.999.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Update to 1.999
commit 4c8c768b6e51518a8cd906416df326ba178071cb
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Oct 10 14:48:05 2014 +0100
Update to 1.999
- New upstream release 1.999
- Make sure we don't use version 0.30 of IO::Socket::IP
- Make sure that PeerHost is checked in all places where PeerAddr is
checked,
because these are synonyms and IO::Socket::IP prefers PeerHost while
others
prefer PeerAddr; also accept PeerService additionally to PeerPort
(https://github.com/noxxi/p5-io-socket-ssl/issues/16)
- Add ability to use client certificates and to overwrite hostname with
util/analyze-ssl.pl
...-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch |4 ++--
...-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch |2 +-
perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec| 16 +---
sources|2 +-
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/IO-Socket-SSL-1.998-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch
b/IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch
similarity index 93%
rename from IO-Socket-SSL-1.998-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch
rename to IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch
index 695af45..5178854 100644
--- a/IO-Socket-SSL-1.998-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch
+++ b/IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
SSL_verify_callback = undef,
SSL_verifycn_scheme = undef, # fallback cn verification
SSL_verifycn_publicsuffix = undef, # fallback default list verification
-@@ -2045,7 +2045,7 @@ WARN
+@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ WARN
my $ssl_op = Net::SSLeay::OP_ALL();
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
or croak(invalid SSL_version specified);
--- lib/IO/Socket/SSL.pod
+++ lib/IO/Socket/SSL.pod
-@@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ recent versions of Net::SSLeay and opens
+@@ -912,7 +912,8 @@ recent versions of Net::SSLeay and opens
You can limit to set of supported protocols by adding !version separated by
':'.
diff --git a/IO-Socket-SSL-1.997-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch
b/IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch
similarity index 97%
rename from IO-Socket-SSL-1.997-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch
rename to IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch
index d565729..d78b7ea 100644
--- a/IO-Socket-SSL-1.997-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch
+++ b/IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
# set values inside _init to work with perlcc, RT#95452
--- lib/IO/Socket/SSL.pod
+++ lib/IO/Socket/SSL.pod
-@@ -929,12 +929,8 @@ documentation (Lhttp://www.openssl.org/
+@@ -931,12 +931,8 @@ documentation (Lhttp://www.openssl.org/
for more details.
Unless you fail to contact your peer because of no shared ciphers it is
diff --git a/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec b/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
index aea6bda..eed0e4b 100644
--- a/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Name: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
-Version: 1.998
+Version: 1.999
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Perl library for transparent SSL
Group: Development/Libraries
License: GPL+ or Artistic
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-Socket-SSL/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SU/SULLR/IO-Socket-SSL-%{version}.tar.gz
-Patch0:IO-Socket-SSL-1.997-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch
-Patch1:IO-Socket-SSL-1.998-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch
+Patch0:IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-cipher-list.patch
+Patch1:IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-use-system-default-SSL-version.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: openssl = 0.9.8
@@ -100,6 +100,16 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/IO::Socket::SSL::Utils.3*
%changelog
+* Fri Oct 10 2014 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.999-1
+- Update to 1.999
+ - Make sure we don't use version 0.30 of IO::Socket::IP
+ - Make sure that PeerHost is checked in all places where PeerAddr is checked,
+because these are synonyms and IO::Socket::IP prefers PeerHost while others
+prefer PeerAddr; also accept PeerService additionally to PeerPort
+(https://github.com/noxxi/p5-io-socket-ssl/issues/16)
+ - Add ability to use client certificates and to overwrite hostname with
+util/analyze-ssl.pl
+
* Mon Sep 22 2014 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.998-1
- Update to 1.998
- Make client authentication work at the server side when SNI is in by use
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index b0270bd..4c5b6e9 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-00e23adb0bd80f4fa9c4336109e4f9db IO-Socket-SSL-1.998.tar.gz
+4f59cb143df2cf2664c83f3360febafb IO-Socket-SSL-1.999.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL/f21] Update to 1.999
Summary of changes: 4c8c768... Update to 1.999 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-1.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 4c8c768... Update to 1.999 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-1.fc22
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.999-1.fc22' was created pointing to: 4c8c768... Update to 1.999 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1127473] Please update to upstream version = 0.06
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127473 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.06-1.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.06-1.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12484/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.06-1.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9wydeFYXaxa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1062757] Review Request: glite-lb-logger-msg - Plugin for sending LB notifications to messaging infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13- ||2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-10 12:03:01 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1hIEn92eKca=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1151011] perl-Socket-2.016 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151011 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-Socket-2.016-1.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Socket-2.016-1.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12518/perl-Socket-2.016-1.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qpvBKva0lia=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1150522] perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150522 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.12-1.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.12-1.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12519/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.12-1.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=szvz4XksYIa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1150092] CVE-2014-1573 CVE-2014-1572 CVE-2014-1571 bugzilla: security fixes release [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150092 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package bugzilla-4.2.11-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing bugzilla-4.2.11-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12530/bugzilla-4.2.11-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qmVEG8i06fa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1147892] perl-Tangerine-0.05 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147892 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Tangerine-0.05-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NkaTbPm4j3a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1127471] Please update to upstream version = 0.06
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127471 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.06-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.06-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12543/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.06-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TT40eUZOQYa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1150523] perl-List-AllUtils-0.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150523 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-List-AllUtils-0.09-1.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-List-AllUtils-0.09-1.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12576/perl-List-AllUtils-0.09-1.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=596PaBLEaHa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1151572] New: Runaway rapid memory growth when handling Net::DNS::Packet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151572
Bug ID: 1151572
Summary: Runaway rapid memory growth when handling
Net::DNS::Packet
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-Net-DNS
Severity: medium
Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
Reporter: john+red...@netservers.co.uk
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
psab...@redhat.com, pwout...@redhat.com
Description of problem:
When I query the NS records for a certain domain using
Net::DNS::Resolver::Recurse, the perl script gets stuck in a infinite loop,
rapidly expanding in size until it is killed by the OOM killer.
How reproducible:
Can be reproduced every time you query certain domain(s). I've reproduced it on
four different Fedora 20 systems, once of which was a virgin system booted from
the Fedora Live DVD.
The problem does _not_ occur on CentOS/RHEL 6.5 or CentOS/RHEL 7.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a perl script that queries NS records for domain
villamontanavista.co.uk
2. Run the script
3. Watch top and see the script grow in size until the OOM killer steps in.
Actual results:
Perl script devours all available memory until it is killed by OOM Killer
Expected results:
DNS records should be handled by the script and it should exit almost instantly
Additional info:
This perl script will always trigger the bug on Fedora 20:
=
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use Net::DNS;
use Net::DNS::Resolver::Recurse;
use Data::Dumper;
select STDERR; $| = 1;
select STDOUT; $| = 1;
my $res = Net::DNS::Resolver::Recurse-new;
$res-hints();
$res-recursion_callback(sub {
my $packet = shift;
print ==\n.Dumper($packet).\n\n;
for ($packet-additional){ print $_-string.\n; }
});
$res-tcp_timeout(10);
$res-udp_timeout(10);
print Starting recursion\n;
my $packet=$res-query_dorecursion(villamontanavista.co.uk,NS);
print Finished recursion\n;
=
Some strace output (goes on like this until killed):
brk(0) = 0x18a1000
brk(0x18c2000) = 0x18c2000
brk(0) = 0x18c2000
brk(0x18e3000) = 0x18e3000
brk(0) = 0x18e3000
brk(0x1904000) = 0x1904000
brk(0) = 0x1904000
brk(0x1925000) = 0x1925000
brk(0) = 0x1925000
brk(0x1946000) = 0x1946000
brk(0) = 0x1946000
brk(0x1967000) = 0x1967000
brk(0) = 0x1967000
brk(0x1988000) = 0x1988000
brk(0) = 0x1988000
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=L3rIiSLBGKa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1141222] Perl pulls in unneeded dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141222 --- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- -309 does not pull the additional dependencies anymore. Thanks for the fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0Wc7jM25Coa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #47915: replication inconsistency for add/replace/delete single valued attribute
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47915 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47915/0001-Description-Fix-for-ticket-47915-replication-inconsi.patch Important note: this fix applies only to 1.2.11.15 branch. Thanks, German. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #47922: dynamically added macro aci is not evaluated on the fly
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47922 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47922/0001-Ticket-47922-dynamically-added-macro-aci-is-not-eval.2.patch Thanks to Rich for his comments. This new patch undo'ed the extra strstr - PL_strcasestr changes and left just for ($dn). Plus error log for the Invalid macro target dn was added. --noriko -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
