Re: Self Introduction: Guido Aulisi
Welcome :) -- 010 Giovanni [dacav] Simoni 001 111 OpenPGP key: 93FC 2A6A 43A4 AAC2 0D8E 5411 2F99 ABB6 BA14 DF9E signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Guido Aulisi
Hi Guido, welcome! Have you already chosen a sponsor? [1] Have a nice day [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20160906.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 25/89 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160905.n.0): ID: 32426 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32426 ID: 32493 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32493 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20160905.n.0): ID: 32411 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32411 ID: 32414 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32414 ID: 32421 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32421 ID: 32424 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32424 ID: 32433 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32433 ID: 32436 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32436 ID: 32438 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32438 ID: 32446 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32446 ID: 32449 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32449 ID: 32461 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32461 ID: 32465 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32465 ID: 32476 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32476 ID: 32478 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32478 ID: 32479 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32479 ID: 32480 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32480 ID: 32481 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32481 ID: 32482 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32482 ID: 32483 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32483 ID: 32484 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32484 ID: 32485 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32485 ID: 32486 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32486 ID: 32487 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32487 ID: 32496 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32496 ID: 32497 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32497 ID: 32516 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32516 Passed openQA tests: 64/89 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20160905.n.0): ID: 32425 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32425 ID: 32427 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32427 ID: 32428 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32428 ID: 32429 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32429 ID: 32430 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_terminal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32430 ID: 32431 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32431 ID: 32432 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32432 ID: 32448 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32448 ID: 32477 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32477 ID: 32517 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32517 Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 108 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 25-20160906.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Failed openQA tests: 12/89 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160905.n.0): ID: 32527 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32527 ID: 32554 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32554 ID: 32556 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32556 ID: 32557 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32557 Old failures (same test failed in 25-20160905.n.0): ID: 32532 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32532 ID: 32541 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32541 ID: 32584 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32584 ID: 32600 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32600 ID: 32602 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32602 ID: 32603 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32603 ID: 32604 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32604 ID: 32605 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32605 ID: 32606 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32606 ID: 32624 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32624 Passed openQA tests: 77/89 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386) New passes (same test did not pass in 25-20160905.n.0): ID: 32544 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32544 ID: 32545 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32545 ID: 32547 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32547 ID: 32548 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32548 ID: 32549 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32549 ID: 32553 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32553 ID: 32555 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32555 ID: 32558 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32558 ID: 32560 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_firewall_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32560 ID: 32574 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32574 ID: 32593 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32593 Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 108 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Guido Aulisi
welcome! Il 06/09/2016 22:54, Guido Aulisi ha scritto: Hi all, I'm GNU/Linux system administrator and a musician too. During my working hours I maintain Linux servers, mostly RedHat distributions, but during my free time I like make music recordings using Fedora, I'm a supporter of the Ardour daw, but I use many audio applications. I'm also a C, C++, Java programmer. I think it's time to help the Fedora Project trying to package some programs I use, exspecially related to music and audio. Guido -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Self Introduction: Guido Aulisi
Hi all, I'm GNU/Linux system administrator and a musician too. During my working hours I maintain Linux servers, mostly RedHat distributions, but during my free time I like make music recordings using Fedora, I'm a supporter of the Ardour daw, but I use many audio applications. I'm also a C, C++, Java programmer. I think it's time to help the Fedora Project trying to package some programs I use, exspecially related to music and audio. Guido -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Weak deps in updates
On Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:59:51 - "Christian Stadelmann" wrote: > I think it is still broken somewhere. I uninstalled > fedora-easy-karma, which makes use of weak deps, and tried to > reinstall it. I'm not seeing any suggested/weak deps. > > See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120 Ah, there may be caching involved. I'll remove bodhi's repocache for tomorrow's updates push and it should regen those weak deps for old existing packages in repo. kevin pgpC4m6vy9aC3.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Weak deps in updates
I think it is still broken somewhere. I uninstalled fedora-easy-karma, which makes use of weak deps, and tried to reinstall it. I'm not seeing any suggested/weak deps. See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild for cmake project error :: Found 'build_dir' in installed files
On 09/06/2016 02:43 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > On 09/06/2016 01:35 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: >> Hi! I have a head scratching problem with a project (clhep) that i try to >> package. >> It is cmake based and the spec file can be seen here: >> https://github.com/adriansev/SPECS/blob/master/clhep.spec >> >> the error that i get is : >> Found '/home/adrian/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/clhep-2.3.3.2-1.x86_64' in installed >> files; aborting >> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tOmNW2 (%install) >> >> i imagine that it is a problem of setting the buildroot but have no idea >> how this translate to cmake settings .. >> >> What is the proper way for packaging cmake projects? (and setting prefix) >> > > Hi Adrian, Hi! > you can use the %cmake macro which conveniently sets most (if not all) > options you need. You can check its content with 'rpm --eval "%cmake"'. > > There is also a Wiki page about packaging with cmake, although it's not > very elaborate: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake Thanks a lot! It worked!! Adrian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild for cmake project error :: Found 'build_dir' in installed files
On 09/06/2016 01:35 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > Hi! I have a head scratching problem with a project (clhep) that i try to > package. > It is cmake based and the spec file can be seen here: > https://github.com/adriansev/SPECS/blob/master/clhep.spec > > the error that i get is : > Found '/home/adrian/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/clhep-2.3.3.2-1.x86_64' in installed > files; aborting > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tOmNW2 (%install) > > i imagine that it is a problem of setting the buildroot but have no idea > how this translate to cmake settings .. > > What is the proper way for packaging cmake projects? (and setting prefix) > Hi Adrian, you can use the %cmake macro which conveniently sets most (if not all) options you need. You can check its content with 'rpm --eval "%cmake"'. There is also a Wiki page about packaging with cmake, although it's not very elaborate: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake Kind regards, Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
rpmbuild for cmake project error :: Found 'build_dir' in installed files
Hi! I have a head scratching problem with a project (clhep) that i try to package. It is cmake based and the spec file can be seen here: https://github.com/adriansev/SPECS/blob/master/clhep.spec the error that i get is : Found '/home/adrian/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/clhep-2.3.3.2-1.x86_64' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tOmNW2 (%install) i imagine that it is a problem of setting the buildroot but have no idea how this translate to cmake settings .. What is the proper way for packaging cmake projects? (and setting prefix) Thank you! Adrian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:01:27AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:34:04AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: "Remove > > webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is > > dependend on) and following text: > > > > """ > > The webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package will be removed from rawhide after > > Fedora 26 is branched due to the high number of unfixed security > > vulnerabilities. You must remove this dependency or your package will > > not be present in Fedora 27. > > > > Please refer to [1] for a FAQ on this matter and be advised that for > > some packages this may require a substantial amount of work. > > > > [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorapro > > ject.org/thread/AKVB363GFCHHJ5MTHGVYHYT6NLLTF5VM/ > > """ > > Is there a Perl binding of webkit2 in Fedora? The webkitgtk4 packages include a gobject introspection typelib, so you can likely use Glib::Object::Introspection to get access to the webkit2 APIs that way. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:34:04AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: "Remove > webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is > dependend on) and following text: > > """ > The webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package will be removed from rawhide after > Fedora 26 is branched due to the high number of unfixed security > vulnerabilities. You must remove this dependency or your package will > not be present in Fedora 27. > > Please refer to [1] for a FAQ on this matter and be advised that for > some packages this may require a substantial amount of work. > > [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorapro > ject.org/thread/AKVB363GFCHHJ5MTHGVYHYT6NLLTF5VM/ > """ Is there a Perl binding of webkit2 in Fedora? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned: elementry, evas-generic-loaders
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote: > As elementry and evas-generic-loaders are merged to efl after 1.8.0. > > The elementry and evas-generic-loaders will be orphanded. Please actually actively retire them, rather than just orphaning then, making sure you add the appropriate obsoletes to EFL to ensure a clean upgrade for users. The only reason you orphan a package is if it's still relevant but you don't wish to maintain it anymore, in this case the package has been actively replaced so should be actively retired to ensure someone doesn't pick it up and it ends up conflicting with EFL. Peterr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
